France halts Gaza evacuations over antisemitism row involving Palestinian student
The move comes after it was revealed that Nour Atallah, a 25-year-old woman from Gaza, had posted antisemitic content on social media before being accepted into a prestigious French university.
French foreign minister Jean-Noël Barrot announced the decision in Paris on Thursday.
'She must leave the country. She does not have a place in France,' Mr Barrot said in an interview with radio station France Info, without naming the student.
He did not specify whether the student would be sent back to Gaza.
He added that no new visas will be issued, and no new admissions from Gaza will take place until an investigation is conducted.
The French and Israeli vetting of her before she arrived in France did not reveal the 'antisemitic and unacceptable' posts, Mr Barrot said.
The temporary suspension will also see a review of all Gaza evacuees who have arrived in France so far. The scandal has triggered strong condemnation across France's political spectrum.
Ms Atallah, who had been awarded a scholarship to study at Sciences Po Lille, faces expulsion from France after her university withdrew her accreditation.
Her social media posts surfaced recently, containing antisemitic rhetoric and praise of Adolf Hitler.
French authorities say a criminal investigation has been opened on the grounds of 'justifying terrorism and crimes against humanity'.
French interior minister Bruno Retailleau wrote on X that he has requested legal action to be taken.
' Hamas propagandists have no place in our country,' he added.
Since October, France has evacuated more than 500 people from Gaza, including children, journalists, and artists, as part of its ongoing humanitarian efforts. The incident has placed renewed scrutiny on the vetting procedures coordinated with Israeli authorities.
A statement from Sciences Po Lille said the content of the student's post was 'in direct contradiction' with its values.
'(Sciences Po Lille) fights against all forms of racism, antisemitism, and discrimination, as well as against any type of call to hatred, against any population whatsoever,' the university said on X on Wednesday.
The French government has not said when evacuations might resume, promising a thorough review and strengthened protocols before any further admissions from Gaza will be considered.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘One in, one out' is a realistic plan to deal with migration – let's give it a chance
The biggest problem with home secretary Yvette Cooper's plan to stop the boats is that it sounds unconvincing. One in, one out… how does that help? Especially when it is more like 17 in, one out? What kind of deterrent is that? But it is the start of a plan to tackle Britain's migration crisis – Home Office figures indicate that last Wednesday, almost 900 people arrived in boats in one day, bringing the total for 2025 to more than 25,000 – and one that could possibly work. It is, genuinely, the only policy that any government, Labour or Conservative, has devised so far that has a chance of doing so. The key to it is that the French government has accepted that Britain can send back some of the people crossing the Channel. The deal that has been published today is only a pilot scheme. It does not even say how many people will be returned, although the target is understood to be 50 a week, which is a small fraction of the average 850 arriving each week. But the point of a pilot scheme is that it allows the mechanics of a return scheme to be tested. It has already passed one test that the naysayers said it would fail: it has been approved by the European Commission. Now comes the hard part: showing that it is possible to detain and process arrivals, defeat the legal challenges and then put them on a plane and deliver them to France. Of those, the legal challenges are likely to be the bottleneck: hence Cooper's announcement of a fast-track asylum appeals procedure to try to ensure that migrants can be turned round within a few weeks. If that works, then the aim is to 'build', as Cooper put it on the Today programme this morning. If Britain can send back 50 a week, then there is no reason why we couldn't return all or nearly all arrivals. The Home Office estimates, and this seems about right, that if it can send back 80 per cent of arrivals, that will have a big deterrent effect, and few crossings will be attempted. Of course, there are reasons for doubting that this can be achieved. Will the French allow us to increase the numbers? Will the French even extend the scheme beyond the initial 11 months to which they have signed up? It is bound to take longer than that to start to get the numbers up. Maybe it will not work, but the point about a pilot scheme is that it allows Cooper the chance to try out, at a small scale, the elements of a scheme that plainly could work. No one else has even proposed a plausible and humane alternative. That said, the voters' frustration at the slow pace at which the government is moving is understandable. Labour has been in power for more than a year; the number of crossings is higher than last year; Cooper is only now announcing the plan; and the plan itself looks underwhelming. No wonder Nigel Farage carries all before him. But let us avoid the trap set by social-media bores of assuming that there are easy or quick solutions that two governments, desperate to escape the fury of the electorate, have wilfully refused to adopt. It took time for Keir Starmer to persuade Emmanuel Macron to accept the key that could unlock the solution: that France will take some migrants back. I didn't think it was possible, because the losses are more obvious than the gains for the French president. Yes, there is the distant prospect of clearing the tent cities in the Pas de Calais, but in the meantime what is France to do with the migrants who are sent back? I don't know what Macron got in return, but that was a negotiating triumph on the part of our prime minister. And it will take more time still to crank the British bureaucracy into action so that it is capable of taking the next, decisive step towards an effective deterrent. Meanwhile, Farage will score points by pretending the problem is simple and the solution is easy. His 'solution' is to destroy our relationship with France by trying to return migrants without French permission; to tear up not just the European Convention on Human Rights but the Refugee Convention and the Convention on the Law of the Sea; and to detain all arrivals indefinitely in huge prison camps at undisclosed locations. And still he wouldn't be able to deport migrants if other countries will not take them. If there is a better way, would it not be worth trying that first, even if it might take some time?
Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Migrants will be allowed into Britain from France for up to three months while claims are processed under Labour's new deal
Migrants in France will be handed a visa to live in Britain for up to three months if they apply through Labour's new 'one in, one out' deal. Details of the new Anglo-French scheme published by the Home Office today revealed applicants will be able to come to this country while their final application is considered. Documents said each successful applicant who meets a number of criteria would be 'granted entry clearance to come to the UK for a period of up to three months' after completing an online application. They will not be allowed access to public funds and will also be barred from working or studying during the initial three month period, while the Home Office considers whether it will grant a longer visa. It is unclear where the migrants will be housed, however, opening the prospect of them being placed in taxpayer-funded hotels. Furthermore, it is not known what would happen to migrants allowed into Britain under the scheme if their applications were later refused. The Home Office also confirmed applicants could be penalised of they fail to 'present for travel to the UK, without reasonable excuse, when directed by the Home Office'. The number of people accepted from France will have a 'cap' equal to the number of small boat migrants who are sent back under the deal, the documents showed. But the Home Office was unable to confirm the level of the cap. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'There are scant details as yet but this risks turning into yet another wide open door into the UK. 'It is not clear what will happen if the Home Office accepts people whose applications are rejected later on, and whether they can be removed. 'And what if the Home Office accepts people without being able to remove the same number to France due to legal challenges? Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has refused to say how many migrants will be involved in the new scheme 'There are a lot of unanswered questions and this risks descending into yet another Labour borders farce.' It came after Home Secretary Yvette Cooper refused to say how many migrants will be returned under the deal because it 'could help the smuggling gangs'. Migrants who arrive by small boat from tomorrow could face being selected for the scheme and placed in detention. Ms Cooper told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'We will provide regular updates, people will be able to see how many people are being detained, how many people are being returned, and it is right that we should be transparent around that. 'But we're not setting the numbers in advance, firstly because there is no fixed number in terms of the overall number of people to come through this system, and secondly because we're not going to provide (gangs) with that operational information.' The agreement with Emmanuel Macron's government will lapse at the end of June next year – just 47 weeks away – unless it is renewed. Last month it was suggested the scheme would see 50 migrants a week sent back to France. At that rate, just 2,350 would be returned before the agreement expires. By comparison, a record 25,436 migrants have reached Britain by small boat since the start of the year, up 49 per cent on the same period last year. Meanwhile, pro-migrant groups have already indicated they are poised to bring legal challenges – just as they did against the previous Conservative government's Rwanda asylum deal. Steve Valdez-Symonds of Amnesty International UK said: 'We anticipate that this deal is likely to face legal challenges from people who quite reasonably will resist being swapped around like mere fodder rather than addressing the claim for asylum they have made. 'Once again, refugees are treated like parcels, not people, while the public is left to pay the price for yet another cruel, costly failure dressed up as policy. 'If and when there is some real detail on how this deal is intended to work, Amnesty will of course consider what further steps we ought to take.' Natasha Tsangarides, of the charity Freedom from Torture, said: 'While this pilot offers a pathway to sanctuary for a small number of refugees, it will rely on the mass detention of survivors of torture and persecution. 'We know from our therapy rooms how profoundly harmful any time in detention is for people who've been through the unimaginable horrors of torture. 'Many survivors were tortured in detention, so locking them up again reopens deep psychological scars and can set them back significantly on their road to recovery. 'A more secure world for everyone depends on international cooperation not only to ensure safety for survivors but also to stop repression.' From tomorrow, any new Channel arrivals will be taken to the Home Office's processing centre at Manston, near Ramsgate, Kent, and assessed by Border Force officials. Any selected for the returns scheme will be transferred to short-term immigration holding facilities operated by the Home Office, such as those at Heathrow and Gatwick airports. After further assessment, they could be sent to an immigration removal centre to await return to France. The first migrants will be returned by the end of August and detention space has already been set aside for the launch of the scheme. The deal was agreed by PM Sir Keir Starmer and French president Emmanuel Macron last month after a summit at Downing Street.
Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
SMALL CAP IDEA: Britain faces an energy storage crunch
Britain is heading for a crunch in energy storage. As wind and solar supply more of the country's power, storing electricity for when the weather doesn't cooperate is becoming critical. Yet the nation has some of the lowest energy storage levels in Europe. France, Germany and Italy each hold roughly ten times more gas in reserve. In the UK, there would be just six days of supply if imports were cut. That matters because, even as the country aims to eliminate unabated fossil fuel use from the power system by 2035, the need for dispatchable energy, available on demand, will remain. The grid's increasing reliance on intermittent renewables only heightens the risk of supply-demand mismatches. Already, surplus wind power costs households and businesses £2billion a year in curtailment payments. By 2030, that figure could climb to £10billion. Enter the Marram Energy Storage Hub, or MESH. It is one of a handful of new storage schemes intended to plug the gap. Developed by EnergyPathways, MESH will sit 11 miles off the coast of Lancashire and is designed to function as a multi-technology underground battery. If built as planned, it would store up to 20 terawatt-hours (TWh) of energy, about 7 per cent of the UK's annual electricity demand. The facility would combine three storage methods: natural gas, compressed air and hydrogen. The first phase of the project, known as Marram A, focuses on repurposing depleted gas reservoirs to provide 17TWh of storage, equivalent in size to the ageing Rough facility off the Yorkshire coast. This initial segment is expected to cost £200million and could be operational by 2028. To put that investment into context, it is around a tenth of the estimated expenditure to fully update Centrica's Rough operation, an endeavour that is mired in wrangling over subsidies and which may well even be shelved. Later phases of MESH will see the construction of 20 salt caverns for compressed air and hydrogen, with a total hydrogen storage capacity of 2.8TWh and a power output of 640MW. The compressed air system, with 400MW capacity, is expected to offer multi-day power, well beyond the capabilities of battery installations. Together, these systems will eventually provide up to 700MW of low-carbon flexible power, helping to smooth fluctuations in wind output. MESH has already secured interest from investors and support from several engineering partners. Alongside Wood Group, EnergyPathways has partnered with KBR, Hazer Group, Costain and Siemens Energy, which has experience developing similar long-duration storage systems in Germany. A final investment decision is due once permitting is complete and finance is secured. The site's location is no accident. The north-west of England is emerging as a hub for energy transition projects, with large offshore wind capacity, major hydrogen and carbon capture initiatives such as HyNet, and strong industrial demand. MESH will tap into this ecosystem, connecting directly to offshore wind farms in the Irish Sea and feeding into the National Grid via existing export infrastructure. Unlike lithium-ion batteries, which store electricity for minutes or hours, MESH is designed for endurance. Its compressed air and hydrogen systems will allow for dispatchable generation over multiple days. Hydrogen will play a growing role as the UK's market matures, replacing the initial use of natural gas. The salt caverns planned for storage are well suited to the task, chemically inert, self-sealing and already used elsewhere in Europe. The benefits are threefold. First, MESH would improve Britain's energy security by reducing reliance on imported gas. Second, it would reduce curtailment of wind power, turning wasted energy into usable supply. Third, it would provide a reliable source of low-carbon electricity, supporting the UK's 2030 target for clean power. The system's carbon emissions will be at least 30 per cent lower than unabated gas power, and the site will be electrified and powered by renewables. That figure will reduce to zero with hydrogen decarbonisation displacing gas use. EnergyPathways says it expects to begin earning revenue within two and a half years of final go-ahead. The project is designed with a 25-year lifespan and forecasts an internal rate of return above 20 per cent. Around 500 jobs are expected to be created during construction, supporting the government's goal of a just transition for the offshore workforce. Political winds are also favourable. The new government has signalled strong support for energy storage as part of its push for clean power by 2030. Ministers have underlined the importance of domestic supply in the face of geopolitical uncertainty. European electricity imports are increasingly unreliable, and recent blackouts in France, Spain and Portugal have highlighted the risks of overdependence on cross-border flows. With costs of net zero beginning to show up in energy bills, ministers are under pressure to deliver reliable infrastructure that doesn't break the bank. Storage, particularly long-duration capacity, offers a way to meet climate goals while keeping costs down. Projects like MESH will not be enough on their own, but they offer a template for how the UK might store more of its homegrown energy, rather than letting it blow away.
