Akhilesh Yadav, the Ambedkarite
Cut to November 2024. Ahead of the bypolls, SP chief Akhilesh Yadav addressed rallies in western U.P. In each rally, he would underline his Other Backward Classes (OBC) identity. He would mention how after he lost power in 2017 and vacated the official residence of the Chief Minister in Lucknow, the BJP cleansed the premises with Gangajal as an act of purification. He would then speak about the Kannauj incident in 2024 where BJP workers washed the precincts of a temple after he visited it to offer prayers during his Lok Sabha election campaign. By narrating these incidents, Mr. Yadav would align his identity with the Dalits, who have historically been treated as 'impure' by the so-called upper castes.
Recently, Mr. Yadav raised his voice against the assault of two Yadav priests in Etawah, another SP stronghold. The BJP accused him of giving the incident a casteist spin. However, it was this tweak in his politics that won him 43 seats alongside the Congress in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls.
Political analysts say that the change in Mr. Yadav's world view was evident from 2018 when B.R. Ambedkar prominently appeared in the party's poll literature. Soon after, a bust of Ambedkar appeared at the party office in Lucknow, and Babasahib Vahini, a party-affiliated outfit, was formed to reach out to Dalits. This crystallised into the PDA (a Hindi acronym for backwards, Dalits, and minorities) formula that has been paying electoral dividends. The order of groups may be different, but this is not significantly different from Kanshi Ram's Bahujan (majority people) politics and differs from Ms. Mayawati's focus on Sarvajan (all people) politics.
This strategy reflected in ticket distribution in 2024. The party shed its Muslim-Yadav tag while selecting candidates and successfully played the Dalit and OBC card. By focusing on Kurmi, Shakya, Maurya, and Nishad candidates and fielding two Dalits from general seats, Mr. Yadav disturbed the caste calculus of the BJP. That the desertion of established caste leaders such as Swami Prasad Maurya did not impact the party's performance indicates that the most backward communities believed in Mr. Yadav.
Political observers say that with the BSP losing direction, Mr. Yadav is aiming to replace Ms. Mayawati in the Dalit mind. A party insider says that after the election results, when people saw that 'judenge toh jeetenge (united we win)' was possible, they wouldn't buy the slogan of the BJP, 'batoge toh katoge (divided you will fall)'. Instead of hitting the streets, Mr. Yadav has motivated the cadre to hold PDA panchayats in villages across the State to highlight the strength of unity and the failure of the 'double engine' BJP government. 'We are trying to drill the idea that the ideologies of Ram Manohar Lohia and Ambedkar can fulfil the dreams of the country and of our ancestors,' said a senior party member.
Mr. Yadav is often poetic in Parliament when he criticises the government about the Waqf Act or the deaths at the Kumbh Mela. However, he lets his displeasure be known when journalists try to corner him as a dynast or a privileged politician and accuses them of being soft on the government.
With the family feud settled in his favour, one of the most significant changes in Mr. Yadav's public behaviour is that he no longer gives the impression of being an insecure politician. Despite unsavoury statements made by some Congress leaders from U.P., Mr. Yadav remains committed to the INDIA bloc. With Azam Khan out of the picture, the partnership with the Congress helps him outsource Muslim issues to the grand old party.
A section of young leaders in the SP feels that with the polls only 18 months away, Mr. Yadav should launch a padayatra like Rahul Gandhi did. They fear that without the active participation of grassroots leaders, PDA meetings could just become photo ops.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
37 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Analysing why Maharashtra's Hindi u-turn exposes NEP's language paradox
For this live, we are joined by Deepak Pawar from the Marathi Abhyas Kendra and The Hindu's Mumbai Bureau Chief, Vinaya Deshpande. They will discuss Maharashtra's U-turn on making Hindi mandatory in schools, the political backlash it triggered, and what this controversy reveals about the National Education Policy's three-language formula.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
THIS Muslim country orders complete BAN on Burqa, 70 percent of population follows ISLAM, its not Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, the name is…
Representational Image/AI-generated. New Delhi: Do you know that there is a country in the world where over 70 percent of the population follows Islam and the president is also Muslim, yet they have ordered a ban on women covering their faces? Kazakhstan, one of India's key neighbours, has passed a significant law banning all types of face-covering clothing, including veils, in public places. This major step by the Kazakh parliament comes at a time when there is growing religious extremism and security concerns in the country. According to the reports, this bill has now been sent to Kazakhstan's President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev for the final approval. It is worth noting that more than 70 percent of Kazakhstan's population is Muslim, but the country's constitutional system is secular. President Tokayev himself follows Islam and observes its associated beliefs. He has performed Umrah in Mecca and also fasts during the month of Ramadan. Why have the authorities ordered a ban on the burqa? According to the authorities, any cloth covering the face of the women makes it difficult for them to identify individuals. This can pose a threat to public safety in the country. Who all are exempted? The bill also states that if a person covers their face for medical reasons, weather conditions, workplace requirements, cultural events, or under civil defense, they will be exempted from this ban. Here are some of the important details: The government says that this step has been taken to maintain the country's image as one that upholds secular policies and traditional cultural values. Officials stated that the niqab and full-face coverings are not mandatory in Islam These practices are often associated with foreign religious influences. What did President Tokayev say about the Niqab? In 2024, President Tokayev had said that the niqab is an outdated and unnatural garment, imposed on the country's women by newly emerged extremists. He described it as being against Kazakhstan's traditional culture. It is important to note that in recent years, the number of women wearing the niqab and covering their entire bodies in black clothing has increased on the streets of Kazakhstan. This reflects the country's changing religious trends, which are in stark contrast to its secular image. Kazakhstan has always been against these outdated rules. In 2017, Kazakhstan had imposed a ban on wearing the hijab for schoolgirls. In 2023, this ban was extended to include all students and teachers in schools. At that time as well, President Tokayev had said that a school is an educational institution where there is no place for religious attire.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
File complete record of loudspeaker removal process, HC tells police
MUMBAI: In response to a petition filed by five Muslim religious establishments in Vikhroli challenging the removal of their loudspeakers by the police since May as unconstitutional and violating due process, the Bombay high court (HC) on Tuesday issued notice to the police to file a complete record of action taken by them by July 9. File complete record of loudspeaker removal process, HC tells police The details asked for include: names of places of worship whose loudspeakers had been removed, measurements of volume emanating from the loudspeakers, whether the police had asked them to lower the volume and if they had complied; the notices sent to them, and whether, despite chances given to them to comply, they had not, before penalties were imposed and loudspeakers removed. A bench of Justices R V Ghuge and M Sathaye initially stayed the imposition of penalties in these cases but were informed by senior counsel Yusuf Mucchala, appearing for the petitioners, that the fines had already been paid. The receipts were part of the petition. The bench asked assistant public prosecutor (APP) S V Gavand whether similar action had been taken with respect to all religious establishments. 'Can we assume that now in Mumbai there is no place of worship with a loudspeaker on top?' asked Justice Ghuge. Gavand consulted with senior inspector Sunil Shinde, of the Mumbai crime branch, before replying that loudspeakers had been removed only where they exceeded the prescribed limit. The judge then asked whether the police had measured the volume to determine if the limit was breached. The APP replied in the affirmative. However, Advocate Muchhala informed the Bench that an RTI application filed in May (included in the petition) showed that the police department neither possessed special volume-measuring instruments nor trained personnel to use them. Both were mandatory according to the Supreme Court's 2022 judgment on the issue. He also referenced the 2023 Gujarat HC judgment which, rejecting a petition to ban loudspeakers on masjids, had ruled that the azaan did not constitute noise pollution. 'Arbitrary action has been taken on the basis of complaints by a political leader who has posted on social media that he's on a 'Bhonga Mukt Maharashtra' mission,' said Muchhala. 'Notices have been issued without details about when the prescribed volume limit was breached.' The petition contained copies of the notices issued, he informed the court. Some of them had been issued even after loudspeakers had been disconnected. Muchhala further informed the court that a sample survey carried out by the petitioners of 117 mosques in Mumbai showed that 23 had been fined ₹ 5000 each since May, and 29 had had their loudspeaker license terminated. The APP asked for two weeks' time to file a 'brief reply'. When the bench rejected this, APP Gavand said, 'This is not a life and death issue, it's not as if a demolition has taken place.' Justice Ghuge then asked the APP if he knew why the azaan was called five times a day. 'It is a call telling believers that now is the time to pray. Namaz has to be offered at fixed times. Temples don't make similar calls because there are no fixed timings when people must go and pray there. If loudspeakers are completely removed, how will the people be called for namaz?' The HC ruling comes a few days after Mumbai police commissioner Deven Bharti had said that the city was 'loud-speaker free'. While not naming any community, he claimed that following meetings with community leaders and trustees of religious bodies, more than 1,500 loudspeakers were removed.
