DBKL ticked off for being unreasonable over Dataran Merdeka events
PETALING JAYA : A requirement by Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) for all gatherings at Dataran Merdeka to
A requirement by Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) for all gatherings at Dataran Merdeka to
obtain official approval has been described as unreasonable and an example of selective enforcement.
A human rights activist, lawyer P Rajsurian, said a recent peaceful book-reading and discussion session which was disrupted by enforcement officers could have qualified as a social activity permitted under the bylaw cited by city hall.
He said DBKL's enforcement seemed selective as many other social activities were allowed to go on undisturbed.
'If you go to Dataran Merdeka, especially on weekends, you will see many people engaging in social events like picnicking without being disturbed,' he told FMT. 'Do those who picnic now need to obtain permits as well?'
Rajsurian also said the disruption raises serious concerns about how the authorities interpret the constitutional rights on freedom of movement, speech, and assembly.
On Tuesday, DBKL said that all events at Dataran Merdeka, regardless of nature, require the mayor's prior approval, citing a city by-law which prohibits speeches, demonstrations, campaigns, or political and social activities without a permit.
Events involving public assemblies must also obtain police approval.
DBKL's statement came after the National Youth Federation of Malaysia claimed that a peaceful book-reading and discussion event at Dataran Merdeka was disrupted last Saturday.
Nalini Elumalai, a senior programme officer with Article 19 Malaysia, said the latest incident showed a continuing intolerance toward freedom of expression. She called for open dialogue on the issue.
'The government should recognise and respect Dataran Merdeka as a legitimate venue for public gatherings and discussions, ensuring it is afforded the same level of access as any other public space in the country,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Kelantan open to talks with AIDS council, cops over LGBT event
Kelantan deputy menteri besar Fadzli Hassan said programmes touching on sensitivities must be approved by the relevant authorities. PETALING JAYA : The Kelantan government has expressed its willingness to meet with police and the Malaysian AIDS Council regarding the recent organisation of a programme related to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender communities in Kota Bharu. Deputy menteri besar Fadzli Hassan said they were seeking to discuss and gain a clearer understanding of the event so the matter can be resolved diplomatically, and to dispel any unfounded allegations. 'Perhaps the mistake was not the organiser's. That's why it needs to be investigated first so that police are not wrongly blamed by the public. 'The police have their job, the AIDS council also has its responsibilities. 'Any programme that goes against the state government's policies and the customs of Kelantan's people is something we simply cannot accept,' Bernama reported him as saying at the Kota Darulnaim Complex today. Fadzli said programmes touching on sensitivities, especially when held within village communities, require permission from the relevant authorities such as the Kelantan Islamic religious affairs department, police and others. He said the state government can also take appropriate action if any event is found to have violated any of its regulations In mid-June, Kelantan police raided an LGBT-related event involving more than 20 men at a bungalow on Jalan Kemumin in Kota Bharu. Kelantan police chief Yusoff Mamat was reported as saying the operation was conducted based on tip-offs and intelligence gathered by a special task force, following complaints. A search of the premises uncovered hundreds of condoms and several boxes of HIV medication stored in a special room believed to be used as a storage place by the organisers. The Malaysian AIDS Council said it had conducted an outreach session on June 17 in Kemumin to engage with high-risk communities as part of HIV prevention efforts before the police raid. The programme, which ran from 8pm to 2am, was part of a strategic approach by the health ministry to deliver more inclusive and community-centred HIV treatment services.
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Anwar's constitutional reference appeal for case management tomorrow
Anwar Ibrahim wants the Court of Appeal to refer eight legal questions, which he said arise from a civil suit brought by former research assistant Yusoff Rawther, to the Federal Court for determination. PUTRAJAYA : The Court of Appeal has brought forward case management of Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's constitutional reference appeal to tomorrow, with a view to disposing of the case on an expedited basis. Anwar is appealing against the High Court's refusal to refer eight legal questions – which he claims arise from a civil suit brought by former research assistant Yusoff Rawther – to the Federal Court for determination. An e-mail sent out by senior assistant registrar Ahmad Izuddin Fajri Fakrullah, sighted by FMT, said the case management was being brought forward as the appeals court bench had indicated this morning that an early hearing should be held. As such, Izuddin said case management, previously scheduled for Sept 2, has been brought forward to tomorrow. Lawyer Rafique Rashid Ali, appearing for Yusoff, who filed his suit in 2021 against Anwar over an alleged assault, confirmed the matter. 'The case management will be held online,' he said when contacted. Earlier today, a three-member bench chaired by Justice Ruzima Ghazali said the stay should be granted as Anwar had shown special circumstances. Ruzima, who sat with Justices Wong Kian Kheong and Lim Hock Leng, however, said parties were at liberty to apply for an early hearing date. On June 4, High Court Justice Roz Mawar Rozain dismissed Anwar's reference application and directed that the trial proceed on the seven days previously set between June 16 and June 25. In her decision, Roz Mawar said none of the questions posed in the application had crossed the threshold set out in Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 to justify a referral to the apex court. In a 21-page judgment, she said the application was misconceived as to the jurisdiction of the courts and based on speculative doctrines with no constitutional footing. On June 10, the Court of Appeal granted Anwar an interim stay pending today's hearing of the prime minister's stay application. The prime minister wants the apex court to determine whether Articles 5(1), 8(1), 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution grant him qualified immunity from the suit filed by Yusoff four years ago. Yusoff's suit relates to events which allegedly took place before Anwar took office on Nov 22, 2022. A grandson of the late Penang consumer advocate SM Mohamed Idris, Yusoff claims he was assaulted at Anwar's home in Segambut in October 2018. He is seeking general, special, aggravated and exemplary damages, as well as interest, costs and other relief deemed fit by the court. Anwar denies the claim and has filed a countersuit.
Free Malaysia Today
4 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Lawyer wants BM version of constitution declared as authoritative text
The suit filed in the Kuala Lumpur High Court names the government as the defendant. PETALING JAYA : A lawyer has filed a suit against the government in the Kuala Lumpur High Court, seeking a declaration that the Bahasa Malaysia version of the Federal Constitution is the authoritative text. Haniff Khatri Abdulla said he filed the writ of summons and statement of claim through the law firm Ahmad Fuad Abi & Aidil. The suit names the government as the defendant and is aimed at getting the High Court to declare that the Bahasa Malaysia version of the constitution should take precedence over the English version. 'This suit is based on Article 160B of the Federal Constitution, which provides that if and when the constitution has been translated into the national language, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong may prescribe the national language text as the authoritative text. 'After that, if there is any conflict or inconsistency between the national language and English text, then the national language text shall prevail,' he said. Although the Agong had launched the BM version of the constitution on Sept 29, 2003, Haniff said, the government has yet to make it the authoritative version. 'Even more than two decades later, the government continues to fail, refuse and/or neglect to enforce the position of the text in the national language as the authoritative version,' he said. He claimed this was a breach of the government's constitutional duty to ensure that it took the necessary steps to uphold and dignify the national language. 'It is highly unreasonable that a sovereign and independent nation like Malaysia still does not have an authoritative constitutional text in its own national language, more than six decades after achieving independence,' he said. In 2023, then attorney-general Idrus Harun said the Attorney-General's Chambers planned to suggest that the government make the Bahasa Malaysia version of the constitution the authoritative text. However, he said, this was subject to the approval of the king. This proposal was met with opposition from an interfaith council, which said relying on the Bahasa Malaysia text would have an effect on the Federal Court ruling on unilateral conversion. An MP also said such a move must first obtain Sabah and Sarawak's approval.
