Woman Has Sore Throat While Pregnant, Then Comes Shock Diagnosis
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
After finding out she was pregnant in November 2022, Mariana Bom should have been filled with excitement and anticipation. But instead, she couldn't shake the feeling there was something seriously wrong.
In the first trimester, Bom, 25, noticed multiple white patches and an ulcer on the back of her tongue. Shortly after, Bom, of Germany, also developed a sore throat and earache too. She told Newsweek that she wondered if they were side effects of the COVID vaccine at the time, but doctors "always dismissed this theory."
But when she noticed a small blister at the back of her tongue that hadn't gone away for two weeks, Bom grew concerned. She visited an ear, nose and throat (ENT) specialist to get a second opinion
Bom said: "The ENT told me it was nothing serious, that it would go away, and there was no sign of danger. A month later, I went back, and they said it could be due to pregnancy as dental issues or oral thrush are common."
Mariana Bom laying in a hospital bed after her diagnosis.
Mariana Bom laying in a hospital bed after her diagnosis.
@mariana___1999 / TikTok
The mouth ulcer continued to grow and that area of her mouth became really swollen. The more it pressed against her teeth, simple acts like eating and talking became excruciating.
As the weeks went by and her symptoms persisted, Bom took matters into her own hands. She did some research and was horrified to learn that her symptoms aligned with tongue cancer.
"One evening, I went to the emergency room. My belly was already visible by then and I told them that I suspected tongue cancer. At the ER reception, I was laughed at because I was too 'young to have cancer' in their view," Bom said.
"In the treatment room, the doctor dismissed me and told me to put baking soda on my tongue and that it would go away."
That wasn't good enough for Bom, who decided to see another ENT two weeks later. She was determined to get answers and needed to be heard. The next ENT decided to do a biopsy and check for any signs of malignancy.
Just a week later, everything changed.
"That's when I got the call—it was an aggressive tongue carcinoma," Bom said.
Cancer is devastating for anyone, but being pregnant made it even more complicated. Bom hadn't even told her family she was pregnant because it was still so early. But now she had to tell them that not only was she expecting, but she had cancer too.
Her mom, who had battled cervical cancer in 2019, instantly took her daughter's hand and supported her.
"Since I was pregnant, our biggest concern was the baby. Would it have to come early? What were the options?" Bom told Newsweek.
"After many discussions between the specialist doctors, we decided, for the sake of my baby and my health, that I would undergo surgery while pregnant to remove as much of the tumor as possible."
Surgery to remove the tumor lasted between five and seven hours. The cancer had already spread to the lymph nodes in her neck, so they too were removed.
Bom's recovery involved spending two weeks in hospital, unable to eat or speak, and with drains coming out of her neck. It was a living nightmare, and she didn't know if she'd ever feel the same.
Mariana Bom while pregnant in 2022.
Mariana Bom while pregnant in 2022.
@mariana___1999 / TikTok
"After two weeks, the ENT specialists and the OB-GYNs discussed whether my daughter should be delivered early so I could start radiation therapy—to be sure we destroyed any remaining cancer cells. Eventually, they decided to deliver her one month after my surgery via C-section," Bom continued.
Bom's daughter was delivered at 30 weeks and immediately taken to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). She was placed on a ventilator as she was struggling to breathe and given a feeding tube.
Just a few weeks after welcoming her daughter, Bom began radiation. For the next eight weeks, she'd go to the hospital for treatment and then visit her daughter in the NICU after.
Her battle was certainly not over because the radiation side effects were so intense. It was "nearly impossible" to eat anything, she lost her sense of taste and felt exhausted.
"For the first few weeks, I could only consume liquid. I lost a lot of weight, and I felt extreme fatigue. I think it was a combination of postpartum exhaustion and the toll that the cancer treatment took on my body," she said.
Thankfully, Bom and her daughter are doing much better now. While there are some lasting effects, Bom is glad to have her life and to still be here for her family. She still gets inflammation in her mouth frequently, and on some occasions, it feels as though her body has "been beaten up."
While healing, Bom has documented her experience on TikTok (@mariana___1999) to raise awareness and encourage others to seek answers. She didn't even know tongue cancer existed before her diagnosis, and what little information she found online left her without hope.
Now, she wants to be a beacon of light for others. For anyone experiencing symptoms, Bom urges them to listen to their body and push for answers.
"You always hear about common cancers, but I had never heard of tongue cancer," Bom said. "The only thing that kept me going was thinking about my children and my husband. Without them, I don't think I would've gotten through it. I wanted to show that there are different outcomes and it's possible to survive."
Is there a health issue that's worrying you? Let us know via health@newsweek.com. We can ask experts for advice, and your story could be featured on Newsweek.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Woman Has Sore Throat While Pregnant, Then Comes Shock Diagnosis
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. After finding out she was pregnant in November 2022, Mariana Bom should have been filled with excitement and anticipation. But instead, she couldn't shake the feeling there was something seriously wrong. In the first trimester, Bom, 25, noticed multiple white patches and an ulcer on the back of her tongue. Shortly after, Bom, of Germany, also developed a sore throat and earache too. She told Newsweek that she wondered if they were side effects of the COVID vaccine at the time, but doctors "always dismissed this theory." But when she noticed a small blister at the back of her tongue that hadn't gone away for two weeks, Bom grew concerned. She visited an ear, nose and throat (ENT) specialist to get a second opinion Bom said: "The ENT told me it was nothing serious, that it would go away, and there was no sign of danger. A month later, I went back, and they said it could be due to pregnancy as dental issues or oral thrush are common." Mariana Bom laying in a hospital bed after her diagnosis. Mariana Bom laying in a hospital bed after her diagnosis. @mariana___1999 / TikTok The mouth ulcer continued to grow and that area of her mouth became really swollen. The more it pressed against her teeth, simple acts like eating and talking became excruciating. As the weeks went by and her symptoms persisted, Bom took matters into her own hands. She did some research and was horrified to learn that her symptoms aligned with tongue cancer. "One evening, I went to the emergency room. My belly was already visible by then and I told them that I suspected tongue cancer. At the ER reception, I was laughed at because I was too 'young to have cancer' in their view," Bom said. "In the treatment room, the doctor dismissed me and told me to put baking soda on my tongue and that it would go away." That wasn't good enough for Bom, who decided to see another ENT two weeks later. She was determined to get answers and needed to be heard. The next ENT decided to do a biopsy and check for any signs of malignancy. Just a week later, everything changed. "That's when I got the call—it was an aggressive tongue carcinoma," Bom said. Cancer is devastating for anyone, but being pregnant made it even more complicated. Bom hadn't even told her family she was pregnant because it was still so early. But now she had to tell them that not only was she expecting, but she had cancer too. Her mom, who had battled cervical cancer in 2019, instantly took her daughter's hand and supported her. "Since I was pregnant, our biggest concern was the baby. Would it have to come early? What were the options?" Bom told Newsweek. "After many discussions between the specialist doctors, we decided, for the sake of my baby and my health, that I would undergo surgery while pregnant to remove as much of the tumor as possible." Surgery to remove the tumor lasted between five and seven hours. The cancer had already spread to the lymph nodes in her neck, so they too were removed. Bom's recovery involved spending two weeks in hospital, unable to eat or speak, and with drains coming out of her neck. It was a living nightmare, and she didn't know if she'd ever feel the same. Mariana Bom while pregnant in 2022. Mariana Bom while pregnant in 2022. @mariana___1999 / TikTok "After two weeks, the ENT specialists and the OB-GYNs discussed whether my daughter should be delivered early so I could start radiation therapy—to be sure we destroyed any remaining cancer cells. Eventually, they decided to deliver her one month after my surgery via C-section," Bom continued. Bom's daughter was delivered at 30 weeks and immediately taken to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). She was placed on a ventilator as she was struggling to breathe and given a feeding tube. Just a few weeks after welcoming her daughter, Bom began radiation. For the next eight weeks, she'd go to the hospital for treatment and then visit her daughter in the NICU after. Her battle was certainly not over because the radiation side effects were so intense. It was "nearly impossible" to eat anything, she lost her sense of taste and felt exhausted. "For the first few weeks, I could only consume liquid. I lost a lot of weight, and I felt extreme fatigue. I think it was a combination of postpartum exhaustion and the toll that the cancer treatment took on my body," she said. Thankfully, Bom and her daughter are doing much better now. While there are some lasting effects, Bom is glad to have her life and to still be here for her family. She still gets inflammation in her mouth frequently, and on some occasions, it feels as though her body has "been beaten up." While healing, Bom has documented her experience on TikTok (@mariana___1999) to raise awareness and encourage others to seek answers. She didn't even know tongue cancer existed before her diagnosis, and what little information she found online left her without hope. Now, she wants to be a beacon of light for others. For anyone experiencing symptoms, Bom urges them to listen to their body and push for answers. "You always hear about common cancers, but I had never heard of tongue cancer," Bom said. "The only thing that kept me going was thinking about my children and my husband. Without them, I don't think I would've gotten through it. I wanted to show that there are different outcomes and it's possible to survive." Is there a health issue that's worrying you? Let us know via health@ We can ask experts for advice, and your story could be featured on Newsweek.
Miami Herald
6 hours ago
- Miami Herald
California Has a Drinking Water Problem
California's drinking water has elevated levels of a certain contaminant found to be associated with adverse birth outcomes, causing experts to advise that safe water advisories need to be updated. According to a nationwide study led by researchers at Columbia University, parts of the state have levels of arsenic in public drinking water higher than 5 micrograms per liter. While the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) currently maintains that levels of arsenic in drinking water are safe at 10 micrograms per liter or less, the study found certain health risks were associated with lower levels. Researchers found that consumption of drinking water with levels of arsenic of 10 micrograms or less were connected to a higher chance of babies being born preterm, with lower birth weights, or smaller than expected for their gestational age. Other research has found that cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes have been linked to low levels arsenic exposure, while chronic exposure to the mineral has been associated with heightened cancer risks. An EPA spokesperson previously told Newsweek that the maximum contaminant level for arsenic in drinking water was based on an assessment of implementation and cost, as well as public health. While the goal is for the level of arsenic to be zero, because of "technical limitations" and cost, the goal cannot be met by water systems, the EPA said. Therefore, the EPA's current maximum contaminant level is based on a "health risk reduction and cost analysis," ensuring public health has been considered, while giving water service bodies a more feasible target. "California has some of the safest water in the nation, with 25 maximum contaminant levels that are set at more protective health levels than the federal levels, and 14 maximum contaminant levels for contaminants that have no federal equivalent," the California State Water Resources Control Board told Newsweek. "This new study makes clear what California already understood-that maximum contaminant level should be revised to a level that is more protective of human health, especially for infant development. The state has been working to address this," the board added. Sacramento County was one of the regions with higher levels of arsenic in public drinking water and the City of Sacramento Department of Utilities told Newsweek that it "closely monitors water quality and is committed to meeting or exceeding all state and federal drinking water standards, including those for arsenic." In the city's most recent Consumer Confidence Report, arsenic levels in the drinking water system were below the EPA's maximum contaminant level, at an average of 2.3 micrograms per liter, while its groundwater levels ranged from non-detectable to 4.7 micrograms per liter. "The City of Sacramento's drinking water meets or exceeds all federal and California state water quality standards," the city's Department of Utilities told Newsweek. It added that it "supports California's existing and established science-based approach to setting or modifying drinking water quality standards." Meanwhile, Sacramento County Water Agency told Newsweek: "We are in compliance with the state's standards. We do not dictate the guidelines." According to the agency's 2024 Consumer Confidence Report, Northgate and Southwest Tract had ranges of arsenic in water that reached 5 micrograms per liter, while East Walnut Grove had levels that reached higher than the EPA guidance-at a range of non-detectable to 11 micrograms per liter. Merced County was another area of the state that appeared to have higher levels of arsenic in drinking water, per the study's map. A public information officer for the city of Merced told Newsweek that the city's drinking water is "routinely tested and remains in compliance with all state and federal safety standards, including those for arsenic." "We monitor over 250 contaminants and collect thousands of samples annually to ensure water quality," they added. "While we can't comment on conditions outside city limits, we take emerging health research seriously and remain committed to providing safe, clean water to our residents." When approached for comment, the California Department of Public Health pointed Newsweek to the state's Water Resources Control Board. As arsenic is a natural element that can be found in soils, sediments and groundwater, it can feed into public drinking water systems, but some areas will have higher levels because of natural geology, certain human activities, irrigation practices and other factors. Many community water systems in California "draw upon groundwater that is naturally elevated in arsenic, so it's not unusual-even with treatment or mixing of waters-that detectable arsenic remains once water is supplied to users," Bethany O'Shea, a professor in the environmental and ocean sciences department at the University of San Diego, told Newsweek. The reason California's groundwater is higher in arsenic is a result of "geologic sources," Janet Hering, former director of the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, told Newsweek. Although, for the city of Los Angeles, water supply is affected by "inputs of geothermal water at Hot Creek in Owens Valley," she added. In the Central Valley, arsenic originates in certain minerals in rocks of the Sierra Nevada foothills, Peggy A. O'Day, a professor in the Department of Life and Environmental Sciences at University of California, Merced, told Newsweek. "Weathering and erosion of these rocks transported arsenic-bearing minerals to the Central Valley where they were deposited as sediments and buried mineral alteration and dissolution can eventually release arsenic into groundwater," she said. Although, while the study specifically looks at public water systems, O'Shea warned that arsenic can be found in privately supplied water from wells. "An abundance of research exists showing elevated arsenic in wells across states like Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont," she said. She added that, as a result, "similar birth outcome risks may exist for people drinking from private wells containing arsenic." "This underscores the need for more research to better understand how even small concentrations of arsenic in all types of drinking water, public or private, might lead to health risks such as adverse birth outcomes," O'Shea said. Experts who spoke with Newsweek believed that the current maximum contaminant level for arsenic should be lowered in light of the findings of Columbia University's study but added that this might not be as simple as it sounds. "The important finding of this study is that even those small concentrations of arsenic remaining may be harmful, suggesting that a lower water standard may be effective," O'Shea said. A number of countries, like Denmark, and some U.S. states, such as New Jersey and New Hampshire, have set water standards at 5 micrograms per liter, lower than the 10 microgram per liter level set by the EPA. "Setting that goal of zero as a standard-or even lowering the standard by half, to 5 micrograms per liter-may help alleviate health risks," O'Shea said. O'Day said the study supports a "history of evidence" indicating that the current level for arsenic "may not provide a sufficient level of protection from adverse health impacts for all segments of the population." "Federal drinking water standards should be reviewed and updated based on new, reliable scientific information," she said. Although O'Day added that lowering the maximum contaminant level for any contaminant is "a long process and does not necessarily ensure that public water suppliers have the resources to meet it without an undue cost burden on their customers." Ultimately, "more funding needs to be directed towards rural and underserved communities to improve their infrastructure and testing to provide safe drinking water that meets health-based standards for arsenic, lead and other contaminants," she said. Hering also cautioned that "legally, lowering the [maximum contaminant level] has to reflect practical considerations and economic feasibility." "Personally, I think it makes sense to try to prioritize potential adverse exposures and consider other possible contaminants as well as arsenic," she said. Related Articles Pregnant Women Issued Drinking Water WarningRFK Jr. Says 'More Cavities' Due to No Fluoride in Water Is 'a Balance'Hidden Danger in Drinking Water Revealed in New StudyUS States Issued Drinking Water Warning 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Newsweek
8 hours ago
- Newsweek
Woman, 33, Has Small Pimple for Two Years, Then Comes Shock Diagnosis
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. When Rachel Archer noticed a small pimple on her forehead, she thought nothing of it—having acne-prone skin, she was used to it. But when it didn't disappear and started to bleed six months ago, she began to worry. The 33-year-old, who lives in North Carolina, sought medical advice and was initially told she was too young for cancer, sent away with the theory that it was a scratched mosquito bite. The next month, she returned to the doctor and was sent for a biopsy. Archer was diagnosed with the most common type of skin cancer, called basal cell carcinoma (BCC), often caused by sun exposure. The American Cancer Society (ACS) states roughly 5.4 million basal and squamous cell skin cancers diagnosed each year in the U.S. After posting her journey online @racheltemac, she told Newsweek: "When you are younger you don't think about the risks of being in the sun too long and getting sun burnt so I believe seeing a video of what it would be like to get skin cancer would be helpful for younger people, so they are more careful! "I think it's good for people to see that you can get skin cancer even at a younger age and you need to be careful, or you could get skin cancer too!" (L-R) Archer before the diagnosis and a close up of the pimple on her forehead. (L-R) Archer before the diagnosis and a close up of the pimple on her forehead. TikTok/@racheltemac Speaking about her own relationship with the sun, the mom of three explained that she only started using sunscreen in her late twenties. She also used tanning beds a handful of times. With no family history of cancer, Archer described the diagnosis as "surreal." "Especially at my age," she said. In a TikTok clip shared on June 15, Archer can be seen with a large round scab on her forehead. This is from six weeks of a chemotherapy topical solution called Imiquimod. The ACS states it is a prescription cream that you can put on during very early-stage skin cancers (like some basal cell cancers). It works by triggering your body's immune system to attack and get rid of the abnormal skin cells. You usually put it on the affected area several times a week for a few weeks, but exactly how often depends on your doctor's instructions. "It was applied multiple times a week for six weeks," explained Archer. "The treatment caused my skin to react by bleeding and scabbing up. It felt like my skin was being burned off and it's possible that is what was happening." Today, she never leaves the house without Sun Protection Factor (SPF), and encourages others to do the same. In the clip, which has 1.2 million views, she says: "There's no excuses to lay out and get burned" with the number of products that contain sunscreen that are now available. What Are the Warning Signs of Skin Cancer? Newsweek spoke to Dr. Hannah Kopelman, a dermatologist clinically trained in cutaneous oncology at Boston University and in hair loss at Columbia University. She said: "Skin cancer doesn't always look dramatic or obvious. It can start as something that seems harmless—a tiny pimple that doesn't heal, a rough patch that keeps coming back, or a mole that slowly changes over time." She explained the key signs to look for are referred to as ABCDEs of melanoma: Asymmetry Irregular borders Color variation Diameter larger than a pencil eraser, and evolution or change. She added: "But even beyond that, any lesion that bleeds, crusts, itches, or lingers longer than a month without healing is worth getting checked. Trust your instincts—if something feels off, it's always better to get it evaluated." If a spot doesn't heal within four to six weeks, Kopelman, who practices in New York at Kopelman Aesthetic Surgery, encourages people to sought medical advice. (L-R) Archer was left with a large scab on her forehead following chemotherapy. (L-R) Archer was left with a large scab on her forehead following chemotherapy. Rachel Archer Advice for People Who Are Dismissed Because of Their Age Kopelman told Newsweek: "This part really hits home for me because I've had young patients come in after being told they're 'too young' for skin cancer. I want to be very clear: skin cancer does not discriminate by age. I've diagnosed aggressive forms of melanoma in patients in their 20s and even late teens. If you feel like your concerns are being brushed off, please don't give up. "You have every right to advocate for your health. Seek a second opinion—preferably with a board-certified dermatologist—and keep pushing until you're heard. You know your body better than anyone, and early detection saves lives." Is there a health issue that's worrying you? Let us know via health@ We can ask experts for advice, and your story could be featured on Newsweek.
