logo
After a decade on probation, Chandigarh teachers to go on hunger strike tomorrow

After a decade on probation, Chandigarh teachers to go on hunger strike tomorrow

Indian Express6 hours ago
Written by Amanpreet Thakur and Nivedita
Ten years after joining service, teachers recruited in 2015 under the Chandigarh Education Department are still awaiting confirmation. With no progress despite favourable court orders, the Joint Teachers Association (JTA) on Monday announced a hunger strike on Guru Purnima (July 10), calling it a symbolic protest for 'dignity and justice'.
At a press conference held at the Chandigarh Press Club, JTA president Ranbir Jhorar said, 'we're raising our voices here because no one else is listening. When any employee is exhausted by the struggle, the media becomes the only hope'.
The teachers were recruited in 2015, but a paper leak in Punjab led to a criminal investigation. While 49 names surfaced, only six were charge-sheeted. 'The SIT cleared the rest, and yet the department continues to treat the entire batch as suspect,' Jhorar said. He added that three challans were filed between 2017 and 2021, effectively closing the investigation for most.
Though the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) quashed the government's 2018 cancellation of the recruitment and the high court upheld that order in 2019, the administration filed a special leave petition in the Supreme Court. 'But there's no stay,' Jhorar pointed out, adding, 'why are we being punished when there is no legal bar'.
He called the never-ending probation 'the biggest torture,' stating that government rules allow probation to be extended only once, up to a maximum of two years. The Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) also mandates confirmation after successful completion of the probation period. 'There's no written communication of misconduct or failure, so what's the justification for the delay,' he asked.
The JTA also raised concerns about 2023 recruits under the Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) not being given 7th Pay Commission (CPC) benefits. 'They joined after April 1, 2022, when central pay rules were already in force, but are still stuck on outdated pay scales,' Jhorar said. He blamed the delay on the DoPT's failure to issue cadre-specific orders.
In addition, the association highlighted that deputationist teachers from Punjab and Haryana working in Chandigarh schools were not being given due seniority, despite a 1999 Supreme Court ruling (Roop Lal vs. Lt. Governor). 'This violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution,' the JTA chief said.
The teachers plan to escalate their protest if their demands are ignored. 'This is not a fight against the department, but for the enforcement of rules and court orders,' Jhorar said. The association has submitted detailed representations up to the Chief Secretary and even secured political support, with BJP Chandigarh president Jatinder Malhotra writing to Union Home Minister Amit Shah in March.
'Even IAS and IPS officers whose cases are pending in court are serving in regular roles. Why are rules applied differently to us?' Jhorar asked, concluding, 'if rules exist, they must apply equally — not be bent at will.'
The writers are interns with The Indian Express
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mass job cuts, layoffs soon in U.S? Check who will be fired?
Mass job cuts, layoffs soon in U.S? Check who will be fired?

Economic Times

time22 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Mass job cuts, layoffs soon in U.S? Check who will be fired?

Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way on Tuesday for President Donald Trump's administration to resume carrying out mass job cuts and the restructuring of agencies, elements of his campaign to downsize and reshape the federal government. The justices lifted San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Susan Illston's May 22 order that had blocked large-scale federal layoffs called "reductions in force" affecting potentially hundreds of thousands of jobs, while litigation in the case proceeds. Trump in February announced "a critical transformation of the federal bureaucracy" in an executive order directing agencies to prepare for a government overhaul aimed at significantly reducing the federal workforce and gutting offices and programs opposed by the administration. Workforce reductions were planned at the U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Health and Human Services, State, Treasury, Veterans Affairs and more than a dozen other wrote in her ruling that Trump had exceeded his authority in ordering the downsizing, siding with a group of unions, non-profits and local governments that challenged the administration. "As history demonstrates, the president may broadly restructure federal agencies only when authorized by Congress," Illston judge blocked the agencies from carrying out mass layoffs and limited their ability to cut or overhaul federal programs. Illston also ordered the reinstatement of workers who had lost their jobs, though she delayed implementing this portion of her ruling while the appeals process plays ruling was the broadest of its kind against the government overhaul being pursued by Trump and the Department of Government Efficiency, a key player in the Republican president's drive to slash the federal spearheaded by billionaire Elon Musk, DOGE has sought to eliminate federal jobs, shrink and reshape the U.S. government and root out what they see as wasteful spending. Musk formally ended his government work on May 30 and subsequently had a public falling out with San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 ruling on May 30 denied the administration's request to halt the judge's 9th Circuit said the administration had not shown that it would suffer an irreparable injury if the judge's order remained in place and that the plaintiffs were likely to prevail in their lawsuit."The executive order at issue here far exceeds the president's supervisory powers under the Constitution," the 9th Circuit wrote, calling the administration's actions "an unprecedented attempted restructuring of the federal government and its operations."The 9th Circuit's ruling prompted the Justice Department's June 2 emergency request to the Supreme Court to halt Illston's the personnel of federal agencies "lies at the heartland" of the president's executive branch authority, the Justice Department said in its filing to the Supreme Court."The Constitution does not erect a presumption against presidential control of agency staffing, and the president does not need special permission from Congress to exercise core Article II powers," the filing said, referring to the constitution's section delineating presidential plaintiffs urged the Supreme Court to deny the Justice Department's request. Allowing the Trump administration to move forward with its "breakneck reorganization," they wrote, would mean that "programs, offices and functions across the federal government will be abolished, agencies will be radically downsized from what Congress authorized, critical government services will be lost and hundreds of thousands of federal employees will lose their jobs."The Supreme Court in recent months has sided with Trump in some major cases that were acted upon on an emergency basis since he returned to office in cleared the way for Trump's administration to resume deporting migrants to countries other than their own without offering them a chance to show the harms they could face. In two cases, it let the administration end temporary legal status previously granted on humanitarian grounds to hundreds of thousands of also allowed Trump to implement his ban on transgender people in the U.S. military, blocked a judge's order for the administration to rehire thousands of fired employees and twice sided with his Department of Government Efficiency.A1. The full form of DOGE is Department of Government Efficiency.A2. President of USA is Donald Trump.

BRS to start rail blockade if BJP, Congress continue to delay implementation of Telangana OBC quota Bill: Kavitha
BRS to start rail blockade if BJP, Congress continue to delay implementation of Telangana OBC quota Bill: Kavitha

The Hindu

time31 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

BRS to start rail blockade if BJP, Congress continue to delay implementation of Telangana OBC quota Bill: Kavitha

Blaming the Congress and the BJP for their delay in implementing a Bill passed by the Telangana Assembly to grant 42% reservation for other backward classes (OBCs), Bharat Rashtra Samiti (BRS) leader K. Kavitha said on Tuesday (July 8, 2025) that her party will launch a rail blockade agitation on July 17 if a government order to implement the law is not issued in the next State Cabinet meeting. She asked Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to direct Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy to issue the order using the provisions of the Constitution. Ms. Kavitha also urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to act so that the legislation, which is at present awaiting approval from President Droupadi Murmu, can be notified soon. 'If the Backward Classes Bill is not approved, not a single train wheel will be allowed to move forward from Telangana,' she said. 'Deceiving the backward classes' Ms. Kavitha accused both the Congress, in power at the State, and the BJP-ruled Central government of deceiving the backward classes (BCs). 'Opposition to BCs is ingrained in BJP's DNA. If the BC Bill is not approved, 2.5 crore BC children in Telangana will teach BJP a lesson,' she said. Talking to reporters in the national capital on Tuesday, the BRS leader said that she would write to all political parties seeking their support for the implementation of BC reservations. She said the State government is trying to wash its hands of the matter after sending the Bill to the President. 'Why isn't Rahul Gandhi making a phone call to Revanth Reddy to issue the Government Order? If he truly supports the Constitution, he should ensure that the Revanth government enforces the 42% reservation through a Government Order,' she said.

U.S. Supreme Court clears way for Trump's plans to downsize federal workforce
U.S. Supreme Court clears way for Trump's plans to downsize federal workforce

The Hindu

time36 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

U.S. Supreme Court clears way for Trump's plans to downsize federal workforce

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (July 8, 2025) cleared the way for President Donald Trump's plans to downsize the federal workforce despite warnings that critical government services will be lost and hundreds of thousands of federal employees will be out of their jobs. The Justices overrode lower court orders that temporarily froze the cuts, which have been led by the Department of Government Efficiency. The Court said in an unsigned order that no specific cuts were in front of the justices, only an executive order issued by Mr. Trump and an administration directive for agencies to undertake job reductions. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the only dissenting vote, accusing her colleagues of a 'demonstrated enthusiasm for greenlighting this President's legally dubious actions in an emergency posture.' Mr. Trump has repeatedly said voters gave him a mandate to remake the federal government, and he tapped billionaire ally Elon Musk to lead the charge through DOGE. Mr. Musk recently left his role. Downsizing of federal workforce Tens of thousands of federal workers have been fired, have left their jobs via deferred resignation programs or have been placed on leave. There is no official figure for the job cuts, but at least 75,000 federal employees took deferred resignation and thousands of probationary workers have already been let go. In May, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston found that Trump's administration needs congressional approval to make sizable reductions to the federal workforce. By a 2-1 vote, a panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to block Illston's order, finding that the downsizing could have broader effects, including on the nation's food-safety system and health care for veterans. Illston directed numerous federal agencies to halt acting on the President's workforce executive order signed in February and a subsequent memo issued by DOGE and the Office of Personnel Management. Illston was nominated by former Democratic President Bill Clinton. The labor unions and nonprofit groups that sued over the downsizing offered the justices several examples of what would happen if it were allowed to take effect, including cuts of 40% to 50% at several agencies. Among the agencies affected by the order are the departments of Agriculture, Energy, Labour, the Interior, State, the Treasury and Veterans Affairs. It also applies to the National Science Foundation, Small Business Association, Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store