Qantas says 6 million customer accounts accessed in cyber hack
The hacker targeted a call centre and gained access to a third-party customer service platform containing six million names, email addresses, phone numbers, birth dates and frequent flyer numbers, Qantas said in a statement today.
The airline did not specify the location of the call centre or customers whose information was compromised. It said it learnt of the breach after detecting unusual activity on the platform and acted immediately to contain it.
"We are continuing to investigate the proportion of the data that has been stolen, though we expect it will be significant," Qantas said, reporting no impact on operations or safety.
Last week, the US Federal Bureau of Investigation said cybercrime group Scattered Spider was targeting airlines and that Hawaiian Airlines and Canada's WestJet had already reported breaches. Qantas did not name any group.
"What makes this trend particularly alarming is its scale and coordination, with fresh reports that Qantas is the latest victim" of a hack, said Mark Thomas, Australia director of security services for cyber security firm Arctic Wolf.
Scattered Spider hackers are known to impersonate a company's tech staff to gain employee passwords and "it is plausible they are executing a similar playbook", Thomas said.
Charles Carmakal, chief technology officer of Alphabet-owned cybersecurity firm Mandiant, said it was too soon to say if Scattered Spider was responsible but "global airline organisations should be on high alert of social engineering attacks".
The breach is Australia's most high-profile since those of telecommunications network operator Optus and health insurance leader Medibank in 2022 prompted cyber resilience laws including mandatory reporting of compliance and incidents.
It brings unwelcome attention to Qantas which is trying to win public trust after actions during and after the Covid-19 pandemic saw it plunge on airline and brand league tables.
Qantas was found to have illegally sacked thousands of ground workers during the 2020 border closure while collecting government stimulus payments. It also admitted selling thousands of tickets for already-cancelled flights.
The airline drew the ire of opposition politicians who said it lobbied the federal government in 2022 to refuse a request from Qatar Airways to sell more flights. Qantas denied pressuring the government which eventually refused the request - a move the consumer regulator said hurt price competition.
Qantas CEO Vanessa Hudson has improved the airline's public standing since taking office in 2023, reputation measures showed.
"We recognise the uncertainty this will cause," Hudson said of the data breach. "Our customers trust us with their personal information and we take that responsibility seriously."
Qantas said it notified the Australian Cyber Security Centre, the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner and the Australian Federal Police.
The airline said the hacker did not access frequent flyer accounts or customer passwords, PIN numbers or log in details.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
5 hours ago
- Irish Independent
‘The Government needs to stand up for policyholders' – backlash as motor insurance premiums to keep rising
There was a big jump in the number of claims in the first half of last year and increased costs of repairing vehicles, a report from the Central Bank shows. Drivers have seen motor insurance premiums rise for more than a year-and-a-half, with premiums up by more than 8pc in the year to May alone. Now the Alliance for Insurance Reform says the increase in claims would push premiums even higher. This is because the Central Bank said the cost of settling claims was 23pc higher in the first half of last year when compared with the previous six months. 'This is primarily driven by an increasing trend in both the number and cost of damage claims,' the Central Bank's H1 2024 Private Motor and Liability Mid-Year Reports show. When compared with pre-Covid times, the cost of settling injury claims is down 16pc. This was driven by a fall in the number of claims settled. The fact that the cost of settling motor damage claims shot up by 23pc in six months meant there was no justification to increase the official guidelines on award levels further, the Alliance said. T he cost of settling motor claims went up 23pc in just six months The Judicial Council has proposed that personal injury award guidelines should be increased by almost 17pc. Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan is to bring a memo to the Cabinet next Tuesday, paving the way for draft legislation that would give effect to a planned rise in award levels. The Alliance said: 'T he cost of settling motor claims went up 23pc in just six months – now is not the time to increase these costs further.' The Central Bank report also shows that there is no financial benefit for claimants to have their case taken away from the State's Injuries Resolution Board. Injuries claims can be litigated if a settlement from the board is rejected. The Central Bank's report found that the average award paid by the board and one that is litigated both come in at €24,000. Legal fees for cases settled through the Injuries Board average €597. Litigated cases have average legal costs of €24,786. The Alliance said this needs to be specifically addressed in the Government's forthcoming action plan for insurance reform. Alliance board member Tracy Sheridan said: 'The increase in awards will raise premiums further and adversely impact the volume of claims settled at the Injuries Resolution Board. We are already seeing month-on-month premium increases 'The Government has not said a word about the planned increase [in the award guidelines] for the last six months and there has been no opportunity for public debate either. This is wrong.' Ms Sheridan said that if the Government increases award guideline levels by 17pc, there will be no check on costs. 'We are already seeing month-on-month premium increases as the cost of living continues to spiral out of control. 'The Government needs to stand up for policyholders, not make things more difficult for them,' she said. The Central Bank also released a report on business liability insurance, showing claims were down 10pc in the first half of last year compared with the previous half year.
Irish Independent
7 hours ago
- Irish Independent
‘The Government needs to stand up for policyholders' – backlash as motor insurance premiums to keep rising due to surge in claims
There was a big jump in the number of claims in the first half of last year and increased costs of repairing vehicles, a report from the Central Bank shows. Drivers have seen motor insurance premiums rise for more than a year-and-a-half, with premiums up by more than 8pc in the year to May alone. Now the Alliance for Insurance Reform says the increase in claims would push premiums even higher. This is because the Central Bank said the cost of settling claims was 23pc higher in the first half of last year when compared with the previous six months. 'This is primarily driven by an increasing trend in both the number and cost of damage claims,' the Central Bank's H1 2024 Private Motor and Liability Mid-Year Reports show. When compared with pre-Covid times, the cost of settling injury claims is down 16pc. This was driven by a fall in the number of claims settled. The fact that the cost of settling motor damage claims shot up by 23pc in six months meant there was no justification to increase the official guidelines on award levels further, the Alliance said. T he cost of settling motor claims went up 23pc in just six months The Judicial Council has proposed that personal injury award guidelines should be increased by almost 17pc. Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan is to bring a memo to the Cabinet next Tuesday, paving the way for draft legislation that would give effect to a planned rise in award levels. The Alliance said: 'T he cost of settling motor claims went up 23pc in just six months – now is not the time to increase these costs further.' The Central Bank report also shows that there is no financial benefit for claimants to have their case taken away from the State's Injuries Resolution Board. Injuries claims can be litigated if a settlement from the board is rejected. The Central Bank's report found that the average award paid by the board and one that is litigated both come in at €24,000. Legal fees for cases settled through the Injuries Board average €597. Litigated cases have average legal costs of €24,786. The Alliance said this needs to be specifically addressed in the Government's forthcoming action plan for insurance reform. Alliance board member Tracy Sheridan said: 'The increase in awards will raise premiums further and adversely impact the volume of claims settled at the Injuries Resolution Board. We are already seeing month-on-month premium increases 'The Government has not said a word about the planned increase [in the award guidelines] for the last six months and there has been no opportunity for public debate either. This is wrong.' Ms Sheridan said that if the Government increases award guideline levels by 17pc, there will be no check on costs. 'We are already seeing month-on-month premium increases as the cost of living continues to spiral out of control. 'The Government needs to stand up for policyholders, not make things more difficult for them,' she said. The Central Bank also released a report on business liability insurance, showing claims were down 10pc in the first half of last year compared with the previous half year.
The Journal
16 hours ago
- The Journal
Labour Chancellor Rachel Reeves in tears after criticism over major welfare reform u-turn
LABOUR CHANCELLOR RACHEL Reeves appeared to cry in the Commons this afternoon as British prime minister Keir Starmer declined to guarantee she would remain in place until the election. Starmer faced MPs at Prime Minister's Question after being forced to scrap key planks of his welfare reforms. The welfare u-turn has left an almost £5 billion (€5.8b) black hole in Reeves's spending plans and has fuelled speculation she could be forced to hike taxes. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said Reeves looked 'absolutely miserable' and challenged Starmer to say whether the Chancellor would keep her job until the next election. Watch as Chancellor Rachel Reeves sheds tears during Prime Minister's Questions 📽️ — The National (@ScotNational) July 2, 2025 Starmer dodged the question about whether Reeves would be in place for the remainder of the UK Parliament, saying Badenoch 'certainly won't'. The Tory leader said: 'How awful for the Chancellor that he couldn't confirm that she would stay in place.' Despite Starmer not backing her in the Commons, Downing Street insisted she was 'going nowhere' and had the prime minister's 'full backing'. Asked about Reeves's tears, a spokesman for the Chancellor said it was a 'personal matter'. Welfare u-turn Welfare spending in the UK stood at £40billion before the Covid pandemic but is projected to skyrocket to £100 billion by 2030. In March, reforms to the UK's welfare system – aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work – were announced. The aim was to make welfare savings of £4.8 billion by 2029-30. But yesterday, Starmer was forced to abandon a key plank of his welfare reform package in the face of a Labour rebellion. Advertisement The climbdown came just 90 minutes before MPs were due to vote for the first time on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment (Pip) Bill. Universal Credit is a means-tested benefit that replaced and combined six 'legacy' benefits – it is paid to those looking for work, unable to work due to illness or disability, those on a low income or those with caring responsibilities. Meanwhile, Pip is a payment for people who have extra care needs or mobility needs as a result of a disability. With around 1,000 new Pip awards every day, the UK Government argued the current situation was unsustainable. Proposals to cut the health element of universal credit by almost 50% for most new claimants from April 2026 remains in place following yesterday's u-turn. However, the UK Government shelved plans to restrict eligibility for the Pip and any changes will now only come after a review of the benefit, which is due to conclude in the autumn of 2026. The move caused a major headache for Reeves as the welfare squeeze was originally meant to save £4.8 billion a year, which was subsequently reduced to £2.3 billion when the Bill was first watered down last week. But after another concession yesterday, it is uncertain how much the reforms will save from the soaring welfare bill, if anything. Indeed, the Resolution Foundation think tank suggested the concessions meant there would now be no 'net savings' from the reform by the end of the decade. The Bill changed so much in the interim that MPs questioned if there was even any point in voting on it. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch accused Labour of 'utter capitulation' and said the legislation was now 'pointless'. She said: 'They should bin it, do their homework, and come back with something serious. Starmer cannot govern.' A previous effort to kill the Bill had attracted more than 120 Labour supporters, but was dropped after the first partial u-turn on the legislation last week. And in yesterday's vote, Starmer faced a revolt of almost 50 MPs despite the changes, with the legislation clearing its first parliamentary hurdle by 335 votes to 260, a majority of 75. -With additional reporting by Diarmuid Pepper
