logo
Brad Pitt wants access to Angelina Jolie's private conversations to prove his case

Brad Pitt wants access to Angelina Jolie's private conversations to prove his case

News2416-07-2025
Brad Pitt is not backing down when it comes to the sale of half of Château Miraval, the winery he owned with ex-wife Angelina Jolie.
The F1: The Movie actor recently filed court documents requesting to see private conversations between Angelina and Alexey Oliynik, who works for Stoli Group, which bought out her stake of the winery.
Zahara Jolie, Angie and Brad's daughter, is all grown up and dating a rising star!
In 2021, the Salt actress sold her 50% stake to Tenute del Mondo, a subsidiary of the Stoli Group and Brad felt sidelined when the news broke because he claimed they'd had an agreement that they both had to give consent before selling. The following year, he sued Angelina (50), claiming he'd been 'waging a vindictive war' against her since she filed for divorce in 2016.
In the new filing, Brad (61) claims Alexey had firsthand knowledge of the sale of the French winery and that he was refusing to hand over relevant documents.
'These requests go directly to key allegations about Pitt's objections to the sale,' the Oscar winner's legal team wrote in his filing.
His lawyers say the documents will prove Brad's claims that Angie 'acted with malice' in selling to Stoli, a move 'she knew Pitt opposed'.
The former couple haven't commented on the new filings, but Angie's legal team has previously said that Brad declined to buy her out of the winery business because she refused to sign a non-disclosure agreement he wanted from her.
The actress claimed that Brad's non-disclosure agreement was 'designed to force her silence about his abuse', referring to a private jet flight in 2016 in which Brad was allegedly verbally and physically abusive with his family.
An insider shared that the events leading up to the divorce are what 'turned the kids against him' but adds that Brad 'doesn't blame [Angelina] for everything'.
'The divorce is something that had been controlling his life for so many years,' the insider says. 'He loved her and he knows he made mistakes.'
The Babylon actor recently opened up on a podcast about facing obstacles with perseverance and said that he's ready to put the past behind him as he's learned from his mistakes when it comes to parenthood and marriage.
'No matter the mistake, you know, you just learn from [it] and move on,' he said at the premiere of F1.
Brad, who is now dating Ines de Ramon (32), said that at his age he sees 'how important it is to surround yourself with the people you know, the people you love, the people that love you back'.
'Friends, family, and that's it,' he said. 'From there, we get to go make things. It's a pretty simple, I think, equation.'
A source close to the mom of six said that Angelina hopes Brad can 'move on'. However, they point out that she feels this will be impossible until he calls off his lawyers.
'Sadly, until he drops his lawsuit, this family will not have the peace and healing they so very much desire and deserve,' Angie notes in legal documents her team has filed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tobey Maguire Asks for Joint Custody of Son Otis, 15, in Response to Estranged Wife's Initial Filing Nearly 5 Years Ago
Tobey Maguire Asks for Joint Custody of Son Otis, 15, in Response to Estranged Wife's Initial Filing Nearly 5 Years Ago

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Tobey Maguire Asks for Joint Custody of Son Otis, 15, in Response to Estranged Wife's Initial Filing Nearly 5 Years Ago

NEED TO KNOW Tobey Maguire is requesting joint custody of his son Otis, 15, nearly five years after his estranged wife initially filed for divorce The former couple is also parents to daughter Ruby, 18 Maguire asked that child and spousal support be determined through private mediationTobey Maguire is requesting joint custody of his son. In a response to his estranged wife Jennifer Meyer's initial divorce filing from October 2020, the actor, 50, is asking for joint legal and physical custody of his son Otis, 15, according to documents obtained by PEOPLE. The former couple is also parents to daughter Ruby Sweetheart, who turned 18 last November. He also asked that child and spousal support be determined through private mediation. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Meyer initially filed for divorce from Maguire in 2020, nearly four years after the former couple publicly split. Last September, Meyer announced that she is engaged to Geoffrey Ogunlesi, who is the son of Nigerian billionaire lawyer and investment banker Adebayo Ogunlesi. After nine years of marriage, Meyer announced she and Maguire were separating in 2016 and said the two would continue to co-parent. 'After much soul searching and consideration we have made the decision to separate as a couple,' Maguire and Meyer said in a joint statement shared to PEOPLE. 'As devoted parents, our first priority remains raising our children together with enduring love, respect and friendship.' In October 2016, a source told PEOPLE that the couple had "been living separate lives for a while." "They have completely different interests and haven't seemed to be connecting," the insider said at the time. "He's extremely private and prefers to stay home, and she's very social and has tons of girlfriends." "They haven't been happy together for a long time," the source continued, "but they are great parents and they love their children." This past June, Maguire and Meyer reunited as they celebrated his teenage daughter Ruby's graduation from high school. "Congratulations Ruby!!!!! ♥️ Graduate of our dreams. We are so proud of you in every way. We love love love love love you baby 🥰♥️" Meyer wrote in the caption. Read the original article on People

Why Are There Such Bad Vibes Surrounding ‘The Adventures Of Cliff Booth,' The Upcoming Brad Pitt / David Fincher / Quentin Tarantino Movie?
Why Are There Such Bad Vibes Surrounding ‘The Adventures Of Cliff Booth,' The Upcoming Brad Pitt / David Fincher / Quentin Tarantino Movie?

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Why Are There Such Bad Vibes Surrounding ‘The Adventures Of Cliff Booth,' The Upcoming Brad Pitt / David Fincher / Quentin Tarantino Movie?

Has another dream of the '90s finally up and died? 25 years ago, the news of a movie written by Quentin Tarantino and directed by David Fincher would have been greeted with a flood of film-geek (and, OK, maybe also film-bro) delight, as if thousands of dorm-room posters had spontaneously sprung to life and thrown a kegger together. But with the commencement of shooting on The Adventures of Cliff Booth, which is indeed a Tarantino-penned, Fincher-directed, Brad Pitt-starring companion piece to Tarantino's beloved Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, much of the internet reacted more like their beloved dorm posters had been mashed up into a horrible A.I.-generated, Facebook-posted fake project. Why is this project being treated (at least in some corners) like an announcement of Morbius 2: More-bius? Why are the vibes so off? Are people afraid that Cliff will somehow cross paths with an alt-universe Mank? Some point to an incongruity between the styles of Fincher and Tarantino, to which I say: So?! If anything, Tarantino has become overly precious with his own work over the years – not in the work itself, which is often terrific (Once Upon a Time is one of his best; plenty of legendary filmmakers could not say the same about their most recent films), but in his obsession with making just ten movies (Kill Bill counts as one, but so does Death Proof, his half of Grindhouse) as a writer-director, to address his highly outdated idea of what happens to directors as they age. Tarantino came of age at a time when filmmakers did often limp into retirement past their prime, so he has it in his head that old guys don't make great movies. This seems patently absurd living in the era of Martin Scorsese, Steven Spielberg, Michael Mann, and so on, but Tarantino is a weird guy and maybe he has weird opinions about Spielberg's last great movie being The Terminal or something. Anyway, the idea of Tarantino mitigating his fussiness by giving a script he liked, but wouldn't want to make his ceremonious final film ever, to another filmmaker is actually a pretty exciting development, as is Fincher working with a strong writer. The fact that Fincher's meticulous, clinical, immaculately composed sleekness feels at odds with Tarantino's equally fussed-over but more rambling, loquacious, and playful style is half the point! Tarantino making a Cliff Booth sequel about the later life of the laconic stunt man would be kind of boring. Fincher making a Tarantino screenplay is inherently interesting, even if it turns out to be a disaster. One common ground the two filmmakers share is Pitt, who has collaborated repeatedly with both of them; maybe he's the problem. (Admittedly, his shaggy wig doesn't necessarily inspire confidence.) This might seem counterintuitive: Pitt won an Oscar for playing Cliff Booth, and F1 represents his biggest hit in a decade. But is it possible that the golden light emanating from Pitt has faded over the years in light of abuse allegations and the kind of self-flattering star-maintenance projects that F1 represents? His previous Tarantino films came amidst work with Terrence Malick, Andrew Dominik, Steve McQueen, Robert Zemeckis, and the Coen Brothers. Bullet Train, F1, and an upcoming David Ayer movie aren't exactly on that level. He hasn't reached Johnny Depp levels of over-ness, but there is a strange parallel between two long-beloved actors with alcohol problems, accused of spousal abuse, who may finally be seeing their age catch up with them after years of defying the clock. Maybe that bad wig is the telltale hairpiece, serving as a grim reminder of the hubris involved with revisiting an Oscar-winning character in a Netflix movie. And that last bit may actually be the heart of the disdain toward the Cliff Booth project. When I tweeted a sarcastic response to my feed full of movie-critic types turning up their noses at a Fincher/Tarantino project, I was repeatedly and witheringly informed that this was a Netflix movie, which doesn't count; that Fincher has been 'washed' since he started working with the streamer; and that everyone was right, actually, to dismiss it sight unseen. This strikes me as borderline delusional. Netflix does seem like a strange place for a project that would almost assuredly attract a lot of attention upon release (which was part of my original point; scoff now, but you'll watch this movie as soon as it comes out!), and the company is inarguably bad for the movie business as a whole. But does that purity test really disqualify movies like The Irishman, Marriage Story, or Roma from worthiness? Fincher's The Killer isn't any Netflixier than his pre-Netflix projects, and it's a hell of a lot better than many of them. I did not spend my two hours with that movie seething about Netflix. (Granted, I was lucky enough to see it in a theater, and will almost certainly make that happen for Cliff Booth.) Maybe a lack of universally sky-high expectations can only help this Tarantino/Fincher movie. It certainly fits the post-'60s hangover that the movie itself might indulge, given that it takes place well into the decade following Once Upon a Time's fabricated Hollywood ending. (How alternate will this timeline where Sharon Tate lived actually be?) And strange as the antipathy toward this project might seem, maybe that free-floating Netflix hostility is a good thing. Tarantino's earlier film is a starry-eyed look at a shifting Hollywood, and now here comes a vulgar example of what's become of that '90s boomer crop of American auteurs: a mix-and-match sequel going that will go straight to streaming for most of the country because the corporation funding it sees movie theaters as an 'outmoded' form of competition. Maybe this unlikely collaboration between three Hollywood titans is just giving the industry the bad vibes it deserves. Jesse Hassenger (@rockmarooned) is a writer living in Brooklyn. He's a regular contributor to The A.V. Club, Polygon, and The Week, among others. He podcasts at too. Solve the daily Crossword

"The Simpsons" Creator Just Dropped How People Can Be Liberated From MAGA In Three Words
"The Simpsons" Creator Just Dropped How People Can Be Liberated From MAGA In Three Words

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

"The Simpsons" Creator Just Dropped How People Can Be Liberated From MAGA In Three Words

The Simpsons has quite a history of predicting real-life events. In the year 2000, they predicted Trump would be president. In 1995, they predicted smart watches would be a thing. And they even predicted Greece's 2015 economic downturn in 2013. Matt Groening is the creator of The Simpsons, and he offered up some future predictions at a panel at San Diego Comic-Con. Variety reported his first prediction was that Elon Musk would be the first man to land on Mars. "The Simpsons predicts Elon Musk will be the first man to land on Mars. Amazingly, he will crash-land on Mars. But he will radio back that he is marooned there forever. And most emotionally of all, he will be able to hear the cheering all the way." His second prediction was that the Statue of Liberty would be given back to France. "America will return the Statue of Liberty to France and North America remembers what the word Liberty means." And the third prediction was about how kids would liberate their parents from MAGA. "'The Simpsons' predicts kids across America will liberate their Republican parents from the cult of MAGA. And here's how you do it. Grab the TV remote, go to menu, go to controls, vertical controls, look for channel list and delete Fox News." Yes, it's simple: "Delete Fox News." Now, let's see if these predictions come true. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store