IRD warns about misunderstanding fringe benefit tax
There was a warning this week that farmers buying expensive utes at Fieldays could be in for a shock if the FBT rules changed in line with proposals released earlier this year.
Federated Farmers has also warned of a "ute tax 2.0".
But Inland Revenue deputy commissioner, policy, David Carrigan, said there were misunderstandings about the tax, including a myth that utes had been FBT-free.
"When it comes to double cab utes, these are treated no differently to any other vehicle. Unless the use of the vehicle meets all the requirements for an exemption from FBT, then a double cab ute is, and always has been, subject to FBT. That is the current law," Carrigan said.
ADVERTISEMENT
"Work-related vehicles are only exempt from FBT if they meet certain requirements. This includes double cab utes."
The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including Auckland's supermarket fire, Trump's threat to Iran, and how a smart watch could make you fitter. (Source: 1News)
At the moment, work vehicles such as utes are only exempt from FBT on days when they are used for essential work purposes.
He said what was proposed was not a change to that treatment, but to remove the necessity to count days when a vehicle was or was not available for private use.
"The idea is to simplify FBT, not create additional obligations. If a business - including a farm - is not currently liable for FBT on a vehicle, then it's unlikely they would become liable for FBT under any proposals taken forward."
He said the aim of the FBT proposals was not to increase revenue but to reduce compliance costs of FBT.
"The government has not made any final decisions in relation to potential changes to the FBT regime and Ministers are currently considering the feedback received from submitters on the Inland Revenue issues paper with a view to refining those proposals."
ADVERTISEMENT
Deloitte tax partner Robyn Walker agreed there was "fake news" circulating about the FBT rules.
She said there had historically been concerns about low levels of compliance with FBT.
"This review essentially concluded that a lack of compliance with the existing laws (and lack of compliance by Inland Revenue) had the potential to erode the integrity of the tax system.
"Essentially, if taxpayers think it is okay to not comply with FBT rules, they'll also start not complying with other tax laws."
She said the idea that utes were completely exempt from FBT was long-standing but had never been the case.
But under the proposals released earlier this year, a vehicle used for work purposes and generally only available for home to work travel and travelling to different worksites would be "category three" vehicle with a 0% rate for FBT purposes.
"Under the proposals, if there was occasional additional private use of the vehicle, this would be ignored."
ADVERTISEMENT
She said the changes also opened this category up to other vehicles such as small cars and electric vehicles.
"There is a proposed rule that vehicles assigned to shareholder employees would not be able to be exempted from FBT if the vehicle has a cost of $80,000-plus.
"However, for FBT purposes, you only look at the cost of the vehicle and you ignore any 'business accessories'.
"There is a false narrative that if a ute is purchased and it is fitted with work-related gadgets that increase the total cost to above $80,000 that the vehicle is automatically subject to full FBT. This is incorrect."
rnz.co.nz
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
18 hours ago
- 1News
The red light some Auckland drivers treat as a suggestion
Auckland's motorway on-ramp signals play an important role in managing traffic and improving safety, but some motorists seem to treat the red light as optional. Ramp signals, installed on the city's motorway network in the late 2000s, aim to manage the rate at which vehicles move down the on-ramp and onto the motorway. With 91 ramp signals across the Southern, Southwestern, Northern and Northwestern motorways, Auckland has the largest system of its kind in the Southern Hemisphere. Since their introduction, NZTA says travel speeds have improved by 12%, merging-related crashes have reduced, and throughput onto the motorway has increased by 18%. NZTA said it was illegal for a motorist to go through a red ramp signal. ADVERTISEMENT "Ramp signals are a legal traffic signal and running a red light holds the same penalty as a regular traffic light." Failing to stop at a red light will set you back $150 if you get caught. Prakash Ranjitkar, a transport engineering expert at the University of Auckland, told 1News there could be many reasons for motorists not complying with ramp signals. "Many drivers may not fully understand their purpose, perceive them as inconvenient, or believe they can safely merge without waiting." Ramp signalling controls the rate at which vehicles enter the motorway. (Source: Getty) The signals control the rate at which vehicles entered the motorway and help to prevent "sudden surges" that could cause shockwaves, bottlenecks and unstable driving conditions, he said. "This metered entry allows vehicles already on the motorway to maintain consistent speeds and reduces the risk of rear-end and side-swipe crashes near on-ramps." ADVERTISEMENT Ignoring these ramp signals could "undermine the entire motorway system", he added. "Uncontrolled merging can disrupt mainline flow, significantly raising crash risk, increasing congestion, leading to localised delays and a breakdown in coordinated traffic management, especially during peak periods." Ranjitkar suggested public education campaigns could help drivers better understand why the signals exist and how they benefit drivers. Police said in a statement that officers actively watch priority lanes and the stop-go lights on the on-ramps when out on the road. "If our officers see breaches they respond accordingly. "We urge anyone with concerns around dangerous driving to report it to police immediately on 111 if it's happening now, and on 105 after the fact."
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
KiwiSaver hardship reveals hidden cost of this economic downturn
We had news last week that KiwiSaver members withdrew more than $470 million for hardship reasons in the past 12 months amid continuing economic stress. Inland Revenue figures showed $470.7m was taken out of KiwiSaver in the June financial year, up 56.6% from $300.5m over the prior period. Looking back through the figures, there has certainly been a big spike in withdrawals in the past two years, but they have been on the rise for several years. Since Covid, both the number of people withdrawing funds and the amount withdrawn have risen steadily. As a barometer of the general economic situation, that isn't great. But the bigger problem with these hardship withdrawals is that the ultimate cost is (quite literally) compounded through the years. More than $1.3 billion of KiwiSaver funds has been withdrawn for hardship reasons in the past five years. If we do some back-of-the-envelope calculations and assume this money could have earned around 7% returns for the next 20 years, then we get a figure of more than $5b that will be missing from the nation's pool of retirement funds by 2045. Given the current trend of withdrawals, I suspect this is a conservative estimate. I understand why we allow withdrawals for hardship. It doesn't make sense for people to lose their homes or to go hungry when they have thousands of dollars sitting in a KiwiSaver account, so I'm not advocating that we stop allowing the withdrawals. However, there is a hidden cost and the situation highlights just how crucial it is for the Government to put more focus on retirement savings. There is a lot more money coming out of the KiwiSaver scheme to fund people into their first homes. Since Covid hit, an average of about $1.2b a year has been withdrawn from KiwiSaver for first home purchases. A home is an asset at least, and home ownership is an important step on the path to financial independence. I suspect we just have to accept the first home buyer withdrawals as a feature of the KiwiSaver scheme. If young people are in the scheme from the start of their working life and have $10,000 or $20,000 to put towards a house deposit, they are probably ahead of where many in my generation were at the same age. But the reality is that as a nation, we're well behind on where we need to be with our retirement savings. According to Stats NZ projections, the percentage of the population aged 65+ will increase from roughly 16-17% in the early 2020s to about 19-20% by 2030. By 2050, around 24-26% of New Zealanders are expected to be 65+. The old-age dependency ratio (ratio of elderly to working-age population) is expected to nearly double between 2020 and 2050. Our annual superannuation bill already comes in at more than $20b, and Treasury has projected that to rise to about $45b by 2037. According to Budget 2025 data, New Zealand Superannuation costs $4352 per person per year, making it the third-largest area of government spending after welfare ($6181 per person) and health ($5804 per person). From the Treasury's long-term fiscal projections, spending on NZ Super is projected to grow from 4.3% of GDP in 2010 to 7.9% in 2060, an increase of 3.6 percentage points. It is also rising as a percentage of the Government's total tax revenue – from about 17% now, it is projected to rise above 21% by 2037. So we know we have a problem. It seems almost certain that the age of superannuation will have to be raised to 67 in the coming years – despite the current opposition of NZ First and Labour. Future governments will almost certainly come under more pressure to means-test. KiwiSaver, which currently has total funds of $122b, is one of our great hopes. But the total figure is flattering. There are more than three million KiwiSaver members so the average fund size is just $37,000. Hopefully, that will be skewed by a lot of young people who will see their savings grow dramatically in the next decades. That brings us back to the downside of withdrawing funds early for hardship, though. We need to be saving more, not less. Moves by the Government to lift the default contribution rate for both employees and employers to 4% from April 2028 were a step in the right direction. However, they pale in comparison to Australia's compulsory scheme, which requires 12% employer contributions. The scheme has the equivalent of $4.5 trillion invested, making Australia the fifth-largest holder of pension fund assets in the world, not per capita but in nominal terms. Australia, for the record, also allows people to withdraw funds for hardship, but one suspects fewer people there need to. If we want to make the most of the KiwiSaver scheme we have, we need to look more closely at who is withdrawing their money and why. Meanwhile, young Kiwis are voting with their feet and joining the Australian Superannuation scheme ... by virtue of moving to work there. Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.
1News
2 days ago
- 1News
South Island pulls ahead as regional divide widens — economist
New Zealand's regions are showing signs of recovery, but there is a growing economic performance divide between the North and South Islands, a new report from Kiwibank says. The Annual Regional Note, released on Saturday, showed that the South Island was continuing to outperform the North and that while most regions recorded gains, progress remained uneven. The national average score has lifted from 3 to 4 out of 10. Kiwibank chief economist Jarrod Kerr said the economic tide was turning. "Most regions have seen at least some improvements, but the recovery is far from even." ADVERTISEMENT Southland and Otago lead with scores of 5, driven by a building boom and tourism rebound respectively. Northland, Taranaki, and Gisborne scores declined. Wellington and Auckland lifted slightly, with New Zealand's biggest city supported by population growth. "The further south you go, the more optimistic people are," Kerr said. "So you think about Northland and Taranaki and Gisborne, they've gone backwards over the last year. And you think further south, you know, going to Otago and Canterbury, they're actually doing a lot better." He said the divide could become a "self-fulfilling prophecy" with people leaving places such as Auckland and moving to Christchurch. "It is more affordable and, these days, you don't necessarily have to be in the largest cities — a lot of people are working from home." Kiwibank chief economist Jarrod Kerr. (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT Kerr said the housing market had remained largely "locked in lateral moves". "Since stabilising in early 2023, national house prices are up just 1.8%. Since the Reserve Bank began cutting rates in August, house prices have only lifted by half a percent — and, in many regions, they're still flat or falling." Labour market conditions were also mixed. Otago had the strongest employment growth in the country, up 8%, while Taranaki recorded the steepest employment drop at -8%. Retail sales remained subdued and below their average levels in most regions, with Wellington recording the steepest at -3.3%, while regions such as Waikato, Northland and the Bay of Plenty improved slightly on last year. Consumers were still being cautious, Kerr said, "They're rebuilding balance sheets, not rushing to the shops just yet." 'Time for the Reserve Bank to step on it' ADVERTISEMENT Kerr told 1News he would like to see the Reserve Bank "go from having their foot firmly on the brake, to putting it in neutral, to actually putting their foot on the accelerator". He believed the Official Cash Rate should fall from its current position at 3.25% to 2.5% to provide meaningful stimulus to the economy. "We think the risk, if anything, is that inflation falls too far and falls below 2% because the economy is so weak. So, job done on the inflation front, it's time to stimulate growth."
