Trump says Apple must pay a 25% tariff on iPhones not made in the U.S.
Mandel Ngan | AFP | Getty Images
President Donald Trump said in a social media post Friday that Apple will have to pay a tariff of 25% or more for iPhones made outside the United States.
'I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhone's that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else. If that is not the case, a Tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple to the U.S.,' Trump said on Truth Social.
Shares of Apple fell about 2% on Friday after the post.
Apple's flagship phone is produced primarily in China, but the company has been shifting manufacturing to India in part because that country has a friendlier trade relationship with the U.S.
Some Wall Street analysts have estimated that moving iPhone production to the U.S. would raise the price of the Apple smartphone by at least 25%. Wedbush's Dan Ives put the estimated cost of a U.S. iPhone at $3,500. The iPhone 16 Pro currently retails for about $1,000.
This is the latest jab at Apple from Trump, who over the past couple of weeks has ramped up pressure on the company and Cook to increase domestic manufacturing. Trump and Cook met at the White House on Tuesday, according to Politico.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in an interview with Fox News on Friday that he was not part of the meeting at the White House but that the Apple situation could be part of the Trump administration's push to bring 'precision manufacturing' back to the U.S.
'A large part of Apple's components are in semiconductors. So we would like to have Apple help us make the semiconductor supply chain more secure,' Bessent said.
Cook gave $1 million to Trump's inauguration fund and attended the inauguration in January. Apple has announced a $500 billion spend on U.S. development, including AI server production in Houston.
Apple declined to comment for this story.
The company said during its May 1 earnings report that it expects about $900 million in additional costs for tariffs in the current quarter. Cook said on the company's earnings call that the tariff outlook was 'very difficult to predict' past June.
Foxconn, one of Apple's main iPhone assembly partners, is spending $1.5 billion on expanding its India facilities, the Financial Times reported Thursday.
Trump has publicly criticized other major U.S. companies, including Walmart , during his trade war push, but the levies on a specific consumer product is a new step. The exact legal mechanism for the tariff is unclear.
Trump followed up his post about Apple with another one calling for a 50% tariff on products from the European Union. Taken together, the posts point to trade tensions increasing again after the U.S. had temporarily lowered many of its levies, including in an agreement with China.
Apple also had to navigate tariff threats during Trump's first term, when a 15% tariff on Chinese imports was being considered in 2019. At that time, Cook had a strong relationship with Trump and the final trade deal excluded core Apple products from the duties.
As Apple is caught in the U.S. president's crosshairs, the company is also seeing weak demand in China. On Friday the company hiked trade-in incentives for iPhones in China.
READ SOURCE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
6 minutes ago
- CNBC
Luxury carmakers flag combined costs of $889 million as U.S. tariffs bite
Luxury automakers Porsche , Mercedes-Benz Group and Aston Martin on Wednesday each laid out the painful impact of U.S. President Donald Trump 's trade war — to the tune of a combined $889 million blow. German sportscar manufacturer Porsche said U.S. import tariffs resulted in a 400-million-euro ($462 million) hit in the first six months of the year, while domestic peer Mercedes-Benz Group warned of a tariff effect of roughly 370 million euros in the second quarter. British luxury carmaker Aston Martin also issued a profit warning, citing the impact of U.S. tariffs and weak Chinese demand. The London-listed company, famed for both featuring in the iconic James Bond movies and for its history of financial ups and downs, said the "evolving and disruptive U.S. tariff situation was unhelpful to our operations" through the June quarter. Collectively, the luxury carmakers warned of combined costs exceeding 770 million euros, or $889 million, from U.S. tariffs. The flurry of corporate earnings has been reaffirming the impact of the Trump administration's trade measures on Europe's auto giants. The White House in April raised tariffs to 27.5% on European Union auto imports, seeking to protect and strengthen the U.S. automotive sector. Several carmakers have since sounded the alarm , particularly given the high globalization of supply chains and the heavy reliance on manufacturing operations across North America. European auto industry groups welcomed news of a U.S.-EU framework trade agreement earlier in the week, while simultaneously expressing deep concern about the costs linked to the new tariff reality. 'Not a storm that will pass' The agreement brokered on Sunday means the Trump administration will impose a blanket tariff of 15% on most EU goods. It represents a significant reduction from Trump's threat to levy charges of 30% from Aug. 1 and almost halves the existing tariff rate on Europe's auto sector. "We continue to face significant challenges around the world. And this is not a storm that will pass," Oliver Blume, chairman of the executive board of Porsche, said in a statement out Wednesday. "The world is changing dramatically – and, above all, differently to what was expected just a few years ago. Some of the strategic decisions made back then appear in a different light today." Shares of Porsche rose 2.4% on Wednesday morning, while Mercedes-Benz Group dipped 1.5% and Aston Martin fell more than 2%.
Newsweek
6 minutes ago
- Newsweek
GOP Senator: Congress Must Hold NATO to Its 5 Percent Defense Spending Commitment
The main benefit of alliances, such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), is deterrence. Our enemies are less likely to harm one of us if they know they'll have to face all of us. At the end of the day, though, an alliance is just a promise—built on mutual trust—stating that we won't leave each other to fight threats alone. An alliance will only deter threats if our adversaries sincerely believe that we will all stick together no matter what. If an alliance has loopholes, it's not really an alliance at all. That's why some of the fine print in NATO's latest defense spending commitment is so concerning. On the surface, it appeared as though every member of NATO agreed to increase its defense spending to 5 percent of its GDP by 2035—and I'm confident that many of our allies intend to do just that. A NATO flag is pictured. A NATO flag is pictured. MATEUSZ SLODKOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images But some of our friends in NATO have already begun to weasel their way out of this commitment. Spain, for example, has flat-out refused to spend 5 percent on defense. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez told NATO officials that Spain would only spend 2.1 percent on defense, adding, "It is the legitimate right of every government to decide whether or not they are willing to make those sacrifices." To clarify: Sánchez expects the American people to make sacrifices to contribute to our shared defense, but he doesn't want anyone in Spain to miss a single siesta for the cause. Does that sound like someone who would ride with you into battle? Still, NATO exempted Spain and made the 5 percent defense spending requirement optional for each country, turning its commitment into a wish list. The Spanish carveout isn't the only crack in NATO's commitment. Under the new agreement, only 3.5 percent of each country's spending needs to contribute to core defense needs, such as military, ammunition, and other standard warfighting needs. The remaining 1.5 percent of spending can be applied to almost anything the country can claim is beneficial to its defense. Italy, for example, is already planning to include a €13.5 billion bridge to Sicily as part of its 1.5 percent defense spending. The Italian government has long viewed the bridge, which would be the world's largest suspension bridge, as a possible economic driver. Under NATO's flimsy language, though, the bridge may count as defense infrastructure. This wouldn't be the first time our NATO friends skirted their defense responsibilities. In 2006, NATO agreed to have each member spend 2 percent of its GDP on defense. Only three members of the alliance had hit the spending goal by 2014, the same year that Russian President Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula. Putin's aggression prompted NATO to reaffirm its 2 percent defense spending goal in 2014. By 2022, only seven members of NATO had reached 2 percent, and, once again, Putin invaded Ukraine in a war that continues today. That should have been the final wake-up call our NATO friends needed to meet their 2 percent spending pledge. Still, NATO's latest numbers show that eight members, including Canada, Italy, and Spain, have not met the 2 percent spending goal. Yet we are supposed to believe they'll hit 5 percent defense spending by 2035. Friends tell friends the truth. When they don't, friendships fall apart—and our adversaries take note. Today, I am introducing a resolution to commend our NATO allies who agreed to increase their defense spending to 5 percent and to strongly urge every member of NATO to follow through with this commitment sincerely. If we want to deter our adversaries, we need real investments in our defense, not bridges that have little, if anything, to do with national security. NATO is one of the greatest defensive alliances in all of human history, but these loopholes make us weaker. The world needs to know we have each other's backs, and that starts by putting your money where your mouth is. Senator John Kennedy is a Republican senator from Louisiana. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Newsweek
6 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Map, List of Cities Hosting 'Rage Against the Regime' Protests on August 2
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. "Rage Against the Regime" demonstrations against President Donald Trump and his administration's policies are scheduled to take place across the U.S. on August 2. Newsweek has contacted the 50501 Movement, who is behind the protests, for comment via email. Why It Matters There have been several nationwide days of protests against the Trump administration since he returned to office in January, many of them organized by the 50501 Movement (50 protests, 50 states, one movement). Last month, millions took to the streets for "No Kings" protests on June 14, targeting a military parade in Washington marking the Army's 250th anniversary that coincided with Trump's 79th birthday. Protests in honor of the late civil rights icon and congressman John Lewis also took place on July 17, while "Free America" events were held across the country over the Fourth of July weekend. 'Rage Against the Regime' Protest Locations on August 2 "Rage Against the Regime" is the latest nationwide day of action organized by the 50501 Movement. In a press release, organizers called for "a mass mobilization to channel our collective rage against the Trump administration for its weaponization of ICE against our communities, construction of concentration camps, covering up the Epstein files, attacks on transgender rights, and its dismantling of Medicaid, SNAP, USAID, the Department of Education, NOAA, and the National Weather Service into collective action." More than 300 demonstrations are set to take place on August 2, according to the Rage Against the Regime website. A map shows where "Rage Against the Regime" protests are planned to take place on August 2. A map shows where "Rage Against the Regime" protests are planned to take place on August 2. Rage Against the Regime website Here's a look at one event happening in every state where protests have been planned. To see all the events taking place, you can visit the website. What People Are Saying Hunter Dunn, 50501 National press coordinator, said in a statement: "The Trump administration's heralding of American neo-fascism has given us plenty to rage about. When our so-called representative government builds concentration camps and funds genocide, it becomes clear that, as Tom Morello said: 'Some of those that work forces are the same that burn crosses.'" What's Next The protests will take place in states across the U.S. on August 2. According to a messaging guide for organizers, it is a day to "come together to transform anger into action, harnessing the energy of collective resistance."
