Full of failures, frauds, false claims: Cong chief Kharge on 10 years of Digital India
In a sharply-worded post on his X handle, Kharge accused the Modi government of making lofty claims while hiding glaring gaps in execution, digital access and data security.
'The fine print of Modi Govt's lofty claims of 'Digital India' is marred by unfulfilled promises, digital exclusion, and weakened transparency,' Kharge wrote.
Citing official data, Kharge highlighted that out of the 6.55 lakh villages targeted for broadband connectivity under the BharatNet project, only 35 per cent have been covered so far, despite the deadline being revised eight times over 11 years.
'Only 766 Gram Panchayats — just 0.73 per cent — have active Wi-Fi services,' he noted.
The Congress chief also targeted BSNL's performance, pointing out that even after receiving three revival packages worth over Rs 3 lakh crore since 2019, the PSU has not completed the installation of 1 lakh 4G towers.
He added that BSNL and MTNL's debt has ballooned by 291.7 per cent and 136.2 per cent respectively, between 2014 and 2024.
Kharge didn't stop at infrastructure failures. He accused the Modi government of digitally excluding the poor and marginalised.
Quoting National Sample Surveys data, he said 75.3 per cent of Indians above 15 years still do not know how to use a computer, including 81.9 per cent in rural areas.
'Even today, 54 per cent of government schools don't have an Internet connection, 79 per cent have no computers, and 85 per cent lack smart classrooms,' he said.
Raising concerns about data security, Kharge claimed that India has witnessed over 10 crore cyberattacks since the Pahalgam terror incident. CERT-In data showed a 76 per cent spike in cybersecurity incidents between 2020 and 2024.
He also accused the ruling government of undermining transparency, citing the weakening of the RTI Act and replacing it with a "flawed" Data Protection Law.
Taking a swipe at the BJP for taking credit for initiatives launched by previous governments, Kharge reminded that it was the UPA government under Dr Manmohan Singh that laid the foundation for Aadhaar, UPI, and Direct Benefit Transfers.
"Instead of glossing over national achievements, and trying to seek credit for 10 years of Digital India, perhaps you should reflect on the multiple 'failures' and 'frauds' inflicted by your government", Kharge said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
14 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump signs his controversial Big Beautiful Bill into law as he celebrates July 4 with family
US President Donald Trump has signed the controversial Big Beautiful Bill, turning it into a law as he celebrated the Fourth of July with family and members of the US Congress read more Donald Trump signs his signature bill of tax breaks and spending cuts at the White House on Friday in Washington, surrounded by members of Congress. AP Commemorating the 249th year of independence, US President Donald Trump has signed his sweeping spending package, famously known as ' Big Beautiful Bill'. Trump made the bill into law on Friday during a Fourth of July picnic at the White House, after it was passed in both the US House of Representatives and the Senate. The bill is deemed as controversial because it significantly cuts back on federal safety-net programs in increases funding for aggressive immigration enforcement. Former 'First Buddy' and Tesla CEO Elon Musk was also not a fan of the bill since it slashes subsidies on Electric Vehicles. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD During the Fourth of July picnic, Trump was seen gloating about the passing of the bill in both chambers of the US Congress. 'It's the most popular bill ever signed in the history of the country,' Trump said, while standing next to his wife, Melania Trump. 'What we've done is put everything into one bill. We've never had anything like that before.' This is a developing story.
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kusum-C scheme: Target to generate 2,400MW solar power for farmers, says George
Hassan: Under the Kusum-C scheme, which aims to solarise agricultural feeders and provide daytime electricity supply to farmers' pumpsets, 200MW of electricity is being produced. In the coming months, 545MW of electricity will be generated, stated energy minister KJ George. Speaking to reporters after the energy department's progress review meeting of Hassan district, held on Friday at the Zilla Panchayat hall in the city, George said, "Under the Kusum-C scheme, construction of solar units with a capacity of around 200MW is completed. In the next few months, solar units with a capacity of 545MW will be commissioned at 93 locations. This will help provide an adequate daytime electricity supply to farmers. " "The state govt has set a target of generating 2,400MW of solar electricity through feeder solarisation of agricultural pumpsets under the Kusum-C scheme. Recently, chief minister Siddaramaiah inaugurated a solar power unit established under the Kusum-C scheme in Gauribidanur. The feeder solarisation work is progressing at a rapid pace," the energy minister added. Under the Kusum-C scheme, generating 1MW of electricity requires 4 acres of land. If govt land is available, CM Siddaramaiah has directed that it be allocated free of cost. However, private power producers must pay Rs 25,000 per acre, which will be deposited with the district commissioner and used to improve govt schools and anganwadis in villages where the substations are located, the minister elaborated. "If private land is used, developers awarded the power generation contracts will lease the land and pay landowners a minimum of Rs 25,000 per acre," George said. Of the 4 lakh unauthorised irrigation pumpsets in the state, 3 lakh are already regularised. For pumpsets within 500m of power feeders, transformers will be installed by the department. Those beyond 500m will receive solar pumpsets under the Kusum-B scheme, he said. Earlier, during a progress review meeting, the district MLAs raised issues concerning the energy department in their constituencies. In response, George instructed the CESC MD to take swift action and reiterated that officials should proactively consult elected representatives and follow through on their suggestions. MP Shreyas Patel, MLA and Housing Board chairman KM Shivalingegowda, MLAs K Manju, Swaroop Prakash, CN Balakrishna, HK Suresh, and S Manjunath, KPTCL MD Pankaj Kumar Pandey, DC S Latha Kumari, and ZP CEO BR Poornima were present.
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Eat butter in peace, or be toast in war
Ukraine is not a rich country. The average Ukrainian earns the equivalent of $15,885 - PPP terms - in a year, which is 75% more than the average Indian but slightly less than the average Iranian. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now To catch up with neighbours like Romania ($40,304) and Poland ($43,625), Ukraine must spend more on development, but last year it spent a third of its GDP fighting Russia. Where India with a $4tn economy had a $75bn defence budget in 2024, Ukraine spent $65bn on defence from its meagre and stagnant $180bn GDP. Guns Vs Butter That's the guns/butter trade-off of war. You can have more of one only at the cost of the other. As Eisenhower said: "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed..." It was 1953 and, perhaps, Eisenhower remembered how 3mn Indians had starved to death in the Bengal famine a decade earlier. Historians say the calamity wasn't caused by drought but the misplaced priorities of Churchill's wartime cabinet. True, there was a shortage of grain in Bengal in 1943, but London made it worse by continuing to export rice from the province for British troops. The price of grain skyrocketed, and when Indian officials sought an emergency supply of wheat, London declined. Saving Empire became more important than saving people. People suffer It doesn't matter who imposes war on whom - whether Russia invades Ukraine or Afghanistan erupts in civil war - non-combatants pay a high price. A UN Women research paper shows how the Afghan govt spent 37% of its budget on defence and policing in 2019, as against 6% on health. In Mali, another war-torn country, defence expenditure in 2017 was five times higher than the outlay for social programmes. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Contrast that with Kiel Institute's data for G7 nations. Over a 90-year period, from 1872 to 1962, their military expenditure exceeded social programmes, dipping below 20% of their budget only once, immediately after WW-1. But today, these nations spend less than 10% of their budget on defence, as against more than 40% on social expenditure. Under pressure from Trump, Nato members have pledged to raise defence spending to 5% of GDP by 2035, but don't count on it. No winners War can spur the economy - as it's done in Russia - by increasing demand for killing machines, but data shows a dollar spent on the military produces fewer jobs than a dollar spent on infrastructure, health, education, etc. The Vietnam war may have been good for US defence contractors, but it hurt ordinary Americans by starting an inflation spiral that lasted till the 80s. Likewise, the post-9/11 American wars diverted money away from infrastructure and the social sector, and have run up an $8tn bill. So, guns or butter? Sometimes, countries - like Ukraine - don't have a choice, but when they do - like Russia - they should pick butter, and a loaf of Borodinsky.
