Dubai-based bizman abducted in Bengaluru, four arrested
The businessman, who was held captive for seven days, managed to alert the residents of the neighbouring flat about his kidnapping.
Based on a complaint, Ashok Nagar police, who swung into action, rescued him and arrested four of the accused. The businessman's ex-girlfriend and three others involved in the crime are absconding.
The arrested have been identified as Salman Pasha, 22, of DJ Halli, Mohammed Nawaz, 27, from KG Halli, and Mohammed Asif, 42, and Mohammed Suhel, 25, of RT Nagar.
According to police, Lawrence Melvani, 37, who recently returned to Bengaluru from Dubai, lived in a lodge in Indiranagar. On July 16, his ex-girlfriend Mahima contacted him and requested to meet her. She booked a cab for him. After picking him from Indiranagar, the driver stopped the car near Koramangala, where three men barged in, blindfolded him and took him to a serviced apartment.
The accused forced him to part with Rs 1 lakh in cash and two iPhones. They then assaulted him demanding Rs 2.5 crore. On July 23, Melvani managed to alert the family living in the neighbouring flat from the washroom of the serviced apartment about his kidnapping.
Meanwhile, Melvani's family members alerted the police after they could not contact him for several days. Before the police could reach the serviced apartment, the accused bundled Melvani into a car and headed towards Tumakuru Road. After seeing a police team chasing them, the accused pushed Melvani out of the car and fled. The team intercepted the car after a few hours of chase and arrested the four accused. A senior police officer said Melvani's ex-girlfriend was behind the abduction plot. A search is on to nab her and other accused.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
a minute ago
- Indian Express
HC denies bail to ED, CBI officers in bribery case: ‘grave abuse of official power'
Holding that allegations against them represent a 'grave abuse of official power', the Punjab and Haryana High Court denied regular bail to former Enforcement Directorate assistant director Vishal Deep and Central Bureau of Investigation's (CBI) Deputy SP Balbir Singh, both accused of demanding and facilitating bribes from accused in the Himachal Pradesh scholarship scam. Dismissing three connected bail petitions, a bench of Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul held that the allegations warranted continued custody of the accused to preserve the integrity of the trial process. The court noted that although the prosecution's case involved circumstantial and digital evidence, it nevertheless revealed 'a premeditated and well-orchestrated conspiracy' that exploited the institutional positions of the two senior officers. 'The allegations against petitioner Vishal Deep of demanding illegal gratification in exchange for manipulating outcome of the investigation and influencing arrests strike at the heart of the institutional integrity,' the court observed. It added that the use of encrypted apps like Zangi, assumed identities such as 'Rahim', and involvement of family-owned vehicles painted a picture of 'deliberate and strategically engineered' misconduct. The FIRs in the case, both dated December 22, 2024, stemmed from complaints by Bhupinder Kumar Sharma, chairman of Dev Bhumi Group of Institutions, Una, and Rajneesh Bansal, chairman of Himalayan Group of Professional Institutions, Sirmaur. They alleged that bribes of Rs 55 lakh and Rs 60 lakh, respectively, were demanded to avoid arrest in the ongoing ED and CBI investigations into the alleged scholarship scam. Vishal Deep, posted in Shimla at the time as the ED investigating officer, was accused of demanding bribes while posing under false names. A joint trap was laid following the complaints. The CBI claimed that two vehicles, one registered in Vishal Deep's name and another in his brother Vikas Deep's name, were found with traces of phenolphthalein, a chemical used in trap operations. Additionally, Rs 1.25 crore was recovered from Vikas Deep, further strengthening the prosecution's case, the court noted. The petitioners had argued that no direct recovery was made from them, and that the case relied solely on circumstantial and documentary evidence. Senior advocate Vinod Ghai, appearing for Vishal Deep, argued that his client had been falsely implicated and had already been granted bail in the second FIR. He submitted that 'further incarceration would serve no useful purpose' since the chargesheet had been filed on March 15 and no charges had yet been framed. Counsel for Balbir Singh contended that his client was not named in the initial FIR and was being implicated based on an allegedly inconclusive audio recording. Balbir Singh also cited his serious medical condition, including a renal transplant and chronic kidney disease, and stressed that he had cooperated with the investigation while out on interim medical bail. However, the court was unconvinced, stating that Balbir Singh's role 'went beyond passive facilitation'. His alleged coordination of meetings, selective leave from duty on critical dates, and presence corroborated by CDRs and CCTV footage 'indicate active participation in the execution of the conspiracy,' the court held. On the medical plea, the court took on record a report from PGIMER, Chandigarh dated July 2, which stated that Balbir Singh's cardiac and renal status was 'currently stable and within normal limits'. It directed the jail authorities to ensure follow-ups and treatment as advised but did not find medical grounds sufficient for bail. While acknowledging that 'bail is the rule and jail is the exception', the court underscored that this principle must be balanced against the need to protect public trust and prevent potential tampering of evidence, particularly since the complainants had yet to testify. 'Such exceptions must be tempered by the imperative to preserve the integrity of the process,' the court said, refusing to extend bail to either petitioner.
Indian Express
a minute ago
- Indian Express
HC denies bail to ED, CBI officers in Himachal scholarship scam bribery case
In a scathing order, the Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday denied regular bail to senior Enforcement Directorate (ED) officer Vishal Deep and Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Deputy SP Balbir Singh, both accused of demanding and facilitating bribes from accused in the Himachal Pradesh scholarship scam. Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul dismissed three connected bail petitions, holding that the allegations represented a grave abuse of official power and warranted continued custody to preserve the integrity of the trial process. The court noted that although the prosecution's case involved circumstantial and digital evidence, it nevertheless revealed 'a premeditated and well-orchestrated conspiracy' that exploited the institutional positions of the two senior officers. 'The allegations against petitioner Vishal Deep of demanding illegal gratification in exchange for manipulating outcome of the investigation and influencing arrests strike at the heart of the institutional integrity,' the court observed. It added that the use of encrypted apps like Zangi, assumed identities such as 'Rahim', and involvement of family-owned vehicles painted a picture of 'deliberate and strategically engineered' misconduct. The FIRs in the case, both dated December 22, 2024, stemmed from complaints by Bhupinder Kumar Sharma, chairman of Dev Bhumi Group of Institutions, Una, and Rajneesh Bansal, chairman of Himalayan Group of Professional Institutions, Sirmaur. They alleged that bribes of Rs 55 lakh and Rs 60 lakh respectively were demanded to avoid arrest in the ongoing ED and CBI investigations into the scholarship scam. Vishal Deep, posted in Shimla at the time as the ED investigating officer, was accused of demanding bribes while posing under false names. A joint trap was laid following the complaints. The CBI claimed that two vehicles, one registered in Vishal Deep's name and another in his brother Vikas Deep's name, were found with traces of phenolphthalein, a chemical used in trap operations. Additionally, Rs 1.25 crore was recovered from Vikas Deep, further tightening the prosecution's case, the court noted. The petitioners had argued that no direct recovery was made from them, and that the case relied solely on circumstantial and documentary evidence. Senior advocate Vinod Ghai, appearing for Vishal Deep, argued that his client had been falsely implicated and had already been granted bail in the second FIR. He submitted that 'further incarceration would serve no useful purpose' since the chargesheet had been filed on March 15 and no charges had yet been framed. Counsel for Balbir Singh contended that his client was not named in the initial FIR and was being implicated based on an allegedly inconclusive audio recording. Singh also cited his serious medical condition, including a renal transplant and chronic kidney disease, and stressed that he had cooperated with the investigation while out on interim medical bail. However, the court was unconvinced, stating that Balbir Singh's role 'went beyond passive facilitation'. His alleged coordination of meetings, selective leave from duty on critical dates, and presence corroborated by CDRs and CCTV footage 'indicate active participation in the execution of the conspiracy,' the judge held. On the medical plea, the court took on record a report from PGIMER Chandigarh dated July 2, which stated that Balbir Singh's cardiac and renal status was 'currently stable and within normal limits'. It directed the jail authorities to ensure follow-ups and treatment as advised but did not find medical grounds sufficient for bail. While acknowledging that 'bail is the rule and jail is the exception', the court underscored that this principle must be balanced against the need to protect public trust and prevent potential tampering of evidence, particularly since the complainants had yet to testify. 'Such exceptions must be tempered by the imperative to preserve the integrity of the process,' the court said, refusing to extend bail to either petitioner.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Anti-sacrilege bill: Punjab assembly panel seeks suggestions by Aug 31
Chandigarh: The Punjab assembly's select committee, formed for wider stakeholder consultation on an anti-sacrilege bill, has released a WhatsApp number and email ID for public suggestions, with a deadline of Aug 31. The 'Punjab Prevention of Offences Against Holy Scripture(s) Bill 2025', proposing stricter penalties — including life imprisonment — for religious sacrilege, was referred to a select committee on July 15 for examination and to seek public opinion. The 15-member committee was formally constituted by Punjab assembly speaker Kultar Singh Sandhwan on July 19 and held its first meeting on July 24. According to a public notice on Thursday, the committee has sought suggestions from the public, religious institutions, non-govt organisations, experts, intellectuals, and various representatives of civil society regarding the bill. Suggestions can be sent by the public in writing on WhatsApp number '8054495560' and on email IDs secy-vs-punjab@ or or through the local MLA. Under the bill, a person found guilty of sacrilege could face imprisonment of not less than 10 years, extending to a maximum of life imprisonment, along with a fine of Rs 5 lakh, which can go up to Rs 10 lakh. Anyone who abets such a crime will receive the same punishment. The panel, which is headed by AAP MLA Inderbir Singh Nijjar, will submit its report within six months. MSID:: 123019933 413 |
