
Young people in England's coastal towns three times more likely to have a mental health condition
This 'coastal mental health gap' means that young people in these towns, which include areas of Tendring on the east coast and Blackpool and Liverpool to the west, are suffering disproportionately, often alone and with no help, said the researchers who conducted the study.
Over the next year, the Against the Tide project from the Guardian's Seascape team will be reporting on the lives of young people in coastal communities across England and Wales.
Young people in many of England's coastal towns are disproportionately likely to face poverty, poor housing, lower educational attainment and employment opportunities than their peers in equivalent inland areas. In the most deprived coastal towns they can be left to struggle with crumbling and stripped back public services and transport systems that limit their life choices.
For the next 12 months, accompanied by documentary photographer Polly Braden, we will travel up and down the country to port towns, seaside resorts and former fishing villages to ask 16- to 25-year-olds to tell us about their lives and how they feel about the places they live.
By putting their voices at the front and centre of our reporting, we want to examine what kind of changes they need to build the futures they want for themselves.
'We don't yet know why these young people are being left out but one reason might be that they are not demanding the help in the way the older generation is, or if they are, they are not having their voices heard,' said Emily Murray, director of Essex University's centre for coastal communities. The study found that the opposite is true for older people living in the same communities, who were a third less likely to have undiagnosed mental health problems than people the same age living inland in similar areas of deprivation.
The Essex researchers, led by Claire Wicks, studied data from 28,000 adults across the UK to see how different generations experience life in Britain. They looked at the responses from adults living in coastal communities and inland in England between 2018 and 2023 who scored highly against a widely accepted measure of mental distress but where they had not had a diagnosis. Deprivation was determined using the official indices from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government.
Four years ago, a report by England's chief medical officer, Chris Whitty, found that diagnosed mental health problems were disproportionately higher among young people in coastal areas.
Separate work by the University of Essex and University College London (UCL), also seen by the Guardian, found a range of factors at play. These included higher levels of poverty but also lower rates of progression to higher education and higher crime levels in the places they live.
The primary explanation for the disproportionate levels of mental health is the economic and social challenges that people face who live in these communities, said Murray. Household incomes and private renting are key factors.
'Young people on the coast are more likely to be living in areas where incomes are lower and more families are renting from private landlords,' she said. 'On top of that they often live in areas that are geographically isolated, making it harder to reach places where there are more economic and healthcare opportunities.'
Ceilidh Bardsley, 21, who lives in Weston-super-Mare, described living in a town where it feels as if tourists are given priority. 'A lot of emphasis is put into the main seafront for things to look nice' she said. 'But then you look around the estates, and there are potholes everywhere, shop fronts are falling down and there's mould in many of the houses.'
Twenty-year-old Levi, who has lived in Southend all his life, said that it was an 'amazing' place. 'But growing up, seeing how many places have closed down, it feels like Southend is getting worse, not better. I couldn't imagine wanting to bring up children here.'
Separately, the UCL researchers went round the country talking to dozens of policymakers and local practitioners about what could drive change in coastal areas. Many said that what was needed was to champion young people's voices and focus on what local people need and want.
'I think letting people make decisions is massive, is so important in our town,' said one practitioner in Barrow, in the north-west. 'Don't bring consultants in to tell our communities what they need. Come and talk to us.'
Others talked about the need for long-term, sustainable public-sector funding to run youth services and community projects, and to train and retain staff, as well as for money to be targeted specifically towards young people in coastal places.
Prof Sheena Asthana, co-director of the Centre for Coastal Communities at the University of Plymouth, said: 'The Essex research confirms our own analysis that signals of poor mental health among young people, such as hospital admissions for self-harm, are disproportionately higher on the coast.
'The very high rates of undiagnosed mental health in deprived coastal areas suggest that the government might want to explore whether long waiting times for children and young people's mental health services are to blame.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
NHS disruption expected as resident doctors vote for strike action
The NHS could face six months of disruption after resident doctors in England voted in favour of strike action. Downing Street said pay negotiations will not be reopened because the Government 'can't be more generous' than it has been already this year. The ballot gives resident doctors a mandate for strike action until January 2026. Some 90% of voting resident doctors in England, formerly known as junior doctors, said they would down their stethoscopes and take to picket lines amid an ongoing row over pay. The British Medical Association (BMA) said there was a turnout of 55%. The union has said resident doctors need a pay uplift of 29.2% to reverse 'pay erosion' since 2008/09. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said it was 'disappointing' that medics were threatening strike action, saying that the 'majority of resident doctors did not vote to strike'. BMA resident doctors committee co-chairs Dr Melissa Ryan and Dr Ross Nieuwoudt said in a statement: 'All we need is a credible pay offer and nobody need strike. 'Doctors don't take industrial action lightly – but they know it is preferable to watching their profession wither away. 'The next move is the Government's. 'Will it repeat the mistakes of its predecessor? Or will it do the right thing and negotiate a path to full pay restoration and the restoration of doctors' confidence in our profession's future?' Mr Streeting said: 'While the majority of resident doctors did not vote to strike, it is disappointing that the BMA are threatening strike action that would harm patients and set back all the progress we're making with the NHS. 'Thanks to this Government, resident doctors have received a 28.9% pay rise compared to three years ago, and the highest pay award of the entire public sector this year. 'I met with the BMA today, and while we can't go further on pay than we already have this year, I offered to work with them to resolve issues they face around working conditions. These are not grounds for strike action. My offer to meet their entire committee remains open.' A Number 10 spokesman said: 'We aren't going to reopen negotiations on pay. 'Resident doctors have received the highest pay award across the public sector for two years in a row, and we've been clear that we can't be more generous than we already have this year.' A fresh bout of walkouts could cause severe upheaval across the health service. Previous strikes by resident doctors and other staff groups saw some 1.5 million appointments, procedures and operations postponed as a result. The news will come as a blow to the Government after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's 'plan for change' pledged that by July 2029, 92% of patients will be seen within 18 weeks for routine hospital treatment such as hip and knee replacements. The waiting list for routine hospital treatment in England is currently at its lowest level for two years, according to the latest figures, with an estimated 7.39 million treatments waiting to be carried out at the end of April. Danny Mortimer, chief executive of NHS Employers, which is part of the NHS Confederation, said: 'Further strikes are the last thing health leaders wanted and could result in tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of operations and procedures being delayed or cancelled, leaving patients in pain or discomfort.' Daniel Elkeles, chief executive of NHS Providers, said: 'A return to industrial action would be a huge setback – bad for patients, for staff and for the NHS.' In September, BMA members voted to accept a Government pay deal worth 22.3% on average over two years. And the 2025/26 pay deal saw resident doctors given a 4% uplift plus £750 'on a consolidated basis' – working out as an average pay rise of 5.4%. The BMA call for a 29.2% uplift is based on Retail Prices Index (RPI) inflation, the measure of average changes in the price of goods and services used by most households. Edward Argar, shadow health secretary, said: 'We warned Labour that caving in to union demands for above-inflation pay rises without conditions would set a dangerous precedent and that the unions would simply come back for more. 'That warning has sadly become true with today's strike vote. 'We are now staring down the barrel of a summer of strikes.' There are around 77,000 resident doctors in England who work in various settings from GP surgeries to hospitals. Resident doctor is a catch-all term for all doctors in training, ranging from graduates to medics with a decade of experience.


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
‘Oldest' victim of Horizon IT scandal says ordeal ‘destroyed' her health
A woman thought to be the oldest victim of the Horizon IT scandal said the ordeal 'destroyed' her health as she celebrated the publication of an inquiry report. Betty Brown, 92, from County Durham, ran the Annfield Plain Post Office near Stanley with her late husband Oswall, in the 1990s and early 2000s. She claims his death was impacted by the ordeal of missing hundreds of pounds each week in their accounts. Ms Brown told the PA news agency: 'We had a nice office, nice atmosphere, nice customers, and everything was fine, no problem. 'And then we were told about this wonderful advancement in technology, and we would get a system put in, called Horizon that would half the workload – which it didn't. 'So Horizon was put in, then the very first night, the balance was £500 short, but they thought something had been missed in the accounts or whatever and that was just let go. 'Then it began eventually that there was so many mistakes in the system that it was concerning, and these losses were coming out in amounts of £1,500, £1,600 every week, and we were having to put this money in and make it good, because that's what you sign up for.' Ms Brown said the ordeal caused her to lose her voice and said the anxiety it caused her husband disrupted his cancer treatment. He died a year after they sold the Post Office, which Ms Brown said she felt forced to do. 'Even my voice today isn't a voice that I had naturally,' she said. 'The stress, I lost my voice, and after retired, I had to go for elocution lessons, to learn to speak again so that people could understand me. 'The stress was unbelievable. You would go to bed at night and you couldn't sleep.' Ms Brown and her husband moved away from Annfield Plain to Consett after the ordeal. 'We couldn't live there (Annfield Plain) any longer, because the stigma was there and we kept a low profile. 'We didn't integrate into what the community. We kept ourselves apart. And when people would say to us, what did you do while you were working? 'You evaded the question, and you tried to change the subject.' Ms Brown continues her campaign for full compensation but said on Tuesday, after the first tranche of the Horizon inquiry's final report was published, that she had an 'amazing' day. 'Sir (Wyn) Williams has done a wonderful job,' Ms Brown said. 'He has felt the pain, he's felt the anxiety, he's felt the agony, he's felt everything that subpostmasters felt and he has been able to bring that with all his skill into a meaningful book. 'I hope that the Post Office will take this on board.'


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Government suing firm linked to 'Baroness Bra' for £122m because of 'buyer's remorse' after Covid contract, High Court told
The Government is suing a firm linked to Michelle Mone for £122m claiming it had 'buyer's remorse' over a Covid PPE contract. The bra tycoon and Tory peer had recommended PPE Medpro, which went on to provide 25 million 'faulty' surgical gowns during the coronavirus pandemic. PPE Medpro is now being sued by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), with Government lawyers claiming the gowns couldn't be used because they were not sterile. The department wants more than £121 million back from PPE Medpro, plus storage costs of over £8 million. PPE Medpro is also accused of supplying the gowns without CE markings, which shows if a product meets certain medical standards. The consortium, led by the Tory peer's husband Doug Barrowman, was awarded contracts by the former Conservative administration. Following a month-long trial at the High Court in London, lawyers for PPE Medpro said in closing that the Government had ordered 10 years' worth of excess gowns by December 2020. Charles Samek KC, for PPE Medpro, said in written submissions: 'That simple fact explains why, once the PPEM gowns landed in the UK, they were no longer needed or wanted.' He described the Government's assessment at the time as 'wildly and hopelessly wrong', adding: 'DHSC's obvious buyer's remorse was channelled into looking for ways to escape from a contract it wished it had never made.' PPE Medpro has issued a counterclaim saying DHSC owed a duty of care to the company to advise it on compliance with the contract. Mr Samek said DHSC approved the gowns without seeing a valid CE mark because they did not need one, adding that it is 'obvious' that PPE Medpro 'did not have and did not pretend to have a valid CE mark'. Testing of 140 gowns after delivery showed that 103 failed to meet the sterilisation standard, the court was previously told. Mr Samek said that after delivery to the UK, the gowns were kept in shipping containers for 'at least three months'. Contamination therefore likely happened 'subsequent to delivery, most probably during the subsequent transportation, storage and handling of the tested gowns', he added. Paul Stanley KC, for DHSC, said PPE Medpro did not follow a validated sterilisation process and did not keep sufficient records. He said the bioburden, or level of microbial contamination prior to sterilisation, was not properly assessed and that PPE Medpro has been unable to show evidence of this assessment. In written submissions, he said: 'The absence of such documentation is compelling evidence that the assessment of bioburden did not take place.' He continued: 'DHSC invites the court to find as a matter of fact that this fundamental step in a validated process for sterilisation was not done.' The barrister also referenced photographs that he said showed how the gowns were not manufactured in a way that would reduce microbial contamination. These included workers wearing short sleeves, gowns trailing on the floor and personnel wearing street shoes and working without hair protection, he said. Mr Stanley denied that DHSC owed a duty of care to PPE Medpro and said DHSC 'is entitled to repayment of the price, and to recover damages for storage costs'. He added: 'The gowns were not sterilised using a properly validated process and were not, as a result, compliant with the contractual standard or (in the true commercial sense) 'sterile' gowns at all.' Closing submissions are expected to conclude on Thursday with a written judgment given at a later date.