Kate Middleton was just spotted with this chic bag: Here's how you can get it
And when she gives us lessons in style, we take note.
We've discovered that the latest accessory to join the Princess on an outing is the Nano Montreal Bag from award-winning brand DeMellier.
Retailing for $697, and made ethically and sustainably using cowhide leather, this hand-crafted bag features a removable strap so it can be worn cross-body, over the shoulder or held by the top handle.
The perfect size for small essentials like a phone, wallet and keys, we're loving Princess Kate's choice of the deep toffee colourway which is perfect for autumn.
Best yet, for every item purchased, DeMellier funds lifesaving vaccines and medical treatments for children in need, through the 'A Bag, A Life' charity initiative with SOS Children's Villages.
Award-winning designs
DeMellier is a London-based award-winning handbag brand founded by Mireia Llusia-Lindh in 2017.
The brands all-female London design-team conceives each piece of the collection which are then handcrafted in Europe using the finest sustainably sourced materials.
Shoppers love the range of handbags DeMellier have on offer, including the beautiful Midi New York Bag which is the perfect everyday bag.
For those after a cross-body bag, you'll love DeMellier's Siena Saddle which has a top handle and strap that are both detachable.
Treat yourself to a new accessory
If you prefer a more traditional style of handbag then you'll want to purchase The Hudson which is made with Italian leather and perfect for your everyday needs whether they be social or work-related.
For a personalised touch, you can also get your bag monogrammed on DeMellier's website.
Shoppers on DeMellier's Instagram account can't stop raving about the bags.
'Beautiful bags,' one impressed person wrote.
'Insane,' another person added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
The one Queen act that Princess Kate ‘refuses' to do
There is no other building in the world that has housed four Kings, four Queens, 27 princes and princesses, close to 113 international heads of state and Prince Andrew's 72 teddy bears – really – than Buckingham Palace. It has a pedigree like no other – 775 rooms, its own lake and ATM – but when the day comes, King William V and Queen Catherine won't want a bar of it and are reportedly scrap nearly 200 years of tradition and will refuse to move in. Since 1837, the Palace has been the official London residence of the monarch but the Waleses have already, seemingly, let it be known they have no intention of ever calling the 52-bedroom Palace home. One of the most famous buildings on the planet now looks set to become the biggest white elephant the royal family has been saddled with since Andrew found himself at a loose end. It's been a rocky few years for the old girl. Since 2017 the Palace has rung with the sound of hammers and saws as it undergoes a $776 million, 10-year renovation. This programme includes everything from replacing the plumbing a fresh-faced 20-something Prince Philip had installed to fixing a leaky glass roof over a priceless trove of Canalettos, Vermeers and Rembrandts. Because of all this work, so far, King Charles and Queen Camilla have yet to be able to move in there. However the end is in sight and this week the Palace confirmed the decade-long reno (or in their lingo, 'reserviecing') is on track to finish according to schedule in 2027. Except now no one wants to live there. Already William and Kate seem to be indicating they have no interest in packing their bags when the inevitable day comes. You might think, golly gosh why? It's a literal Palace with hot and cold running servants and more Rembrandts per square inch than even the Netherlands can boast. It is the rien ne va plus of opulence and a deeply symbolically-imbued national treasure that befits the head of state. The reality is though, no one inside the royal family actually likes the Palace that much. Back in the day, come the end of the working week, Queen Elizabeth and Philip beetled off to Windsor Castle or Sandringham to breathe large sighs of relief over the drinks trolley. In 2020 when the pandemic struck, they decamped to Windsor full-time with a trusted cadre of aides and formed 'HMS Bubble'. They never moved back to London. Then came the accession of Charles in September 2022, but with the renos still ongoing, he and Camilla stayed put at their place, Clarence House, just a short walking distance down The Mall. (Though One takes the State Bentley to travel the 200 metres or so to the Palace where One's offices are.) On the King's coronation day in May 2023, BBC camera crews filmed His Majesty, still in is positively medieval regalia making his way down Palace halls strewn with dust sheets and scaffolding. (Side note – Charles does work out of the Palace. His private office and communications teams are run out of there and it is where he conducts the business of State and having the Prime Minister around for a weekly cuppa. William would likely do the same.) What this week's news confirms is that come 2027, the Palace will be ready to be fully occupied and to have a ready King and Queen occupy the usual private apartments. But the old dear faces a very lonely future. Charles and Camilla have signalled they aren't going to pack up their Lladro dog figurines and bunion pads to trade Clarence House, where they have been for 25 years, for the museum piece. 'I know [the King] is no fan of 'the big house', as he calls the palace,' a source has previously told The Times. 'He doesn't see it as a viable future home or a house that's fit for purpose in the modern world. Look further down the road and things look even sadder for the fabled building. Unlike his father who publicly entertained the possibility of one day making the Palace his home, William and Kate aren't even doing that, seemingly making it clear from this far out it's a hard pass for them. William reportedly agrees with his father's view and thinks 'the palace is not suitable for modern family life,' per the Times. This gels with the blueprint that he and Kate put in place as far back as 2011 when they wed. Just think of it as HMS Normally Normalton. The couple has always tenaciously, and some might argue a tad naively, tried to keep their life as work-a-day as possible – at least for people who travel with gun-toting protection officers to pop down to Asda for a litre of skim milk. Home for the Waleses is Adelaide Cottage, a four-bedroom home on the Windsor Estate that used to be where Kings stashed their dutiful equerries, not where two future Kings dossed down. So compact, in royal terms, is the Cottage they have no, gasp, live-in staff. Brave stuff. The prince and princess still religiously share the school run. They are also, reportedly, regularly seen at their kids' concerts, plays and sporting matches. Recently, the next King of Great Britain was seen standing poolside at his daughter Princess Charlotte's swimming gala, holding her sports bag, 'just like any other dad,' The Times ' royal editor Roya Nikkhah reported. For the privacy-loving Waleses, having to pack up and move into Buckingham Palace would constitute nightmare stuff. Just to really mash metaphors, it's the world's most opulent, gilded fishbowl. Consider the sheer numbers. It is filled with 800 plus staffers and every summer 300,000 plus tourists pay to tramp through it goggling at all the filigree frou frou and paying $98 for a decidedly average cream tea out the back. It also, in normal times, hosts 40,000 members of the public at garden parties, 10,500 investiture attendees, and 40,000-plus people for official receptions. London attracts about 20 million international visitors a year – you would have to think about 19,999,999 go and stand outside the Palace and have a sticky beak. Imagine trying to live in the middle of that and trying to pop out for a flat white or to attend Prince Louis' trombone recital. (William would, like Charles, have his office there and still use it for doing his public-facing Kinging.) Which brings us to a multibillion-dollar problem that William will inherit – the number of royal properties will outstrip the number of HRHs to fill them. There will be Highgrove House, Clarence House, the Castle of Mey, Sandringham, Balmoral, Anmer Hall, St James's Palace, and swathes of the Kensington Palace complex including the properties there currently occupied by 80-somethings the Duke and Duchess of Gloucester, Prince and Princess Michael of Kent and the Duke and Duchess of Kent. (Prince Harry and Meghan, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex's former home Frogmore Cottage is still empty too.) The public wouldn't stand for, nor would he consider for a second, filling them with sponging second and third cousins. Being King is never a piece of cake. If you want an indication of the direction that William and Kate are taking Crown Inc, look no further than a Colchester hospital this week where the Princess of Wales turned wearing a pair of Veja trainers and talked about her feelings. Now that is an activity I'd wager that no one has ever attempted inside Palace walls.
News.com.au
5 hours ago
- News.com.au
Vile reaction as TV star, 62, marries 34-year-old
The wedding video of a popular British TV host has been flooded with cruel remarks after he tied-the-knot for the third time with a woman 28-years his junior. Katie Dadzie, 34, married 62-year-old Nick Knowles, the star of cult UK home reno show DIY SOS, in a lavish ceremony last month that reportedly cost 'six figures'. But after sharing a heartwarming video from their nuptials, the new Mrs Knowles became the target of cruel online trolls who bombarded her photos with a series of nasty remarks. Others flooded a video of the pair's nuptials with a barrage of abuse noting their considerable age-gap. 'Third time's a charm. Especially with someone young enough to be your daughter...' one snared. 'I thought he was waiting to give his daughter away,' scoffed another. The awful abuse sparked a wave of support from many of Katie's followers who urged others to think twice before leaving hateful remarks. 'This is Katie's personal Instagram page not a tabloid page. Please think before posting your commenting on her wedding photos,' one pleaded. 'Katie, I'm so so sorry you have had to put up with such vitriol on what should have been one of the best times of your life,' another said. As one noted: 'These awful comments! And all from women. What's happened to people that they feel the need to be so nasty about somebody's wedding day.' 'Why are people so hung up on age difference? They're a good looking couple and love is indiscriminate,' added someone else. Instead of letting the cyber bullying get to her, Katie instead decided to 'furiously hit back', and recently began responding to inappropriate comments left on wedding photos she later posted, The Sun reports. When one troll commented on the fact her new husband is almost three decades older than her by writing, 'I give it one year', Katie responded: 'Amount of f**ks given.' Another troll snared, 'I give it three months,' prompting the new bride, who is a mother-of-two, to clap back with a tongue-in-cheek comment, writing: 'I give it a year.' One speculated that neither Katie kids or Knowles' four from his two previous marriages were at the big day, prompting her to ask: 'Did you see that in the front row?' The couple met in 2019 when their Katie's daughters and Nick's youngest son, Eddie, became playmates. However, they didn't get together until 2021 when the pair 'bumped into each other' and were both single. 'And that was that. It's very handy to have kids the same ages – they play together really well, which is lovely,' he told Closer previously. In their wedding snaps and video, the smitten pair could be seen enjoying their first slow dance together after exchanging vows at Braxted Park in Essex while surrounded by friends and family. Nick and Katie reported 'spared no expense on the big day' which is rumoured to have cost six figures with their lavish spending continuing into their Ibiza honeymoon which has been estimated to cost £2000 (around $4000 Australian Dollars) a night. The couple chartered a luxury yacht to sail around the party island and were seen snuggling and cuddling as they soaked up the sun.
News.com.au
9 hours ago
- News.com.au
Model praised for ‘normalising' secret-shame all women experience
A popular swimsuit model has been praised for 'normalising' a wardrobe mishap that almost every woman has suffered while attending Wimbledon. Brooks Nader was recently at the annual tennis tournament in London when she unknowingly came on her period. As a result, the 28-year-old was left with a patch of blood on her long white skirt, an experience anyone who menstruates will be all too familiar with. Studies show that persistent stigma surrounding periods has long left women feeling that menstruation is unclean and embarrassing, and can lead to feelings of shame and discomfort. But Nader proved she is determined to break the cycle of negativity surrounding the perfectly normal bodily function, and took to social media to poke fun at her relatable period mishap. 'Tries to be chic,' Nader wrote on a video she shared Friday. 'Starts [blood drop emoji] at Wimbledon.' In the clip, the model could be seen wearing a cap-sleeve black blouse with her skirt as she spun around to reveal the blood stain. 'Of course #Wimbledon,' she added in her caption. Her relatable moment was applauded by many of her 216,000 followers, who praised the star for 'normalising' the incident. 'You're so real for this,' wrote one commenter, while another shared: 'Happens to us all.' 'Thank you for normalising what we go through,' a third added. 'OK even beautiful women go through this,' another said. As one praised: 'I love that you shared this! This is real life for women!' Stigma and shame surrounding periods can be dated back thousands of years (the Bible literally refers to menstruating women as 'unclean) and have continued to modern day through sociocultural norms. These feelings of stigma and shame have created a long-running expectation on women to hide their periods. Still, researchers in 2021 found this secrecy can cause other issues, such as preventing people from identifying when their periods are unusual and subsequently seeking necessary healthcare, The Conversation reports. It's for these reasons that Nader's video has struck such a chord, as it is viewed as helping to break down the stigma that is deeply entrenched in society. 'Serving looks, realness and breaking taboos,' one follower wrote on TikTok. 'This is the most relatable thing ever,' another agreed. As one concluded: 'Absolutely nothing to be embarrassed of ever, it happens. Thanks for showing it.' Nader shot to fame after winning the 2019 Swim Search held by Sports Illustrated, and was featured in the swimsuit edition of the magazine in 2020, 2021, and 2022. In 2023, Nader became a cover girl for the magazine.
