What we know about the plane crash that killed 6, including alternative music executive Dave Shapiro
It could take a year to sort out exactly what happened to the plane that hit power lines and crashed into a neighborhood just before 4 a.m. Thursday. But investigators know there was thick fog, problems with the runway lights and a broken weather alert system, Dan Baker of the National Transportation Safety Board said.
Shapiro's death stunned the heavy metal and hard rock scene that grew out of the punk movement. The music agency he cofounded, Sound Talent Group, represented groups like Pierce The Veil, Parkway Drive, Sum 41 but also ventured into more pop acts like Hanson and Vanessa Carlton.
Baker said Friday that the plane's pilot and passengers were killed in the crash.
'There were no ground fatalities or serious injuries," he said.
Also killed were Daniel Williams, a former drummer for the popular Ohio metalcore band The Devil Wears Prada, as well as two employees of Shapiro's agency: Kendall Fortner, 24, and Emma Huke, 25.
A fifth passenger, 36-year-old Celina Marie Rose Kenyon, has also been identified by the coroner's office in San Diego as one of the victims aboard the plane. Kenyon was not an employee of Sound Talent Group, a spokesperson for the agency confirmed Saturday.
The coroner's office has not yet released information on the sixth victim.
The plane was headed from New Jersey to San Diego after a fueling stop in Kansas. It crashed about 2 miles from San Diego's Montgomery-Gibbs Executive Airport. Eight people on the ground were hurt, none seriously.
The Cessna 550 Citation went down after hitting power lines, Baker said.
The pilot of the plane acknowledged to an air traffic controller that the weather was not ideal and debated diverting to a different airport, according to audio of the conversation posted by LiveATC.net.
The Federal Aviation Administration posted an official notice that the runway lights at Montgomery-Gibbs Executive Airport were out. The pilot didn't discuss that with the controller but did mention he knew the airport's weather alert system wasn't working.
'Doesn't sound great, but we'll give it a go,' he told the air traffic controller.
The fog was so thick around the time of the crash that 'you could barely see in front of you," Assistant San Diego Fire Department Chief Dan Eddy said.
Officials have not said who was flying the plane. Shapiro was listed as the plane's owner and had a pilot's license.
Shapiro, 42, got into the music industry playing in the band, Count with Stars, he founded with friends while in high school. It was the connections he made more than the music he played that made him successful.
Shapiro helped bring the underground $10-a-show alternative scene in the 2010s to the mainstream. But he also was huge in creating a community, said Mike Shea, founder of Alternative Press Magazine.
'In this music industry, there are just too many people ripping people off and using people,' he said. 'Dave was not like that. He was a beautiful soul, and beautiful person, a guiding force, just someone who would end up being an inspiration."
Even with all his famous clients, Shapiro stayed warm, genuine and interested in bringing new bands to a wide audience.
'He would listen to any band you put in front of him to give them a chance,' said Dayna Ghiraldi-Travers, founder of public relations agency Big Picture Media, who worked with Shapiro for over 15 years.
The U.S. saw its deadliest plane crash in more than 23 years in January when an American Airlines passenger jet and a U.S. Army helicopter collided in Washington. The crash killed every passenger on each aircraft, a total of 67 people.
A sightseeing helicopter broke apart and crashed into the Hudson River between New York City and New Jersey last month, killing six people, while a small commuter plane crashed in western Alaska in early February, killing all 10 people on board.
In Philadelphia, a medical transport plane that had just taken off plummeted into a neighborhood in late January, killing all six people on board and two people on the ground.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16-07-2025
- Time of India
Is Andrew Scott's role in Too Much based on Anora director Sean Baker? Fans points to Letterboxd rants, sex worker film parallels
Lena Dunham's new Netflix series Too Much, which premiered on July 11, is exactly the rom-com we needed this summer. Starring Megan Stalter and Will Sharpe, the show dives into loneliness, connection, and all the awkwardness in between. While Dunham has said the story is only 'five percent' based on her real life, fans aren't so sure, especially after noticing one character in particular. Andrew Scott plays Felix, a brooding indie director known for making films about sex workers and marginalised communities and for leaving the occasional dramatic review on Letterboxd. It didn't take long for viewers on Reddit to draw comparisons to Anora filmmaker Sean Baker, and the internet's been piecing it together ever since. What is Too Much about? Too Much follows Jessica (Megan Stalter), a recently heartbroken New Yorker who impulsively moves to London in search of something different. That 'something' turns out to be Felix (Andrew Scott), a politically intense, emotionally elusive director who challenges and complicates her fresh start. The show is Dunham's first since Girls and blends personal messiness with sharp, often uncomfortable cultural observations. The Reddit post that started the theory In a post on the pop culture subreddit Fauxmoi, one user pointed out that Felix's character bears a strong resemblance to Sean Baker's public and creative persona. 'Baker has made 5 movies about women who engage in sex work (and is reportedly making a sixth),' they wrote. 'Every leading woman in his films plays a character who is a sex worker or engages in sex work.' They also noted that nearly all of his eight films focus on people living in poverty. Adding to the comparison was Baker's infamous one-star review of his own film The Florida Project on Letterboxd, an unusual move sparked by criticism over its final scene being shot on an iPhone, not film, as the rest of the movie had been marketed. 'We've all met guys like this' Too Much began filming months before Anora premiered, so the character may not exactly be based on Baker, but many viewers believe the connection holds up, or at least that Scott's character taps into a recognisable type. One user wrote, 'I think it's more taking aim at the type of man Sean Baker is—those 'film bros' are a dime a dozen, perpetually stuck in the mental space of their first philosophy and film theory classes.' Another added, 'It may not be Baker directly, but if you've been in entertainment long enough, you know a guy like this.' More about Too Much The series is loosely inspired by Lena Dunham's own life, especially her move to London following her breakup with musician Jack Antonoff. While she's described the series as emotionally honest but largely fictional, some viewers think there may be more real-life parallels than she's letting on. One popular theory is that Emily Ratajkowski's character, Wendy Jones, draws inspiration from Lorde, who Jack was rumoured to have been romantically linked to around the time of his split with Dunham. Of course, that's all speculation. As for Felix, whether he's a direct nod to Sean Baker or just a familiar type in the world of indie filmmaking, Too Much has already become a Netflix sensation.
Time of India
03-07-2025
- Time of India
Road rage at 136 km/hour speed to chase ex's wife: Indian-origin woman Sharanjit Kaur jailed in New Zealand for killing man
Sharanjit Kaur was sentenced to four years in prison after killing a man in road rage in New Zealand. (Photo: Waikato Times) An Indian-origin woman, Sharanjit Kaur, has been sentenced to four years in jail after she pleaded guilty to reckless driving causing death of Jonathan Baker. The road rage took place on June 27 last year and the sentence was handed down by Hamilton District Court, New Zealand. According to reports, Kaur was triggered after she saw a photograph of her ex, referred to Mr R in court documents, with his wife and family at an Indian restaurant. It is not clear whether the man was her ex or current partner. Kaur confronted the man and then started following the wife, referred to as Mrs R. Court documents revealed that Kaur followed Mrs R at high speed, tailgating, brake-checking, and attempting to intimidate her. She drove recklessly on the wrong side of Boyd Road at speeds between 125–136 km/h before smashing into Baker's vehicle. He died instantly and Kaur sustained minor injuries. 'Mistress chasing the a bad novel' 49-year-old Baker's widow Andrea told the court how devastated she was when she received the news of her husband's death. She said her Christian faith prompted her to forgive Kaur. 'In forgiveness for me comes freedom in the long run... I do forgive you, my hope is with you hearing these words... by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pernas e tornozelos inchados? Descubra o que pode ajudar a drenar agora aartedoherbalismo Undo learn from it and do some good.' Baker's mother-in-law Colleen told the court that Kaur killed a totally innocent man. 'The mistress chasing the wife... is beyond comprehension, it's like a bad novel'. She said a drunk or drugged driver-or even an angry wife chasing a mistress - would have made some sense. Kaur's lawyer Anjeet Singh said she knew nothing she could say would alleviate the Bakers' pain, but her client 'accepts full responsibility'. She said the photo 'led to a psychological collapse... Something more than rage'. The photo brought forth years of turmoil and uncertainty around her eight-year relationship, she said pleading for home detention, which was rejected.
The Hindu
26-06-2025
- The Hindu
Delay in revealing details about Air India crash is causing anxiety
Two weeks have passed since the fatal crash of Air India flight AI 171 in Ahmedabad on June 12. The vital digital flight data recorder (DFDR) and cockpit voice recorder (CVR) have been recovered. Initial reports mentioned they were damaged and were being sent to the U.S. for the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) to decode. Subsequently, authorities announced it was being decoded in India. With rumours and theories going around, blaming the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner aircraft, and various YouTube experts dishing out various interpretations, there is fear not only among the passengers but also the operating crew of Air India. The continued procrastination in coming out with information that could put to rest the wild rumours and the silence by the Directorate-General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), as well as the airline, compel me to reassure the public that flying is safe, and it is the system that is at fault. The only visual clue we have is the CCTV footage released by the airport operator. Though it does not show the first part of the take-off run, it does provide vital clue about the second part, and why 'human error', and not the aircraft, is at fault. If the entire take-off sequence was available in the video, it would have put to rest the rumour that the flight did not use the full length of the runway but took off from an intersection. It was clarified by the flight tracker service provider that the full length was used but a new doubt has sprung up: if the aircraft used the turning pad before the end of the runway to expedite departure. It's hoped that in the interest of Air India and Boeing, the DFDR findings would be released immediately. Going by the footage, one can see the aircraft emerging from the right at the four-second mark. In that frame, one can see an aircraft taxiing on Taxiway B to turn into the parallel taxi track. The B intersection is approximately 600 feet from runway 23-end. All the main wheels and the nose wheel of AI 171 are on the runway as it passes the B intersection in the seventh second of the video. This is a clear indication that the aircraft has not reached the minimum speed for lift-off. At the eight-second mark, AI 171 is almost at the end of the runway and has not rotated for take-off. Take-off rotation is close to five seconds, and at a speed of 174 knots (as mentioned in some of the radar plots), the aircraft would cover close to 1,500 feet in that period. That would take it well into the overrun area, which is not paved and which will have compacted sand and gravel. The first sign of rotation appears at the 15-second mark and one can see a cloud of dust rising. A couple of seconds later, one can see the aircraft nose yaw (swing) to the right, indicating right-engine failure. One can see the exhaust from the left engine for the next three seconds, blowing dust and debris away. The left engine also stops, and the aircraft nose-high attitude clearly indicates impending stall. The ingestion of debris into the engine and possible bird ingestion during the flight portion on the overrun area, could have resulted in both engines failing due to foreign object damage. Birds, though not visible in the low-resolution footage, must be there as the runway and the taxiway at the Ahmedabad airport are surrounded by lush growth of grass and weeds. That is visible in the video footage. Many questions The questions that arise are: 1) Was a wrong weight and temperature entered in the Flight Management Computer? 2) Did the pilots not use the full length of the runway for take-off, considering the high temperature? 3) Why did the pilots not recognise a slower than normal acceleration? Were they not observing the Speed Trend Vector on the Primary Flight Display Speed Tape? The trend vector would have indicated the estimated speed in 10 seconds, and at 100 knots, it should be showing more than the V2 speed. If they recognised that, why did they not reject the take-off when they still had 3,000 feet of runway left? The aircraft could have safely stopped by the end of the runway. 4) Even when they were approaching B intersection and they recognised insufficient speed, they had 600 feet of runway, 60 metres of paved strip at the end of the runway, and another 240 metres of firm ground as Runway End Safety Area (RESA). This 1,600-feet-plus clear space beyond the boundary wall would have been sufficient for stopping with maximum brakes and max-reversers. The aircraft may have been damaged but a safe stop could have been achieved. The lack of situational awareness and performance knowledge is an area of concern. The training appears to be deficient when it comes to runway markings. Air India has a history of not recognising the runway markings and touchdown areas. 1) January 20, 1999: VT-EVA Air India B-747-400 at Frankfurt. Probable cause: 'The ground contact about 1,000m in front of the touchdown zone (coming short) was the consequence of an unstabilised final approach which was not discontinued by initiating a go-around procedure in a timely manner. The contributing factors were: 1. The glideslope interception from above; 2. A hydraulic malfunction during the approach requiring to perform the referring checklist; 3. The rapid deterioration of the visibility; 4. The continuation of the manual approach although the flight crew was not qualified for CAT II/III approaches; and 5. Poor crew co-ordination and missing crew resource management.' 2) May 22, 2010: Air India Express 812: High and fast approach and late touch down resulted in overrun and fatal crash 3) January 14, 2014: Air India B 787-800, registration VT-ANM, performing flight AI-301 from Sydney, NS to Melbourne,VI (Australia), was descending towards Melbourne International airport. The aircraft aligned with Melbourne's Essendon Airport's runway 35 (1,500 metres/4,930 feet length) and descended towards that runway when the air traffic controller intervened, instructing the crew to turn left and subsequently telling the crew their runway was in their two o'clock position, they were still cleared for the visual approach runway 34. 4) September 7, 2018: Air India 263 operating on Delhi-Thiruvananthapuram-Male sector, touched down on under construction runway at Male. 5) August 7, 2020: Air India Express 1344 overshot the runway, resulting in 21 fatalities. The approach was high and fast and there was a very late touchdown. 6) December 5, 2024: An Air India flight (AI2592) from Mopa Airport to Hyderabad was involved in a serious incident where the pilots attempted to take off from a taxiway instead of the designated runway. The ATC instructed the pilots to reject the take-off. All these point to serious deficiencies in training and safety standards. Fatigue and stress, which is adding to human errors, is another area that the airline has to address. So many lives have been lost and there is a fear induced by the lack of human failure understanding. There is no accountability and the Tatas will need to take a very bold stand to correct the drift. A captain returning from take-off point or cabin crew reporting sick due to fear are not healthy trends for portraying a safe airline culture. The Tatas and Boeing have to come out with some positive information as soon as possible to reassure the pilots, crew, and public. Procrastination will cost them a huge price. Captain A. Ranganathan is a former airline instructor pilot and aviation safety adviser. He is also a former member of the Civil Aviation Safety Advisory Council (CASAC), India.
