logo
NAB pays over $488,800 penalty over breaches of consumer data rights rules

NAB pays over $488,800 penalty over breaches of consumer data rights rules

Reuters18-06-2025
June 19 (Reuters) - Australia's competition watchdog said on Thursday that National Australia Bank (NAB.AX), opens new tab has paid A$751,200 ($488,806) fine over alleged breaches of consumer data right rules due to failures to disclose credit limit data.
($1 = 1.5368 Australian dollars)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

See why footy fans are accusing NRL trainer of the lowest act of the season: 'Ban him for a year!'
See why footy fans are accusing NRL trainer of the lowest act of the season: 'Ban him for a year!'

Daily Mail​

time42 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

See why footy fans are accusing NRL trainer of the lowest act of the season: 'Ban him for a year!'

Penrith Panthers trainer Corey Bocking has been accused of robbing the Gold Coast Titans of a win over his team with an act of 'pathetic sportsmanship' on Saturday. The Titans had scored five tries in 25 minutes to take a 26-24 lead late in regular time when Bocking ran in front of Gold Coast kicker Jayden Campbell as he attempted a conversion. Campbell missed the kick after having to re-set himself. Had he converted, the score would have been 28-24 with just four minutes to play. Instead, Penrith star Nathan Cleary was able to boot a two-point conversion in the last minute of regular time to take the match to golden point, with his teammate Blaze Talagi scoring a try in extra time to seal the 30-26 win. To add insult to injury, footage from Fox Sports' coverage of the match showed Bocking appearing to smile as he ran past Campbell after ruining his preparation for the shot at goal. Afterwards, Titans coach Des Hasler said he didn't know whether the incident cost his team the game - but fans had no such doubts. Furious fans like this one vented their fury on social media after the Panthers won the match in extra time, with many saying the trainer robbed the Titans of a win 'Titans robbed. Panthers trainer running right in front of Jayden Campbell as he's about to kick is disgusting. Panthers should be DQ'd from that result for clear blatant interference,' one wrote on X. 'Ban the trainer for 12 months, fine Penrith, and dock them the two competition points. Absolutely pathetic sportsmanship and it's not the first time they've done it. Send a clear message that it won't be tolerated,' another added. 'Whatever happens here, the Titans have been absolutely dudded. Fox will wax lyrical about Cleary, but Campbell should have had a conversion attempt from in front,' a third said. 'Great kick by Cleary but Penrith trainer running across the conversion line like he did negates anything from this game. He knew what he was doing, no excuses,' added another. Asked about the incident after the match, Hasler said, 'Did it cost us the game? I don't know. 'He will get breached. That's the only thing that's going to come out of it.' Penrith coach Ivan Cleary insisted that Bocking's actions were not deliberate. 'He was in the wrong place at the wrong time. We had a sub and I changed it at the last minute,' he said. 'He was trying to communicate with the bench for a late change. It was an honest mistake. He apologised straight away.' Another Penrith trainer was caught in an underhanded act earlier this year. Shane Elford was busted wetting the football in Penrith's 30-all draw with North Queensland in May, in an attempt to make the ball harder to handle for the opposition just before the Panthers kicked off. A video taken by a fan showed Elford pouring water from a bottle onto the Steeden seconds before Dylan Edwards put boot to ball. Cowboys coach Todd Payten said his coaching staff had spotted the trainer doing the same thing throughout the contest. 'He did it before every kick-off,' Payten said. The win over the Titans gave the Panthers an eighth consecutive victory to leave the four-time defending premiers on 29 competition points, just one behind the fourth-placed Warriors. In an ominous omen, Penrith have made the grand final on all five occasions (2003 and 2020-2024) they have previously won eight in a row. They were cruising at halftime but Gold Coast had other ideas. Brimson sent centre Brian Kelly in before Campbell intercepted a Cleary pass to race 90m and get the 16th-placed Titans on the board. Campbell was at it again to step and weave his way through and hooker Sam Verrills dived over from dummy-half. Minutes later Phil Sami finished off a Brimson bust and the lead had been cut to two. Sami was in again after Penrith muffed a Kieran Foran bomb and Gold Coast led with six minutes to play. 'I thought they showed a lot of character,' Hasler said.

See the moment TV star James Hooper crashes into parked cars while allegedly more than FIVE times over the limit in shocking new video
See the moment TV star James Hooper crashes into parked cars while allegedly more than FIVE times over the limit in shocking new video

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

See the moment TV star James Hooper crashes into parked cars while allegedly more than FIVE times over the limit in shocking new video

Dramatic footage has revealed the moment high-profile TV reporter James Hooper allegedly crashed his ute into three parked cars while more than five times over the legal drink-drive limit. Hooper was sacked from his role with Fox Sports after the incident, which occurred shortly before 7.30pm last Thursday in the inner-west Sydney suburb of Leichhardt. Police allege Hooper recorded a result of 0.253 when he was tested for alcohol. Now CCTV footage has shown the moment Hooper's vehicle allegedly collided with parked cars. The video, which appears to have been taken from a camera attached to a house near the site of the accident, shows sparks flying at the moment of impact. Further footage taken by Channel Nine reveals damage to the parked vehicles. Vision from Channel Nine shows the damage to another vehicle after Hooper's ute was involved in the alleged accident last Thursday night Shortly after the police charges came to light, Fox Sports managing director Steve Crawley confirmed that the chief rugby league reporter would be leaving the NRL broadcast partner effective immediately. 'James has been a great contributor since he joined us in 2016, but he's also battled some significant personal issues from time to time,' Crawley said. 'In speaking to him today, James also acknowledges that things need to change for him.' Hooper admitted that he was dealing with personal issues. 'I've let the game of rugby league, my employers, my wife and kids down terribly,' he told News Corp. 'Clearly I'm not handling the tough side of the job. 'Hopefully this is the punch between the eyes that will set me straight.' Hooper spent many years as a reporter and columnist for The Daily Telegraph. The 47-year-old (pictured appearing on Fox Sports) said, 'I've let the game of rugby league, my employers, my wife and kids down terribly' He then moved to Fox Sports, featuring on shows such as NRL 360 and as a sideline commentator for NRL matches. His work spanned print, online, and broadcast, making him one of News Corp's most prominent rugby league voices. Hooper told News Corp that he would be seeking professional treatment following this incident. 'About 7.30pm yesterday [Thursday 31 July 2025], police were called to Allen Street, Leichhardt, following reports of a crash,' NSW Police said in a statement. 'Officers attached to Leichhardt Highway Patrol attended to find a Ford utility had collided with three parked cars before coming to a stop. 'The driver – a 47-year-old man – was located nearby and allegedly returned a positive breath test before he was taken to Newtown Police Station where he returned a breath analysis of 0.253. 'He was charged with drive with high range PCA and not give particulars to owner of damaged property [three counts]. 'The man was issued a court attendance notice to appear before Downing Centre Local Court on Monday 15 September 2025.'

Bad men problem: Gareth Ward and Mark Latham leave NSW parliament in unchartered territory
Bad men problem: Gareth Ward and Mark Latham leave NSW parliament in unchartered territory

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Bad men problem: Gareth Ward and Mark Latham leave NSW parliament in unchartered territory

The New South Wales parliament has a problem with men behaving badly. But more to the point, it seems to have an inability to deal with it. On Tuesday, the parliament will try to deal with two very different cases that share a common consequence: damage to its reputation as an institution. Despite being a convicted rapist in custody awaiting sentence, Gareth Ward, the MP for Kiama, remains a member of the Legislative Assembly, drawing a base salary of more than $170,000 courtesy of NSW taxpayers. Labor plans to move a motion to have him expelled when parliament resumes on Tuesday and the opposition has said it will support it. Expelling Ward will almost certainly lead to more litigation, especially as the government will probably try to call a byelection in his south coast seat soon after. Sign up: AU Breaking News email But first to backtrack a little. Most politicians being investigated or facing criminal charges choose to resign, or their parties put the pressure on the MP to draw a line under their faltering political career. But Ward has toughed it out and continues to claim his innocence, despite being convicted for serious sex offences against two young men. He was suspended and left the Liberal party in 2022 after being charged with sex offences. He then ran as an independent in the 2023 state election and was returned by the voters of Kiama. Now that he has been convicted, he faces a potential sentence of more than five years. Under section 13A of the NSW constitution, a person is ineligible to be an MP if they are convicted of an offence punishable by five years or more. But it's only counted as a conviction once the person has reached the end of the appeals process and has not had their conviction overturned, constitutional expert Prof Anne Twomey says – and Ward has confirmed he plans to appeal the verdict. The appeals process could take years. The other route is expulsion. The NSW constitution does not give a specific power to expel a member, but Twomey says there is an inherent power for the NSW parliament to expel an MP to protect itself and its proper functioning. This appears to be where the premier, Chris Minns, is headed – but it is relatively untested territory. The courts have ruled that expulsion must not be as punishment, but it can be done to protect public confidence in the integrity of the parliament. If Ward is expelled, a byelection would need to be held to replace him, which only adds to the complications. Would Ward seek an injunction to prevent the byelection while he appeals both the expulsion and the criminal conviction? Understandably, there are few cases to guide the way – the last time an MP was expelled from the NSW lower house was in 1917. But what is certain is that unless Ward resigns voluntarily, litigation appears inevitable. The first stop will be the supreme court, followed by a possible high court appeal. For those who want a deeper dive, Twomey's podcast, Constititional Clarion, explores all the twists and turns that could emerge over coming weeks. The controversial independent upper house member Mark Latham is also under the microscope but for entirely different reasons. The former One Nation MP is under scrutiny over his use of privilege within the chamber and his general standard of behaviour, which Labor has been calling out of late. Has the Minns government suddenly found a new moral rectitude? Or is the premier motivated by more base political considerations? Latham has been working with the opposition and crossbench to block changes to workers compensation legislation that the government dearly wants passed. In parliament, Minns has called him 'one of the most shameful bigots in NSW' who has an 'odious Twitter account', which he deployed for a 'disgusting homophobic attack' on independent MP Alex Greenwich. More recently prurient allegations about Latham's personal life have spilled into the public domain due to a relationship breakdown, which have added fuel to the fire of outrage. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion These are the subject of a case seeking a domestic violence order that he is vehemently contesting. As the relationship degenerated, allegations from court filings including leaked texts about female MPs and other unsavoury exchanges have found their way into the public domain. Latham's behaviour raises questions of respect for the parliament and female MPs, and whether the behaviour is appropriate in any workplace. Latham allegedly covertly photographed female workmates and shared the images with derogatory commentary. If true, in any other workplace, that would at the least prompt counselling, a warning or possibly dismissal. Then there is Latham's use of parliamentary privilege. Privilege exists to allow politicians to speak freely without fear of defamation, but Latham arguably pushes its limits. He is a blunt, borderline-rude interrogator of witnesses before committees. In the chamber he has used privilege to attack his enemies, such as Greenwich, who won a $140,000 defamation settlement against Latham in 2024, and domestic violence campaigner Rosie Batty. Last month Latham outraged colleagues by talking about Greenwich's medical records, which had been produced as part of a separate case Greenwich has brought against Latham in the NSW civil and administrative tribunal. But can the upper house actually mete out a punishment or persuade Latham to alter his behaviour? The answer is probably no. Labor plans to move two motions in the next sitting period, which starts on Tuesday: one relating to a specific breach of privilege and another more general censure. Labor will allege that Latham breached privilege in relation to certain documents about the former police commissioner Karen Webb and investigations into gifts of gin that were produced on the basis that only parliamentarians could view them. Labor wants Latham referred to the privileges committee for breaching the order, something he disputes. The allegations of exposing medical records, taking covert photos and perhaps other actions are likely to be wrapped up into a censure motion condemning his behaviour. But as for meaningful outcomes, don't hold your breath. The privileges committee could recommend an apology or perhaps a suspension, but that is rare. Labor lost control of this powerful committee a month ago after a dispute with the crossbench and the opposition. They combined to cut a Labor member so control of the now seven-member committee is out of Labor's hands. And what of a censure? It is likely to be little more than a slap on the wrist for Latham, while he enjoys the notoriety and attention that this latest saga will bring. The problem for the NSW parliament is that its rules to set and enforce appropriate standards of behaviour are hopelessly outdated, its processes are archaic and it has failed to implement many of the recommendations from a report by Liz Broderick completed two years ago. The federal parliament has moved to establish a standards commission with real teeth to fine or even suspend parliamentarians for poor behaviour outside the chamber. It is still to be tested but it is a start. Instead, in NSW, we will spend weeks on the immediate crises that will further lower the parliament's standing in the public eye, without dealing with the real problem of cultural change that is sorely needed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store