Trump, Netanyahu and Khamenei — three angry old men who could get us all killed
Likewise, Iran must halt its retaliation immediately and drop its escalatory threats to attack US and UK bases.
This conflict is not limited, as was the case last year, to tit-for-tat exchanges and 'precision strikes' on a narrow range of military targets. It's reached a wholly different level. Potentially nothing is off the table. Civilians are being killed on both sides. Leaders are targets. The rhetoric is out of control. With Israel fighting on several fronts, and Iran's battered regime backed against a wall, the Middle East is closer than ever to a disastrous conflagration.
Reasons can always be found to go to war. The roots of major conflicts often reach back decades — and this is true of the Israel-Iran vendetta, which dates to the 1979 Islamic revolution. The so-called 'shadow war' between the two intensified in recent years. Yet all-out conflict had been avoided, until now.
Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu: War is Netanyahu's choice. It's what gets him out of bed in the morning. It's what keeps him and his UK-sanctioned far-right cronies in office and out of jail. Picture: AP /Ohad Zwigenberg
So who is principally to blame for this sudden, unprecedented explosion?
Answer: three angry old men whose behaviour raises serious doubts about their judgment, common sense, motives and even their sanity.
The fact that one of them — Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister — has actively sought a showdown with Iran for years does not mean it had to happen. The fact the Tehran regime is unusually vulnerable after Israel's attacks last year and the defeat of its Hezbollah ally does not somehow legitimise a surprise assault on its sovereign soil.
It's true that UN nuclear inspectors say Iran is breaking treaty obligations. But that doesn't amount to a green light for war.
Netanyahu attacked Iran to avert an 'existential threat'. He may have made it worse.
Netanyahu, 75, is unfit to lead Israel, let alone make life-or-death decisions on its behalf. He failed to protect Israelis from the 2023 terror attacks, then dodged responsibility. He has failed to fulfil his vow to destroy Hamas and bring back the hostages, yet his soldiers have killed more than 55,000 Palestinians in Gaza in the process. He invaded Lebanon and Syria. Now it's Iran. Where will he stop? Will he fight Turkey next? It's not out of the question.
War is Netanyahu's choice. It's what gets him out of bed in the morning. It's what keeps him and his UK-sanctioned far-right cronies in office and out of jail. His actions have inflicted extraordinary damage on his country's reputation, fuelling antisemitism globally.
He claims Israel is fighting for its existence — but his own political survival is a prime consideration, too. Netanyahu has been indicted for alleged war crimes in Gaza. He should be arrested, not defended and enabled, before any more crimes are committed.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's bellicose supreme leader, is the second leading culprit. He should have been put out to grass in Qom years ago. The 86-year-old squats atop a repressive, corrupt theocratic regime that has lost touch with the society and people it ostensibly serves.
Elections are fixed, judges are bent, media censorship is pervasive. The regime's military incompetence, economic mismanagement and brutal persecution of young women, gay men and human rights defenders such as Nasrin Sotoudeh are notorious.
Like Netanyahu, Khamenei is backed by hardline conservatives and opposed by reformers, but it's him who calls the shots. His suspicious insistence on stepping up uranium enrichment, even though civil applications are lacking, ultimately gave Netanyahu an opening. Although he is said to be unwell, Khamenei is a key reason why Iran will not abandon its nuclear programme. Even without him, Netanyahu's idea that it can be totally eliminated is fantasy.
This blindspot may be the regime's final undoing. Israel's strikes have killed senior military leaders and damaged nuclear facilities and ballistic missile and drone forces. Khamenei himself, and Iran's vital energy exports, may be next.
In a patronising video, Netanyahu urged Iranians to rise up and seize their 'freedom'. Many would like to. The difficulty with such advice, coming from a tainted source, is that it could have the opposite effect of rallying the public, and Arab leaders, around the regime.
US president Donald Trump: Whether he is selling out to Vladimir Putin, weaponising tariffs, botching a Gaza ceasefire or bullying neighbours, Trump is a total menace.
Iran's threats to attack US, British and French bases and ships if they help defend Israel, and to close the strait of Hormuz, heighten the risk of full-scale war and a global energy shock that could hurt the west and benefit Russia. These are some of the direct consequences of Donald Trump's weak, vacillating stance.
Trump, 79, is the third man in this avoidable tragedy. He previously said he preferred to negotiate a new nuclear deal with Iran, having idiotically trashed the previous one. But he couldn't decide on terms, and his amateurish negotiators kept changing their position.
That was partly because Trump, as with Palestine and Ukraine, is too idle to study the details. He wings it instead, trusting to instincts that are invariably bad. That makes him easy prey for wily operators such as Netanyahu.
Trump's feeble ineptitude meant that when Israel's leader insisted last week that the time was right for an all-out attack on Iran, he folded. Typically, once the attack began, he switched, trying to claim credit and issuing flatulent threats of his own.
Each time he opens his mouth, Trump inadvertently confirms Iran's suspicions that the US and Israel are acting in close concert.
Anyone who still thinks Trump has even the remotest idea what he's doing when confronting the big international questions of the day should study the alarming events of the past week.
Whether he is selling out to Vladimir Putin, weaponising tariffs, botching a Gaza ceasefire or bullying neighbours, Trump is a total menace. Far better, and safer, for Britain to bypass him and try as much as possible to act independently of the US from now on.
These angry old men could get us all killed.
Read More
Maria Walsh: Polish election result shows we cannot take trust in Europe for granted
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Ukrainian drones hit Russian energy and defence infrastructure in response to deadly strikes on Kyiv and Kharkiv
Russian officials report three dead in strikes as Trump issues new deadline to Putin Rescuers lay toys and flowers on the site of Russia's Thursday night missile strike in Kyiv that hit a house and left 31 dead, including five children. Photo: AP A drone attack on the Rostov region, on the border with Ukraine, killed one person, acting governor Yuri Slyusar said. Further from the front line, a woman was killed and two other people were wounded in a drone strike on business premises in the Penza region, according to regional governor Oleg Melnichenko. In the Samara region, falling drone debris sparked a fire that killed an elderly resident, regional governor Vyacheslav Fedorishchev said. Russian officials did not name specific facilities which were hit, but Ukrainian authorities later said they had targeted key sites in Russia's energy and defence sectors late on Friday in retaliation for deadly Russian strikes on Ukrainian cities earlier this week. Ukraine's general staff said it struck the Ryazan and Novokuibyshevsk oil refineries, a fuel storage facility in Voronezh, and a defence-linked electronics manufacturer in Penza. According to the Ukrainian air force, Russia launched 53 drones and decoys at Ukraine overnight into yesterday. It said that air defences shot down or jammed 45 drones. Eleven people were wounded in an overnight drone strike on the Kharkiv region, governor Oleh Syniehubov said yesterday. The reciprocal drone strikes followed a day of mourning in the Ukrainian capital Kyiv on Friday, after a Russian drone and missile attack killed 31 people, including five children, and wounded more than 150. The continued attacks come after US President Donald Trump on Tuesday gave Russian President Vladimir Putin a shorter deadline - August 8 - for peace efforts to make progress. Mr Trump said on Thursday that special envoy Steve Witkoff is heading to Russia to push Moscow to agree to a ceasefire in its war with Ukraine and has threatened new economic sanctions if progress is not made. Meanwhile, Ukraine's anti-corruption bodies said yesterday they had uncovered a major graft scheme that procured military drones and signal jamming systems at inflated prices, two days after the agencies' independence was restored following major protests. The independence of Ukraine's anti-graft investigators and prosecutors, NABU and SAPO, was reinstated by parliament on Thursday after a move to take it away resulted in the country's biggest demonstrations since Russia's invasion in 2022. In a statement published by both agencies on social media, NABU and SAPO said they had caught a sitting lawmaker, two local officials and an unspecified number of national guard personnel taking bribes. None of them were identified. . Join the Irish Independent WhatsApp channel Stay up to date with all the latest news Russia Ukraine Donald Trump
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
The Sunday Independent's View: EU's supporters must examine why it is losing voters' trust
Beyond a few cranks, there is no real appetite for any form of 'Irexit'. Indeed, the most recent Eurobarometer survey, which tracks public opinion across the 27 member states, found that Ireland continues to share the highest level of trust in the EU's institutions, along with Poland. There are some clouds, nonetheless, on which political weather-watchers would do well to keep an eye, lest they rain on any future parade. On two key markers, those being the continuing nightmare in Gaza and the trade deal the EU concluded last week with US president Donald Trump, today's Sunday Independent/Ireland Thinks poll reveals growing angst at the direction being taken in Brussels. About seven in 10 respondents rate the EU's performance on Israel-Gaza as either bad or very bad. More than half (58pc) also regard the EU's performance on the tariff deal as bad or very bad. Dissatisfaction goes well beyond those two issues. On question after question, Irish voters give a resounding thumbs-down in this poll to the bloc's efforts to tackle problems they are facing every day, be it the cost of living (63pc take a negative view) or immigration (68pc negative, with 0pc rating the EU's performance as 'very good'). Overall, 63pc say their opinion of the EU is either somewhat or much disimproved since the start of the conflict in Gaza, up significantly from 51pc a year ago. These are remarkable figures in a country where there are rarely any stirrings of discontent at the EU, and fewer still since Brexit starkly demonstrated the perils of isolationism. There is no room in the Irish political marketplace for Euroscepticism It speaks of a lack of appreciation of the potential of conflict in Gaza to destabilise domestic politics in Europe. Add in the spanner that Trump has thrown into the works by strong-arming the EU into a trade deal that increasingly appears to represent a capitulation to US might, and the potential for further disruption is obvious. There is no room in the Irish political marketplace for Euroscepticism. Most of us recognise that EU membership has served us well. All the same, complacency must be avoided. Europe has always been able to hide its differences under a comfort blanket of economic stability. The current omnishambles of crises rocking trust in the EU has only been exacerbated since Trump came into office, as he lives up to his reputation as a Great Disruptor. The leverage he now exerts over our economic and political discourse may be uncomfortable for anyone who values democracy over dominance. A significant 77pc of people in our poll believe the EU should have been prepared to risk some disruption of its own by standing up to Trump more on tariffs. Doing so might even have been the making of the EU. Those who cherish the solidity provided by European solidarity must at least use the space provided by the US trade deal, imperfect as it is, to finally confront the bloc's internal divisions. It is these, rather than any malicious actions by the White House, that could prove its undoing. Paying humble attention to the disaffection indicated in our latest poll, rather than breathing a sigh of relief that it has not yet spilled over into more toxic forms of protest, would be a good start.
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Letters: Occupied Territories Bill is about morality, not economics
I believe that Ireland taking this stance sends out a powerful signal to the world that this country is adopting a strong line on what is happening in the occupied territories. One must not forget that some of the same arguments being posited by Mr Shatter were the same ones that were made against anti-apartheid measures and how this would have a negative impact on black people in South Africa. I am curious about what Mr Shatter has to say about the seven innocent Gazan children who were recently killed by the Israeli military while waiting for water at a distribution point. This is about morality, not economics. John O'Brien, Clonmel, Co Tipperary Criticism is far from being antisemitism Madam — Criticism of the state of Israel is not antisemitism. Alan Shatter's column repeatedly refers to the targeting of Jews, rather than Israel, so he can level accusations of antisemitism. The settlements he refers to have been declared illegal by the UN, but he suggests they should not be subject to sanction because there are Jews present. Religion should be a matter of personal choice, not state policy. Mark O'Hagan, Ballinacurra, Midleton, Co Cork Zionism is more like English plantation Madam — A more bizarre and ridiculous statement is hard to imagine than that made by Alan Shatter in your last edition: 'Zionism is nothing other than a belief in the right of the Jewish people to self-determination in their ancient homeland. It is no different to the belief that the Irish people have the right to self-determination on the island of Ireland.' In the first and second centuries AD, the Romans drove out most of the Jews from what are today called Palestine and Israel. In the late 19th century, a sectarian, colonialist ideology was invented in the form of Zionism. This entailed Jewish plantation in Palestine and dispossession of Arabs of the lands where they had been living for almost two millennia. If a comparison is to be made with Ireland, it is not insultingly with the Irish freedom struggle, but rather with the English plantations that began here in the 16th century in an attempt to supplant the native Irish. The idea of an 'ancient homeland' of the Jews goes back to a situation that prevailed about 2,000 years ago and rests on a theological notion of a 'chosen people' in a 'promised land'. As for 'self-determination', that does not attach to a religion, but to a people living in a territory where they have been located for most of modern (and often medieval history), namely the Arabs in historic Palestine 'from the river [Jordan] to the sea'. Daltún Ó Ceallaigh, Rathmines, Dublin 6 Claims about Irish jobs are hysterical Madam — Alan Shatter has misinterpreted the Occupied Territories Bill, which will probably include services as well as goods. While the value of these is small, the purpose of the bill is to draw attention to Israel's illegal annexation in the West Bank, undermining the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination. None of his proposed arguments are correct. The bill does not discriminate against Jews. The conflict in Gaza would not have ended if Hamas had released the hostages. In spite of Joe Biden's pleas, Benjamin Netanyahu declared all-out war. The passing of the bill would have no effect on Hamas. The enforcement of the bill is a matter for the Irish Government, but it must be passed regardless of the hysteria about its potential effect on Irish jobs. There will be no effect on jobs as countries invest only where it is advantageous to do so. Teresa Mitchell, Arklow, Co Wicklow Israel has terrorised Palestine since 1948 Madam — After reading Alan Shatter's column, I would like to point out that the war on Palestinians did not start after the Hamas outrage on October 7, 2023. It started with the Deir Yassin massacre of Palestinians in April, 1948, which led to the mass exodus of 430,000 Palestinians fleeing in terror. Israel has forcibly occupied, ethnically cleansed and practised apartheid against the Palestinian people ever since. Daniel Teegan, Listarkin, Union Hall, Co Cork Bill is an important symbol of resistance Madam — While Alan Shatter earned a serious reputation as a politician, his analysis of the Occupied Territories Bill is flawed. It fails to recognise the legislation as an important symbol of resistance in a world that turns a blind eye to killing and destruction on a scale that was never meant to happen again. Mr Shatter is eloquent in reflecting the Israeli narrative, but is unfortunately silent on the other side of the story. Richard Collis, Castleknock, Dublin 15 Irish women are ready to fight for trans rights Madam — John Boyne's article about JK Rowling ('An ode to my friend JK Rowling on her 60th birthday', July 27) refers to 'grown women' who support trans rights as being 'complicit in their own erasure' and likens our support of trans people to 'being ready to pin a handmaiden down as her husband rapes her'. Growing up in Ireland in the 1970s, 80s and 90s, I am one of the 'grown women' he refers to. I remember vividly the treatment of women who did not look or act as we were told we should; the vitriol with which queer people were spoken about and treated; the scorn and shame heaped on parents of gay people; the Aids epidemic; the Kerry Babies trial; and I remember Ann Lovett, dying cold, alone and terrified. The 'grown women' of Ireland remember very well what erasure and control and lack of bodily autonomy feels like,and it is for that very reason that we stand so passionately with the trans community today. Over 10,000 people marched for trans rights through the streets of Dublin. They, like me, simply want for the trans community what we want for ourselves — dignity, respect and the right to make medical decisions about our bodies in privacy with our doctors. Karen Sugrue, co-chair, Mammies for Trans Rights, Co Limerick Size of march shows where support lies Madam — On checking my diaries, I discover that I weighed just under 10 stone in 2015, at the time the Gender Recognition Act came into law. Far from being erased, as John Boyne would have it, there appears to be considerably more of me today. I wholeheartedly support the rights of transgender people to live their best, authentic lives, and, as a woman who has been a feminist since the 1970s, I know this does not affect my rights in any way. The 10,000 people who marched at Trans and Intersex Pride in Dublin last month would seem to agree. The 'greatest sin of our time' is not transphobia, but, as so often in our past, the failure to believe women when we tell you who we are. Bernie Linnane, Dromahair, Co Leitrim Boyne far removed from female minds Madam — John Boyne writes in support of JK Rowling and especially commends what he describes as her advocacy on behalf of women. He breezily dismisses her critics as being either middle-aged men, young people 'indoctrinated by social media' or dangerously misinformed women. According to Boyne, this last group is perhaps the worst. I wonder what makes Boyne such an expert, either on what women need or why so many of us disagree with Rowling's activism? Might he, too, be a middle-aged man taking out his frustration? Perhaps he should allow Irish women to think and speak for ourselves. Tracey Nutterfield, Newcastle West, Co Limerick Planning system works fine without Haughey-style fixes Madam — Fianna Fáil MEP Barry Cowen presented us last week with his conviction that the Government needs to follow the questionable example of Charles Haughey when it comes to planning obstacles ('Say what you like about Haughey, he knew how to unblock planning — Cowen', July 27). I was one of those who appealed in the case that he gives as an example, a Midlands beef-chilling plant that was approved in 2019 and 'is still in the courts six years later'. We appealed in the common good because, chief among other problems, there was a critical question of river pollution with a large-scale abattoir and meat processing plant development. The Environmental Protection Agency was directed to give evidence in court regarding the stream that ran through the site. An Bord Pleanála conceded its case as the flaws in its arriving at granting planning permission became evident. We should all be grateful that the court system upholds the law for the common good. In this, the Banagher Chilling case, the court system allowed equitable consideration of the realities on both sides and facilitated the exposure of more than might otherwise have emerged. Desmond Kampff, Ballyeighter, Coolfin, Banagher, Co Offaly McEntee must not turn to usual suspects Madam — Helen McEntee has announced that she intends to hold a National Convention on Education, calling it the 'largest ever conversation on education since the foundation of the State'. I am delighted to hear this because I am deeply concerned by the direction being taken by the Department of Education, from the imposition of gender ideology to the introduction of inappropriate content in Relationships and Sexuality Education (RSE). However, I am also concerned that those allowed to contribute to this conversation will be the usual suspects, namely the organisations funded by the Government to lobby the Government to put in place the things the Government wants put in place, to create the sort of society the Government wants and the sort of people the Government wants in it. Will the voices of ordinary parents be ignored, as they were during the 'consultation' on the National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA) review of RSE, with the NCCA drawing the conclusion: 'It was evident that a large number of online submissions arose through an organised campaign targeting members of the public.' Did it not occur to them that parents would not have availed of a template provided by a grassroots organisation that did represent their views if they had felt represented by the mostly government-funded organisations they knew would otherwise dominate the consultation? E Bolger, Dublin 9 Irish across world feel the pull of final Madam — Reading Tommy Conlon's fine piece on the great annual migration to Croke Park reminded me of one of my favourite moments during the All-Ireland final ('Get ready to witness our great annual migration', July 27). It's when the commentator throws a shout-out to those tuning in from far-flung places — Sydney, Vancouver, London. A nod, but one that says 'we know you're still with us'. In the 1970s, I joined a kind Kerryman called Jerry Cronin, a fire captain in Millbrae, California, as he headed off at 6.30am to a house in San Francisco's Sunset District. Forty of us would gather there in the basement to hear a match relayed via telephone: someone in Ireland held the phone to the radio and someone in San Francisco held another to the speaker system. Crude, but strangely heroic. Tommy Conlon was right to frame this as a great migration. But it's not just a movement across the Irish landscape — it's a deeper, older pull that crosses oceans and time zones. The GAA travels well, and long may it. Enda Cullen, Tullysaran, Co Armagh Conlon captured the magic of showdown Madam — I thought I had devoured all the columns on the All-Ireland football final last Sunday morning in your sports pages. But once again the best piece was Tommy Conlon in the main section of your paper. It was a pleasant and wonderful surprise to come upon this brilliant take on the similarity and diversity of the two counties. His paragraph imagining David Attenborough's take on affairs was right on the mark. John McCann, Co Donegal Are Healy-Raes the men of the match? Madam — At the All-Ireland football final, I could not help thinking about Shane Ross's column ('TDs get €275bn of camouflage for their special deals', July 27) and the joke about Michael Lowry extracting a promise from Micheál Martin that if Tipperary met Cork in an All-Ireland final, Cork would concede. As the Kingdom ran away with it last Sunday, I started to wonder if the Healy-Rae brothers won a similar arrangement for Kerry in return for their support for the Government. Thomas Garvey, Claremorris, Co Mayo Boring football in need of an overhaul Madam — Despite the new 'improvements' being trialled for men's Gaelic football, this year's All-Ireland was still boring and a hard watch. With nearly 500 hand passes and the over and back possession game outside the big arc, and players virtually unchallenged as one team kept possession, it was like two boxers refusing to engage. And to pay €100 to watch that. Instead of tinkering with the rules, is it time to go back to scratch and come up with a totally new game of football? Wasn't that what happened at the foundation of the GAA when 'Gaelic' football was invented? After nearly a century-and-a-half, is it not obvious the game that was invented is unsatisfactory and possibly irredeemable? If it's not possible to come up with a satisfactory new game, maybe the GAA would be better off using the resources devoted to men's Gaelic football to the further promotion of the genuine Irish game of hurling. After all, didn't Kerry win a senior hurling All-Ireland before they won a football one? Joseph Mackey, Glasson, Co Westmeath An Post gets a dire O'Connell reception Madam — An Post released a stamp last week to celebrate the 250th anniversary of Daniel O'Connell's birth. It depicts the Liberator resplendent in a gilded chariot being applauded by crowds in Sackville Street with the GPO in the background. The building opposite has a television aerial on its chimney. Ireland must have been way ahead of itself to have had TV 200 years ago. Maybe later this year when the statue of O'Connell is unveiled in Leinster House, they could place a satellite dish on top to show how much the country has progressed since his day.
