Royal fans think King Charles made Trooping the Colour 'faux pas'
King Charles appears to have made a Trooping The Colour 'faux pas', royal fans claim. The celebration is due to kick off later today (Saturday, June 14) in honour of the monarch 's birthday.
Every year, more than 1,400 soldiers, 400 musicians and 200 horses make their way to Horse Guard 's Parade via The Mall in honour of the big day. The festivities are brought to an end each year with an RAF flypast, with senior members of the Royal Family watching from the balcony at Buckingham Palace in front of adoring crowds. Trooping the Colour has been held in June every year for hundreds of years.
Male members of the Royal Family will traditionally wear the uniforms of different regiments of the Household Division, of which Charles is Colonel in Chief. But eagle-eyed royal enthusiasts think they have spotted what they claim is a mistake in King Charles ' uniform from last year's parade.
Taking to Reddit, one fan said: "There seems to be a faux pas in the King's uniform of Colonel-in-Chief of the Irish Guards at Trooping the Colour today.
"He seems to be wearing the sash of a general officer's rather than the appropriate colonel's sash for the regiment."
Another added: "Good catch! I think that probably is a faux pas. Of course we could retrospectively justify it by saying it's his army and he can wear what he likes."
The Royal Family's Facebook page last year shed light on Charles' choice of attire, and revealed there was a reason he chose to wear the uniform he selected.
"Members of the family taking part in today's parade proudly wore uniforms of regiments with which they have special associations," the post read.
"The King, Colonel in Chief of the Household Division, wore the tunic of the Guard of Honour Order, the Irish Guards. The Monarch always wears the uniform of whichever Regiment's Colour is being trooped."
Royal fans previously discovered why King Charles marks his birthday in June, despite being born in November.
According to the official Royal Family website, Trooping The Colour "has marked the official birthday of the British Sovereign for over 260 years."
The celebration is thought to have begun during the reign of King Charles II, who sat on the throne from 1660 until 1685.
"Regimental flags of the British Army were historically described as 'Colours,'" The Household Division's website states.
"The principal role of a regiment's Colours was to provide a rallying point on the battlefield."
The Household Division explains young officers would march between the ranks of troops, holding the Colours high and giving rise to the parade we know and love today.
"So, what today is a great tradition began life as a vital and practical parade designed to aid unit recognition before a battle commenced.
"In 1748, it was decided that this parade would be used to mark the official birthday of the Sovereign and it became an annual event after George III became King in 1760," the website continues.
"Today, this colourful spectacular remains a celebration of the Sovereign's official birthday."
George III, like the current monarch, was born in November. However, holding a parade in winter was deemed a risky move thanks to the UK's reliably unreliable weather.
June was chosen because it is more likely to be warm and dry, offering better conditions for a royal parade.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
8 minutes ago
- BBC News
Sandringham Flower Show returns before break
A local flower show held for the past 142 years on the King's Norfolk estate is getting under way before it takes a two-year annual Sandringham Flower Show, organised by 15 to 20 local volunteers, attracts about 20,000 people each year and is taking place on Wednesday, to be attended by King Charles III and Queen the event will pause to make way for the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) touring flower show in 2026 and 2029.A spokeswoman for the locally organised show said it was "fully supportive" of the new RHS event. "We're doing what we can to help them and they're doing what they can to help us," she year was the first time in 30 years no member of the Royal Family had attended the Sandringham Flower Show was a favourite of Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, who attended each year after World War Two. The show traditionally sees local colleges, agricultural businesses and experts taking part, while in the amateurs' marquee, local gardening and horticultural clubs enter a judged display competition.A month before the show, Royal estate employees, pensioners and tenants have the opportunity to enter their gardens in two judged Flower Show's profits are donated annually to local charities, and it said it had given more than £825,000 since 1977. A year ago, Graham Brown, chair of the show, said: "The future of the show is going to carry on."I will see the show through the RHS and we will work with them to make sure our show is incorporated with their show."Sandringham is changing and we all have to move with that." The King became patron of the RHS in 2024 and its 2026 event will be a six-day its website, RHS director general Clare Matterson said the decision to run the new touring events was to ensure it reached more people "in new locations".RHS director of shows, commercial and innovation, Helena Pettit, said the changes were the biggest it had made in a generation."We want to inspire current and new audiences with world class horticulture and provide access to the UK's best plants people to help even more people garden and grow," she said. Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Daily Mirror
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Real reason Princess Anne ‘criticised' by United States media for not being ‘fairytale' princess
Princess Anne was 'not received well' when she visited the United States for the first time in 1970, being accused of looking 'sulky' and even nicknamed 'Princess Sourpuss' While she might be considered one of the most popular members of the Royal Family now, Princess Ann e was once subject to vicious barbs from the US media. The Princess Royal made her first official visit to the US in 1970 when she joined her older brother in Washington. Anne and the-then Prince Charles spent two days touring around the capital and meeting President Richard Nixon. Anne however was 'not very well received' by the American media at the time. She was branded 'sulky' and during one sharp exchange with a journalist replied with 'I don't do interviews' when asked what she thought about the Washington Monument. Reports at the time suggested Anne could have been 'tired', having previously spent 10 days touring Canada. On Channel 5's Princess Anne: A Quite Remarkable Royal, journalist Victoria Murphy explains that the US press were quick to highlight that Anne should have 'smiled more'. She said: 'One of the first trips that she did officially was to go with Prince Charles to the US in 1970. 'This trip was actually quite challenging because she got some negative press as a result of this trip from the US media. They were quite quick to pick up on the fact that she wasn't smiling very often. They thought that she didn't look like she was enjoying herself as much as they thought she might.' Royal commentator Wesley Kerr however believes it was Anne's natural expression that led Americans to believe she wasn't looking happy. He said: 'Her resting expression isn't smiling and happiness so I think there was some criticism from the US press that she wasn't a fairytale princess, that she was perhaps a bit surly.' In 2021, commentator Penny Junor told that many journalists in the States felt as though Anne looked 'sulky' during her US tour. It led Anne to being nicknamed 'Princess Sourpuss' by Americans. Junor said: 'She went to the White House to visit Nixon when he was President and there was a lot of negative press because she seemed to be so sulky. 'She looked at the time as though she didn't want to be there, they said. She refused to answer anyone's questions, snappily saying 'I don't give interviews'. Anne and Charles arrived in Washington on July 18, 1970 as part of a semi-official visit. They were hosted by President Nixon's two daughters, Julie and Tricia Nixon and the President's son-in-law, David Eisenhower. At the time of the visit 19-year-old Anne had only recently taken on royal responsibilities. The stay saw the royals visiting the Lincoln Memorial, Mount Vernon and the Smithsonian Institution's Space Museum. They attended a barbecue at Camp David and a Washington Senators baseball game. On the final evening, the Nixons hosted a dinner and a party at the White House, which was attended by over 700 guests.
New Statesman
38 minutes ago
- New Statesman
David Gentleman's pensées for the novice artist
David Gentleman. Courtesy of Pelican Books Among the 400 or so instructional letters sent by Lord Chesterfield to his illegitimate son in an attempt to school the young man in 'the Art of Becoming a Man of the World and a Gentleman' there is one, dated 1747, that touches on the importance of art. 'I find that you are a tolerably good landscape painter, and can present the several views of Switzerland to the curious,' he wrote, 'I am very glad of it, as it is a proof of some attention.' Attention, the nobleman thought, was the key attribute not just of art but of life itself, since 'the world is a country which nobody ever yet knew by description'. Attention is also one of the elements stressed by the artist-designer David Gentleman in his own book of instruction, Lessons for Young Artists. Gentleman's is a more humble endeavour than Chesterfield's and is notable for its simplicity, but he too believes that to understand the world you need to be in it. He is now 95 and this charming, illustrated volume presents a distillation of some the wisdom gained during a near 80-year career. That span has seen him become one of Britain's most ubiquitous though least-known practitioners. On leaving the Royal College of Art in 1953 he set himself against teaching as a way of subsiding being an artist, as many of his peers did, and relied instead on commissions, for whatever was needed and wherever they came from. His first was for a set of wood engravings for a book called What About Wine? and, thanks to his versatility and inventiveness, they have kept coming. He hasn't always warmed to them, and one brief for an American company was, he later learned, for pesticides that had turned out to be poisonous for the farmers who used them. 'I realised that besides finding interesting and well-paid work, it ought to be responsible, too,' he notes. But, as he says in one of the short commentaries that explains each of his artistic nuggets, jobs are a necessity and, faced with a workaday task, 'I just had to get it done.' The reward, he says, was slow accumulation that eventually led to recognition and a reputation. Nevertheless, it was 20 years before he held an exhibition of his work. It helped that Gentleman was not just the son of two painters but was taught at the RCA by John Nash and Edward Bawden. It is a bloodline that links him directly to a group of figures who transformed British art in the first half of the 20th century, Paul Nash and Eric Ravilious among them. In the 1920s and 1930s the RCA was committed to the idea of allying art and design. Its principal, William Rothenstein, was determined to steer the students away from producing 'dreary imitations of Morris designs' and towards work that had a 'more alert spirit'. It was an ethos still prevalent when Gentleman studied there, and this heritage – and spirit – has long been apparent in his work. Indeed, Gentleman confesses that Bawden's influence in particular was in danger of becoming a little too insistent. When he noticed that there were echoes of his teacher cropping up in his own work, he 'consciously tried to avoid them'. This was not to denigrate Bawden but to make sure his own pictures were original rather than an imitation, however reverential. What makes Gentleman a significant figure is both the range and the quality of his work. He has found a form of artistic demotic that, certainly to Britons of a certain age, has a comfortable familiarity that nevertheless sparkles with imagination. Between 1962 and 2000, he created 103 stamps for the Post Office. His designs ranged from British trees, birds and building types to stamps commemorating the Battle of Britain, 50 years of the BBC, and the launch of Concorde. He has designed posters for London Transport and the National Trust and is responsible for a redesign of the Trust's oakleaf and acorn logo. He has created dustjackets for Faber & Faber and the New Penguin Shakespeare series – a staple for innumerable schoolchildren. He is responsible too for the platform murals at Charing Cross Tube Station showing the building of the Eleanor Cross, a 13th century stone monument; the commission came in 1975 with no brief from London Transport other than 'it had to explain how Charing Cross got its name'. He responded with a bande dessinée of 'medieval' wood engravings that were then expanded to life size. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Perhaps his most untypical work was with the placards he designed for the Stop the War Coalition following the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Using a typographical 'No' spattered with blood, he took advice from Tony Benn, whom he had first met when the latter served as postmaster general and Gentleman started designing stamps. For good measure, Gentleman was responsible for coming up with the 'Bliar' slogan too. So the guidance here comes from a long-lived and engaged mind. What Gentleman offers is the antidote to swathes of contemporary art-think and -speak. There is no talk in his book about 'meaning' or 'profundity', much less the wilful obfuscation and vapidity of much contemporary and conceptual art. Instead he proffers modest advice that in less authentic hands would be mere cracker-barrel slogans. Start with a pencil, he counsels, and draw quickly and then you'll get the essentials without being distracted by detail; sketch whatever is to hand; embrace the accidents of watercolour; return to motifs in different weathers and times of day; choose unlikely angles; look up. Attention, attention, attention. His pensées may not be worthy of Montesquieu but they are straightforward and have a validity that is applicable beyond the mere making of images: 'Keep your expectations slight'; 'Just get on with it'; 'You don't have to like, or be good at, everything'. And he accompanies these crisp strictures with a generous helping of his own pictures – drawings in pencil, pen and ink, wood engravings and lithographs, commercial designs and fully fledged watercolours, many from his travels. Some are from his patch of Camden Town in London (as in the view of Euston and King's Cross from the Regent's Canal, pictured above) and others are of the unshowy Suffolk countryside around the cottage he has owned for more than 40 years in a village ten miles from the coast. These pictures are invariably endearing, both observant and skilled, and, in his more considered watercolours, full of detail too. Part of their appeal is that they show a man in tune with the craft tradition; his are indisputably hand-eye works. And while David Gentleman must have looked into his soul many times over the years, he is far too good natured and well mannered to bother the viewer with what he has found there. Art, for him, is not knotted self-expression, revelation or provocation: 'We make art because it is interesting,' he says. It is not highfalutin, but it is a better definition than many. Lessons for Young Artists David Gentleman Particular Books, 192pp, £20 Purchasing a book may earn the NS a commission from who support independent bookshops [See more: Samuel Pepys's diary of a somebody] Related
