"Stalin may take pride in declaring himself non-devotee of Murugan": ANS Prasad accuses DMK of anti-hindu agenda
Madurai (Tamil Nadu) [India], June 14 (ANI): Tamil Nadu Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) State Media Spokesperson ANS Prasad issued a scathing statement on Friday, accusing Chief Minister MK Stalin and the ruling DMK government of politicising religion and placing covert obstacles in the way of the upcoming World Murugan Devotees' Conference, scheduled to be held in Madurai on June 22.
In a sharp attack on the state government, Prasad said, 'Chief Minister Stalin may take pride in declaring himself a non-devotee of Murugan to please the followers of E.V. Ramasamy (Periyar). But at the same time, the DMK government must stop covertly imposing obstacles on the upcoming Murugan Devotees' Conference in Madurai, which could give the public the impression that Stalin is an 'enemy of Tamil deity Murugan'.'
'Judicial Intervention Sought: CM MK Stalin and DMK Govt Directed to Cease Politicisation, Ensure Unfettered Conduct of World Murugan Devotees Conference in Madurai, Upholding Spiritual Rights & Constitutional Freedoms,' he added.
Prasad alleged that CM Stalin, known for distancing himself from religious practices, had acted against Hindu sentiments to appease followers of EV Ramasamy (Periyar).
He said, 'Chief Minister Stalin may take pride in declaring himself a non-devotee of Murugan to please the followers of E.V. Ramasamy (Periyar). But at the same time, the DMK government must stop covertly imposing obstacles on the upcoming Murugan Devotees' Conference in Madurai, which could give the public the impression that Stalin is an 'enemy of Tamil deity Murugan'.'
He reminded the DMK that under the Indian Constitution framed by B.R. Ambedkar, a Chief Minister must serve all religions equally, regardless of personal beliefs.
Prasad also pointed out that preparations for the conference were underway, with expectations of over 5 lakh devotees attending from Tamil Nadu and around the globe.
According to Prasad, the DMK and its alliance partners, including Congress, VCK, CPI(M), and others, had grown increasingly nervous over the conference's expected success. 'Their nervousness indicates the grand success this event is going to be,' he said.
He further added, 'The people have now realised the true nature of the 'anti-Hindu Periyarist DMK' of Chief Minister Stalin, the 'missionary-backed anti-Hindu DMK' of Deputy CM Udhayanidhi Stalin, and the 'foreign religious, Hindu-targeting DMK' of the controversial Minister Sekarbabu.'
Prasad also condemned the state government for allegedly misusing temple funds to organise a parallel state-sponsored event in Palani, claiming it was done for electoral gain and to divide Hindu society.
As the event drew near, Prasad claimed that groups like Makkal Adhikaram, May 17 Movement, Periyar Dravidar Kazhagam, and Dravidar Viduthalai Kazhagam, allegedly backed by the DMK, had petitioned the Director General of Police (DGP) seeking a ban on the conference.
These petitions were called 'another anti-Hindu drama' by the BJP leader.
'These groups have been making derogatory remarks about the conference, the Hindu religion, and Hindu gods, inciting social unrest. Meanwhile, the police remain silent spectators,' Prasad stated.
He also alleged that police had stopped volunteers from distributing invitations and intimidated Murugan devotees.
Referring to the spiritual heritage of Tamil Nadu, Prasad said, 'Tamil Nadu, the land once guided by the Nayanmars and Alwars, has always been a spiritual land. Despite invasions and temple destructions in North India, Tamil Nadu is home to thousands of ancient temples that have withstood the test of time.'
He raised serious concerns over a long-standing controversy surrounding Tirupparankundram Hill, the first of the six sacred abodes of Lord Murugan, claiming that certain groups were trying to rename it 'Sikandar Hill' and conduct non-vegetarian feasts and animal sacrifices near the temple.
He said, 'A group led by IUML MP from Ramanathapuram, Nawaz Kani, even staged a protest by eating non-vegetarian food along the sacred path to the temple, releasing photos of their act. This enraged the entire Tamil community.'
Prasad pointed out that a mass protest held on February 4, which attracted over 50,000 people despite government restrictions, had already served as a warning to the ruling coalition.
He warned that any further attempts to hinder the June 22 conference would backfire politically and spiritually. 'This conference will serve to reaffirm that Tamil Nadu is a land of spirituality, and expose the DMK government's double standards, selectively targeting Hinduism under the guise of secularism.'
Calling the upcoming event a festival of Hindu resurgence, he said, 'This conference, which unites Murugan devotees beyond political lines, will be a grand success and will deliver a strong blow to anti-Hindu forces. The spiritual uprising at Tirupparankundram will surely echo in the upcoming 2026 assembly elections!'
The conference is expected to see the presence of Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath and Andhra Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister Pawan Kalyan, with preparations for their participation underway. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Oppn alleges admn incompetence, undue favour to BJP workers; BJP counters
1 2 Bhubaneswar: Leader of opposition and BJD president Naveen Patnaik on Sunday termed the stampede in Puri as a glaring incompetence by the govt in crowd management, while Congress attributed it to undue favour shown to BJP workers to gather around chariots. "Today's stampede, occurring just a day after the abysmal failure of crowd management during the Rath Yatra that left hundreds injured, exposes the govt's glaring incompetence in ensuring a peaceful festival for devotees," Naveen wrote on X. Quoting eyewitness reports, he added that the initial response to the tragedy came from the devotees' relatives, with no govt machinery present to manage the surging crowds, highlighting a shocking lapse in duty. "The inordinate delay in pulling the Nandighosha chariot on Rath Yatra day was conveniently attributed to 'Mahaprabhu's Wish', a shocking excuse that masks the administration's complete abdication of responsibility. While I refrain from accusing the govt of criminal negligence, their blatant callousness undeniably contributed to this tragedy. I urge the govt to implement urgent corrective measures to ensure the smooth conduct of Adapa Bije, Bahuda, Suna Besha and other key #RathYatra rituals," Naveen wrote. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo He said, "I extend my heartfelt condolences to the families of the three devotees who lost their lives in the tragic stampede at Saradhabali, #Puri, and I pray to Mahaprabhu Jagannatha for the swift recovery of the devotees injured in this devastating incident." Echoing him, state Congress president Bhakta Charan Das said the entire arrangement for the festival, including security, was VVIP- and BJP worker-centric. "It should have been devotee-centric, but it was not so. Thousands of BJP workers from all over the country made unauthorised entry close to the chariot perimeter, swelling the crowd and pushing other devotees to the brink. Uncountable delegates made their way into the VVIP dais as well. It is highly condemnable," Das said. BJP countered the opposition allegations and said that strong action was taken against the negligent officers and more action is awaited as an inquiry is underway. "The incident is being thoroughly probed. All lapses will be identified and negligence will not be viewed lightly," law minister Prithiviraj Harichandan told the media.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Ravi Shankar Prasad at Idea Exchange: ‘No leader can dare to impose an Emergency. That's the biggest positive consequence of that struggle'
Senior BJP leader Ravi Shankar Prasad looks back at the Emergency 50 years later, the institutional guardrails that ensure it does not happen again and the upcomig Bihar elections. The conversation was moderated by Liz Mathew, Deputy Editor, The Indian Express. Liz Mathew: How do you look back at the Emergency 50 years later? The Emergency was the darkest chapter of India's independent history. The whole country was turned into a prison. I was an intermediate student when the JP (Jayaprakash Narayan) movement started and we became big leaders in the Bihar student movement. Mrs Gandhi was losing her appeal, there was an economic downturn, price rise, and corruption. This is when the movement gathered steam. In Bihar, torture began before the Emergency. I was arrested under MISA (Maintenance of Internal Security Act) in front of my house. Ten policemen jumped over me in the dead of night while I was going on a tour to Bhabua. I suffered an injury and was put in jail. Mrs Gandhi was becoming an authoritarian. And then her election was set aside by the Allahabad High Court. The brave judge Jagmohanlal Sinha, who never had any limelight, was a pre-collegium appointee. And thereafter, Emergency was imposed in the dead of the night. In that dark period, there was one light of hope, The Indian Express and Ramnath Goenkaji. Every attempt was made to take over The Indian Express by sinister means. I was underground during the Emergency and I have seen the torture from close quarters. JP once told us that he was arrested in the same guest house in Haryana, where he saw Morarji Desai walking in the garden. JP's kidney was seriously damaged and he was shifted to Jaslok hospital. When his condition became critical, he came to Patna. God saved him because he had to save the democracy of India. Dev Kant Barooah was the president of the Congress party. He coined the expression, 'Indira is India and India is Indira'. Sycophancy was at its extreme. The Supreme Court failed us shockingly. Nine High Courts of India quoted a detention order as arbitrary. When the matter went to the Supreme Court, it was reversed. One judge asked Niren De, the then Attorney General, if a detainee was shot inside the jail, would he have any remedy? He said, 'no, he has no remedy'. That argument was effectively upheld by the court. It was a shameful moment for the Indian judiciary. There was one brave judge, Hans Raj Khanna, who gave a dissenting judgment. And he was denied the post of the key justice for two months and was superseded. These are very emotional moments. Being under JP has been one of the most extraordinary experiences of my life. He was a great leader, a great freedom fighter. He scaled the 30-foot wall of Hazaribagh Jail and ran away. He struggled, was tortured, and arrested at the Nepal border. Nehruji liked him. He offered him to join the government and become the deputy prime minister. He said, no, I will work for Sarvodaya and Bhoodan. In 1977, when BJP won, all because of him, he could have been the PM, but he said, no. Liz Mathew: What do you remember about your time in jail? Those who were political prisoners were treated differently and the others were treated horribly. This was a great influence on me when I became a lawyer in Patna High Court. I decided I will take up the cases of these inmates. During the Emergency, many people — socialist leaders, Sarvodaya leaders, and RSS leaders were arrested and tortured. But I remember many young RSS Swayamsevaks whose nails were extracted to get confessions. It was torture and it was extreme. The lesson I learned in jail was to help the needy and the undertrials. Liz Mathew: The 77th government formation — the coming together of Opposition parties with a lot of hope and optimism to provide an alternative post the Emergency — failed miserably. Why do you think that happened? It was pure craving for power. JP was disenchanted, so were we. This whole fight — Charan Singh, Raj Narayan, among others, was very unfortunate and the Opposition lost out. But what is the biggest lesson of the Emergency? People of India know who they are and what they owe to themselves. They know for sure they can defeat any political party by the power of their vote. Indira Gandhi lost. Sanjay Gandhi lost. The Congress Party was wiped out in North India, and only one seat was won by Kamal Nath… I would've appreciated Rahul Gandhi or his party to have publicly apologised for all the atrocities against journalists, against the supersession of judges, against public leaders. But that is not forthcoming. Liz Mathew: In the run-up to the 2024 election, various parties came together. They say that an undeclared Emergency is happening now. They have the right to ask questions. What else will they say? After all, the NDA led by Narendra Modi is winning elections. The point is ab aapko vote nahi milta toh hum kya karein? Aap jeet jaiye. Get the votes. Every day they hold a press conference, every day they shower classic abuses on Narendra Modi. They also keep on chasing us. That is what democracy is about. On the emergency | It was pure craving for power… I would have appreciated Rahul Gandhi or his party to have publicly apologised for the atrocities against journalists, against public leaders. But that's not forthcoming Aakash Joshi: MISA became a symbol of the oppression of the Emergency. Why do you think no government has been able to get rid of preventive detention, which is not only allowed, but also being used by the government, and various agencies? Do the victims of terror have human rights or not? Commander Narwal, who was killed brutally in Pahalgam, does his wife have a human right or not? Similarly, does India have threats or not? From Maoists, from terrorists, from their network? Therefore, in many cases, you have to resort to preventive detention because of the sheer nature of the challenge. The larger question is, when India became free, why was it kept? There is a proper safeguard in the Constitution: if you are arrested in preventive detention, you have to be present before the advisory board, which confirms it, and thereafter, you can challenge it in court. In many cases, courts have quashed the detention order if it does not satisfy the grounds of detention. That is a safeguard. Vikas Pathak: While JP was the face of the movement, who do you think are the three or four people who did a creditable job? Lalu Prasad Yadav was in jail with me, though much senior to me. Nitish Kumar was there. In the strategy part, I think Ram Bahadur Rai, KN Govindacharya and Nanaji Deshmukh. I remember Nanaji Deshmukh moving throughout the country in his Fiat and he'd keep the literature in the stepney of the car. No leader can dare to impose an Emergency in India now. That's the biggest positive consequence of that struggle. Shalini Langer: Why do you think Indira Gandhi called off the Emergency or called for elections? That is a million-dollar question. The only thing which strikes me is that there were a lot of international campaigns against her. In the US, in the UK, particularly. India's growth was nothing, but we used to be proud of the fact that we were a democracy. That was also snatched away. There were protests abroad. Remember JP was a socialist leader. All the socialist internationals also stood by him. Perhaps they pressured her. She misjudged. Her system had informed her she will sweep the polls. Amitabh Sinha: Fifty years after the actual Emergency, what institutional guardrails have we set up to make sure that no leader can think about imposing an Emergency? First are the newspapers, journalists, the TV media and social media; second is judicial: PIL, public opinion; and third is that all the political groups know that if we impose Emergency, people will drop us. Amitabh Sinha: Why are more active efforts not made to get the 42nd Amendment reversed? Parts of it were challenged. There is only one thing which was accepted. In the Preamble, secularism was introduced, but it was not touched for obvious reasons. The Fundamental Duties remain. Let the people and political parties not misunderstand me, but India has to become a big sporting power. Shouldn't sports come under the concurrent list? The government of India and the state government can pool their resources. If India's tourism has to become global, these are questions which will come. Amitabh Sinha: But the objection to the 42nd Amendment was not just on the content but also on the process itself. The whole 42nd Amendment process was conceived in sin. To make Mrs Gandhi the president. Autocracy or benign autocracy, as the case may be, and the rest is history. The election law was changed retrospectively to ensure her success. Liz Mathew: Often we see arrest warrants or FIRs against journalists. Draconian laws are imposed on YouTubers. How do you justify that? Freedom of the Press is sacrosanct. Independence of the judiciary is sacrosanct. And if Indian democracy has become what it is today over 75 years, apart from political activism and the people, the judiciary and media have played a crucial role. And obviously, if a CM in the East arrests someone for a cartoon… Those who are in politics need to understand one thing: Fun, pun, vyangya and cartoons are a part of democracy. Let us learn to accept it. But is all the YouTubers' content proper? Is there not a case of some YouTubers pandering to (content from) across the borders? You cannot generalise it. Article 19.1 gives the freedom of speech and expression. Article 19.2 in the same Constitution says that reasonable restrictions can be imposed. On freedom of press | Freedom of the Press is sacrosanct. Those who are in politics need to understand one thing: Fun, pun, vyangya and cartoons are a part of democracy. Let's learn to accept it Liz Mathew: What do you think of the widespread criticism of the role of media, especially visual media, during Operation Sindoor. I don't accept this general criticism. When there is a big Army operation, some degree of sanctity has to be given. There cannot be an hourly briefing. One briefing was done by the foreign secretary along with two very distinguished women officers of the armed forces. Thereafter, all the DGs of military operations of the Air Force, Navy and Army gave a wonderful presentation. I had gone to Europe and addressed media in London, Paris, Brussels, Germany, and think tanks. I was asked repeatedly: 'why did you send your forces inside?' And then we said, you can send your armed forces 12,000 kilometres and kill Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan. The life of an ordinary Indian is as costly or precious as that of an American or European. We went only four kilometers. Then they say, why don't you discuss? We were very clear that we have not come to seek your mediation. We are capable of handling Pakistan as we have handled wars. But today, terrorism is a cancer, knocking at your door. And any terrorist attempt, be it in 9/11, in New York, in London, in Paris, in Marseille, in Brussels or Germany, it is either a Pakistani terrorist or one trained in Pakistan. The generals in command in Pakistan are not the political leaders and have vested interests to have these terrorists — their assets to wage a war. In that scenario, whom to talk to? Liz Mathew: During your visit to these multiple cities as part of an all-party delegation, what do you think India should do more? I learned that the committee system of the European Parliament is very powerful. There is a need to utilise this interaction. And when I would introduce my team and say that I am the leader of BJP, we have Congress members, Shiv Sena members, and we have thinkers, then they used to appreciate the diversity of India's politics. The second is, they are deeply impressed by the economic performance of India. Europe wants to have good relations with India. Liz Mathew: The world is facing conflict after conflict. But we don't see India as a player of significance. The global scenario is becoming complex with alarming regularity. What about multilateralism? What about global institutions? What I foresee is this: apart from the UN, many other institutions like the G7, like G20, like Quad, are emerging. I think in all this, India's role is very powerful. As far as the conflict between Israel and Iran is concerned, India has a good equation with both. Therefore, the ceasefire is something we welcome. But the way India rescued its citizens in Iran and Israel is commendable. Liz Mathew: In the Donald Trump era, do you think that India is in a dilemma over how to deal with the tariffs? Let us trust the seasoned capability of Indian negotiators to have a good deal. Trade is a factor which is conditioned by a lot of supplementary factors. You cannot be judgmental today. A lot of give and take, is there. I would refrain from making any comment. On Bihar not developing A second-rung leadership | Nitish Kumar and our relationship goes way far back… If he has been taken as a leader, it doesn't mean the capable people are not there. We will win Bihar again, convincingly Amitabh Sinha: On the judicial reforms, what are the few things that need to be prioritised apart from the Collegium vs NJAC (National Judicial Appointments Commission) debate? With a very good judicial data grid available now, we know how long the cases have been pending in the district courts. All the criminal cases pending for trial for more than five to 10 years and all the pending criminal and civil appeals must be prioritised. There should be a conscious attempt to write off all these outstanding matters. NJAC was brought in by me as the Law minister. There were a lot of recommendations of the Constitutional Review Commission of the Law Commission. And for the first time in the contested polity of India, every party supported it. In the Rajya Sabha, only Ram Jethmalani was a dissenting voice. It has been quashed. We have accepted the judgment. The PM, assisted by his Cabinet, is the key player in the appointment of the President, the Vice President, the three army chiefs, the CVC, the CAG, and the Public Service Commission. He holds the nuclear button. But through the assistance of his law minister, he cannot be trusted to appoint a fair judge, is too sweeping a comment. Liz Mathew: Nitish Kumar has been the Bihar CM for 20 years and will be leading the coalition. Do you think BJP has failed to nurture a second-rung leadership in Bihar? Nitish Kumar and our relationship goes way far back. He was the first to join the BJP alliance in the Samata Party. In the fodder scam, he was the first to oppose Lalu Prasad and came to our support. He was with the Vajpayee government in 1996, in 1998, 1999. Vajpayee ji and Advani ji pushed him as the chief minister in 2000. And from 2005, he became the chief minister. There was a little hesitation in his own camp to let him become the leader of the coalition. How has Bihar changed? I'll give you only one instance. The size of Lalu Prasad's last budget was Rs 23,000 crore. Now it is 3,07,000 crore. The roads are coming, the airports are coming, things are changing. There is a lot of scope to do more, but we can see the transformation. We respect that coalition. If we begin a coalition, we maintain our relationship. We don't kick out our coalition partners. If anyone leaves, it is a different matter; we don't leave. And if Nitish Kumar was taken as a leader, it doesn't mean the capable people are not there. We will win Bihar again, convincingly.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Post-CAA stir and pandemic lull, uptick in student clashes at Jamia
New Delhi: After a relatively quiet period following the 2019 anti-CAA protests and the lull caused by the pandemic, Jamia Millia Islamia (JMI) has seen a sharp rise in student clashes, with 42 incidents reported in two years – 2023 and 2024 -- reveals an RTI query. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In comparison, the university saw no clashes in 2020 and 2021. Between Jan 2019 and Dec 2024, a total of 55 student clashes were reported. In 2019, the year that saw the university become a focal point of the nationwide agitation against CAA, six incidents were reported. JMI students held sustained protests, with police entering the campus library on Dec 15, sparking outrage across the country. In the following two years, during Covid and the lockdown, no incidents were recorded. While 2022 saw seven incidents, there were 22 reported clashes in 2023 and 20 in 2024. According to the RTI data, the nature of recent incidents is broadly described as "altercations", mostly taking place on the main campus. In 2023, 10 such clashes occurred between Jan and May. The trend continued in 2024, with 11 incidents reported between Jan and July. While the RTI response does not elaborate on the causes of each incident, the records confirm they were officially registered by university authorities. The rise in clashes has been accompanied by a marked increase in disciplinary measures. The number of students who faced action jumped from 17 in 2019 to 47 in 2022, 105 in 2023, and 74 in 2024 — a total of 243 students over four years. The actions ranged from warnings and show-cause notices to suspensions and campus bans. In 2023, Jamia issued 71 show-cause notices, asked 21 students to sign good conduct bonds and banned three from campus. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In 2024, 56 students were issued show-cause, eight put on good conduct bonds, four suspended, and one was banned from the campus. No disciplinary action was taken in 2020 and 2021, the years in which no clashes were reported. Police were involved twice — in 2019 and 2024 — to "restore order and ensure safety", according to the university. Over the six-year period, five FIRs were registered in connection with the altercations — one in 2019 and four in 2024. The FIRs were filed under sections relating to 'causing hurt', though the university declined to disclose specific provisions, citing Section 8(1)(h) of RTI Act, which exempts details that could impede an investigation. Jamia also stated that details on whether any students were detained or arrested were "not available". Between 2019 and 2024, Jamia collected a total of Rs 27,000 in fines. This includes Rs 7,000 in 2019; Rs 4,000 in 2022; Rs 12,500 in 2023; and Rs 3,500 in 2024. No fines were collected in 2020 or 2021. The university's RTI reply does not specify if the clashes were linked to political groups or factions active on campus. Jamia has not held students' union elections since 2006, though student collectives and informal groupings continue to exist. While the RTI data confirms a clear uptick in student unrest on Jamia's campus post-2022 compared to the pandemic years, the university has largely relied on internal disciplinary mechanisms to address the clashes. With fines remaining symbolic and police action minimal, the data reflects a cautious administrative approach.
