Fairer and transparent KZN budget urgently needed
This is according to the DA in KZN, which says the 2025 Division of Revenue Bill forms the cornerstone of the province's fiscal framework.
DA KZN Spokesperson on Finance, Tim Brauteseth, says this Bill determines how nationally-raised revenue is distributed across the three spheres of government.
He says there needs to be a greater focus on the Bill's implications for KZN's government departments and municipalities.
In education, Brauteseth said, while allocations have increased nominally, they fail to keep pace with inflation, rising pupil numbers, and infrastructure backlogs.
'This, while our rural schools continue to operate without proper sanitation, libraries, or digital access. We call for a ringfenced infrastructure grant for rural schools and performance-linked incentives for provinces that improve literacy and numeracy outcomes,' said Brauteseth.
Meanwhile, in health, he said the provincial hospitals and clinics are under strain due to staff shortages, outdated equipment.
Despite funds intended for medicine being ringfenced, he said poor management of medicine stockpiles hampers timely delivery, to the ultimate detriment of patients.
Moreover, Brauteseth added that the social development allocations remain modest despite growing demand.
'During recent public hearings, citizens raised concerns about the funding of NPOs that deliver critical services.
'KZN's departments of transport and public works face similar challenges. Road maintenance and infrastructure upgrades are essential for economic development, yet funding remains unspent in the case of transport; close to R1-billion will remain unspent,' he said.
Don't have the ZO app? Download it to your Android or Apple device here:
HAVE YOUR SAY
Like our Facebook page and follow us on Twitter.
For news straight to your phone invite us:
WhatsApp – 060 784 2695
Instagram – zululand_observer
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Samsung gambles on its slimmer but costlier new foldable phones to fend off Chinese challengers
Yet analysts predict foldable smartphones will remain a niche segment, now accounting for just 1.5% of the market. Samsung Electronics unveiled thinner, lighter new foldable phones in New York on 9 July, as it aims to fend off Chinese competition in the higher-margin, premium segment that remains untapped by archrival Apple. The stakes are high. The South Korean company lost its global smartphone crown to Apple in 2023 and faces growing competition from Chinese rivals such as Huawei and Honor. Meanwhile, Samsung's mainstay chip business has suffered a profit slump stemming in part from its delayed supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips to Nvidia. Samsung's mobile president and chief operating officer, Choi Won-joon, said his most important mission was to make Samsung a leader in AI-powered smartphones. 'I believe that foldable phones, integrated with AI features, are ready to become mainstream by offering [a] unique, differentiated experience,' he told Reuters in his first media interview since being promoted in March. He said Samsung aimed to take a leadership position in AI by enhancing cooperation with external partners such as Google – unlike Apple, which has been using in-house AI technology that has faced delays in adding key features. Samsung also unveiled its first smartwatches equipped with Google's AI voice assistant, Gemini, which can make recommendations to the wearer, such as good locations for a run, for instance. Samsung said in April that it was pushing ahead with a premium product strategy as US tariffs threatened to dampen demand and raise component costs. The smartphone maker increased the US price of the Galaxy Z Fold 7 by 5% from its predecessor Fold 6, and it will cost $1,999. It also introduced a less-expensive version of its Galaxy Z Flip 7 clamshell phone, Flip 7 FE, priced at $899. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 is equipped with Qualcomm's fast processor, Snapdragon 8 Elite, whereas the Galaxy Z Flip 7 is powered by Samsung's in-house Exynos chips. Analysts said Samsung's new models tackled some of the issues with foldable phones, such as bulkiness, and would create a premium halo around the brand. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 weighs 10% less than its predecessor and is 26% thinner. But high prices and a lack of use cases mean foldable phones are likely to remain a niche segment, the analysts said. Data from the research firm IDC showed they account for just 1.5% of the total smartphone market. Research firm Canalys predicts that Samsung's foldable shipments, which peaked in 2022, will remain flat or decline slightly in 2025. This is in line with the broader market's flat growth, according to data provided to Reuters. Samsung's foldable smartphones account for 4% of its total phone sales, but 16% of those priced over $800, Canalys said. Its data shows Samsung's dominance of the foldable phone segment is being eroded by Honor and Huawei, which are enjoying strong sales, especially in China. Samsung will focus on the US, Europe and South Korea for foldable phone sales, Choi said at the unveiling on Wednesday. He said Samsung was 'working hard' to develop tri-foldable phones, which users can fold three ways, without elaborating on the launch date. Reuters/DM This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Socioeconomic crisis looms as US tariffs hit Eastern Cape's vital automotive industry hard
The Automotive Business Council says it is hopeful that a proposal for 40,000 tariff-free vehicles for export to the US will find favour, as the impact of tariffs in their current form will be catastrophic for both the manufacturing industry and the Eastern Cape. 'This is not just a trade issue, it's a socioeconomic crisis in the making,' CEO of the Automotive Business Council (Naamsa) Mikel Mabasa said on Tuesday. The organisation, like many others in the Eastern Cape, is grappling to come to terms with the devastating impact of export tariffs imposed by the United States. Mabasa said the export tariffs threatened thousands of jobs in the automotive sector, disrupted hard-won industrial capabilities, and risked devastating communities such as East London, where the automotive sector formed the economic heartbeat of the town. He said Naamsa was, however, encouraged by South Africa's early proposals for a quota of 40,000 duty-free vehicle units per annum, 'which would allow us to retain our footprint in this key market'. He said that if the country could not retain export markets such as the US, 'we risk turning vibrant industrial hubs into ghost towns'. Ripple effects through the value chain He said the ripple effects of production loss due to disappearing export markets would be felt throughout the automotive value chain – from component manufacturers to logistics providers, and across the thousands of workers and families who depended on the sector for their livelihoods. 'Export diversification and finding new markets is not something that can be achieved overnight. Our global competitors are already redirecting their exports into markets we traditionally serve. This intensifies the pressure on our original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), who must now absorb rising costs, reduce production, and reconsider future investments,' he said. Urgent diplomacy needed 'We have also taken note of President Cyril Ramaphosa's formal response on the same day, which confirmed South Africa's diplomatic and strategic approach to this matter. He said South Africa's automotive sector was particularly vulnerable to the 25% sectoral tariff imposed under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which specifically targeted automotive exports. This escalation in trade tensions poses a serious threat to one of South Africa's most globally integrated and export-oriented industries. He said the United States had consistently been South Africa's second-largest trading partner and key export destination for South African manufactured vehicles. Agoa at risk – billions in trade and thousands of vehicles 'Since the inception of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa), the automotive industry has benefited from substantial two-way trade and investment. In 2024, the auto sector accounted for 64% of all Agoa trade between South Africa and the US, generating R28.6-billion in export revenue, with 24,681 vehicles exported to the US under Agoa,' Mabasa said. He said the effect of just the anticipation of the high export tariffs, however, had been devastating to the industry and had an immediate effect on trade performance. He said that even before the formal effect of the tariffs, vehicle exports to the US dropped by 73% in the first four months of 2025, followed by a further decline of 80% and 85% in April and May, respectively. 'This represents a risk of a direct loss of vehicle and component export volumes, and annual export earnings, which would be difficult to recover in the short term,' he said. OEMs under pressure But the news is even worse, he said, as tariff disruptions placed major pressure on [OEMs], who had made long-standing industrial commitments to South Africa and invested significantly in local manufacturing, skills development and export infrastructure. The SA automotive industry contributes 22.6% of the country's total domestic manufacturing output and directly supports 110,000 formal sector jobs. Mabasa said Naamsa welcomed the SA government's continued diplomatic engagement with the US, including discussions held on the sidelines of the US-Africa Summit in Luanda on 23 June 2025, and the submission of SA's Framework Deal on 20 May 2025 to address the concerns raised by the US government. 'We urge both governments to accelerate negotiations toward a balanced, rules-based trade agreement. We are encouraged by early proposals for a quota of 40,000 duty-free vehicle units per annum, which would allow us to retain our footprint in this key market. It's vital that we use this opportunity to preserve the business case for continued investment', he said. Mabasa, however, emphasised the need to prepare for a more uncertain and competitive global landscape. Behind every statistic are people and communities 'Naamsa is equally concerned about the livelihood impact of these developments. Behind every tariff statistic are real people – auto workers, supply chain technicians, logistics operators and their families. Nowhere is this more visible than in East London, a community that has grown and thrived on the back of automotive exports. 'The erosion of this trade threatens to unravel decades of socioeconomic progress. We urge all parties involved in the diplomatic negotiations to recognise the strategic and social importance of safeguarding mutually beneficial trade frameworks like Agoa, and to avoid short-term decisions that carry long-term consequences for vulnerable regions,' Mabasa said. CEO of the Nelson Mandela Bay Business Chamber Denise van Huyssteen, said it was clear that the US trade tariffs, planned for implementation on 1 August, would have a disproportionate impact on the Eastern Cape economy given its high reliance on the automotive sector. 'The initial most vulnerable automotive and components manufacturers will be those who directly export products to the United States. The tariffs will put them in a very uncompetitive position, making it difficult to continue to do trade with the US, which could lead to export orders drying up. This, in turn, will have a knock-on impact on direct and indirect suppliers located in East London and Nelson Mandela Bay, and the overall supporting ecosystem around these manufacturers, who may or may not be able to withstand the loss in volume. 'Additionally, as the volumes, especially of [OEMs], potentially decline, economies of scale are diminished, potentially putting some components manufacturers in a position where they are unable to continue a viable supply to their other OEM customers located elsewhere in the country,' she said. Competitiveness crisis She said the tariff structure also meant that manufacturers who exported products to other parts of the world may now be competing with other countries that had significant cost advantages over South Africa, as they faced lower tariffs or could absorb the tariffs. 'Essentially, the global trade order has been upended, and this is likely to affect global manufacturing footprints and where the best locations will be to produce products in the future,' Van Huyssteen said. She said that switching markets was not a quick solution as these measures took time to implement, and neither would 'replace' current OEMs with new ones. 'On this score, and in order to retain employment, it is vital that any potential incoming OEM investors commit to utilising local components for their manufacturing operations,' she said. Unemployment warning for Nelson Mandela Bay She said the chamber also remained deeply concerned about the devastating impact these 'tariff wars' might have on Nelson Mandela Bay's economy and the thousands of jobs supported directly and indirectly through the automotive industry and its supply chain. 'This, in turn, will add to the already unacceptably high unemployment and poverty levels in Nelson Mandela Bay and the Eastern Cape. It must be remembered that Nelson Mandela Bay is home to the greatest number of automotive component suppliers in the country. Furthermore, 41% of the country's automotive manufacturing employment is based in the Bay,' she said. Call for government urgency 'Given how small SA's economy is, the country's response should not be to retaliate, but rather to look internally and consider deploying incentives to support local manufacturers, rather than to keep others out by way of tariffs. This should also incorporate policy support and assistance in establishing new markets for SA-produced goods.' She called for urgency on the side of the government. 'The government needs to move fast and take action in addressing barriers such as excessive red tape and complex policies associated with doing business in the country. Absolute urgency is required to improve the country's competitiveness versus other emerging locations, which have, over the years, become much more attractive investment destinations. 'These even include some countries on this continent who have surpassed South Africa in some key performance areas. Priority focus must be placed on ensuring that the basic enablers are in place, such as well-maintained infrastructure, efficient logistics and the delivery of basic services at a local municipal level, to help improve the competitiveness of local manufacturers and to sustain their continued operations in the Bay.' MEC warns Mercedes-Benz may exit Speaking at the Finance Committee in the Council of Provinces last week, Eastern Cape MEC for Finance Mlungisi Mvoko said they had held discussions with the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC), as the matter significantly affected the Eastern Cape. He highlighted that Mercedes-Benz, currently exporting 90% of the vehicles it manufactures in East London to the United States, was facing the most risk. Mvoko warned that the company might consider withdrawing from South Africa due to the tariff changes. Mvoko said that if Mercedes-Benz were to leave, it would have devastating consequences for the East London Special Economic Zone (SEZ), where many companies existed solely to supply the vehicle maker. He also made it clear that thousands of families in East London and Qonce were reliant on Mercedes-Benz operations. DM
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Presidency condemns DA's ‘latest effort to embarrass' special envoy Mcebisi Jonas
Ramaphosa's spokesperson said, 'The DA is trying cheaply but dangerously to exploit a critical engagement between South Africa and the United States to protest President Ramaphosa's removal of Mr Andrew Whitfield.' The Presidency has hit back at the Democratic Alliance (DA) for what it calls 'disinformation' and 'harassment' targeting President Ramaphosa's special envoy to the US, Mcebisi Jonas. 'The Democratic Alliance's latest effort to embarrass President Ramaphosa's Special Envoy to North America, Mr Jonas Mcebisi, involves claims — in the DA's framing — that the United States has rejected Mr Jonas's 'credentials' and that Mr Jonas is therefore unable to perform his role as special envoy. 'The DA seeks to add sensationalism to its claim by suggesting President Ramaphosa and Mr Jonas face a crisis in view of the United States' pending implementation of trade tariffs announced several days ago by President Donald Trump. 'The facts around this matter include the reality that special envoys do not present diplomatic credentials to host countries in the way designated heads of mission or other diplomats are,' said Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya in a statement on Tuesday, 15 July. Magwenya's statement comes after the DA claimed Ramaphosa had for months been concealing the fact that his special envoy to the United States 'is not welcome in Washington'. Emma Powell, the DA spokesperson on international relations and cooperation, claimed in a statement on Tuesday that the US had denied Jonas a diplomatic visa in May. She said the Presidency 'continued to mislead the public by insisting that Jonas remained the president's special envoy' to the US. Powell said these facts were coming to light with just two weeks to go before devastating 30% trade tariffs on SA exports to the US were to take effect, a result which Jonas was supposed to help prevent. The Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) has rejected her claim and accused her of working against SA's interests. 'The US government has formally rejected Jonas' credentials and has informed the Presidency that he would not be recognised as South Africa's official interlocutor. The Ramaphosa administration was explicitly advised on multiple occasions that Jonas was not acceptable to Washington and was urged to appoint an alternative envoy,' said Powell. 'This week, when confronted with the DA's announcement that it would submit a Promotion of Access to Information (PAIA) request detailing Jonas' official engagements over the past 90 days, instead of coming clean with the truth … Magwenya lashed out on social media, accusing the DA of 'encroaching' on the President's powers,' she added. Powell called on the Presidency to explain why it continued to back Jonas as SA's envoy when his 'credentials have been officially rejected by the host government'. Powell said that following the expulsion of Ebrahim Rasool as SA's ambassador to the US, Ramaphosa was more concerned about 'saving face than safeguarding livelihoods'. She said the DA would ask Parliament to request an urgent briefing from the Presidency on Jonas' appointment. Daily Maverick approached Jonas and his spokesperson, Ranjeni Munusamy, for comment, but Munusamy referred us to the Presidency. 'Right-wing nexus' In a statement on Monday, Powell said that more than 90 days after his appointment as Ramaphosa's special envoy to the US, Jonas was 'nowhere to be seen'. She noted that Jonas' appointment came on the back of the expulsion of Rasool, 'and was billed as a critical intervention to stave off the impending collapse of vital export industries under punitive liberation day tariffs. 'With just over two weeks to go before the 30% tariffs come into effect on 1 August, industries that support hundreds of thousands of jobs — from citrus to automotives — remain on a knife's edge,' said Powell. Magwenya said that Jonas' role did not 'supersede the leading role' of the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC) and Dirco in SA's 'difficult but constructive' trade negotiations with the US. 'Mr Jonas has, however, played an important role in working with the DTIC to develop the trade proposals in which South Africa is currently engaging the United States in good faith and with the expectation of mutually beneficial terms. 'Similarly, he has been assisting Dirco in government's efforts to reset diplomatic relations and all areas of cooperation between South Africa and the United States,' said Magwenya. He said that while these processes were underway, Ramaphosa had not required Jonas to visit the US on urgent business. 'The Presidency is therefore concerned about the Democratic Alliance's persistent campaign against South Africa's national interest and its posture of trying to embarrass and belittle our country, and in this specific circumstance, Mr Jonas. This campaign has its origins in a Democratic Alliance visit to the United States earlier this year, to advance an ideological agenda rather than our national interest,' he said. 'The DA has positioned itself as part of a right-wing nexus that seeks to use a foreign state to effect changes to democratically developed national policies in our own country. 'The DA is trying cheaply but dangerously to exploit a critical engagement between South Africa and the United States to protest President Ramaphosa's removal of Mr Andrew Whitfield as deputy minister of trade, industry and competition.' Last week, Trump sent Ramaphosa a letter confirming that the US would impose a 30% tariff on all imports of South African goods from 1 August — 'separate from all sectoral tariffs'. He originally announced the 'reciprocal' tariffs on SA and almost all other countries in April and said the new tariffs would kick in after 90 days, on 9 July. This was supposed to give countries time to lower their tariffs on US imports. But although the DTIC said it had presented a draft Framework Deal to the US on 20 May, and requested an extension of the 90-day pause for further negotiation, Trump confirmed the 30% tariffs last week. He again said that if SA eliminated its trade barriers, the US would 'consider' adjusting the 30% tariffs. DM
