Justin Baldoni attends Blake Lively's deposition in legal dispute
Baldoni, aged 41, faced Blake Lively, 37, as his lawyers questioned her at her legal team's office.
The courtroom drama has captivated not just Hollywood but the world. Conversations about workplace rights and legal protection have been resonating strongly.
The legal battle centres on Lively's allegations of sexual harassment and retaliation against Baldoni. Justin Baldoni was her director and co-star in the film It Ends With Us .
Baldoni has firmly denied the claims, according to People .
Justin Baldoni's physical presence at the deposition defied many expectations. Traditionally, parties refrain from attending such depositions in person.
Bryan Freedman, Justin Baldoni's lawyer, previously said, 'He wants to be vindicated, and that's all that he cares about.'
'Baldoni knows who he is, what he's done, what he hasn't done. He wants the truth to come out, and he's waiting for his day in court.'
Judge Lewis J. Liman has strictly regulated the legal process by issuing a protective order. This allowed Lively's lawyers control over the location and notification of those present for the deposition.
In a powerful statement after the dismissal of Baldoni's counterclaims, Blake Lively stated: 'Like so many others, I've felt the pain of a retaliatory lawsuit. This includes the manufactured shame that tries to break us.
I am more resolved than ever to continue to stand for every woman's right to have a voice in protecting themselves, including their safety, their integrity, their dignity and their story.'
Baldoni's countersuits include allegations of extortion and defamation against Blake Lively and her husband, actor Ryan Reynolds.
A judge dismissed Justin Baldoni's defamation lawsuit against Blake Lively in June 2025.
The court rejected his claims of extortion and defamation, ruling that Lively's actions constituted permissible negotiation rather than wrongful extortion.
A judge has set the trial for March 2026, and both Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively will testify.
Freedman summarised his approach: 'I'm going to ask her questions under penalty of perjury. She'll have to provide evidence and the truth.
We're going to see how consistent her testimony is with the facts of what transpired.'
The case remains a stark reminder of both the challenges faced by women in asserting their rights and the importance of due legal process.
As anticipation builds for the trial, one reality remains clear: both sides are preparing for a battle where the truth and public vindication are at stake.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
42 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Don't complain if you're part of the problem
From pirated newspapers to poor theatre etiquette, South Africans often bemoan decline while contributing to it. We get what we deserve. It's a thought that seems to miss many of those who complain the most. People complain about the paucity of newspapers, but they don't buy them, instead they're happy to pirate digital logins on WhatsApp. It's the same Karens and Kevins who moan on their social media platform of choice about main stream media (MSM) not picking up a story, ignoring the fact that it was invariably broken by MSM journalists. There's fertile ground for them to complain. The common thread is one of entitlement. There's no deeper reflection, especially not about the effort or cost that goes in to producing something, particularly in the arts and the media. It was wonderful to see the ongoing success of one of Johannesburg – and South Africa's – finest exports, the multitalented and ferociously hard-working Jonathan Roxmouth playing to another full house at the weekend. South African performers, though, have a hard row to hoe, there's little to no government support, the number of theatres we have across the country are dwindling, with those struggling to maintain sustainable runs of longer than a couple of weeks normally only in venues that are cross-subsidised in gaming-type resorts. ALSO READ: Journalism's battle for survival starts with readers who care For the arts to flourish, like so much else in this country, ordinary citizens need to support them, it's too important an asset to leave to government. But do showgoers even deserve that which they pay for? The commentariat is quick to moan about dropping standards but loathe to observe the same standards themselves. Paying for tickets to go to the theatre is one thing, but there is also a concomitant requirement to behave when the lights dim in a way that doesn't detract from the other patrons' enjoyment. If you must check your e-mails on your smartphone, you obviously don't have the time to be there. No-one needs you to live tweet the show and even less to take grainy videos or snapshots during the performance – especially not from 16 rows back. It's the same WhatsApp group that moans about corruption in the country but sees nothing wrong about slipping a cop a couple of grand to look the other way when they're caught in a roadblock over the limit on a Saturday night. If we are serious about building a South Africa fit for all, we've got to make sure we're not part of the problem we are railing against. NOW READ: Why modern cinemas are failing to keep audiences happy
The South African
9 hours ago
- The South African
Domestic helper arrested after stealing designer items in viral video
A Tshwane woman has posted a series of TikTok videos in which she had her domestic helper arrested for stealing her designer clothing, alcohol, and household items. The clips, which were posted over the weekend, went viral and received over a million views. On TikTok, user @brasco posted several videos about discovering how the family's domestic helper had stolen a vast amount of her personal items from her Mamelodi East home. This included bottles of alcohol like Ice Tropez and Veuve Clicquot, designer Burberry T-shirts, and household items like detergents and hardware. 'Prioritise checking your helper's bags when they leave to go on holiday. You'll be shocked', the TikToker posted in a video amassing almost one million views. In another, with close to two million views, police arrive to arrest the domestic helper. @brascoza ♬ original sound – KHADEAIR @brascoza ♬ LEMENEMENE – King Monada Others reveal how the woman emptied the contents of her helper's bags to discover her items inside. The woman claimed she felt inclined to search the bags of her Lesotho-born domestic helper after another incident a few weeks prior. @brascoza ♬ original sound – brasco In the comment section, viewers were shocked at the volume of goods stolen by the domestic helper. However, the woman's decision to call the police and have her employee arrested had mixed views. Some felt sorry for the helper and felt that involving the police was unnecessary. @Morekotholethoko: 'The salaries we pay these people are so little. I wouldn't call the police on her. I will be a bit more gracious.' @Jackie: 'She envied having this life, that's why she did whatever she did. Forgive her' Others felt the domestic helper's actions justified the outcome. @luvleigh_leigh: 'Theft is a criminal offence.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
9 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The price of going viral – when political activism becomes very expensive
In an age where a single WhatsApp message can mobilise protesters and a Facebook post can shape public opinion about workplace disputes, the traditional boundaries between political activism and trade union representation are blurring in ways that would have been unimaginable a generation ago. The recent labour court judgment in Boomerang Fruits (Pty) Ltd v Umkhonto weSizwe and Others offers a stark reminder that these boundaries exist for good reasons and that crossing them can have serious legal consequences – particularly when amplified through digital platforms that can transform minor workplace grievances into viral political campaigns. From payroll error to digital political theatre The case began with a seemingly mundane payroll error. Agricultural workers at a fruit farm in Elgin in the Western Cape were underpaid overtime wages ranging from R120 to R176 per person – hardly the stuff of revolutionary politics. Yet within days, this minor administrative mistake had escalated into a full-blown industrial dispute involving police escorts, highway blockades, criminal charges and a sophisticated digital media campaign that branded the employer across multiple online platforms as racist and colonial. The transformation was breathtakingly swift. What might once have taken weeks of careful union organisation now unfolded in real time across social media networks. The Umkhonto weSizwe party (MK) didn't simply insert itself into the dispute – it digitally amplified it, using Facebook posts, press releases and WhatsApp groups to craft a narrative that reached far beyond the farm gates of the Western Cape. The digital disruption of industrial relations The involvement of the MK party demonstrates how political parties have learned to exploit the digital revolution in ways that fundamentally challenge traditional industrial relations. When employees contacted the party for assistance, the MK party didn't simply offer advice or direct workers to appropriate legal channels. Instead, it created a parallel digital infrastructure that bypassed established negotiation mechanisms entirely. The party's WhatsApp communications coordinated meetings with management, its Facebook posts generated public sympathy for workers, and its press releases shaped media coverage – all while maintaining the pretence of merely providing 'advisory' support. This digital orchestration allowed the MK party to function as a shadow trade union while avoiding the legal responsibilities that formal representation would entail. Judge Robert Lagrange's judgment methodically dissected this digital strategy, concluding that the MK party had 'consistently assumed the role of the representative of the strikers' while simultaneously 'launching a media attack on Boomerang, portraying it in villainous terms'. The court recognised that in the digital age, representation isn't just about formal negotiations – it's about controlling the narrative that shapes public perception and influences the balance of power. The legal principle at stake is both simple and profound, but its application has become infinitely more complex in the digital era. South Africa's industrial relations system was designed for an analogue world where disputes unfolded in board rooms and on factory floors, not on social media platforms where every statement can be screenshot, shared and weaponised. The social media amplification effect The court's analysis of the MK party's digital campaign reveals how social media has fundamentally altered the dynamics of labour disputes. Traditional negotiation assumes a degree of privacy that allows parties to make concessions without losing face publicly. Digital platforms destroy this privacy, creating performative pressures that make compromise virtually impossible. The MK party's Facebook posts describing the company as a 'colonial nest' and 'active site of colonial exploitation' weren't just political rhetoric – they were strategic digital content designed to generate shares, comments and viral engagement. The party understood that in the attention economy, inflammatory language performs better than nuanced analysis. The result was a digital firestorm that bore little resemblance to the original overtime payment dispute. WhatsApp democracy and workplace organising Perhaps most significantly, the case highlights how WhatsApp has become a significant organising tool for both legitimate trade union activity and political interference. The MK party's use of WhatsApp groups to coordinate with workers, arrange meetings and distribute talking points created an informal, but highly effective communication network that traditional employers and unions struggle to understand or counter. This 'WhatsApp democracy' operates outside formal industrial relations structures, creating new possibilities for worker organisation, but also new vulnerabilities to political manipulation. The platform's end-to-end encryption makes it nearly impossible for employers to understand how disputes are being coordinated, while its group messaging functionality allows political parties to influence large numbers of workers simultaneously. The judgment also reveals how digital platforms have created expectations of real-time transparency that clash with the traditionally private nature of labour negotiations. The MK party's social media strategy assumed that followers expected constant updates, behind-the-scenes content and immediate responses to developments. This digital transparency imperative makes the patient, confidential work of genuine dispute resolution nearly impossible. When every negotiation session can be livestreamed, every concession can be immediately scrutinised by online audiences, and every statement can be taken out of context and shared widely, the incentives shift dramatically towards performative confrontation rather than problem-solving. Political parties, with their natural understanding of digital engagement, are far better positioned to exploit these dynamics than traditional trade unions or employers. Digital accountability and legal consequences Judge Lagrange's decision to confirm the interdict against the MK party represents one of the first serious judicial attempts to grapple with how digital platforms are reshaping labour relations. The court recognised that social media posts and WhatsApp messages aren't just commentary – they constitute active participation in labour disputes with real legal consequences. The costs order against the MK party is particularly significant in the digital context. By requiring the party to pay the employer's legal costs, the court has established that viral social media campaigns carry financial risks. This digital accountability principle could fundamentally alter how political parties approach online labour activism. The broader implications extend far beyond this single case. Digital platforms don't just amplify existing power dynamics – they create entirely new ones. Political parties that master social media engagement can mobilise workers more effectively than traditional trade unions, but they lack the institutional knowledge and legal obligations that make genuine representation possible. The result is what might be called 'algorithm activism' – political engagement optimised for digital metrics rather than real-world outcomes. The MK party's campaign generated thousands of shares and comments, but it ultimately prolonged the dispute and harmed the workers it claimed to represent. The digital medium had become the message, drowning out the substance of legitimate workplace grievances. Towards digital industrial relations As South Africa grapples with persistent inequality and workplace exploitation, the intersection of digital technology and labour relations will only become more complex. The Boomerang Fruits case provides a crucial precedent for how courts might approach political parties that use social media to blur the lines between advocacy and representation. The challenge ahead is developing industrial relations frameworks that can harness the democratising potential of digital platforms while preventing their exploitation by political opportunists. This will require new forms of digital literacy among trade unionists, employers and judges, as well as clearer legal guidelines about what constitutes impermissible political interference in the social media age. The labour court's firm stance in this case demonstrates that legal principles can adapt to technological change, but only if we remain vigilant about protecting the institutional boundaries that make effective labour relations possible.
