General Directorate of Verdict Enforcement Concludes Ramadan Iftar Campaign
The General Directorate of Verdict Enforcement and Alternative Sentencing has successfully concluded its Ramadan Iftar campaign, which aimed to promote social solidarity and support rehabilitation efforts. As part of the initiative, 45 beneficiaries of the Open Prisons Programme participated in distributing 1,200 meals across various areas in Bahrain.
The campaign emphasized the importance of community engagement in the reintegration process, aligning with Bahrain's commitment to alternative sentencing and rehabilitation. The initiative provided an opportunity for beneficiaries to contribute positively to society while fostering a sense of social responsibility during the holy month of Ramadan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Tribune
4 days ago
- Daily Tribune
Celebrating beneficiaries of ‘Weyak' programme
Coinciding with the International Day Against Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking, the General Directorate of Verdict Enforcement and Alternative Sentencing held a celebration for the beneficiaries of the 'Weyak' programme, a pioneering initiative under the alternative sentencing framework. The event was attended by the Director-General of Verdict Enforcement and Alternative Sentencing, His Excellency Shaikh Khalid bin Rashid Al Khalifa, alongside representatives from supporting and partner entities involved in implementing the programme. On this occasion, the Director-General affirmed that the 'Weyak' programme, from which two batches have graduated with a success rate of 87%, is a practical embodiment of the instructions of H.E. Interior Minister General Shaikh Rashid bin Abdullah Al Khalifa to enhance recovery opportunities and ensure the safe reintegration of individuals into society. He noted that the programme has proven its effectiveness.
Daily Tribune
6 days ago
- Daily Tribune
Ombudsman Team Visits Jau Prison to Monitor Ashura Religious Practices
As part of its ongoing mission to uphold human rights and monitor conditions inside correctional facilities, a team from the General Secretariat of the Ombudsman conducted a field visit to Jau Reformation and Rehabilitation Center. The visit focused on observing the conditions of inmates and ensuring they were able to practice their religious rituals during the Ashura season. This is in line with the team's responsibilities outlined in Article 12 of Decree No. (35) of 2013, and aimed to verify that inmates are treated in accordance with national legal standards. During the visit, the team met with a group of inmates selected at random. In private conversations, the inmates expressed that they were able to freely participate in Ashura-related religious practices. The team also reviewed CCTV footage across different buildings and prayer halls, confirming that groups of inmates had been gathering both in the morning and evening to hold religious ceremonies and gatherings. These activities were conducted without violating internal prison rules or safety requirements. The Ombudsman team also reviewed relevant documents and plans prepared by the prison administration to facilitate the rituals. The review showed clear coordination and cooperation by prison staff to ensure a smooth and respectful environment for religious observance, while maintaining security. The General Secretariat of the Ombudsman affirmed its continued commitment to monitoring the situation in reform and rehabilitation centers—especially during major religious events such as Ramadan and Ashura. These efforts reflect the organization's role in promoting transparency, accountability, and the protection of constitutional and legal rights within the Kingdom of Bahrain.
Daily Tribune
17-05-2025
- Daily Tribune
Mother loses custody case after court hears claims of smoking near children
A Bahraini mother has lost her bid to regain custody of her children after a Sharia court heard claims that she regularly smoked in their presence and spent long hours in cafés — concerns raised by the father as evidence of unfit parenting. The Minor Sharia Court rejected the mother's attempt to overturn the 2019 divorce terms, which had awarded custody to the father. The court found no legal basis to prove a permanent transfer of guardianship had taken place, despite the mother's claims that she had been the primary caregiver for over five years. The woman told the court she had borne full responsibility for raising the children — handling daily care, school runs, and expenses — while the father remained largely absent. She alleged that he retained legal custody only to threaten and intimidate her, and that he had made little meaningful contribution to their upbringing. However, the father, represented by lawyer Jassim Ebrahim Al Essa, countered that the children had been in his custody until May 2024, when the mother asked to take them for a visit and failed to return them. He submitted school enrolment records near his home in Hamad Town, along with messages from the mother arranging the visit. He further argued that she was unsuitable for custody, accusing her of smoking frequently in the presence of the children and pointing to her history of having given up custody of two daughters from a previous relationship. The mother denied the allegations and said she had filed a criminal complaint in which the children described their father as unfit. Both sides presented witnesses. The mother's landlord, brother, and former neighbour testified that the children had been staying at her residence. One said he often heard them in the early mornings, while another recalled them delivering food during Ramadan. But the court deemed the testimonies vague and lacking in legal weight. Meanwhile, relatives of the father told the court the children had lived with him, kept their personal belongings at his home, and attended local schools. Their accounts matched the documents submitted and there was no record of a previous legal dispute over custody. The judge ruled against transferring the matter to a civil court, affirming it fell within the jurisdiction of family law. A separate request to allow the daughter to choose where to live was also rejected, as the court said her shifting views suggested she had not reached the level of maturity required under custom. While the court acknowledged that the mother may have cared for the children for extended periods, it found no evidence of a permanent, legal transfer of custody — nor any indication of serious neglect by the father. The case was dismissed.
