
Portland will ban cellphones during school day
The highly watched decision follows a national trend and statewide push to get cellphones out of schools from the start of each day to the end. The board heard support from educators and parents during a public hearing, and opposition from a local LGBTQ+ youth organization.
Members approved an amended version of the policy in a unanimous vote with two members absent. The board's student representatives all voted against it, although their votes do not bear on the result.
In past public hearings, many teachers have testified that policing phone use is one of the greatest challenges of their teaching day, and parents have argued that cellphones have negative mental health impacts on school-age children. However, some school officials have been hesitant about enacting a ban and say current policies are working just fine, and some parents had concerns about safety and communicating with their children. High school students have been almost universally opposed to the ban, according to administrators.
Reception to the policy at a first reading in May was mixed, with slightly more commenters speaking in support of its passage.
A K-12, bell-to-bell ban has been in consideration for Portland schools since last summer. The school board's Curriculum and Policy Committee advanced the policy in April, after which the district held seven well-attended stakeholder engagement sessions with students and parents to gather input. The district also conducted a survey of community members following the first hearing in May and received 1,200 responses, according to board Chair Sarah Lentz. She said the board also got several hundred emails about the policy.
District representatives recently visited Morse High School in Bath, where a cellphone ban has been in place since the start of the school year. Administrators say the policy has led to fewer student suspensions, greater focus and higher teacher morale.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Many educators and parents, like Portland High School teacher Lily Sage, encouraged the board to pass the policy Tuesday night.
"I believe that a phone ban will help students focus better, socialize and detox from the omnipresent screens, at least during the school day," Sage said. "When we allow phones in students' pockets or in their bags or anywhere within their reach or view, we are inviting distraction into the classroom, even when they are untouched."
Casco Bay High School teacher Matt Hosmer said cellphones are designed to be addictive to young people and worried his students are unable to focus in class or stay away from phones without a blanket ban.
"Minors should be protected from products that are designed to be addicting," Hosmer said.
But several representatives of the LGBTQ+ youth advocacy group Portland Outright turned out against the policy. The organization's director Osgood said a blanket ban would impact the most marginalized students.
"This policy is, unfortunately, following a troubling trend in local and national politics to police, control and limit the power of young people," they said. "We worry about the impact on queer students and students of color who are always impacted by bans and criminalization."
Other organization members described the policy as punitive, worried that it would negatively impact student autonomy and said it would prevent students from developing healthy relationships around technology.
"I am extremely concerned that this current provision will be used to violate the privacy of students at risk of being overly policed," Portland student and Outright member August Chandler testified.
BOARD DELIBERATION
Lentz and District 5 Member Sarah Brydon introduced an amended version of the policy. Their revision stipulates that personal electronic devices "shall not be available or accessible to students for the duration of the school day."
Lentz and Brydon said that in response to community feedback, they simplified the policy by removing language around search and seizure and discipline, and broadening the language to allow schools to create policies for special circumstances like when students go off campus or travel between schools. The amendment includes an expanded exception policy that allows a student's family to submit a phone exception request if they believe access during the school day is needed.
The creation and implementation of rules are up to the administration and individual schools. The district is looking at possibly using magnetically locking pouches that students keep on their person at the high school level.
The board discussed details of language around exceptions, district liability and off-campus trips, and approved several line-item amendments before approving the policy.
Throughout deliberations, student representatives to the board expressed skepticism about the policy, and the four high school student members voted against it.
Portland High School Representative Mina Fitzgerald said her peers are confused about why the board has acted so quickly and prioritized the change over others, and said the district did not have an open mind to student concerns during stakeholder meetings. She said adults often model poor behavior around phone use.
"I do think that at the end of the day, we've let phones become very integrated. And so if you wanted to educate around how to develop properly as a person by using phones, then adults themselves have to do the exact same amount of work, if not more work, than any students," she said. "And I just do not see that effectively happening within the next three months."
Copy the Story Link
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil Holds Gain as Trump's Russia Deadline Raises Supply Concerns
(Bloomberg) -- Oil held a gain after President Donald Trump pushed for Russia to reach a swift truce with Ukraine or face potential economic penalties, raising concerns crude supplies from the OPEC+ producer could be disrupted. Budapest's Most Historic Site Gets a Controversial Rebuild San Francisco in Talks With Vanderbilt for Downtown Campus Can This Bridge Ease the Troubled US-Canadian Relationship? Trump Administration Sues NYC Over Sanctuary City Policy West Texas Intermediate was around $67 a barrel after closing 2.4% higher on Monday. Brent settled near $70. Trump said he would impose a new deadline of 10-12 days for Moscow to reach a ceasefire, warning of 'secondary sanctions,' he said on Monday. The president initially gave Russia 50 days for a truce. Trump's action follows the latest round of sanctions by the European Union on Russia, which included penalties on India's Nayara Energy. Global markets are also focused on the US deadline for trade deals by Aug. 1, and the upcoming OPEC+ meeting that will decide supply policy for September. Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk Confessions of an American Who Helped North Korea's Wild Remote Worker Scheme Cage-Free Eggs Are Booming in the US, Despite Cost and Trump's Efforts ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


CNET
28 minutes ago
- CNET
Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Makes Sweeping Tax Changes: Here Are the New Deductions You Can Expect
Trump's OBB adds a few new tax deductions worth keeping in mind. CNET The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" was signed into law by President Donald Trump in early July, and by now, you've probably heard a lot of heated debate about its provisions. Beyond all that divisiveness, you might at least have some new tax deductions coming your way. The OBB is essentially a massive government funding and spending bill, sweeping in scope by design. Initially designed as a measure to extend the tax cuts implemented during Trump's first term in the White House, it was expanded to encompass a much wider range of his second-term political goals. This includes cutting many of the green energy tax credits introduced during the Biden administration and allocating a historically massive increase in funding for ICE. In order to offset the cost of extending the 2017 tax cuts, the bill is also set to make huge cuts to Medicaid, including adding new requirements that could result in nearly 12 million people losing their coverage. All of those provisions have sparked intense debate and scrutiny across the political spectrum, and rightly so, but if you're hoping for even a small silver lining, you're in luck. Included alongside all those huge changes are a handful of new tax deductions. While the extension of the Trump tax cuts might not mean much change for your tax dues, these new policies might do the trick, at least a little bit. To help you get a handle on what new options you'll have come tax season, I've pulled together a list of the new deductions created by the OBB and how you might be able to use them. For all the details, keep reading, and to find out about another new money policy created by the bill, check out my explainer on the newborn investment savings accounts. 'No Tax on Tips' deduction The idea for this new deduction has been floating around for a while, gaining traction from both major party tickets during the 2024 election. I've written about it at length in the past when it was being proposed, but under the OBB, a tax deduction for tipped income is officially on the way. Starting with your income for the 2025 tax year, you'll be able to claim a deduction for tipped income if you work a job that the IRS says is "customarily and regularly receiving tips." Annoyingly, there isn't a list of such professions available yet, but the IRS is required to release one by Oct. 5. Despite that name, there are some limits on how much tipped income you can claim. The maximum deduction is $25,000, and that amount begins to phase out for people making $150,000 or more in a year, or $300,000 for joint filers. So is this deduction even a good idea? While it might be a bit of relief for certain taxpayers, the jury's definitely still out on that question. Critics have argued that a deduction won't address the underlying issue of tipped workers earning low hourly wages and might push more jobs toward a tip-based model to avoid taxation. 'No Tax on Overtime' deduction This one goes hand-in-hand with the "no tax on tips" deduction and works in a similar way. Under this policy, you can deduct the pay you get from working qualified overtime from your reported income. The limit on the deduction is $12,500 for single filers and $25,000 for joint filers. It has the same $150,000/$300,000 income limits as the tipped income deduction. 'No Tax on Car Loan Interest' deduction The third major new deduction you need to know about concerns interest paid on a car loan. This deduction will allow you to claim up to $10,000 in such interest paid throughout the tax year, but the loan will have to originate after Dec. 31, 2024. Essentially, it's meant to encourage new car loans, so that loan you've been working on since, say, 2019 doesn't count, sorry to say. It also applies only to loans on new cars for personal use. So anyone who gets a loan for a used car or a car for their business need not apply for this deduction. The income limits are also slightly different for this one: $100,000 for single filers and $200,000 for joint filers. A tax deduction just for being a senior citizen? Aside from those deductions, there's also the somewhat curious "deduction for seniors" created by the OBB. It's as simple as it sounds: a $6,000 deduction you can claim just for being 65 or older. That goes up to $12,000 for couples where both spouses are senior citizens. And good news if you were born on Dec. 31, 1960: You only need to have turned 65 on or before the last day of the tax year to qualify for this deduction. The income limit is set at $75,000 for single filers and $150,000 for joint filers. When do these deductions take effect? All of the deductions I broke down for you above will be in effect for the 2025 tax year and stick around through the 2028 tax year. That neatly lines up with the timeline for Trump's second term in office, a trend that can be seen all over the OBB's provisions. Benefits to the American people last throughout his remaining time in office, while detriments don't kick in until he leaves in 2029. Critics have tarred this as an attempt to avoid the blame for the bill's negative aspects by passing them onto whoever occupies the White House next. For more, check out CNET's in-depth breakdown of Trump's tariff plans.


Fast Company
28 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Find peace in a time of chaos
A sense of unease has settled over the country—a shared anxiety fueled by headlines, social media, and persistent uncertainty about the future. From escalating conflicts in the Middle East to disturbing incidents of political violence here at home, Americans across the spectrum are grappling with instability and disruption. This isn't just partisan fatigue or angst—it's a broader disorientation about who we are as a nation and where we're headed. As an avid scuba diver, I (Craig) have learned that when seasickness strikes, the best remedy is to focus on the horizon. In times of uncertainty, we need that same kind of long-range perspective. America, while powerful, is relatively young. History is replete with examples of empires experiencing internal strife. Fareed Zakaria's Age of Revolutions documents this phenomenon with precision. While historical parallels don't alleviate our present anxieties, they can offer a broader context. One reason this moment feels so disorienting is that there's often a gap between expectations and reality. Many of us grew up with a hopeful, sometimes idealized narrative of American progress and unity. Today's polarized discourse, political violence, and institutional tensions can challenge that view. But rather than disengage, we need to adapt—and recommit. In moments of uncertainty, our instincts may be to fight, flee, or freeze. But when we try to do all three at once, we risk exhaustion and paralysis. Freezing—tuning out or giving up—feels safe, but it's unsustainable. Instead, we advocate for a balanced approach: fight and flight, both with intention. Fight: Civic engagement as a steadying force To fight is to stay constructively engaged. That means seeking out credible, fact-based news. It means voting and encouraging others to do the same. It means participating in civil dialogue and seeking to understand perspectives that differ from our own—empathy can bridge divides. Leaders in business, nonprofits, and communities all have a role to play. Upholding the rule of law, supporting fair elections, and defending the institutions that sustain our economy and civic life aren't political acts—they're commitments to stability and shared progress. At Leadership Now Project [DA1], we've mobilized business leaders from both parties to take action, supporting policies that protect democracy, engaging with policymakers, speaking out publicly, defending election officials, and recognizing courageous leadership. These efforts are grounded in principle, not partisanship, because a strong democracy is essential to a thriving economy. Flight: Protecting peace isn't escapism—it's strategic Flight doesn't mean tuning out—it means stepping back to preserve focus and clarity. In an era of constant information overload, it's easy to feel overwhelmed. But we can't let the noise drown out the signal. This means prioritizing what truly matters: health, relationships, and purpose. It means limiting the distractions that drain us and being intentional about how we spend our energy. Whether through mindfulness, service, or simple moments of joy, finding inner stability helps us stay grounded. It's what allows us to show up consistently, over the long term. Holocaust survivor and psychologist Viktor Frankl once wrote that while we can't always control our circumstances, we can choose our response. That mindset—anchoring in purpose and positivity even amid chaos—can help us move forward with clarity and resolve. Find purpose In short: Even in uncertainty, we can find purpose. Even amid division, we can choose to build. The storm may not pass quickly, but we are far from powerless. When we anchor ourselves in values—curiosity, leadership, accountability—we become more resilient. And when we come together across differences, we remind ourselves that the story of this country has always been written by people who chose to engage, to hope, and to act. We are not alone. And the horizon is there to help us refocus.