Sinn Féin demand explanation as portrait of President is removed
Following a social media post by Ms Kelly, Sinn Féin councillors were quick to notice that a portrait of Mr Higgins had been removed from a reception parlour in the building.
Sinn Féin has now called on Ms Kelly to explain the decision to remove the portrait. Lord Mayor of Belfast Tracy Kelly. Pic: Belfast City Council
The portrait had been placed in the reception room by Sinn Féin's Ryan Murphy when he was lord mayor. The picture was put up after Mr Murphy received a portrait of King Charles and decided to place the two side by side. This was then followed by a formal event to mark the occasion.
The portrait's disappearance prompted Mr Murphy to question its whereabouts in a council meeting on Tuesday.
Belfast City Council confirmed that the portrait, despite no longer being on display, is being safely stored at City Hall, 'at the request of the current lord mayor'. President Michael D Higgins. Pic: Joe Giddens –In a council meeting on Tuesday, Mr Murphy praised Ms Kelly on her work so far as the Democratic Unionist Party's (DUP) first female Lord Mayor of Belfast before raising concerns surrounding the removed portrait.
In a transcript of the meeting released by the BBC, Mr Murphy said: 'When our representatives have been in that position of being the mayor, there were certain things that we never took off the walls. There were certain things we felt were off limits.'
The council defended the decision, saying decoration of the City Hall was 'a matter for each individual lord mayor throughout their term in office. Former Lord Mayor Ryan Murphy. Pic: Belfast City Council
Mr Murphy said there was 'no rationale behind the removal of this portrait', asking, 'What kind of message does it send out for the people in this city who hold the President of Ireland in high regard?'
The DUP said that 'decoration of the lord mayor's parlour is not yet complete' and that 'there will be further artefacts to be added in the next few weeks'.
Mr Murphy described the initial placement of the portrait as a symbolic means of representing the many communities of Belfast, saying, 'a large section of the community in Belfast have a deep respect for Uachtarán na hÉireann and that was reflected in the presence of the portrait in City Hall'.
He told Extra.ie: 'The mayor of Belfast has a responsibility to promote respect and tolerance for all traditions in our city.'
This isn't the first time controversy has arisen surrounding the placement of portraits in Belfast City Hall. In 2011, Sinn Féin lord mayor Niall Ó Donnghaile upset unionists after removing pictures of the Queen Mother and Prince Philip from the reception parlour.
He replaced them with the 1916 Proclamation and a portrait of the United Irishmen, sparking outrage from DUP councillors at the time.
Last October, there was controversy after the PSNI opened an investigation into damage caused to a portrait of former DUP lord mayor Wallace Browne at Belfast City Hall. The PSNI would later declare it a hate crime. A Sinn Féin employee from Stormont later came forward to the party's chief whip, admitting to causing the damage and later tendering their resignation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
9 hours ago
- The Journal
Tetchy scenes between neutrality activists and politicians during Triple Lock abolition meeting
THERE WERE TETCHY scenes during the Oireachtas defence committee meeting this morning discussing legislation around the abolition of the Triple Lock mechanism. Politicians on the committee are hearing from experts on a government proposal to remove the need for formal UN approval from the existing triple-lock system for deploying Irish troops abroad. Niamh Ní Bhriain of the Transnational Institute and Chairperson of the Peace and Neutrality Alliance Stephen Kelly appeared before politicians today to advocate for the retention of the triple lock. The pair clashed with TDs and senators on many occasions, as it become abundantly clear that there were vast differences in ideology between some members of the committee and the invitees. At one point, Fianna Fáil senator Diarmuid Wilson called out Kelly for comments he made regarding politicians' ability to approve future military personnel deployments and Ní Bhriain for remarks about the deploying of Irish children. In her opening remarkers, Ní Bhriain said: 'I urge the members of this Committee to scrutinise this legislation as though it were your sons and daughters being deployed on EU battlegroup or NATO-led missions. 'For those who vote in favour of this legislation such that it is eventually passed, you should know that if Irish personnel are deployed to future wars from which they will return maimed, traumatised or in body-bags – because no one returns from war unscathed – your cards will have been marked and this will be your legacy.' Speaking later, Wilson told her: 'I speak as a father of a member of the Irish Defence Forces. And as I said to a number of people who came before us as witnesses, we take every piece of legislation seriously in this house. 'And we take it as if we're talking about the sons and daughters or gender-neutral members of any family. No matter what the piece of legislation, I want to assure you of that.' Advertisement 'I do not appreciate those comments' Kelly, in his opening remarks, questioned how effective a 'double lock', the deployment of troops following Government and Dáil approval, would be. He said the Peace and Neutrality Alliance reject it as an adequate replacement from the Triple Lock. Both invitees refused to say what would be an adequate replacement to the triple lock, arguing that the existing framework is the closest thing to ensure the neutrality of Ireland in law. Kelly accepted that neutrality and the triple lock were separate, but described them as 'close cousins'. Many politicians challenged this view, claiming that the abolition of the triple lock was to provide more control to Ireland around Defence Forces' deployments. Addressing Kelly's remarks, Wilson asked if Kelly had ever stood for election, to which the chairperson of the neutrality group said he did not. 'Well, it's important that you realise the fact that the people who put themselves forward for election – in every election there are hundreds of people who put themselves forward, be it at local level or national level – some are successful, some are not, but at least they tried. 'I would suggest to you, you should try it yourself sometime before you make those comments in relation to public representatives,' he said. Wilson continued to ask his questions to the invitees. Before answering, Kelly said: 'I don't particularly appreciate your comment.' 'I'm sure you don't,' Wilson replied. 'I don't appreciate it – at all. I'm a citizen, I've come here, I was invited to come here. I didn't have to, I was invited, I took the day off work. And I don't like the implication that you have to run for election to have an opinion on something,' Kelly said. The committee today also heard from Fianna Fáil MEP Barry Andrews and Sinn Féin MEP Lynn Boylan. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
The Journal
12 hours ago
- The Journal
Jamie Bryson and Daithí McKay cleared in Northern Ireland Nama misconduct trial
THREE MEN, INCLUDING loyalist activist Jamie Bryson and former Sinn Féin MLA Daithí McKay, have been cleared at Belfast Crown Court of charges relating to misconduct in public office. Bryson, 35, from Rosepark in Donaghadee, and co-accused Thomas O'Hara, 41, from Lisnahunshin Road in Cullybackey, were found not guilty of conspiracy to commit misconduct in public office. The charges had related to a Stormont committee hearing that examined the sale of the National Asset Management Agency's (Nama) Northern Ireland assets in 2015. McKay, 43, from Loughan Road in Dunnamanagh – who was chairman of the finance committee at the time – was found not guilty of misconduct in public office. Bryson and McKay said there are now questions for the Public Prosecution Service (PPS) over why the prosecution was brought. The PPS has said the available evidence had indicated it was in the public interest to prosecute. Trial judge Gordon Kerr KC said he believed Bryson had lied while giving evidence in the case, but said he was not involved in a criminal conspiracy. The long-running Nama trial had related to Bryson's 2015 appearance before the Stormont committee, chaired by McKay, which was investigating the sale of Nama's Northern Ireland assets to a US investment fund. The criminal probe was launched after the publication of leaked Twitter messages between Bryson, McKay and the account of O'Hara, who at the time was a Sinn Fein activist in north Antrim. McKay quit as an MLA within hours of the Twitter messages being published in August 2016. The Stormont Finance Committee inquiry was set up in 2015 amid political controversy over the multimillion-pound sale of Nama's property portfolio. Advertisement Nama, the so-called bad bank created by the Irish government to deal with the toxic loans of bailed-out lenders during the economic crash, sold its 800 Northern Ireland-linked properties to investment fund Cerberus for £1.2 billion. Giving evidence to the committee in 2015, Bryson used Assembly privilege to name former DUP leader Peter Robinson as a beneficiary of the sale. The then-first minister of Northern Ireland strongly rejected any suggestion he benefited from the deal. All other parties involved in the transaction also denied wrongdoing. Delivering his judgment in the non-jury trial today, the judge said: 'Despite his lies in court, I am sure that Bryson was at all times communicating with McKay. 'I am sure that the communications were designed to give Bryson the best advice and guidance to maximise his chances of giving evidence. 'My analysis of the messages do not show any occasion where McKay undertook to say or do anything outside his duties as chairman to ensure Bryson's evidence would be in open session. 'Clearing Bryson, the judge said the evidence did not establish there had been a criminal conspiracy between him and McKay. He said: 'In the absence of an agreement, the conspiracy charge must fail.' Turning to McKay, the judge said there was 'no doubt he deliberately misled the committee to ease the way for Bryson's presentation'. The judge pointed out the Assembly had its own code of conduct and said there was 'no precedent for a prosecution in these circumstances'. Clearing McKay, he added: 'I do not consider it my role to expand the offence.' The judge said the evidence against O'Hara 'fell well short' of anything which would convince him of his guilt.
Irish Times
13 hours ago
- Irish Times
College fees: Students and parents feel ‘betrayed' by prospect of contribution charge rising
Students and their parents cannot wait until October's budget to find out how much the student contribution charge will be for the upcoming academic year, the Dáil has heard. Social Democrats TD Jennifer Whitmore told Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe members of the public believed a promise in the programme for government about reducing college fees 'and they have been betrayed'. Ms Whitmore was speaking as the controversy over whether students would have to pay €2,000 or €3,000 in September was raised in the Dáil for the third day running. The student contribution was €3,000 but was reduced to €2,000 as a temporary cost-of-living measure and then rolled over for two more years. Sinn Féin justice spokesman Matt Carthy said Mr Donohoe was the fifth minister who had failed to clarify what level of fees would have to be paid. He said Taoiseach Micheál Martin, Tánaiste Simon Harris, Minister for Further and Higher Education James Lawless and Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers had not been able to do so. READ MORE 'Between you all you cannot answer the most simple question,' he said. Mr Lawless sparked the controversy when he told RTÉ radio on Sunday that without a cost-of-living package in the budget, students would have to pay €3,000 'as things stand'. The issue has sparked divisions between Coalition partners Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael. In the Dáil on Wednesday, Mr Lawless said he was 'fighting within the resources available' for 'the best possible outcome' within the budgetary process. On Thursday, Mr Carthy said the 'same question that's being anxiously asked in kitchen tables all around the country' was whether the fee would be €2,000 or €3,000 and that an answer was needed. Jennifer Whitmore TD: 'Families cannot budget like that.' Photograph: Sam Boal/Collins Mr Donohoe, however, outlined that 143,000 students and their families benefit from free fees while 60,000 benefit from lower fees. He said there was further investment in student facilities and in helping to improve the quality of education. He said 'budget by budget, we make changes that we believe are affordable' and the Government will adopt measures that are affordable, 'that we know we can fund, that we know we can build upon'. [ Coalition sharply divided over third-level fees Opens in new window ] Mr Donohoe said Mr Lawless, Mr Chambers and himself 'are very clear' that following 'temporary measures' when inflation was 'so high', they were looking at 'other measures that can make a difference'. Ms Whitmore said: 'I'm really astonished that you think it is okay to tell families, 'wait until the budget and we'll clarify matters for you'. That is four months away and families cannot budget like that.' The Minister said 'those families also have other needs and issues' they want progress on and Government has to make affordable and sustainable decisions. Mr Carthy called on the Minister to 'come down from your ivory tower and answer the question' about fees. Mr Donohoe told him the difference between those in Government and Mr Carthy is 'we are interested in solutions rather than sound bites'.
