Here's how Astronomer used Hollywood to turn a viral disaster into a marketing win

How are businesses are preparing for the August 1 tariff deadline? They can't

CNN

10 minutes ago

CNN

How are businesses are preparing for the August 1 tariff deadline? They can't

On August 1, hundreds of countries will come to learn their fate with the United States, when President Donald Trump's pause on 'reciprocal' tariffs ends. Thousands of US businesses will also learn their fates. However, after months of whipsaw trade policy, planning with any sort of certainty has proven near impossible. 'I don't think I'll know that I'm out of the chess pieces until I'm right there, but it's clear that I'm getting closer,' said Sarah Wells, founder of Sarah Wells Bags, designer bags for breast pumps that are imported. Ninety-seven percent of US businesses that import products are small businesses, according to the Commerce Department. Owners have been trying to navigate the complexities of shifting trade policy all while trying to run their businesses, leaving them confused, financially strapped or worse – forced out of business. 'Not knowing if certain key suppliers will have new trade deals or frameworks at lower or higher tariff rates has made it incredibly difficult for retailers of all sizes to properly plan and forecast what the next buying and selling season will look like,' said Jonathan Gold, the National Retail Federation's vice president of supply shain and customs policy. 'As a result, consumers may be subject to higher costs as well as less product availability.' Currently, imports from most countries (except China) face a 10% universal tariff. But in the last few weeks, dozens of countries have received warning letters from the Trump administration that they will face higher rates unless they negotiate a deal before August 1. That has run as high as 36% for Cambodia, 40% for Myanmar and 50% for Brazil. To date, seven countries have reached a framework for a trade deal. That includes the US's largest trading partner, the EU, which agreed Sunday to a 15% levy on most imports. 'It feels like it's chasing me,' Wells said of the tariffs. Wells started to move the production of her bags out of China in February, when Trump kicked off his trade war. Cambodia, with a 10% tariff rate, seemed like a much better deal than the 145%, then later 30%, rate on China. That is, until the Trump administration threatened Cambodia with a 36% tariff this month. That letter came just days before she placed her first $100,000 order with her new manufacturer in Phnom Penh. If the higher tariff on Cambodia sticks, she will be paying more than she was in China. 'I've tried to manufacture in the United States, but I can't. China, the policies chased me there. Now I am financially invested in Cambodia with the prospect of an incredibly high insurmountable tariff looming this August,' said Wells. It's not just small businesses – retailers of all sizes are feeling paralyzed by the on-and-off-again trade war. According to a survey released this month by global accounting firm KPMG, business leaders are pausing investment for up to a year amid tariff uncertainty. 'Tariffs are forcing companies to rethink their supply chains and investment timelines, but strategic change takes time. Nearly half of businesses reported it takes 7 to 12 months to implement significant supply chain adjustments, and more than half are already working to reconfigure their supply chains in response,' the survey, which polled 300 US-based business leaders at companies with more than $1 billion in revenue, noted. 'Companies are just waiting to see how the new playing field will land in order for them to make important decisions, economically,' said Pedro Casas Alatriste, CEO and executive vice president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Mexico. The American Chamber of Commerce in Mexico represents 1,500 US-based companies that operate in Mexico, including Apple, Coca-Cola and General Motors. Trump has threatened a 30% tariff on imports from Mexico on August 1. Large corporations can and do advocate behind the scenes in Washington, DC. Meanwhile, small businesses have less power and influence on trade policy— and are often more vulnerable to the impacts of tariffs. 'Many small and medium-sized companies are literally fighting for their lives. And then there are the other big ones, let's call it the GMs of the world, that are pursuing a more active strategy in DC, calling out different stakeholders that are capable of influencing President Trump, while at the same time being extremely cautious on how to do this,' said Casas Alatriste. Even when a trade agreement is announced by Trump, for some companies, the uncertainty still remains. 'It is all very uncertain because as we know, he changes his mind or negotiates deals, adds delays. We don't really know what exactly is coming,' said Max Rohn, CEO of Wölffer Estate Vineyard. Mid-sized winemaker Wölffer Estate Vineyard manufactures wine in the farmlands of Long Island, New York. It also imports blends from Germany, France, and Argentina. The winery currently pays tariffs on its wine imports from the EU and Argentina, as well as on glassware, labels and barrels. Wölffer cannot move its supply chain, and its Long Island vineyard only has a limited amount of acreage to grow grapes. 'With wine, it's very difficult because champagne is from Champagne, and that's not a product you can substitute,' said Rohn. But while Sunday's framework raising tariffs on products from the EU to 15% isn't 'as bad' of the previously threatened 30%, the cost still hurts, according to Rohn. The company is currently rushing in 20,000 cases of wine from Europe to the US before August 1. The vineyard has enough product to sell through the end of the year, but after that, it will have to import next year's vintage. So far, the vineyard has absorbed the tariff cost and avoided raising prices, which Rohn said would almost certainly deter customers. 'We are going to take a wait and see regarding raising prices on our European imports. We will try as best as we can to hold off,' he said, adding that 'we know it is still fluid. There are more discussions and deals and changes can always happen.' For Wells, she is running out of options. She's already raised prices and is running low on the inventory she has in the United States. Soon, she'll have no choice but to bring in some of her order from Cambodia at whatever tariff rate is imposed on August 1. 'I've already cut all of those extraneous expenses. I stopped taking any kind of salary in May as the CEO, she said. 'We've cut everywhere we can cut. So do we start laying people off to free up a little bit of cash?' And in an environment where businesses are competing for every consumer dollar, businesses are turning to one another to try to make sense of how to plan for what comes next. The answer is not always comforting. 'It's one of those things that it's out of your control. When I ask around, it's just a lot of hands in the air. 'I don't know. There's nothing, what can we do?'' said Rohn.

CNN

36 minutes ago

CNN

How are businesses are preparing for the August 1 tariff deadline? They can't

On August 1, hundreds of countries will come to learn their fate with the United States, when President Donald Trump's pause on 'reciprocal' tariffs ends. Thousands of US businesses will also learn their fates. However, after months of whipsaw trade policy, planning with any sort of certainty has proven near impossible. 'I don't think I'll know that I'm out of the chess pieces until I'm right there, but it's clear that I'm getting closer,' said Sarah Wells, founder of Sarah Wells Bags, designer bags for breast pumps that are imported. Ninety-seven percent of US businesses that import products are small businesses, according to the Commerce Department. Owners have been trying to navigate the complexities of shifting trade policy all while trying to run their businesses, leaving them confused, financially strapped or worse – forced out of business. 'Not knowing if certain key suppliers will have new trade deals or frameworks at lower or higher tariff rates has made it incredibly difficult for retailers of all sizes to properly plan and forecast what the next buying and selling season will look like,' said Jonathan Gold, the National Retail Federation's vice president of supply shain and customs policy. 'As a result, consumers may be subject to higher costs as well as less product availability.' Currently, imports from most countries (except China) face a 10% universal tariff. But in the last few weeks, dozens of countries have received warning letters from the Trump administration that they will face higher rates unless they negotiate a deal before August 1. That has run as high as 36% for Cambodia, 40% for Myanmar and 50% for Brazil. To date, seven countries have reached a framework for a trade deal. That includes the US's largest trading partner, the EU, which agreed Sunday to a 15% levy on most imports. 'It feels like it's chasing me,' Wells said of the tariffs. Wells started to move the production of her bags out of China in February, when Trump kicked off his trade war. Cambodia, with a 10% tariff rate, seemed like a much better deal than the 145%, then later 30%, rate on China. That is, until the Trump administration threatened Cambodia with a 36% tariff this month. That letter came just days before she placed her first $100,000 order with her new manufacturer in Phnom Penh. If the higher tariff on Cambodia sticks, she will be paying more than she was in China. 'I've tried to manufacture in the United States, but I can't. China, the policies chased me there. Now I am financially invested in Cambodia with the prospect of an incredibly high insurmountable tariff looming this August,' said Wells. It's not just small businesses – retailers of all sizes are feeling paralyzed by the on-and-off-again trade war. According to a survey released this month by global accounting firm KPMG, business leaders are pausing investment for up to a year amid tariff uncertainty. 'Tariffs are forcing companies to rethink their supply chains and investment timelines, but strategic change takes time. Nearly half of businesses reported it takes 7 to 12 months to implement significant supply chain adjustments, and more than half are already working to reconfigure their supply chains in response,' the survey, which polled 300 US-based business leaders at companies with more than $1 billion in revenue, noted. 'Companies are just waiting to see how the new playing field will land in order for them to make important decisions, economically,' said Pedro Casas Alatriste, CEO and executive vice president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Mexico. The American Chamber of Commerce in Mexico represents 1,500 US-based companies that operate in Mexico, including Apple, Coca-Cola and General Motors. Trump has threatened a 30% tariff on imports from Mexico on August 1. Large corporations can and do advocate behind the scenes in Washington, DC. Meanwhile, small businesses have less power and influence on trade policy— and are often more vulnerable to the impacts of tariffs. 'Many small and medium-sized companies are literally fighting for their lives. And then there are the other big ones, let's call it the GMs of the world, that are pursuing a more active strategy in DC, calling out different stakeholders that are capable of influencing President Trump, while at the same time being extremely cautious on how to do this,' said Casas Alatriste. Even when a trade agreement is announced by Trump, for some companies, the uncertainty still remains. 'It is all very uncertain because as we know, he changes his mind or negotiates deals, adds delays. We don't really know what exactly is coming,' said Max Rohn, CEO of Wölffer Estate Vineyard. Mid-sized winemaker Wölffer Estate Vineyard manufactures wine in the farmlands of Long Island, New York. It also imports blends from Germany, France, and Argentina. The winery currently pays tariffs on its wine imports from the EU and Argentina, as well as on glassware, labels and barrels. Wölffer cannot move its supply chain, and its Long Island vineyard only has a limited amount of acreage to grow grapes. 'With wine, it's very difficult because champagne is from Champagne, and that's not a product you can substitute,' said Rohn. But while Sunday's framework raising tariffs on products from the EU to 15% isn't 'as bad' of the previously threatened 30%, the cost still hurts, according to Rohn. The company is currently rushing in 20,000 cases of wine from Europe to the US before August 1. The vineyard has enough product to sell through the end of the year, but after that, it will have to import next year's vintage. So far, the vineyard has absorbed the tariff cost and avoided raising prices, which Rohn said would almost certainly deter customers. 'We are going to take a wait and see regarding raising prices on our European imports. We will try as best as we can to hold off,' he said, adding that 'we know it is still fluid. There are more discussions and deals and changes can always happen.' For Wells, she is running out of options. She's already raised prices and is running low on the inventory she has in the United States. Soon, she'll have no choice but to bring in some of her order from Cambodia at whatever tariff rate is imposed on August 1. 'I've already cut all of those extraneous expenses. I stopped taking any kind of salary in May as the CEO, she said. 'We've cut everywhere we can cut. So do we start laying people off to free up a little bit of cash?' And in an environment where businesses are competing for every consumer dollar, businesses are turning to one another to try to make sense of how to plan for what comes next. The answer is not always comforting. 'It's one of those things that it's out of your control. When I ask around, it's just a lot of hands in the air. 'I don't know. There's nothing, what can we do?'' said Rohn.

Opinion: Forget the G7. We need an FT8 — a Free Trade Eight

Yahoo

an hour ago

Yahoo

Opinion: Forget the G7. We need an FT8 — a Free Trade Eight

By Kevin Lynch and Paul Deegan As a means of pursuing American interests, President Donald Trump clearly views tariffs as an alternative to military power. His MAGA base, deeply sceptical of foreign military engagements, supports tariffs pitched as getting back at others who have been ripping off America. 'Tariff Man' is welding geo-politics, geo-economics and populism into a new global American weapon — tariffs — while making almost no distinction between friend and foe. His tactics — threats to sovereignty, name-calling, flip-flops and Truth Social tirades — may appear haphazard but his strategy has become crystal clear. First, he intends to level a baseline tariff of 10 to 15 per cent against all countries to raise revenues to help pay for his 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' As Team Trump's reaction to the market's reaction to 'Liberation Day' tariffs showed, it is terrified of fixed-income vigilantes driving up long-term U.S. bond yields, especially given the historic increase in U.S. government debt. Trump would never admit his tariffs are a partial consumption tax but his threats to American retailers and producers not to raise prices show he understands they are. Second, Trump will threaten additional, higher tariffs to achieve trade-policy outcomes, whether it be: getting countries to buy specific American goods; opening up markets to U.S. exporters (think dairy and supply management for Canada); or supporting selected American producers (think copper, steel, and aluminum), supposedly in the interests of national security, with prohibitive import tariffs that are essentially a subsidy financed by higher prices for American consumers. Third, Trump is using tariffs to drive American foreign policy and extra-territoriality. Recent examples include demanding Brazil halt prosecution of former president Jair Bolsonaro, Canada ditch its Digital Services Tax, and NATO countries raise defence spending to five per cent of GDP. Finally, Trump is employing his own unpredictability to weaponize uncertainty and shift investment towards the U.S. Business plans that depend on exporting to the U.S. are now much more risky — which is very bad news for this country's growth prospects. After 36 mutually beneficial years, free trade with the United States is now dead. Managed trade, with U.S. tariffs and quotas, is the new reality. And the threat will not end with a short-term deal. We had a deal with Trump — CUSMA — and though he's honouring it for the time being, no one should expect it will last beyond next year's renegotiation. So, what should we do? First, we should not overpay for the new 'managed trade' regime with the U.S. And we should retaliate by restricting government procurement, including defence, to like-minded countries that respect trade agreements with us. Provincial and territorial governments should eliminate their barriers to internal trade and reconsider their own procurement regimes. Corporate Canada needs to step up as well and seek out competitive Canadian suppliers. Second, we need to diversify our trade to like-minded trade partners, particularly the EU, Japan, the U.K. and South Korea. Urgency and practicality are key here, not comprehensive trade agreements that take years to negotiate, so sector-specific agreements should be the focus. We should also prioritize shifting our exports that are of great value to the U.S., such as oil, gas and potash, to new markets in Asia and Europe. Third, we should learn from the Americans' panic over Chinese retaliatory embargoes of rare earths and rapidly build our capacity to mine and process these critical resources of the future, both to diversify our trade and to give ourselves more leverage with the Americans in future trade troubles, which are inevitable. Bill C-5 is a good start, but we have to get diggers in the ground, fast. Finally, we should work with European and Asian allies to create a new group of countries committed to freer, fairer and enforceable trade rules. Doing so could revitalize national banking centres at the expense of New York, eventually leading to less dominance of the American dollar and banking system in international trade. Given today's attacks on free trade by America and China, Prime Minister Mark Carney should promote a new 'FT8' focused on preserving trade liberalization: the current G7, minus the U.S., but plus South Korea and Australia, to begin with. Philip Cross: Does threatening to fire the head of a central bank also threaten its independence? Jack Mintz: Canadian exporters are facing a triple-whammy Canada has a skilled workforce, strong post-secondary institutions, entrepreneurial innovators, a strong and stable financial system, energy and natural resources in abundance, a central bank whose independence is not under daily political threat, and much lower relative deficits and debt than the Americans. In short, we have everything we need to compete economically — provided we are willing to pivot and change. Passing Bill C-5 demonstrated willingness to work in the national interest in times of crisis. Let's build on that with urgency and determination, rally our like-minded allies, and help guide the world through this dark passage for liberal trade. Kevin Lynch was Clerk of the Privy Council and vice-chair of BMO Financial Group. Paul Deegan, a former executive at BMO and CN, is CEO of Deegan Public Strategies.

Here's how Astronomer used Hollywood to turn a viral disaster into a marketing win

Hashtags

Try Our AI Features

Comments

Related Articles

How are businesses are preparing for the August 1 tariff deadline? They can't

How are businesses are preparing for the August 1 tariff deadline? They can't

Opinion: Forget the G7. We need an FT8 — a Free Trade Eight

Here's how Astronomer used Hollywood to turn a viral disaster into a marketing win

Hashtags

Try Our AI Features

Comments

Related Articles

How are businesses are preparing for the August 1 tariff deadline? They can't

How are businesses are preparing for the August 1 tariff deadline? They can't

Opinion: Forget the G7. We need an FT8 — a Free Trade Eight

Get Started Now: Download the App