
Ungku Aziz measures poverty with cultural wisdom, the sarong index
IN Malaysia, the problem of poverty has been discussed and debated for a long time.
Still, few people have approached it with the dedication and wisdom of the late Royal Professor Ungku Abdul Aziz.
Ungku Aziz was well-known for his scholarly endeavours and profound concern for the well-being of the rural poor.
His creative approaches gave Malaysia applicable and culturally appropriate means of comprehending economic inequality.
His creation of the 'Sarong Index' is among the most noteworthy attempts to measure poverty, igniting discussions that are still relevant today.
An inspiration for social transformation
Ungku Aziz, also known as Ungku Abdul Aziz bin Ungku Abdul Hamid, was born in London in 1922 and studied in Malaysia.
From the beginning, his adventure was extraordinary. After deciding to pursue an academic career, Ungku Aziz immediately gained recognition for his compassion and progressive viewpoints.
He advocated for the economic advancement of Malaysians, paying special attention to the rural populace, who comprised a large portion of the country's population in the early years of independence.
In addition to being respected as an academic, he was a social reform pioneer whose influence lasted long after his death in December 2020.
In addition to studying textbook economics, Ungku Aziz also examined the local and cultural markers that characterised Malaysian life to comprehend the extent of rural poverty.
In Malaysian development economics, he became a legend because his work laid the groundwork for socioeconomic policies that influenced government programmes and provided genuine insight into rural poverty.
The sarong index: A creative metric
Ungku Aziz's 'Sarong Index' is among his most famous works. On the surface, it appears pretty straightforward.
The number of sarongs, a traditional Malaysian garment frequently worn in rural families, in a family is divided by the number of household members to determine the Sarong Index.
According to Ungku Aziz, the sarong was a concrete representation of material stability for rural people and an indication that went beyond simple income levels.
This index was quite valuable, particularly since Malaysia lacked sophisticated measures for assessing poverty and a robust infrastructure for collecting data.
According to Ungku Aziz, the quantity of sarongs in a home gauges the general well-being of Malaysians living in rural areas rather than just a measure of apparel.
A basic degree of comfort and stability was indicated when households had enough sarongs, which signified they had money to spend on things other than food.
On the other hand, the lack of several sarongs spoke to a lifestyle that failed to adhere to even the most fundamental cultural standards, suggesting a deprivation beyond mere material poverty.
Transcending data: Cultural perspective on poverty
The distinctive feature of Ungku Aziz's method was its consideration of cultural background. Given that the sarong is more than simply clothing, the Sarong Index captured the social subtleties of Malay living, whereas many other poverty indices are quantitative.
When worn in the house, sarongs convey warmth, cosiness, and cultural identity. By examining sarongs, Ungku Aziz could quantify cultural values, self-respect, and dignity in ways that traditional economic indices could not.
Since it reduced poverty to a straightforward yet relatable visual, this unusual indication struck a deep chord with decision-makers.
It spoke to those who recognised the importance of the sarong in daily Malay living without using complicated economic terms.
The capacity of Ungku Aziz to innovate in both economic theory and the real-world applications of social research was demonstrated by this method.
Developing national initiatives to reduce poverty
The Sarong Index may show Ungku Aziz's wider contributions to Malaysia's socioeconomic policies. His efforts to reduce poverty greatly influenced Malaysia's development initiatives.
The Second Malaysia Plan, a governmental blueprint containing goals for economic growth, better education, and rural development, was formulated in the 1960s, largely thanks to Ungku Aziz's views.
Through the Sarong Index, Ungku Aziz emphasised the significance of comprehending rural poverty in a comprehensive and context-sensitive manner, arguing that national development initiatives need to consider the cultural context of the areas they were intended to assist.
Additionally, his idea paved the way for rural cooperatives, which gave farmers in rural areas better economic possibilities, financial stability, and collective bargaining strength.
Ungku Aziz tackled structural poverty by encouraging cooperatives, which made it possible for the impoverished in rural areas to engage in the country's economy more fully.
Ungku Aziz's lasting influence
The Sarong Index illustrates how Ungku Aziz's theories questioned conventional notions of poverty.
He measured poverty by considering cultural significance, dignity, and quality of life in addition to economic data.
Even today, the Sarong Index reminds us that poverty impacts every facet of human existence, not just a lack of money.
In this regard, generations of economists and politicians have been motivated by Ungku Aziz's groundbreaking work to embrace cultural settings and think imaginatively about poverty.
His theories, which strongly emphasised social cohesiveness and local identity as key components of sustainable development, were innovative for their time.
As Malaysia continues to address poverty and injustice, Ungku Aziz's teachings serve as a reminder of the importance of careful, context-driven social policymaking.
Future prospects: The sarong index's current significance
Today, with Malaysia and other nations dealing with fast-changing socio-economic issues, the Sarong Index's guiding principles are still applicable.
Given the growing cost of living, economic inequality, and the gap between rural and urban areas, Ungku Aziz's analysis of poverty still has relevance for modern policymaking.
Using culturally relevant measures and locally relevant approaches, policymakers today may learn from Ungku Aziz's approach to effectively measuring and addressing poverty.
Poverty is still closely linked to social conventions and cultural identity in rural communities, like those where Ungku Aziz spent his youth.
Despite its symbolic nature, the Sarong Index promotes a comprehensive approach to well-being that considers cultural continuity and community belonging.
Ungku Aziz's observations serve as a timely reminder of the significance of culturally sensitive development planning at a time when local customs are under danger from globalisation and quick economic change.
In addition to being an economist, Ungku Aziz was a humanitarian who valued human dignity in the struggle against poverty.
His creation, the Sarong Index, offers a novel approach to gauging rural poverty while maintaining cultural sensitivity and demonstrates his profound knowledge of Malay society.
Through the Sarong Index, Ungku Aziz provided Malaysia with a cutting-edge instrument to view and combat poverty, which is still applicable despite the difficulties of today.
As Malaysia progresses, Ungku Aziz's work serves as a lighthouse, reminding politicians, economists, and social activists that the development road must honour the cultures and identities it aims to elevate.
His legacy reminds us that reducing poverty concerns more than just statistics. It also concerns the community, humanity, and respect. —June 11, 2025
Datin Sri Prof Dr Suhaiza Hanim Binti Dato Mohamad Zailani is the Director of the Ungku Aziz Centre for Development Studies, Universiti Malaya.
The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia.
Main image: Pinterest

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
9 hours ago
- The Sun
From dial-up to glow-up
AH, the generation gap. That mystical space-time distortion where logic disappears, sarcasm kena tangkap polis and someone is always yelling 'Where's the remote?!' while sitting on it like it is a throne. Gather the whole Malaysian family and suddenly it is like shoving five drama channels into one Astro decoder. One atuk is reliving Konfrontasi, one niece is crying because her TikTok only got 12 likes and someone is trying to connect to the WiFi like it is a life-support machine. Let Makcik break it down for you – generation by generation – with cili api, no-filter truth and proper birth years so no one can pretend: 'Eh? Bukan I.' Yes, you. Especially you. Baby boomers (1946–1964): Tupperware tacticians and WhatsApp warriors Boomers are Malaysia's OG superheroes. They survived rationing, curfews, 14 general elections and three different government logos – all while reusing the same ice cream tub for sambal since 1986. They don't trust GPS – they are the GPS. 'Nak ke pasar? Senang je. Belok kanan lepas rumah arwah Mak Timah, pastu nampak pokok jambu, belok kiri. Kalau sampai longkang, dah salah.' They believe Tiger Balm can cure heartbreak, gout and GST trauma. But try teaching them how to scan QR codes – suddenly become blur, pening and password goes missing. Favourite quote: 'Zaman kami dulu, semua boleh settle dengan rotan dan kuih kapit.' Mood: Forwarded many times. Believe it or die. Generation X (1965–1980): The silent sufferers with slipper accuracy Ah, Gen X. The forgotten middle child of the generation family tree. This is Makcik's generation. We survived without Google, got our gossip from Majalah URTV and played mix tapes we painstakingly recorded off the radio – complete with DJ interruptions. We were the first computer users – the computers that went peeeoooww kwekkkk krak krak when logging into the internet. One email took 10 minutes and made the house sound like a spaceship docking. Now? We are the default tech support, chauffeur, emergency contact and family group admin. Sandwiched between cranky Boomers and emotionally complex Gen Zs. Still using Hotmail, won't throw out that one perfectly functional Nokia phone and still not sure how we ended up paying for everything. Anthem: 'Let me finish this email, then I'll fix the toilet, water the plants, pay bills and scream into a pillow.' Catchphrase: 'We didn't talk about mental health; we had chores and teh o ais limau.' Millennials (1981–1996): High hopes, low bank balance and premium burnout These poor souls were told to chase the dream. Now they are chasing Grab drivers because 'alamat tak betul'. They grew up during Y2K, Britney and dial-up – and now, they cry every time Shopee has a sale because... money mana? They have turned their trauma into Twitter threads, their side hustle into a full-time grind and straight into burnout. Still nostalgic about RM1 nasi lemak and waiting to afford property that is not beside a monsoon drain. Mood: Tired but aesthetic. Catchphrase: 'I just want to be a plant. No thoughts, just sunlight.' Generation Z (1997–2012): Emotionally fluent, logically fried Some were born before the internet exploded, some during the WiFi boom but all raised by TikTok and fuelled by Bubble Tea. These children are chronically online and emotionally aware but also cannot fill up a LHDN borang without spiralling. They use words like 'vibe check' and 'toxic' in conversations with their cat. They know their attachment style, birth chart and Spotify Wrapped but not their IC number. Ask them to make a phone call? Panic attack. Ask them to speak in public? Immediate respiratory collapse. But they will post a two-minute crying video on TikTok with perfect lighting and Comic Sans captions. Mantra: 'Protect your peace. Block your uncle.' Weakness: Slow WiFi, clingy boomers and being tagged in a 2009 Facebook photo. Generation Alpha (2013 onwards): The touchscreen tyrants in Crocs Tiny hands. Mega attitude. These are the iPad generals of the household. Don't be fooled by their innocent Crocs. These children are trained negotiators with volume levels that can reset your nervous system. They don't 'watch' television. They command it: 'Skip ad, change channel, play next.' Your remote? They have changed the settings. Your Netflix? Now in Spanish. Their tantrums? Full surround sound, complete with special effects. Their attention span? Shorter than the Astro ad skip button. YouTube is their religion. Google is their teacher. And if you dare say 'no more tablet', they will look at you like you just cancelled Raya. Catchphrase: 'I'm not sleepy!' while snoring in mid-scream. Power move: Accidentally ordering McDonald's and blaming Siri. So, what now, Malaysia? Peace treaty or sambal belacan showdown? Boomers are yelling, Gen X is groaning, Millennials are spiralling, Gen Z is ghosting and Alpha is screaming like a banshee possessed by Spongebob. But deep down, there is love – a messy, spicy, passive-aggressive type of love. It is the Malaysian kind – the 'nah, eat this' and 'you've gained weight but I bought your favourite kuih' type. Want peace? Here is the deal: - Boomers: Stop forwarding videos with 'Sila sebarkan' like it is wartime propaganda. - Gen X: Change your password from '12345678'. Even your cat knows it. - Millennials: You don't need to turn every crisis into a Canva quote. Just nap. - Gen Z: Not everyone is gaslighting you. Some people are just socially awkward. - Alpha: Sit down. Be quiet. Eat the nuggets. It is still chicken. And when all else fails? Turn off the WiFi. Like moth to a flame, they will all gather in the living room, blinking in confusion and ready to talk like it is 1995.


New Straits Times
a day ago
- New Straits Times
How Malaysians can push back Earth Overshoot Day
LETTERS: Earth Overshoot Day (EOD) marks the date when humanity's demand for ecological resources exceeds what Earth can regenerate in that same year. In 2025, this day falls on July 24, 2025, about a week earlier than in 2024, when it was marked on Aug 1. This means we are consuming natural resources at a faster rate than before, deepening our ecological deficit. This year's EOD highlights a disturbing fact: humanity is living as though we have 1.8 Earths to support our consumption patterns. Since 1970, we have been in ecological overshoot. Our cumulative ecological debt has now grown to the point where Earth would need 22 years to regenerate what we have used. This represents an unsustainable path and a warning that we cannot continue business as usual. For Malaysians, this is not just a global issue but also a local one. As consumers, we must reflect on how our everyday habits contribute to this imbalance. From excessive energy usage and food waste to overreliance on single-use plastics and imported goods, each choice adds up. What can Malaysian consumers do? Buy only what you need. Avoid impulsive purchases and reduce waste, especially food waste. Store food properly and finish leftovers. Choose items with less packaging or bring your bags and containers. Support the local economy. Buy locally made goods and produce. This reduces the carbon footprint from transportation and helps strengthen our local economy. Conserve energy. Turn off lights and appliances when not in use. Use energy-efficient equipment. Consider using solar-powered solutions where possible. Repair instead of throwing things away. Reuse items when you can, and recycle properly. Encourage children and family members to do the same. Join community efforts and support local environmental programmes, such as tree planting or clean-up drives. Talk to friends and neighbours about small lifestyle changes that can make a big difference. As a nation, we have a shared responsibility to protect the Earth. If we fail to change course, future generations may face severe environmental challenges that range from extreme weather and resource shortages to biodiversity loss. If we take action today, we can move the date of Earth Overshoot Day later each year. This would be a sign that we are moving toward balance and sustainability. Let us be remembered not as the generation that used up the Earth, but as the one that restored it.


Malaysiakini
a day ago
- Malaysiakini
A soldier's harrowing memoir of service to country
My platoon commander said, 'Sir, the operations officer told me not to follow your orders and not to return fire if fired upon the patrol, that they are all our saudara (relations by virtue of them being Muslims).' - Somalia (Chapter 56 - World food programme) COMMENT | The quote that opens this review happens towards the end of Major D Swami Gwekanandam's (henceforth the major) career in the crucible, which was Somalia. The quote exemplifies 'the orang kita' mentality, which crept into the armed services and demonstrates how destructive this agenda is to the Malaysian security forces. The fact that it came from a convert is even more depressing. Readers will discover this and much more in a memoir which can only be described as Dickensian in its portrayal of social order and Kubrickian in its depiction of warfare and military dysfunction. This is a politically incorrect memoir. The major not only highlights the systemic racial dysfunction in the army but also does not spare himself from scrutiny. Being a good officer does not mean you are a civilised man.