logo
South East patients advised on services ahead of doctors' strike

South East patients advised on services ahead of doctors' strike

BBC Newsa day ago
Patients across south-east England have been told to think carefully about which NHS services they use as resident doctors go on strike.NHS Kent and Medway has said they will prioritise emergency and critical services and hope to operate as usual while industrial action goes ahead from 07:00 BST Friday until Wednesday. Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust said it expected to be "exceptionally busy" and that "disruption should be expected".Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust said it had "robust plans in place to make sure our patients continue to receive safe, quality care".
Patients have been told to attend scheduled appointments unless they are contacted and told otherwise. NHS Kent and Medway's chief medical officer Kate Langford said: "We are urging everyone to make sure they use the appropriate services and keep emergency care for those who really need it."Anyone needing medical help should use 111 as the first port of call, according to NHS Kent and Medway. Ms Langford said: "Regardless of any strike action taking place, it is important patients who need urgent medical care continue to come forward as normal, especially in emergency and life-threatening cases – when someone is seriously ill or injured, or their life is at risk."The integrated care board has also said it is working hard to protect emergency treatment, critical care, neonatal care, maternity, and trauma, as well as those undergoing cancer surgery.
Resident doctors, previously called junior doctors, voted to take strike action over a long-running pay dispute at the start of July.Doctors were awarded a 5.4% pay rise for this financial year, following a 22% increase over the previous two years.The British Medical Association (BMA) says wages are still around 20% lower in real terms than in 2008.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trans doctor 'tried to mislead' tribunal over phone notes on Sandie Peggie
Trans doctor 'tried to mislead' tribunal over phone notes on Sandie Peggie

Daily Mail​

time16 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trans doctor 'tried to mislead' tribunal over phone notes on Sandie Peggie

A trans doctor was trying to 'mislead' the landmark Sandie Peggie tribunal, it has been told. Phone notes made by female-identifying Dr Beth Upton following a dispute with the nurse had been edited, it was claimed. Ms Peggie was suspended from work at Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, after she objected to the trans medic using the female changing area on Christmas Eve 2023. The 51-year-old has since launched an employment tribunal against NHS Fife and Dr Beth Upton. Yesterday it heard that NHS Fife did not commission a forensic or in-person check of Dr Upton's phone in May 2025. The health board's security analyst 'did not have a technical answer' for discrepancies on dates on Google Notes made by Dr Upton, the hearing was told. And IT expert Jim Borwick agreed with the suggestion the trans doctor 'was trying to mislead' the tribunal. Mr Borwick, director of KJB Computer Forensics Consultancy, had been commissioned by Ms Peggie's representatives to compile a report in to the notes. Mr Borwick wrote, 'Dr Upton is silent on fact that Notes can be rearranged with relative ease', and that he was 'perplexed' and 'at a loss' as to how the discrepancies had occurred, and was told 'notes did not include patient care allegations Dr Upton made about Ms Peggie'. One note from December 18, 2023, logged: 'Working nights, won't make eye contact, won't acknowledge my presence, haven't had direct conversation but can feel the dismissal/hostility.' But the tribunal heard it was edited on December 26 at 1.21am. Mr Borwick told the hearing: 'In addition to text on that date, this had been added so it is not contemporaneous.' Jane Russell, KC, for NHS Fife and Dr Upton, asked: 'When you said Dr Upton is silent on fact that notes can be re-arranged, you're suggesting that Dr Upton is trying to mislead the tribunal?' The IT expert told her: 'I suppose that's my comment, yes.' Ms Russell asked Mr Borwick if he had been instructed to come up with an 'explanation that there were lies on the part of Dr Upton' and to 'undermine Dr Upton's account of patient care allegations'. But the witness told her he was not 'trying to undermine anything', and added: 'I was told to recover notes about patient care allegations; no reason was given, just to recover those notes.' Ms Russell said in one screenshot, 'the conundrum is that the edited date predates the created date', and asked the witness if 'the only explanation for discrepancy is that Dr Upton is lying about creation dates?'. He said he could not recreate this, and nor could NHS Fife's information security manager Peter Donaldson. The tribunal heard a note entitled 'weird incident 26.08.23' was timestamped showing it was created on October 26, 2023, according to Google. Mr Donaldson told the tribunal: 'I don't believe Dr Upton was trying to mislead us in any way. 'I completely agree this is how Google presents; on the face of it the October date is the earliest date. I don't dispute that. The notes supplementary to that are the same.'

NHS strike chaos threatens to spread as paramedics REJECT pay offer on first day of doctors' walkout
NHS strike chaos threatens to spread as paramedics REJECT pay offer on first day of doctors' walkout

The Sun

time18 minutes ago

  • The Sun

NHS strike chaos threatens to spread as paramedics REJECT pay offer on first day of doctors' walkout

NHS strikes threatened to spread yesterday as paramedics in the GMB union voted to reject their annual pay offer. It came as a five-day walkout by hospital resident doctors began over pay, led by the British Medical Association union. NHS chiefs said the health service was still 'open for business'. But ambulance crews and other NHS staff in the GMB union yesterday voted 67 per cent in favour of rejecting their 3.6 per cent offer for this year's pay rise. Paramedics joined nursing strikes in the winter of 2022-23 and could vote to do so again if they cannot get a better offer from Health Secretary Wes Streeting. National Secretary Rachel Harrison said: 'We have written to Wes Streeting, asking him to meet with us to discuss pay and other issues.' The Royal College of Nursing is also angry at getting a lower wage rise than doctors — and hospital consultants with the BMA are also considering striking again. As resident doctors, formerly called junior doctors, kicked off their strike to demand for a 29 per cent pay rise over the 5.4 per cent offer, Mr Streeting warned he could not guarantee patient safety. He said: 'I'm really proud of the way that NHS leaders and frontline staff have mobilised to minimise the disruption and the risk of harm to patients. 'What I can't do is guarantee there will be none. That's why the BMA's action is so irresponsible.' The BMA has made one exception for its strike so far. It allowed resident doctors to be called in to cover neo-natal intensive care at Nottingham City Hospital to protect newborn babies' lives. Strike leader Dr Melissa Ryan, who works there, said: 'We don't have enough senior staff to cover the doctors that aren't there. "It is important to us that those very sick babies get a lot of care.'

Map reveals where it will cost you $40,000 to give BIRTH... as natural-born population risks going 'extinct'
Map reveals where it will cost you $40,000 to give BIRTH... as natural-born population risks going 'extinct'

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Map reveals where it will cost you $40,000 to give BIRTH... as natural-born population risks going 'extinct'

Americans living in 10 states may have to fork over nearly $30,000 to give birth, shocking new data reveals. In Alaska, mothers opting for a vaginal birth can expect to receive a bill for $29,000, including both insurance and out-of-pocket costs. Going with a C-section? That will be an extra $10,000 for moms living in America's 49th state, twice the national average. For vaginal births, which just over 66 percent of American women choose, New York and New Jersey followed closely behind, both costing about $21,800. Connecticut and California rounded out the top five priciest states to have a vaginal birth, totaling $20,600 and $20,400, respectively. And for the 1.2million women in the US who undergo a C-section every year, Maine and Vermont were the two most expensive states behind Alaska, each costing roughly $28,800. States rounding out the list of most expensive C-sections were Oregon and New Jersey, with price tags of $28,700 and $26,900. Meanwhile, women giving birth in Mississippi paid the least on average for both vaginal birth and C-sections. A typical vaginal birth in the Magnolia state runs roughly $9,900, while a C-section is about $11,100. The rankings, compiled by health insurance claims analyst FAIR Health, are based on records from 51billion commercial health insurance claims filed nationwide within the last several years. All services were considered in-network, meaning insurance covered some of all of the costs and a patient paid the remaining balance. The costs account for both the portions paid by the patients and by the insurance companies. Services included vaginal or C-section delivery, anesthesia, ultrasounds, lab work, breast pumps and fetal nonstress tests, which measure a fetus' heart rate and movement in the womb. The average vaginal birth in the US is $15,200, whereas a C-section costs $19,300. C-sections tend to cost more than vaginal births because they need more specialized surgical equipment and often require longer hospital stays and more involved post-operative care. Recent research suggests the cost of childbirth in the US increased 22 percent from 2017 to 2021, a factor potentially driving America's fertility crisis. The current fertility rate reached a new low of 1.6 births per woman, according to a new CDC report. This is well below the 2.1 needed to sustain population growth. It's also a sharp decline from 3.5 in 1960 and 2.1 in the 1990s, showing women are having far fewer children than their mothers and grandmothers. Young Americans have also cited a shifting focus on their careers and climate change as reasons for not having children. Experts previously told that while the US has not seen a 'downward trend economically' in the way countries like South Korea, Japan, or Germany have, the effects of depopulation in the US would be 'detrimental.' They fear depopulation would put a significant strain on the job market and drastically reduce the number of workers in the country. This would drive up the cost of goods. Dr Abigail Hall, an associate professor of economics at the University of Tampa, told 'Economically speaking, depopulation is detrimental for economic growth.' As the population dwindles, there will be fewer people to pay off the nation's debt. For example, the Heritage Foundation estimates a baby born in 2007 will assume $30,500 in debt. However, a baby born in 2020 will assume $59,000. Dr Hall said: 'One thing people would probably witness is that it's going to be harder to find people to fill jobs.' In FAIR Health's analysis, Alaska was the most expensive state for vaginal and C-section births. The former added up to $29,152 while the latter was $39,532. This could be due to one in five Alaskans living in remote locations, meaning medical supplies and personnel have to be transported by air, driving up costs. Rural areas also have fewer hospitals to choose from, leading to many increasing costs since there is little competition. New York, New Jersey and Connecticut all followed closest behind Alaska for the cost of vaginal births. Costs in these states range from $20,600 to $21,800. The Northeast has a generally higher cost of living and rent than the rest of the country, driving up overall hospital stay and material prices. The area also has a high concentration of academic, renowned medical centers like Columbia, Yale New-Haven and NYU Langone, which tend to charge more. California, which rounds out the top five most expensive states for a vaginal birth at $20,390, requires insurance companies to cover many maternity-related screenings that aren't mandatory in other states, which tends to drive up overall total cost. The list varied for C-section births. Following close behind Alaska was Maine with a cost of $28,794. Like Alaska, a significant portion of residents - 61 percent - live in rural areas, limiting their access to a variety of hospitals. Rural hospitals often have lower patient volumes but still have to pay to keep facilities open, so they typically charge more per patient to afford these costs. The same is true for Vermont, where it costs $28,747 on average to have a C-section. Oregon and New Jersey rounded out the top five C-section states, totaling $28,708 and $26,896. Meanwhile, Mississippi was the cheapest state to give birth either vaginally or via C-section. The former costs $9,847 while the latter is $11,110 on average. More than half of births in Mississippi are covered by Medicaid, according to the latest available data, which significantly lowers overall costs. Births in Mississippi are also more likely to occur in lower-cost community hospitals without advanced, costly facilities. Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana and Tennessee also ranked closely behind, with costs ranging from $10,000 to $11,500 for a vaginal birth and $11,500 to $15,000 for a C-section.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store