
Indian Immigrants Get Break as Senate Bill Waters Down Remittance Tax
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Indian nationals in the United States who send money back home are cautiously celebrating a move by Senate Republicans to cut down a planned tax on the funds.
In revisions of so-called Big Beautiful Bill making its way through the Senate, a tax on remittances, which passed the House of Representatives at 5 percent, was cut to 3.5 percent and then further to 1 percent. It is also now limited to only certain money transfers.
The U.S. sent $80 billion in outward remittances in 2022, according to the World Bank, making it the largest sender of remittances in the world. India is the world's top receiver of remittances.
Under the legislation, immigrants who send wages home via wire transfers will still be taxed, though money sent via banks will now be exempt. That would be welcome news for high-earning, short-term migrants, such as tech workers from India.
A Western Union sign is seen inside a Sedano's store in Miami, Florida, on January 12, 2023.
A Western Union sign is seen inside a Sedano's store in Miami, Florida, on January 12, 2023.
EVA MARIE UZCATEGUI/AFP via Getty Images
"Their families back here in India are already good financially. So, it's not that they're very actively dependent on the money that's being sent from here," Alok Dubey, a financial advisor and chief executive officer of PrimeWealth in India, told Newsweek. "The people who are much relieved are the guys who eventually wanted to come back sometime.
"It might be two years, it might be five years, it might be 10 years. So, they are the guys who are more relieved as compared to somebody who sends his wages for the family to take care of themselves here in India."
Why It Matters
A tax on remittances was framed as a way to recoup some of the money immigrant workers send back home and keep it circulating within the U.S. economy. In 2023, the last full year of data available, over $650 billion was received in remittances by countries worldwide, with around a third of that coming from the U.S. In some countries, remittances from the U.S. account for full percentage points of their GDP.
Watering down the remittance tax will come as a blow to those on the right calling for tougher measures around immigration, both legal and illegal.
What To Know
There were warnings when President Donald Trump's budget bill was in the House of Representatives that the original 5 percent remittance tax would have significant impacts on the receiving nations.
India received over $119.5 billion in remittances from its citizens around the world in 2023, according to the Indian government. Nearly 30 percent of that is believed to come from the 2 million Indian nationals living and working in the U.S.
The country has also seen one of the steadiest rises in remittances, according to World Bank data, with experts saying these funds provide a lifeline for immigrants' families back home. Remittance money is often used to cover utilities, housing costs, and groceries, but can also be used as investments.
Under the version of the bill currently up for a vote in the Senate, the 1 percent tax would only apply to cash or physical payments handed to money transfer providers, and not payments made through bank accounts or payment cards. This is a change from the House version of the bill, which taxed all remittances at 5 percent.
The Immigration Accountability Project (IAJ), which advocates for tougher immigration reform, has expressed its dismay at the cutbacks to the initial measure, telling Newsweek that it will be a loss in revenue for the U.S.
"Republican Senators seem to be more afraid of the lobbyist from big banks than they are of those from Western Union and MoneyGram. That's the only thing that that I can see," Chris Chmielenski, President of the IAJ told Newsweek.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) initially estimated around $22 billion per year could be raised through the 5 percent tax. At 1 percent, that figure is now well below $10 billion. The IAJ argues this is tax revenue not generated by American citizens, which the federal government will now miss out on.
Dubey told Newsweek that many wealthy Indian immigrants split their financial assets, with roughly 70 percent staying in the U.S. and 30 percent going back to India. Since the first proposal of a remittance tax, there has been a steady outflow of money from the U.S. as immigrants look to avoid taxation at a later time when they head home for good.
Removing the requirement for remittance taxes on bank transfers, where larger assets may be stored, will likely take the pressure off the money immigrants are storing in U.S. accounts awaiting a later transfer, but Dubey said large sums have likely already been moved without the tax in place.
What People Are Saying
Chris Chmielenski of IAJ, speaking to Newsweek: "I'm pretty disappointed with the developments which have occurred. Disappointed, not just because you know this this is a potential stream of revenue that I don't think a whole lot of Americans are going to really complain about. I think they would view it as somewhat reasonable to be taxing money sent back to foreign money earned here in the United States that's sent out of the country to foreign countries."
Alok Dubey, of PrimeWealth, speaking to Newsweek: "I don't think it's going to stop someone from coming, even if you pay 3.5 percent. The opportunities in the U.S. and just the currency is so high. Let's say I was saving $1,000 and I'm saving just $30 less, then it doesn't create that difference, because if I convert things to my currency, it's a very big amount."
U.S. Tech Workers, part of The Institute for Sound Public Policy, on X: "Senate Republicans are watering down the remittance tax from 3.5% to just 1%. House GOP BBB passed 5%, but the Senate caves — again! So, H-1Bs replace American workers, then get rewarded for wiring U.S. wages to countries profiting off our offshored jobs. Absolute betrayal!"
What's Next
The tax bill is still working its way through the Senate. If passed, it would head back to the House for a final vote as part of the reconciliation process before going to President Trump's desk.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Stock Sinks as Musk-Trump Feud Escalates Again
Shares of Tesla are dropping in premarket trading Tuesday as the feud between CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump heats up again. Trump early Tuesday accused Musk of gaining excessively from electric vehicle subsidies. Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill," currently being debated by the Senate, includes a provision to eliminate the $7,500 new EV tax credit, a key piece of former President Joe Biden's efforts to accelerate U.S. EV of electric vehicle maker Tesla (TSLA) are dropping more than 4% in premarket trading Tuesday as the feud between CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump heats up again. In a post on his Truth Social platform early Tuesday, Trump accused Musk of gaining from subsidies on electric cars. "Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa," Trump wrote. Trump's signature "One Big Beautiful Bill," currently being debated by the Senate, includes a provision to eliminate the $7,500 new EV tax credit, a key piece of former President Joe Biden's efforts to accelerate U.S. EV adoption. "No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!,' Trump added as he lashed out at his former ally. Musk, who also is the CEO of rocket company SpaceX, recently stepped down from running the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in order to focus on his businesses. Trump's comments came hours after Musk posted his latest complaints about the tax-and-spending bill on his social media platform X. "Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!" Musk wrote. "And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth." Tesla shares entered Tuesday having lost more than a fifth of their value this year. During the initial escalation of the public spat between Musk and Trump on June 5, shares tumbled 14%, erasing more than $150 billion from Tesla's market capitalization. Read the original article on Investopedia Sign in to access your portfolio


Gizmodo
35 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Trump Tells Musk to 'Head Back Home to South Africa' in Escalating Feud
The relationship between Donald Trump and Elon Musk, once a powerful alliance, now appears completely broken. In a new escalation overnight, the U.S. President and the world's richest man traded a series of threats that have formalized their political divorce. In a fiery rant on Truth Social early Tuesday, Trump deployed one of America's oldest and most charged political insults, telling the billionaire CEO to 'head back home to South Africa.' The conflict ignited late last week after Musk launched a series of scathing attacks against Trump's signature legislation, the 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' With the Senate preparing to vote on the bill, Musk doubled down on his criticism, threatening to create a third party to compete with the Republicans and Democrats if the legislation passes. 'It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!' the tech mogul posted in anger on June 30. He followed up with a direct threat: 'Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people.' It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!! Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 30, 2025Trump's response was swift and brutal. 'Elon Musk knew, long before he so strongly Endorsed me for President, that I was strongly against the EV Mandate,' Trump wrote. 'Electric cars are fine, but not everyone should be forced to own one.' He then pivoted from policy to a direct, personal assault. 'Elon may get more subsidies than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa,' Trump continued. 'No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE.' The 'go back home' line is a historically loaded nativist trope, often used to question the legitimacy of immigrants and naturalized citizens. By invoking Musk's South African birth, Trump is using a powerful rhetorical weapon that suggests his opponent, despite being a U.S. citizen since 2002 and the head of critical American companies like SpaceX, is not a 'real' American and is therefore disloyal. Trump concluded his post with an ominous suggestion aimed at the very government agency Musk himself created and led, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this?' Trump wrote. 'BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!' The message is unambiguous. Trump is threatening to turn the full power of the U.S. government into a weapon to investigate and potentially dismantle the companies of a political enemy. Tesla and SpaceX have benefited from billions in federal tax credits and government contracts from NASA and the Department of Defense. Musk, however, did not back down. He reacted defiantly on X, demanding that all government subsidies be eliminated. 'I am literally saying CUT IT ALL,' the billionaire posted in reply. 'Now.' I am literally saying CUT IT ALL. Now. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 1, 2025He then hit where it hurts by targeting President Trump's leadership and supporting one of his chief Republican critics, Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky. Massie is one of the few lawmakers in Trump's party to publicly oppose the spending bill. After a user on X urged support for Massie's reelection campaign, Musk replied with a simple, two-word promise: 'Me,' confirming he would be donating. Lead us not into temptation — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 1, 2025It's a stunning turn of events for a relationship that once saw Musk as a key, unconventional ally. Now, in the face of dissent, that alliance has curdled into a public display of dominance, where policy disagreements are met with threats of financial ruin and questions of national identity. Me — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 1, 2025


The Hill
35 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate churns through overnight session as Republicans seek support for Trump's big bill
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate is slogging through a tense overnight session that has dragged into Tuesday, with Republican leaders searching for ways to secure support for President Donald Trump's big bill of tax breaks and spending cuts while fending off proposed amendments, mostly from Democrats trying to defeat the package. An endgame appeared to be taking shape. Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota spent the night reaching for last-minute agreements between those in his party worried the bill's reductions to Medicaid will leave millions without care and his most conservative flank, which wants even steeper cuts to hold down deficits ballooning with the tax cuts. Vice President JD Vance arrived at the Capitol, on hand to break a tie vote if needed. It's a pivotal moment for the Republicans, who have control of Congress and are racing to wrap up work with just days to go before Trump's holiday deadline Friday. The 940-page 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' as it's formally titled, has consumed Congress as its shared priority with the president. At the same time House Speaker Mike Johnson has signaled more potential problems ahead, warning the Senate package could run into trouble when it is sent back to the House for a final round of voting, as skeptical lawmakers are being called back to Washington ahead of Trump's Fourth of July deadline. In a midnight social media post urging them on, Trump called the bill 'perhaps the greatest and most important of its kind.' Vice President JD Vance summed up his own series of posts, simply imploring senators to 'Pass the bill.' What started as a routine, but laborious day of amendment voting, in a process called vote-a-rama, spiraled into an almost round-the-clock marathon as Republican leaders were buying time to shore up support. The droning roll calls in the chamber belied the frenzied action to steady the bill. Grim-faced scenes played out on and off the Senate floor, and tempers flared. The GOP leaders have no room to spare, with narrow majorities in both chambers. Thune can lose no more than three Republican senators, and already two — Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who warns people will lose access to Medicaid health care, and Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, who opposes raising the debt limit by $5 trillion — have indicated opposition. Attention quickly turned to key senators, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine, who have also wroked to stem the the health care cuts, but also a loose coalition of four conservative GOP senators pushing for even steeper reductions. Murkowski in particular was the subject of the GOP leadership's attention, as Thune and others sat beside her in conversation. Then all eyes were on Paul after he returned from a visit to Thune's office with a stunning offer that could win his vote. He had suggested substantially lowering the debt ceiling, according to two people familiar with the private meeting and granted anonymity to discuss it. And on social media, billionaire Elon Musk was again lashing out at Republicans as 'the PORKY PIG PARTY!!' for including the $5 trillion debt limit provision, which is needed to allow continued borrowing to pay the bills. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said his side was working to show 'how awful this is.' 'Republicans are in shambles because they know the bill is so unpopular,' Schumer said as he walked the halls. A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law. The CBO said the package would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion over the decade. Few Republicans appear fully satisfied as the final package emerges, in either the House or Senate. Collins had proposed bolstering the $25 billion proposed rural hospital fund to $50 billion, offset with a higher tax rate on those earning more than $25 million a year, but her amendment failed. And Murkowski was trying to secure provisions to spare people in her state from some food stamp cuts, which appeared to be accepted, while she was also working to beef up federal reimbursements to hospitals in Alaska and others states, that failed to comply with parliamentary rules. 'Radio silence,' Murkowski said when asked how she would vote. At the same time, conservative Senate Republicans insisting on a vote on their plan for health care cuts, including Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, filed into Thune's office for a near-midnight meeting. A few of the amendments from Democrats were winning support from a few Republicans, though almost none were passing. One amendment was overwhelmingly approved, 99-1. It would strip a provision barring states from regulating artificial intelligence if they receive certain federal funding. All told, the Senate bill includes $4.5 trillion in tax cuts, according to the latest CBO analysis, making permanent Trump's 2017 rates, which would expire at the end of the year if Congress fails to act, while adding the new ones he campaigned on, including no taxes on tips. The Senate package would roll back billions of dollars in green energy tax credits, which Democrats warn will wipe out wind and solar investments nationwide. It would impose $1.2 trillion in cuts, largely to Medicaid and food stamps, by imposing work requirements on able-bodied people, including some parents and older Americans, making sign-up eligibility more stringent and changing federal reimbursements to states. Additionally, the bill would provide a $350 billion infusion for border and national security, including for deportations, some of it paid for with new fees charged to immigrants. Unable to stop the march toward passage, the Democrats as the minority party in Congress are using the tools at their disposal to delay and drag out the process. Democrats forced a full reading of the text, which took 16 hours, and they have a stream of amendments. Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, the ranking Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, raised particular concern at the start of debate late Sunday about the accounting method being used by the Republicans, which says the tax breaks from Trump's first term are now 'current policy' and the cost of extending them should not be counted toward deficits. She said that kind of 'magic math' won't fly with Americans trying to balance their own household books. ___ Associated Press writers Ali Swenson, Fatima Hussein, Michelle L. Price, Kevin Freking, Matt Brown, Seung Min Kim and Chris Megerian contributed to this report.