Where do France, Britain and Canada stand on a Palestinian state?
If a week is a long time in politics, then a month is even longer in the Middle East, and what Israel, the West Bank and Gaza will look like by then is an open question.
France has decided to ignore all that, and make its recognition unconditional — at least in theory.
President Macron's statement said: 'True to its historic commitment to a just and lasting peace in the Middle East, I have decided that France will recognise the state of Palestine.
'We must also guarantee the demilitarisation of Hamas, and secure and rebuild Gaza.'
In other words, although he is — like most western states — demanding the disarming of Hamas and its removal as the governing force in Gaza, he would recognise Palestine anyway. He would argue that recognising Palestine in practice means recognising Hamas's rival, the Palestinian Authority, as its government, so this would not be 'rewarding Hamas'.
Britain tried a different tack, in keeping with Sir Keir Starmer's constant attempts to forge a middle way between his backbenchers and his desire to keep good relations with the pro-Israel Trump administration.
David Lammy, the foreign secretary, in a statement to the UN conference on the two-state solution, used similarly grandiose terms to Macron's.
He said: 'It is with the hand of history on our shoulders that His Majesty's government therefore intends to recognise the state of Palestine when the UN general assembly gathers in September here in New York.'
But unlike Macron, he gave Israel, which is deeply hostile to the idea, a way out. 'We will do it unless the Israeli government acts to end the appalling situation in Gaza, ends its military campaign and commits to a long-term sustainable peace based on a two-state solution,' he said.
In his speech, Lammy also made 'absolute and unwavering' demands on Hamas. 'It must immediately release the hostages, agree to an immediate ceasefire, accept it will have no role in governing Gaza and commit to disarmament,' he said.
• What will happen to the West Bank if Palestine becomes a state?
But there was 'no conditionality' attached and no statement that anything Hamas might do or not do would cause the British government to change its mind.
The main criticism raised by pro-Israel critics is that this gives Hamas an incentive to stall any ceasefire deal, since only Israel will be punished if one is not agreed. Lammy said: 'No one side will have a veto on recognition through their actions or inactions.' But only Israel would want to veto this development.
The critics are now demanding the government explicitly insert balancing conditions on the 'other side'.
Mark Carney, the Canadian prime minister, appears to have hewed more to the British path. His statement said that Canada 'intended' to recognise Palestine but also made the decision conditional.
His conditions, though, were aimed at the Palestinian Authority of President Abbas, rather than Israel.
He said: 'This intention is predicated on the Palestinian Authority's commitment to much-needed reforms, including the commitments by Palestinian Authority President Abbas to fundamentally reform its governance, to hold general elections in 2026 in which Hamas can play no part, and to demilitarise the Palestinian state.'
Many people have demanded reforms of the Palestinians — the West, the Gulf states, Palestinians themselves. Few have been forthcoming.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech
The Government has defended the Online Safety Act after Elon Musk's X said the legislation was threatening free speech. In a post titled What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach, the platform, formerly known as Twitter, outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. This includes a new duty for online providers to reduce the risk that users encounter illegal content as well as age verification measures in the UK to access pornographic content. 'As a result, the act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer,' X said. It accused regulators of taking a 'heavy-handed approach' and said that 'many are now concerned that a plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression'. Ofcom said this week it had launched investigations into 34 pornography sites for new age-check requirements. The company said 'a balanced approach is the only way to protect individual liberties, encourage innovation and safeguard children'. A Government spokesperson said: 'It is demonstrably false that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. 'As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression. Failure to meet either obligation can lead to severe penalties, including fines of up to 10% of global revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater. 'The Act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content. 'Platforms have had several months to prepare for this law. It is a disservice to their users to hide behind deadlines as an excuse for failing to properly implement it.' Technology Secretary Peter Kyle became embroiled in a row with Nigel Farage earlier this week over Reform UK's pledge that it would scrap the Act if the party came into power. He said the Reform UK leader of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers'.
The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Palestinian statehood vote at Victorian Labor conference heaps more pressure on PM
Victorian Labor members have voted to immediately recognise Palestine, heaping further pressure on the Albanese government to join Canada, France and the UK in their push for a sovereign state. Rank and file members at Labor's state conference on Saturday also carried an urgent resolution to review the Aukus submarine deal. However, the wording of the motion was watered down before the vote. Labor Friends of Palestine's motion calling on the federal government to immediately recognise Palestine, extend existing sanctions on two Israeli ministers to all members of Benjamin Netanyahu's cabinet, and to end all direct and indirect military trade with Israel was carried. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The internal campaign group's Victorian convener, Oliver van Ingen, told the conference the measures were 'appropriate, effective steps that Australia can take to contribute to peace in the Middle East' and were backed by unions, Labor members and the wider community. 'The time has come for sanctions and an end to military trade – they are the only option to prevent further atrocities and work towards a long-term solution,' van Ingen said. The motion was seconded by Tony Piccolo, from the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union, who said: 'Apartheid is never right, no matter who the perpetrators are and the reasons they say it stands. 'The behaviours we walk past – whether they be in the world, in our community, on the job site, or anywhere else – [are] the behaviours that we accept, and, comrades, we can't accept what is going on in the name of self-defence,' Piccolo said. 'I won't, and I hope you won't either.' Attempts to amend the motion were put forward by Nick Dyrenfurth, from Labor Friends of Israel, and Dean Sherr, a former Albanese adviser and lobbyist, who is also a member of the Jewish community, but failed. Dyrenfurth told the conference it was 'impractical to recognise a Palestinian state at this juncture' and criticised 'one-sided extreme motions, which endlessly demonise just one party in this ongoing conflict'. Albanese has so far stopped short of matching his UK counterpart Keir Starmer's promise to recognise the state of Palestine in September unless Israel abides by a ceasefire and commits to a two-state solution. Two other resolutions by Friends of Palestine – to increase aid and for the protection of civil liberties, including the right to protest – were also carried. As was a motion urging a federal review of the Aukus submarine deal – but only after criticisms of the US president, Donald Trump, were removed, alongside a sentence calling for a 'withdrawal' from the partnership. 'Despite the best efforts of ministers' offices to have this vote killed off, we prevailed and the voice of the rank-and-file has been clearly heard,' the Labor Against War Victorian convener, Hamish McPherson, said. A committee report that called on the government to suspend funding during the proposed inquiry and for the Victorian branch to make a submission calling on withdrawal from the Aukus partnership, however, passed. While non-binding on state or federal Labor MPs, the motions represent one of the most effective ways for rank-and-file members and unions to influence party policy. With prime minister, Anthony Albanese, in the Northern Territory for the Garma Festival, deputy prime minister and defence minister, Richard Marles, was the most senior party figure at Moonee Valley Racecourse on Saturday. But he received a lukewarm reception, with some delegates refusing to stand as he arrived. During Marles' speech, a group of delegates held up their phones to display Palestine flags. Tim Ryder, said participated in the 'silent protest' to 'hold the federal government to account' over their lack of action on Palestine. He also criticised the conference for banning placards on the floor this year, saying branches were 'white hot' with 'rage' over the move. Pro-Palestinian protesters also gathered outside but were unable to make it into the racecourse as they had last year, due to tighter security. Marles said the recent federal election result – where the party won 27 of the 38 seats and 56% of the two-party preferred vote – 'enshrines Victoria as Australian Labor's home base'. He thanked volunteers for their 'countless hours' volunteering during the campaign and vowed to deliver on the 'entirety of the agenda that we took to this election'. The Victorian premier, Jacinta Allan, used her speech to announce a key policy commitment to enshrine in law the right to work remotely two days a week, setting stage for the 2026 state election, which she said 'won't be easy'. 'We've got a fight on our hands, a fight for what we've built, a fight for the people who rely on us, a fight for the future of this state,' she said. 'But let me tell you, it is a fight we will win because our cause is just, our record is strong, our vision for the future is clear and our movement is unstoppable when it remembers what it is fighting for.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
France halts Gaza evacuations over antisemitism row involving Palestinian student
France has suspended all evacuations from Gaza following an antisemitism controversy involving a Palestinian student recently admitted to the country. The move comes after it was revealed that Nour Atallah, a 25-year-old woman from Gaza, had posted antisemitic content on social media before being accepted into a prestigious French university. French foreign minister Jean-Noël Barrot announced the decision in Paris on Thursday. 'She must leave the country. She does not have a place in France,' Mr Barrot said in an interview with radio station France Info, without naming the student. He did not specify whether the student would be sent back to Gaza. He added that no new visas will be issued, and no new admissions from Gaza will take place until an investigation is conducted. The French and Israeli vetting of her before she arrived in France did not reveal the 'antisemitic and unacceptable' posts, Mr Barrot said. The temporary suspension will also see a review of all Gaza evacuees who have arrived in France so far. The scandal has triggered strong condemnation across France's political spectrum. Ms Atallah, who had been awarded a scholarship to study at Sciences Po Lille, faces expulsion from France after her university withdrew her accreditation. Her social media posts surfaced recently, containing antisemitic rhetoric and praise of Adolf Hitler. French authorities say a criminal investigation has been opened on the grounds of 'justifying terrorism and crimes against humanity'. French interior minister Bruno Retailleau wrote on X that he has requested legal action to be taken. ' Hamas propagandists have no place in our country,' he added. Since October, France has evacuated more than 500 people from Gaza, including children, journalists, and artists, as part of its ongoing humanitarian efforts. The incident has placed renewed scrutiny on the vetting procedures coordinated with Israeli authorities. A statement from Sciences Po Lille said the content of the student's post was 'in direct contradiction' with its values. '(Sciences Po Lille) fights against all forms of racism, antisemitism, and discrimination, as well as against any type of call to hatred, against any population whatsoever,' the university said on X on Wednesday. The French government has not said when evacuations might resume, promising a thorough review and strengthened protocols before any further admissions from Gaza will be considered.
