For Netflix, the Srebrenica massacre is a joke - and Gaza is the sequel
It was the mantra forged in the ashes of Auschwitz, a promise to generations unborn that the horrors of genocide would never be repeated.
But today, in an age of digital spectacle and political impunity, "Never again" has become "Ever again". And we are witnessing a grotesque inversion of memory.
From the Warsaw Ghetto to Srebrenica to Gaza, the imagery of genocide - especially the suffering of children - has not only lost its sacredness, it has become fodder for mockery, comedy and the most cynical forms of entertainment.
This is no accident, but a reflection of how unresolved histories and unaddressed root causes have created a culture desensitised to violence and hungry for spectacle.
In a shocking display of insensitivity, the Dutch Netflix comedy Football Parents features a scene that compares the victims of the Srebrenica genocide to clumsy child football players, turning the Bosnian genocide into a punchline.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Mocking victims
More than 8,000 Bosniak Muslim men and boys were murdered under the watch of Dutch UN peacekeepers in 1995. Dutch soldiers not only failed to prevent genocide but also participated in committing it.
Now, Dutch television mocks them.
The scandal runs deeper. The Netherlands has been linked to three major genocides - the Holocaust, the Bosnian genocide, and now the genocide in Gaza.
Incredibly, Football Parents mocked children's football skills by comparing them to genocide victims - a grotesque parallel to the 1993 killing of 74 Bosnian children
The Dutch state is currently being sued for failing to prevent genocide in Gaza. Meanwhile, a recent study revealed that nearly half a million Dutch citizens took part in the Holocaust.
Rather than confront its violent past, Dutch media recycles it as "dark humour".
Incredibly, Football Parents mocked children's football skills by comparing them to genocide victims - a grotesque parallel to 12 April 1993, when 74 Bosnian children were killed by Serb shells while playing football on a school field in Srebrenica.
This goes beyond tasteless comedy - it is genocide denial masquerading as satire.
Denial is not merely an afterthought; it is an integral part of the genocidal process itself, as seen in Israeli TikTok influencers who produce viral "prank" videos feigning donations for Palestinian children in Gaza, only to reveal the appeal as a cruel joke.
These clips have been viewed by millions, turning the real suffering of children under relentless bombardment into nothing more than a callous punchline.
The unspoken truth
How did we arrive here? From solemn commemoration to commodified suffering? From mourning child victims to ridiculing them on screen?
The hard truth is that we never truly moved away from genocide.
Srebrenica genocide survivors draw parallels with Gaza 30 years after massacre Read More »
There was never a "Never again" because there was never a reckoning.
The root causes - racism, colonialism, dehumanisation, militarism - were never dismantled. Instead, the same ideologies that fuelled the Holocaust found new expressions in new times, targeting new bodies.
Gregory Stanton, founder of Genocide Watch, outlined 10 stages of genocide - classification, symbolisation, discrimination, dehumanisation, organisation, polarisation, preparation, persecution, extermination, and denial - that were never internalised by the so-called international community.
If anything, they have become background noise and their warning signs normalised in political discourse and media narratives.
Even linguistically, the promise was always fragile. Say "Never again" often enough, and the "N" erodes - until all that remains is "ever again". A mantra turned into prophecy: "Forever again."
A lost innocence
One of the most iconic images of the Holocaust shows a young Jewish boy in the Warsaw Ghetto in 1943, his arms raised in surrender, fear etched into his face.
Taken by a Nazi photographer, the photo captured the innocence of childhood crushed under the weight of state violence and hatred.
It became a symbol of innocence violated and a rallying cry for remembrance. But today, that same innocence is up for ridicule.
Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war
In the West - particularly in cultural output from nations complicit in past genocides - the suffering of children has become fair game. The sacred is now profane.
Children have always held a certain "entertaining" value in western media.
Their pain is photogenic, their tears emotionally potent. But there is a fine line between representing suffering and exploiting it. And today, that line is not just crossed - it is obliterated.
In the age of livestreamed war and algorithm-driven engagement, genocide is no longer just a crime - it is content.
The Obmana - the Bosnian genocide - was the first genocide broadcast live on television.
Harrowing images streamed into homes around the globe, laying bare the catastrophic failure of the international community to protect its victims.
The genocide in Gaza has become the first fully digital genocide.
Smartphones capture the last moments of children's lives in real time. Livestreams show entire families buried under rubble - only for those images to be drowned out by satire, denial, or worse, parody.
This is not a bug in the system. It is a feature of how power operates today. The same states and institutions that fail to prevent genocide now allow the mockery of its victims to flourish in their cultural industries.
The price of naivety
The world watched in stunned disbelief as western power structures - political, media, and academic - betrayed their sacred "Never again" vow amid Gaza's unfolding genocide.
By perpetuating this dehumanisation, Netflix is repeating the same propaganda that has historically preceded genocide
But this betrayal has deeper roots, stretching back to Bosnia and Obmana, where the West effectively legalised and rewarded genocide.
The proof? Srebrenica is still controlled by the very Serb forces who slaughtered Bosniaks. Impunity for genocide paved the way for its denial.
The University of Vienna, under the leadership of Rector Sebastian Schutze, remains a glaring example of this.
To this day, it refuses to issue an apology to the Mothers of Srebrenica for its documented role in genocide denial.
Gaza confirms the grim truth: once we excuse one genocide, we enable the next.
Despite an outcry in Bosnian media and direct petitions demanding that Netflix remove content that ridicules the Bosnian genocide, the platform has refused to act.
This inaction shows utter contempt for the value of Muslim lives - echoing the dehumanising rhetoric recently amplified by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who remarked that Israel is "doing the dirty work for all of us".
War on Gaza: Did we learn nothing from the Srebrenica genocide? Read More »
Now, as the world scrolls through the Gaza genocide on their feeds, Netflix offers its audience Dutch-produced content mocking the last one - inviting viewers to laugh at the "good work" the Dutch UN peacekeepers carried out in Srebrenica - murdering Bosniak boys and men.
Netflix exposes the twisted hierarchy of white supremacy, where even blonde, blue-eyed European Muslim genocide victims are denied full humanity, deemed unworthy of the series' removal by its leadership, Reed Hastings and David Hyman.
By perpetuating this dehumanisation, Netflix is repeating the same propaganda that has historically preceded genocide.
Many Bosniaks were shocked when the University of Vienna refused to apologise for its role in genocide denial.
Now, they are utterly appalled to see Netflix mocking their dead.
This betrayal cuts especially deep because, like much of the world, they had naively believed in the "Never again" promise - only to learn it never applied to them.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
a day ago
- The National
Palestinian-American man 'beaten to death' by Israeli settlers, authorities say
A Palestinian-American man was beaten to death and a second man was shot dead during a settler attack on a village in the occupied West Bank on Friday, Palestinian authorities said. The ruling Fatah party said Saif Al Din Musallat, 23, was a US citizen, and condemned the attack, which it described as a 'policy of the occupying state's practice of systemic terrorism'. The Palestinian Health Ministry identified the second victim as Hussein Al Shalabi, 23, and said he was shot in the chest. The Wafa news agency said 10 others were wounded in the attack. The US State Department did not comment directly on the killing of Mr Musallat. 'We are aware of reports of the death of a US citizen in the West Bank,' a department representative told The National. 'Out of respect for the privacy of the family and loved ones during this difficult time, we have no further comment.' Mr Musallat's family in Tampa, Florida, issued a statement calling on the State Department to take action. 'This is an unimaginable nightmare and injustice that no family should ever have to face. We demand the US State Department lead an immediate investigation and hold the Israeli settlers who killed Saif accountable for their crimes,' the family statement said. Annas Abu El Ezz, spokesman for the Palestinian Health Ministry, told AFP that Mr Musallat 'died after being severely beaten all over his body by settlers in the town of Sinjil', about 15km north-east of Ramallah. The Florida Palestine Network mourned his loss. 'The young man was injured and remained so for four hours. The army prevented us from reaching him and did not allow us to take him away,' Abdul Samad Abdul Aziz, from the nearby village of Al Mazraa Al Sharqiya, told AFP. 'When we finally managed to reach him, he was taking his last breath.' The Israeli military said clashes broke out between Palestinians and Israelis after rocks were thrown at Israeli civilians near Sinjil, lightly injuring two. It said the ensuing 'violent confrontation … included vandalism of Palestinian property, arson, physical clashes, and rock hurling'. 'We are aware of reports regarding a Palestinian civilian killed and a number of injured Palestinians as a result of the confrontation,' the military said. Violence between Israelis and Palestinians in the West Bank has risen in recent years, with settler attacks becoming more frequent since the start of the Gaza war in October 2023. Israeli killings of US citizens in the West Bank include those of Palestinian-American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, Palestinian-American teenager Omar Mohammad Rabea and Turkish-American activist Aysenur Ezgi Eygi.
Middle East Eye
a day ago
- Middle East Eye
UK: More than 80 protesters arrested at Palestine Action protests
UK police on Saturday arrested more than 60 protesters who were demanding the reversal of a ban on the pro-Palestine direct action group, Palestine Action. The government proscribed the activist group under anti-terror laws on 4 July, after the group broke into RAF Brize Norton earlier this month and spray-painted two planes that they said were 'used for military operations in Gaza and across the Middle East." The legislation made membership of, and support for, the group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, marking the first time a direct action group has been proscribed in the UK as a terrorist group. In response, the campaign group Defend Our Juries (DOJ) announced rallies on Saturday in several UK cities to protest the ban and Israel's war on Gaza. In a statement on X, the Metropolitan Police said it had 'made 41 arrests for showing support for a proscribed organisation'. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters DOJ said 86 people had been arrested across the UK in total, with other protests held in Wales and Northern Ireland. 'Over 300 police officers have been seen carrying away dozens of people from the foot of statues of Nelson Mandela and Gandhi for alleged 'terrorism offences',' the group said in a statement on X. 'Those arrested are accused of holding signs in support of Palestine Action,' it added. On 5 July, twenty-seven people were arrested in London's Parliament Square, including an 83-year-old priest, a former government lawyer, an emeritus professor, and health workers. UN experts, human rights groups, and leading figures have condemned the ban as draconian and warned that it will have major adverse consequences for the freedom of expression, with implications for the rule of law. 'Terrorism legislation hands the authorities massive powers to arrest and detain people, suppress speech and reporting, conduct surveillance, and take other measures that would never be permitted in other circumstances,' Sacha Deshmukh, Amnesty International UK's Chief Executive, said in a statement ahead of the ban. 'Using them against a direct-action protest group is an egregious abuse of what they were created for," Deshmukh said.
Middle East Eye
a day ago
- Middle East Eye
When Britain's 'feminists' cheer for bombs and sneer at Palestinian suffering
A familiar breed of British pundit has resurfaced - loud, self-declared feminists whose outrage is as selective as it is performative, and whose moral compass somehow always aligns with western state power. They remain silent as Gaza burns, but are quick to find their voice to cheer on Israel and its allies as they threaten to flatten Iran - civilian casualties be damned. During Israel's recent strikes on Iran, the radical feminist journalist and co‑founder of Justice for Women, Julie Bindel, branded leftist anti-war feminists "Team Iran" sympathisers. It was a disingenuous, grotesquely misleading and dangerously ideological accusation, but not a surprising one. What we're witnessing goes beyond reasoned critique - it is the cynical weaponisation of feminism to uphold state violence. This is no isolated incident. It's a pattern. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters In October 2023, Bindel shared a Telegraph column that championed Israel's genocidal war on Gaza as "a stand for civilisation", while spreading propaganda against Palestinians and vilifying those who defend their humanity. When Palestinian women are pulled from rubble, starved in besieged hospitals, denied reproductive care or give birth next to the corpses of their children, Britain's loudest feminists look away. UN experts have documented acts of sexual violence against women and girls in Gaza - including rape, forced nudity and public humiliation. No statements. No hashtags. No vigils. The same figures who demand global outrage over gender-based violence have nothing to say when those crimes are committed with American firepower and British backing. Smearing solidarity While women in Gaza bleed in silence, these pundits reserve their fury for pro-Palestine protesters - smearing them as extremists, branding solidarity as terrorism, twisting every act of dissent into an endorsement of "jihad" and weaponising antisemitism to crush critique. Such hypocrisy is as strategic as it is shameful. Nothing unnerves Britain's loudest self-styled 'feminist' commentators more than the Palestinian flag - seen not as a cry for justice but an affront to their moral high ground Nothing seems to unnerve Britain's loudest self-styled "feminist" commentators more than the Palestinian flag - a symbol they treat not as a cry for justice, but as an affront to their proclaimed moral high ground. When groups like Palestine Action engage in peaceful civil disobedience - spraying red-paint slogans on Royal Air Force fences and even RAF planes to protest genocide - they are labelled "terrorists". Indeed, those who dare to expose and resist mass killing face criminalisation as part of a calculated assault on any challenge to the status quo. This isn't careless commentary - it is a deliberate ideological distortion disguised as feminist critique. Moreover, it is a betrayal of feminism's proud legacy of nonviolent resistance. From the Reclaim the Night marches that defied police curfews in the 1970s to Southall Black Sisters, who took to the streets to confront domestic violence, state racism and police inaction long before it was politically convenient, this unbroken tradition of protest against gendered state violence lies at the heart of the movement itself. The same voices who once championed the right to free speech - to occupy, stencil and disrupt - now recoil at a banner that simply demands accountability for colonial violence. Smokescreen for war Apparently, the mere objection to the bombing of Iranian civilians is now considered "supporting the regime". It is a framing that is at once ahistorical and a staggering collapse of intellectual rigour. Even those who have previously criticised some of Iran's policies are accused of siding with the Ayatollah simply for opposing western air strikes. When it comes to Iran, these pundits become overnight experts - reciting floggings, hijabs and hangings with righteous certainty. Iranian 'freedom' won't come from Israeli bombs or US regime change Read More » But raise Israel's war crimes - the bombed hospitals, the mass graves, the deliberate targeting of civilians - and their intellectual faculties, let alone moral clarity, suddenly short-circuit. Iran is treated as uniquely monstrous - requiring exceptional condemnation and meriting exceptional violence from the so-called champions of human rights. The doublethink is exhausting. The same feminists who once championed the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq under the banner of "saving women" are now recycling that same logic to legitimise ongoing western aggression. Have we learned nothing from two decades of war, occupation and manufactured consent? This isn't solidarity - it's a smokescreen for war dressed up in feminist language. Equally, opposing Israel's assault on civilians does not imply an endorsement of the Iranian regime. It is a feminist stance against yet another bloodbath disguised as liberation. To dismiss such opposition as regime sympathy is a reductive insult to the Iranian feminists who have risked everything to confront injustice without calling for foreign bombs. As Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, one of the country's most courageous feminist dissidents who was jailed for defying the state, has made clear, real change will come from within. In Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq, where western intervention was sold as salvation, its bombs left only mass graves, collapsed infrastructure and broken societies. Selective sisterhood Some pro-war commentators have falsely claimed that most Iranians support US or Israeli bombing of their country. In reality, the small crowds seen celebrating air strikes outside Iran's embassy were rallying behind exiled monarchist Reza Pahlavi - a man known for his open support of Israel, who in recent interviews dismissed the killing of his own people as "collateral damage". To frame this fringe display as representative of Iranian opposition is not nuance - it is propaganda dressed up as political principle. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war A hashtag like #TeamIran, barely used beyond one media personality's feed, has been transformed into the centrepiece of a manufactured smear campaign against leftist solidarity. This astroturfed narrative, pushed by pundits and politicians alike, attempts to paint anti-war voices as "regime" loyalists - all to shut down dissent and shore up support for military escalation. These dissenters are then ridiculed as "stupid", "ignorant" or "beyond comprehension". What truly defies comprehension, however, is how some of the UK's loudest feminist voices have spent the past 20 months standing shoulder to shoulder with a military occupier, exposing their casual racism, far-right flirtations and a deep-seated contempt for Muslims cloaked in moral posturing. Western feminism's silence on Gaza lays bare its moral bankruptcy Maryam Aldossari Read More » Their outrage flares only when it flatters imperial power - and disappears entirely when Israeli forces bomb hospitals, block aid convoys or leave women and children to burn while seeking refuge beneath crumbling roofs. Where is their outrage at Israel's catalogue of war crimes? Where is the feminist fury at apartheid policies, the suffocating siege of Gaza and the systematic erasure of Palestinian life? Why has selective sisterhood become the norm - loud for some women, silent for others? Why do so many feminist organisations cower in fear, unwilling to speak unless it serves the powerful? Feminism must mean more than slogans for empire. It is meant to stand against all oppression, not just the kind convenient for white saviours and western allies. It's time to honour that promise by reclaiming it from those who've turned "women's rights" into a weapon of war and whitewashing. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
