This is the best budget anti-ageing cream, according to our reviews
Arriving on the scene in 2018 and impressing beauty editors time and time again, The Inkey List is known for its monochrome minimalist packaging and fast-acting formulas. Aiming to simplify overcomplicated skincare regimes, the brand's products span eye creams (see its cult caffeine formula), serums, moisturisers and even haircare (its scalp treatment is a bestseller).
When it comes to anti-ageing, the brand is at the top of its game with its roster of affordable retinol serums, plumping collagen formulas and oat cleansing balms – but it's the bio-active ceramide repairing and plumping moisturiser that steals the show.
Securing a spot in our review of the best anti-ageing creams, the formula was hailed as the best budget buy by our critic. Nourishing and firming, the moisturiser strengthens the skin's barrier to minimise the look of common signs of ageing (fine lines, wrinkles and uneven skin tone).
Packed with skincare benefits and costing less than £20, here's why The Inkey List's repairing and plumping moisturiser deserves a spot in your own bathroom cabinet.
'The Inkey List's latest anti-ageing cream ticks all the boxes of another buzz-worthy product from the accessible beauty brand,' wrote our beauty critic. Boasting next-generation bio-active ceramides as the leading ingredient, its hardworking formula aims to strengthen the skin barrier through multiple layers.
'For instant gratification, the beautifully rich and creamy texture is also infused with gransil blur, which delivers a soft-focus effect – 'blurring' fine lines and imperfection,' they added. After just a month's use, their complexion felt 'smoother, well-nourished and firmer to the touch'. Plus, the formula is suitable and effective on all skin types, and it can be used as a night cream, too. Tick, tick, tick.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Urgent RSPCA warning over imported dogs
An animal charity has urged the UK government to implement stricter regulations on the import of dogs, citing concerns over disease transmission and behavioural problems. The RSPCA highlighted government statistics that 320,000 pets entered the UK via travel schemes and 44,000 as commercial imports in 2023, warning of 'ticking time bombs' due to inadequate health testing. There is currently no licensing requirement for animal rescue organisations in England, Wales, or Northern Ireland, contributing to the unregulated import of animals. A new Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill, proposed by Liberal Democrat MP Dr Danny Chambers, has passed the Commons with cross-party support. The bill aims to reduce non-commercial animal entry, ban the import of puppies and kittens under six months old or heavily pregnant animals, and prohibit the import of mutilated dogs and cats, such as those with docked ears.
Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Third of young people want fat jabs as demand spirals
A third of young adults want to take fat jabs amid a surge in demand for the drugs, pharmacists have said. One in five people say they have tried to access a pharmacy weight-loss treatment in the past year but this figure is 35 per cent for those aged between 16 and 34. Pharmacists have raised the alarm that demand has far exceeded what can be clinically delivered. Concerns have also been raised that people could resort to looking for drugs such as Wegovy and Mounjaro from online sellers. Current guidelines state that patients being prescribed Mounjaro and Wegovy through pharmacies need a BMI of at least 35 and at least one weight-related comorbidity, such as diabetes, to be eligible. Wegovy can also be prescribed to patients with a BMI of 30–34 who meet the criteria for referral to specialist overweight and obesity management services. However, the NHS is only rolling out Mounjaro to patients with a BMI of over 40 and at least four co-morbidities. It spent £269million on fat jabs in 2024-2025 and prescriptions doubled to almost three million a year. Mounjaro, regarded as the strongest jab and known as King Kong, has driven the spike in prescriptions with 1.1million given out in a year compared with 3,300 in the previous 12 months. The National Pharmacy Association (NPA), which represents about 6,000 pharmacies, surveyed 2,000 Britons and found evidence of demand beyond what the NHS can offer. It is now seeking greater clarity on how pharmacies will be further involved in the distribution of weight-loss medication, something laid out in the Government's recent 10 Year Health Plan. Olivier Picard, chairman of the NPA, said: 'Weight-loss jabs are one of the biggest drug innovations this century but growing demand highlights the need to make sure this is appropriate for those who want it. 'It's clear from this polling that many more people are interested in getting weight-loss jabs than would actually be suitable for treatment. 'We want to make sure supplies are carefully managed so that those in most clinical need can benefit from medication. 'We're also urging the Government to bring forward plans to include pharmacies in the rollout of their NHS weight-management programme. 'Pharmacists are experts in medication and many have extensive experience delivering weight-loss injections as part of a package of care including lifestyle advice. 'Pharmacies are well placed to help roll this treatment out on the NHS and help people make the best use of these powerful medicines,' he added
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Mental health crisis is overblown, say public
The mental health crisis is overblown and people often exaggerate their problems, according to a poll of public beliefs. More than half (56 per cent) of the public believe mental health conditions are exaggerated, while three quarters (76 per cent) think some people mistake life's normal ups and downs for mental illness, according to the survey of more than 2,000 adults by Electoral Calculus. With the Government facing a backbench rebellion over its efforts to restrict welfare benefits, the survey also suggests that ministers – rather than their backbenchers – may have better judged the pulse of the nation. The poll showed more than half of voters (52 per cent) believed that it was too easy for people to claim benefits for mental health illnesses, against 35 per cent who thought it was too hard and 13 per cent who believed it was about right. Last month, Sir Keir Starmer was forced to back down on controversial plans to slash disability and sickness benefits after more than 120 of his MPs threatened to vote against the proposals. Although the public believe benefits are too readily available, they are evenly divided on whether it is too easy or too hard to prove a mental illness in the UK. Some 44 per cent said it was too easy, while 43 per cent said it was too hard. However, Tory and Reform supporters were more likely to believe it was too easy to be diagnosed as suffering from a mental health condition, with 74 per cent of Conservative voters and 55 per cent from Nigel Farage's party saying it was the case. It comes as the head of the Government's workplace review said that employees who have 'I hate my boss syndrome' should not be signed off sick with a mental health condition. Sir Charlie Mayfield said he was concerned some problems are being 'over-medicalised' when they could be solved in the office. The former John Lewis chairman has been appointed by Liz Kendall, the work and pensions secretary, to come up with plans to stop workers leaving their jobs because of poor health. His report is due this autumn. One in five people of working age have a health condition that affects their job and there are 2.8 million people inactive due to ill health – up from 2.1 million since before the Covid pandemic, although the numbers had been rising for several years. Sir Charlie told The Sunday Times: 'The last thing I wish to do is trivialise [mental health conditions] but I agree that things do get over-medicalised.' Half of those polled (49 per cent) agreed that society spends too much time talking about minor mental illnesses. This rose to 77 per cent of Conservatives and 62 per cent of Reform supporters compared with just 35 per cent of Labour voters. Three quarters (74 per cent) said that social media often led to people thinking they had a mental illness when they did not. However, despite the scepticism about 'over medicalisation' of mental ill health, the public believe by five to one majority (68 per cent to 14 per cent) that there were not enough services available to meet the needs of people suffering from mental health problems. Eight in 10 people believed that mental illness had been stigmatised for too long and that it was healthy for people to talk about it more. Seven in 10 also felt that people with serious mental illness are losing out because of the attention given to the growing numbers of people saying they have less serious mental illness. Martin Baxter, the chief executive of Electoral Calculus, said: 'The public shows strong support for tackling stigma and being open about mental health, yet many worry that everyday challenges are being labelled as mental illness, risking the needs of those with serious conditions being overlooked. 'Mental health policy looks set to become a key political battleground, and these findings suggest that politicians will need to tread carefully as they respond to growing public scepticism and a system that most feel isn't working.'
