
Junk NFS system in teachers' hiring, says min
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Arun stated that the NFS system was prevalent in the recruitment process of teachers in higher educational institutions in Uttar Pradesh and was patently unfair. He alleged that a large number of qualified candidates were declared NFS without clear reasons, often resulting in talented candidates from reserved categories being eliminated during selection.
"Currently, many teaching positions in reserved categories are vacant in the state, and due to the opaque NFS system, these positions are not being filled," Arun said.
In his representation to the minister, Arun provided three suggestions to do away with the NFS system. He suggested that the use of NFS should be limited and clear reasons for invoking it should be provided. Additionally, the guidelines of the University Grants Commission (UGC) and the National Education Policy (NEP-2020) for the selection of teachers should be clearly followed.
He also suggested that the academic scores, research work, written exam, and interview scores of every candidate should be recorded to maintain transparency. Furthermore, he recommended that a video-recorded demo class be made mandatory for each candidate, along with the interview, to make the selection process verifiable.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
6 hours ago
- The Hindu
JNU planning to hold in-house entrance exam for two doctoral courses
Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) is planning to hold an in-house entrance examination for doctoral courses in Korean Studies and Cinema Studies, a source said on Wednesday. 'All Deans have accepted this process and it has been signed by them. Once the proposal is accepted, the administration will hold the entrance exam for the two subjects,' the source said. Since 2023, no entrance exam has been conducted for the doctoral studies in the two subjects as they are not covered under the University Grants Commission–National Eligibility Test (UGC-NET). Meanwhile, the JNU Students' Union's hunger strike entered its sixth day on Wednesday. The union has been demanding in-house entrance examination for all courses and allowing UGC-NET 2025 aspirants to apply for this year's PhD admissions. Admissions for PhD courses are under way, while the result of UGC-NET 2025 is awaited.


New Indian Express
8 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Accord mother tongue prominence, but embrace languages sans borders
The 2020 National Education Policy's insistence on teaching at least two languages in school is based on sound science. Research shows that learning multiple languages before adulthood improves crucial skills such as cognition, hand-eye coordination and memory. However, it's the BJP-Sena government's bid to introduce it in primary schools that drew the ire of parents, teachers, language activists and opposition politicians. To Fadnavis's attempts of propping the Union government's policy in his defence, Marathi language activists posit the NEP's advice for instruction only in the local or home language till class 8. The boon and bane of having the same script, Devanagari, is back in intellectual discourse. Such a tangle of livewires has tripped the ambitious chief minister's stride towards Hindi. It's indeed a sensitive issue in a state where people still honour the '106 martyrs' who died in the late 1950s agitating for a separate Marathi speakers' province. Yet ironically, like dominant tongues in several other states, Marathi too flexes muscle for what scholar Prachi Deshpande calls the 'bear hug' of language. Konkani speakers on the state's southern borders have resisted Marathi's sway for decades, while Dangi speakers on its northern fringes are still contending with its peremptory ways. The abiding paradox is that though most Indian states were demarcated linguistically, language itself brooks no border. In a country with 22 constitutionally scheduled languages and hundreds of others thriving, we have to accept lingual influences across and within state lines. Despite the heat of politics, culture shrivels in the cold confines of hard borders.


Hans India
12 hours ago
- Hans India
CLAT-PG: Delhi HC to hear on July 17 plea challenging 'exorbitant' confirmation fee
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Wednesday granted additional time to the Consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs) to file its reply to a petition challenging the "exorbitant" non-refundable confirmation fee being levied for Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) postgraduate admissions. A bench of Justice Vikash Mahajan posted the matter for further hearing on July 17, and in the meantime, asked the Consortium of National Law Universities and the University Grants Commission (UGC) to file their counter affidavits. Last week, a vacation bench of Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta agreed to examine the plea challenging "the arbitrary level of exorbitant fees" in the name of non-refundable confirmation fee at every round of CLAT-PG counselling and issued notices to respondent authorities, including the Bar Council of India (BCI). The plea filed by advocate Siddharth R. Gupta contended that this non-refundable confirmation fee was not only unreasonable, but also violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution, and was being levied mechanically without even examining the suitability of a large number of candidates to bear the exorbitant expenditure of participating in the counselling and admission process. It added that the "exorbitant" non-refundable confirmation fee was also violative of the directions issued by the UGC since all the NLUs are bound by such directions under the provisions of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956. The petitioner Jatin Shrivastava, a successful candidate of CLAT-PG examination, who has achieved 474 rank in the recently revised results, claimed that he is entirely dependent on education loan for pursuing his LLM degree, which would be sanctioned only after he gets admission in any NLU of his choice and even the loan installments will be transferable only to the NLU concerned and not to the CLAT Consortium. As per the plea, despite financial distress in his family, the petitioner has deposited the requisite counselling fees of Rs 30,000, and he chose to espouse the cause on behalf of all such large number of candidates who may be facing financial adversities to pay the exorbitant fees of Rs 20,000-40,000 per round of counselling.