Google Pixel 10 Pro could get a much-needed display upgrade — but the base model's getting left out
A new report has indicated that the Google Pixel 10 Pro series screens will offer improved PWM dimming compared to the basic Pixel 10 — both good and bad news for potential users' eyes.
According to a recent report by Android Authority, Google may use displays with 480Hz Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) dimming for the Pixel 10 Pro and Pro XL. For comparison, the Pixel 9 Pro is capped at 240Hz.
If you've not heard of the term before, PWM refers to how the backlight or pixels of a mobile device's display rapidly turn on and off at different rates to increase or decrease its perceived brightness. You'll never notice this flickering with the naked eye, but at lower brightness levels, when there are larger gaps between the pixels being lit, using the screen can cause eyestrain and headaches in some people, as our friends at Android Central have covered.
Google looking to increase the PWM frequency on the Pixel 10 Pro series would go a long way to counter this risk, and also match the 480Hz seen on the Galaxy S25 and the iPhone 16 series. However, the rumor suggests that the base model will stick with 240Hz like previous Pixels, leaving the issue unaddressed for users who don't want or can't afford a more expensive Pro Pixel.
This rumor follows others that appear to indicate that Google could limit advancements coming to the new Pixels to the Pro models only. For instance, we recently heard that Google might not incorporate a vapor chamber into the base Pixel 10, but will do so on the Pros. That same leak also claims that the Pixel 10 won't support Wi-Fi 7, which is a confusing omission as it is available on the Pixel 9.
On the plus side, there are indications that the Google Pixel 10 will finally feature a telephoto camera, just like the pro models. However, it still appears that some of the features reportedly coming for the Pixel 10 Pro, like the Ultra Res Zoom or Ultra Stable video recording features, won't make an appearance on the vanilla Pixel 10.
We have a lot of questions about the next range of Google Pixel phones. While we'd expect the Pixel 10 Pro to find a place as one of the best phones on the market, there's a chance that the base Pixel 10 will simply fall by the wayside when the phone releases. While we don't have a set date yet, we'd expect this to happen around August, which would match the release of the Pixel 9 series.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
9 minutes ago
- Forbes
Delete Every App That's On This List—‘Risks Are Too Great'
You should never use these apps on your phone. Republished on June 28 with new national security warnings over use of these apps. Tens of millions of Android and iPhone users are being warned they have installed free apps that leave them at serious risk. Those users could now be sending their sensitive data to companies under the control of the Chinese government. Earlier this week, I reported on the list of iPhone and Android apps issued by the Tech Transparency Project (TTP). These are all VPNs — virtual private networks. Apps which are meant to make users safer and more secure but are doing the very opposite. 'Millions of Americans have downloaded apps that secretly route their internet traffic through Chinese companies,' TTP says. It last reported on this threat in April, and now says 'Apple and Google app stores continue to offer private browsing apps that are surreptitiously owned by Chinese companies… six weeks after they were identified.' A raft of warnings now have followed that report, urging users to delete the apps. 'The risks are too great' to keep them on your phone, warns Top10VPNs Simon Migliano. 'In light of these findings, I strongly urge users to avoid Chinese-owned VPNs altogether." For its part, Google says it is "committed to compliance with applicable sanctions and trade compliance laws. When we locate accounts that may violate these laws, our related policies or Terms of Service, we take appropriate action.' While Apple makes similar assurances, and says it enforces App Store rules but does not differentiate its handling of apps by the location of their developers. It does say where VPNs are concerned that data sharing with third parties is prohibited. vpnMentor's Lisa Taylor says this is 'no surprise,' that "China usually uses different methods to gain other countries' citizen's personal information, most of which are often covered behind a legal front.' And that 'free VPNs are perfect cover up to these kind of operations,' often recording user activity even when they say they don't. BeyondTrust's James Maude agrees. 'If you aren't paying for a product, you are the product. These VPN services are a perfect example of the hidden costs of free apps where users seeking more privacy online are potentially unknowingly feeding data to a foreign nation state out of fear their local coffee shop Wi-Fi is spying on them.' While Black Duck's Vijay Dilwale calls TTP's report 'a sobering wake-up call that VPNs, which claim to protect privacy, can pose very serious security risks, especially when their true ownership is hidden. These apps have access to all user traffic, and when handled by Chinese-based entities, the implications are well beyond individual privacy.' TTP reports that all of the VPNs it has identified "are listed as free in the app stores. But during TTP's May spot check, researchers observed that some of the VPNs offered in-app purchases on top of whatever users get with the 'free' app.' This lack of transparency, Taylor told me, 'is one of the main reasons why we do not recommend free VPNs and we are concerned that with all the content restrictions throughout the world, people are flocking to free VPNs.' Migliano says "true internet freedom and privacy depend on transparency and trust. Yet despite being made aware of glaring privacy failures and opaque corporate structures, Google and Apple continue to permit these high-risk apps on their platforms.' There are also some more serious national security concerns that have been raised. The nature of these apps on devices with obscure geographical locations and ownership is a major issue when it comes to those handling sensitive data or making their locations. Cequence Security's Randolph Barr warns 'there's no question Apple and Google can and should do more to mitigate the national security and privacy risks posed by VPN apps with undisclosed foreign ownership, particularly those tied to hostile nation-states.' Which raises a question around an added layer of app store security. 'While they have frameworks in place for data protection and transparency,' Barr told me, 'enforcement is often inconsistent or delayed, especially when developers obscure their true ownership through complex corporate structures. Conducting deeper vetting requires significant legal, technical, and geopolitical effort, something these platforms have been slow to scale.' This leaves a vacuum others may need to fill. Barr suggests the following mitigating actions, and says if they can't be handled at app store level, they must be done by organizations needing to control such risks: Deepwatch's Chad Cragle has issued the same warning. 'When owned by Chinese companies and hidden behind layers of shell companies, it becomes a serious concern. Apple advocates for protecting our privacy, yet these apps are still accessible. Google?' Cragle says 'they often allow nearly any app on their store. It's time for the platforms to take responsibility and set the example. You can't claim to prioritize privacy if you're letting other parties control the playbook. If they don't properly scrutinize these apps, they're not just passively allowing it—they're helping to create the problem. And let's be honest, this isn't just about privacy; it's about national security, too.' Here is the list of apps from TTP's report: Apple App Store: Google Play Store: The Android app vpnify is also in TTP's report, but has now relocated outside China and has contacted TTP to update its information and to be removed from the report.
Forbes
22 minutes ago
- Forbes
Google Confirms Upgrade Choice For 2 Billion Android Users
Decide carefully as new upgrade confirmed. Republished on June 28 withy new warnings despite Google's reassurances. Google's 2 billion Gmail users face a critical decision, as the company upgrades the world's leading email platform to make more use of AI. This means Google's cloud-based AI accessing all your content — however personal and sensitive. I've warned before that Gmail users need to understand the risks before using all these new default updates. It's no accident or surprise that Gmail's AI upgrades conflict with its quasi end-to-end encryption upgrade. One is secure, the other is not. The issue with smart AI search and smart AI replies has been privacy — pure and simple. This week, all Android users have been hit with similar warnings, as a poorly written email from Google seemed to suggest AI would access sensitive apps — including Messages and WhatsApp — even if Gemini Activity is disabled. 'Gemini will soon be able to help you use Phone, Messages, WhatsApp, and Utilities on your phone, whether your Gemini Apps Activity is on or off,' the email told users. As Gizmodo reported: 'Google to Gemini users: We're going to look at your texts whether you like it or not.' And understandably, everyone read that email the same way. Google has now told me this is misleading — the update 'is good for users.' Android phones will 'use Gemini to complete daily tasks on their mobile devices like send messages, initiate phone calls, and set timers while Gemini Apps Activity is turned off.' What that actually means is that turning off Gemini Activity doesn't stop it working on phones, which would have happened before. But 'with Gemini Apps Activity turned off, Gemini chats are not being reviewed or used to improve our AI models.' Before, if you wanted to use Gemini with messaging apps, you'd need to keep Gemini Activity on which would mean those interactions being saved. That's a privacy nightmare and it's what Google has in effect fixed. This choice is good news. This welcome clarity reflects user concerns. But that's what is still missing in the Gmail AI debate, which has been more a take it or leave it offer. I would like to see the same transparent and easy privacy choice for Gmail as well, before this goes much further. One note of caution. Any use of Gemini on Android does still save interactions for 72-hours within your account, even if Activity is turned off. Keep that in mind. And the privacy warnings have not gone away. Per Android Headlines, 'Google's Gemini AI will soon be able to access apps like Phone and Messages, even if 'Gemini Apps Activity' is off, starting July 7, 2025. While Google clarifies that turning off activity still prevents data from being used for AI training, the change sparks user privacy concerns, balancing convenience with trust in Google's data handling.' This new report warns that 'deeper integration inevitably brings legitimate concerns to the forefront for many users. The prospect of an AI having access, even if temporary, to highly personal data within call logs, private messages, and WhatsApp chats immediately raises red flags regarding individual privacy and overall data security.' This was always going to happen — it was clear from the early days of Gemini's integration into email and messages and other apps, just as it's clear with the new news that WhatsApp is to do the same with its own users' messages. As Futurism puts it, 'WhatsApp is now offering AI summaries of text threads for those too lazy to read through their messages themselves… Because what says 'I care' like breezing through an AI-generated summary of the family group chat?" A balance needs to be struck, and the risk is that users do not know enough yet about the complex web of privacy polices to make those decisions.
Android Authority
32 minutes ago
- Android Authority
What really happens when your phone runs out of RAM?
Robert Triggs / Android Authority These days, high-end smartphones and even more affordable models ship with about as much RAM as a modern mid-range PC. And why shouldn't they? We use our phones for various tasks, from flicking through countless apps to playing the latest high-end games. They all need RAM, and increasingly more of it, especially when it comes to chatting with a large language model or using AI to spruce up our media. Can your phone even run out of RAM these days? It sounds unlikely, but I put it to the test. Do you use your phone's RAM management features? 0 votes Yes NaN % No NaN % I didn't know it had any NaN % It doesn't have any NaN % In theory, it is possible to run out of RAM; if you throw enough sufficiently large applications at your OS all at once, it's technically possible to hit that limit. But what happens in those instances? Well, logic says those apps would be forced to close, they could hang, or the entire OS could become unresponsive. But that's very unlikely to happen, and I tested this out to prove it. How Android takes care of your RAM Robert Triggs / Android Authority To keep Android running smoothly and responsive, the OS has a couple of tricks before it starts killing apps you might want to get back to quickly. The first is compressing apps already in RAM using zRAM. zRAM is basically a compressed block of data that lives inside your RAM. It grows and shrinks dynamically, compressing memory pages to save space and decompressing them when needed. App memory that isn't needed is seamlessly pushed and pulled to zRAM even before your phone starts running low on memory. All Android devices use zRAM, with OEMs able to tune how large this compressed pool can grow to balance performance and responsiveness. The catch is that zRAM still uses real RAM, so compressing lots of stuff doesn't always free as much memory as you might expect. zRAM compression is Android's chief tool to keep apps alive for when you need them. If zRAM fills up, Android tries a couple more things: the kernel's swap process (kswapd) will try to flush out memory that can be reloaded from storage, as this can be quickly recalled when required. Failing that, it can kick additional pages out of zRAM or, if available, push memory to a swap file on your phone's storage. However, the use of physical swap storage isn't part of stock Android. Custom ROMs and some OEM 'virtual RAM' implementations have dabbled in swap file use, but this is the exception and not the rule. If all that is exhausted, idle applications are ended to make room for active processes. However, exactly how phones handle this process varies by device manufacturer. Samsung RAM Plus vs Xiaomi Memory extension Robert Triggs / Android Authority I recently had the pleasure of using the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra with 12GB RAM on board, which gave me the perfect opportunity to test out how Samsung's RAM Plus management system works in the real world. I also have the Xiaomi 15 Ultra, which boasts 'Memory extension' technology to augment your phone with additional memory. My first question was: Does RAM Plus rely on traditional zRAM or actual swap space? This is a key distinction, partly because Samsung published a 2023 research paper on an 'Adaptive Swap' idea that leverages both fast zRAM space and slower swap responsiveness to try to obtain the best of both. Samsung's RAM Plus settings menu also states it 'uses your phone's storage space to provide virtual memory,' which certainly hints at swap use, even if it isn't explicitly mentioned. Every phone uses zRAM and some use swap space too. But not the S25 Ultra. However, adjusting RAM Plus settings on the Galaxy S25 Ultra shows no changes in flash storage partitions or mention of swap spaces via adb shell commands like /proc/partitions or df -h. This strongly indicates RAM Plus only affects the zRAM target size, not on-storage swap. This doesn't mean no Samsung phones use swap, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra doesn't. By contrast, adjusting Xiaomi 15 Ultra's 'Memory extension' option sees a decrease of free space in the /data and /storage/emulated directories (which are the same thing, just referenced differently). While I can't track down exactly where this extra storage is being used without root access, the changes on reboot exactly match the amount requested by memory extension. At the same time, the total zRAM pool remains set at 16 GB regardless of the setting. Robert Triggs / Android Authority Why have a toggle at all? Returning to Samsung, changing the RAM Plus setting only adjusts the target amount of compressed swap memory (i.e. how much data the system tries to keep compressed in zRAM) rather than the raw size of the zRAM block device. As more data is compressed, zRAM uses more real RAM, which depends on the compression ratio, which varies with what's being compressed and the algorithm used. A higher RAM Plus setting (e.g., 8GB) means more apps stay alive in the background, but with potential slowdowns due to extra compression. A lower setting (e.g., 3GB) prioritizes speed at the cost of app retention. On the S25 Ultra, Samsung doesn't let you go below a 3GB zRAM target, even if you disable RAM Plus, which makes sense with 12GB physical RAM since zRAM probably won't use more than 1GB anyway. However, this might not be the case for all of Samsung's phones, especially budget models that have less RAM. Samsung RAM Plus lets you optimize RAM use between app retention or extra responsiveness. But if RAM Plus is just a variation on RAM use, why even bother giving the user control over it in the first place? Well, there's a slight but sometimes tangible difference. In short, the option exists so you can choose whether your device should favor background app retention (bigger zRAM) or just‑in‑time responsiveness (smaller zRAM) — all with a simple slider instead of digging into kernel parameters. The Xiaomi 15 Ultra has very different behavior; the handset always targets up to 16GB of memory to compress, but the amount stored in zRAM is backed by additional swap space to avoid killing apps in extreme use cases. Unfortunately, I'm unable to track exactly when compressed memory is kicked over to flash storage, but I imagine it'll be only once a set amount of RAM has been taken up. With 16GB of RAM onboard, it'll probably be quite challenging to kick the phone into using swap space. The drawback is that compressing and decompressing from storage is slower than RAM, even with today's fast UFS storage. What happens when you run out of RAM? Joe Maring / Android Authority To see how this all works under pressure, I stress-tested both phones by gradually loading them up with apps and watching what happened to RAM and zRAM usage. Finally, I overloaded the web browser to consume 8GB of RAM. It's worth noting that flash swap and zRAM are considered 'SwapTotal' for Android's RAM management, which means that it's impossible to see precisely when or how much swap space phones like the Xiaomi use (at least not without rooting the phone). The results are pretty much in line with what you'd expect. Running a few small applications comes nowhere near stressing the Galaxy S25 Ultra's hefty 12GB RAM, and Xiaomi's 16GB doesn't break a sweat. zRAM use is light and flits in and out of real-time compression of some background tasks, but we're talking tens of MB. There's certainly no need for swap space here. While in this state, switching to and from apps is seamless, with no delay and no data loss. Compression quickly kicks in, ensuring that the OS remains responsive when RAM is tight. It's only once we have several games and apps running at once that free RAM drops below 4GB and RAM management starts to ramp up. It varies depending on the workload, but zRAM use can hit high MBs and even a GB or more. Even so, games don't have to reload completely, but I was kicked out of one or two active sessions, and web pages had to be refreshed. Still, I experienced nothing approaching a major system slowdown, even with multiple games loaded up. As we've said before, 12GB is absolutely plenty of RAM. Outside of cutting-edge, niche AI workloads, I suppose. Robert Triggs / Android Authority Android's default RAM management is very robust, then. I had to artificially bring things to a close with a 4GB web page to force anything approaching a mass culling of applications. Even then, One UI stayed snappy, and so did Xiaomi's HyperOS. However, most larger applications had closed at this point, forcing me to reload them from scratch to start them up again. It's basically impossible to run out of RAM, as it's managed dynamically. When you do hit the RAM wall, Android simply starts closing idle apps. And thanks to zRAM (and swap, if used), that wall is far off in most real-world cases. But most importantly, it's almost impossible to approach this point in regular use, thanks to zRAM compression. Phones that use additional swap space fare even better in terms of keeping apps open, but don't feel quite as responsive as zRAM-only implementations. Not that I could notice on the Xiaomi 15 Ultra, but that's probably an indication that 16GB is simply overkill for even a huge number of mobile applications. One final note: swap doesn't replace zRAM — it complements it. You won't wear down your flash memory constantly writing to physical storage by enabling it; it just adds minor wear over time. What's perhaps a bit more noticeable is that bringing back distant background apps from storage is slightly slower than decompressing from RAM, but at least you don't have to load them up again. With RAM capacities continuing to rise and Android's memory tricks becoming ever smarter, swap space might never be essential. Still, it can be a helpful tool for budget or AI-heavy devices.
