Former Metropolitan Police commissioner Lord Ian Blair has died, Sky News understands
Lord Blair led the force for three years between 2005 and 2008 and was in charge during the 7/7 London bombings.
The , which killed 52 people, was on Monday.
The Met's response notoriously including the shooting dead of an innocent man, Jean Charles de Menezes, at Stockwell Tube station two weeks later.
He was killed under the mistaken belief he was a suicide bomber.
False details about how he acted were put out by the Met, insinuating the Brazilian was in some way responsible for what happened.
Lord Blair repeated those details and was later accused of a cover-up and obstructing inquiries into the incident.
"It effectively blighted his time as commissioner," said Sky News crime correspondent Martin Brunt.
"But there were good things. He took hold of the Met and forged a much better relationship with MI5 in the wake of the 7/7 bombings," Brunt adds.
"Some of his big things were diversity and he reformed the way the Met recruited - people from ethnic communities.
"He was a big supporter of neighbourhood policing. Although that, over the years, dwindled due to a lack of funding; but it's more or less the model police forces across Britain are reintroducing."
Originally appointed by Labour, Lord Blair quit as commissioner in late 2008 saying he did not have the confidence of the new Tory mayor Boris Johnson.
Lord Blair was seen as a liberal figure - sometimes jokingly referred to as "PC Blair" by other officers - and was active in the House of Lords right up until his death.
He joined the police in 1970s and served with other forces before joining the Met, where his work as a detective included investigating the fatal 1987 King's Cross fire.
Lord Blair later held senior positions for the Thames Valley and Surrey forces before returning to the capital as deputy commissioner - and then the top job.
This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.
Please refresh the page for the latest version.
You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
39 minutes ago
- New York Post
Billionaire Trump ally Marc Andreessen warns elite universities will ‘pay the price' for DEI
Billionaire Trump ally Marc Andreessen warned that elite universities like MIT and Stanford will have to 'pay the price' for DEI as he called for a 'counterattack' on educational institutions in a group chat with tech leaders and White House officials. 'I view Stanford and MIT as mainly political lobbying operations fighting American innovation at this point,' the co-founder of the Andreessen-Horowitz venture capital firm wrote, according to screenshots of messages sent May 3 and obtained by the Washington Post. 'The universities are at Ground Zero of the counterattack.' 5 Marc Andreessen warned that elite universities will have to 'pay the price' for DEI. REUTERS Andreessen, whose firm has $42 billion in assets under management, has donated millions of dollars to Stanford over the years. He blasted Stanford and other top universities for favoring DEI initiatives that bring in foreign students over US citizens — a sentiment shared by President Trump and Tesla founder Elon Musk. 'The combination of DEI and immigration is politically lethal. When these two forms of discrimination combine, as they have for the last 60 years and on hyperdrive for the last decade, they systematically cut most of the children of the Trump voter base out of any realistic prospect of access to higher education and corporate America,' Andreesseen wrote, according to the report. 'They declared war on 70% of the country and now they're going to pay the price.' The rapid-fire blast of texts were sent to a WhatsApp group used by Trump officials to discuss AI policy with tech leaders and academics, according to the Washington Post. A White House official told the Washington Post that members of the Trump administration participated in the chat in a personal capacity, that no official policy was discussed and that Andreessen was not an official adviser to the president. The White House did not immediately respond to The New York Post's request for comment. 5 The venture capitalist took aim at Stanford University, where he had long been a donor. JOHN G MABANGLO/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock Andreessen deleted many of the messages after sending them, according to screenshots and two members of the text chat who spoke to the newspaper. In the group chat, Andreessen allegedly called for the National Science Foundation, an independent government agency that funds research, to receive 'the bureaucratic death penalty.' 'Raze it to the ground and start over,' He reportedly wrote. Andreessen claimed the agency had backed projects that censored American citizens online – taking a staunch free speech stance similar to Musk, who has loosened content restrictions on X and inspired similar moves from other tech leaders like Meta's Mark Zuckerberg. He also alleged Stanford had ousted his wife, Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen, from her role as chair of the university's philanthropy center. 5 President Trump has targeted universities, DEI, affirmative action and student visas. REUTERS '[T]hey forced my wife out of Stanford without a second thought, a decision that will cost them something like $5 billion in future donations,' Andreessen wrote, according to the screenshots. Representatives for Andreessen Horowitz, Arrillaga-Andreessen and Stanford did not immediately respond to The Post's requests for comment. 'MIT is merit-based and affordable, driven by innovation and entrepreneurship, and committed to excellence,' a university spokesperson told The Post, adding that MIT admits applicants prior to learning their financial circumstances. Some members of the chat found Andreessen's comments out of character for the group – which was often used to argue that a crackdown on immigration and attacks on universities could make it more difficult to attract and train top tech talent, the sources said. Andreessen argued that his 'cohort of citizens' had once been willing to accept diversity policies as the cost of past bigotry in the US, 'even though the discrimination was now aimed at us,' according to the text screenshots. 'The insanity of the last 8 years and in particular the summer of 2020, totally shredded that complacency…And so now my people are furious and not going to take it anymore.' 5 Marc Andreessen and his wife Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen at the 10th Breakthrough Prize Ceremony in April 2024. Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP Andreessen stopped using the group chat soon after his messages in May, according to the report. The group chat is moderated by Sriram Krishnan, a White House senior policy adviser on AI. He created the group before Trump's second term, while he was working as a partner at Andreessen's firm, according to the report. Some of the experts in the chat include Yann LeCun, Meta's chief AI scientist and NYU professor who supported Kamala Harris' presidential campaign; and Fei-Fei Li, a Stanford professor and robotics entrepreneur who worked with the Biden administration on government funding for AI projects. The group has recently debated the Trump administration's budget cuts to the NSF and whether export curbs should be placed on Chinese AI firm DeepSeek, two members of the chat told the news outlet. The tech industry has typically lobbied for research funding and high-skilled immigration policies, like permitting student visas. Andreessen has seemingly sided with Trump's approach – targeting universities, criticizing DEI and affirmative action, slashing research funds and moving to cancel student visas. 5 Students walk in front of a building on Massachusetts Institute of Technology's campus. Getty Images Andreessen has supported Democratic presidential candidates, including Hillary Clinton in 2016, as well as Republicans, like Mitt Romney in 2012. His firm endorsed Trump last July after the assassination attempt during a Butler, Pa. rally, arguing the Republican could help reverse harsh Biden-era policies that stifled tech advancements. Andreessen's firm also financially backed Musk's takeover of Twitter in 2022, saying it would encourage free speech.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
US man gets life for beheading father as political statement and posting video
A Pennsylvania man has been ordered to spend the rest of his life in prison after being convicted of fatally shooting his federal government employee father, decapitating him and brandishing the severed head in an online video that called for the execution of other civil servants. Justin Mohn, 33, was sentenced on Friday after a five-day trial by a judge that found him guilty of murder and terrorism charges, Pennsylvania state prosecutors said. Mohn's conviction is the first time anyone in Pennsylvania has been found guilty under the state's terrorism statute. The local district attorney, Jennifer Schorn, said 'the chilling use of [Mohn's] father's death as a political statement' helped 'underscore the extreme danger he poses'. Among the most damning pieces of evidence in the case was a 15-minute video published on YouTube after the slaying of Michael Mohn, 68, who had long worked for the US army corps of engineers. In it, Justin Mohn, his son, spouted rightwing conspiracy theories, lobbied for militias to torture and execute his father's fellow federal government colleagues, and denounced immigration, LGBTQ+ people, the Black Lives Matter movement and antifascist activists. YouTube removed the video after it had accumulated about 5,000 views in a few hours, the Washington Post noted. Denice Mohn, Justin's mother, came home from work on 30 January 2024 to find her husband dead and beheaded in the bathroom, with a machete and a large knife nearby, said Schorn's office. An autopsy determined her husband had been shot in the head before his decapitation. Denice said at trial that she believed Justin had a normal relationship with his father, but he had struggled to retain employment after graduating from Penn State, which he blamed on the federal government and the educational system. After killing his father, Justin Mohn drove to a national guard training center, where he evidently hoped to convince troops to turn on the federal government, prosecutors alleged. He acknowledged midway through his trial that he had killed his father. But he maintained that the killing resulted from an attempted citizen's arrest that he botched when his father resisted. Prosecutor Edward Louka dismissed Justin Mohn's explanation as 'complete and utter nonsense'. 'He ambushed his dad when he was most vulnerable,' Louka said in court. 'His plan was to murder a longtime federal employee, his father, and order the murder of other federal employees for his warped belief that the government adopt his policies above all else.' After Pennsylvania state court judge Stephen A Corr returned the guilty verdict, Mohn's sister read a statement in court describing how her family felt 'violated by the defendant's extremely calculated and premeditated betrayal and from the posting of the horrifying video that he published online for thousands to see'. 'The awareness that my own brother is capable of such atrocities is terrifying,' Stephanie Mohn said in court, according to prosecutors' statement. 'That person we grew up with is long gone.' In their statement, prosecutors made it a point to allude to Michael Mohn's reputation of being 'a loving husband' as well as a 'father who was always there for his children'. 'Notably, he continued to provide significant emotional and financial support to … Justin, even into his 30s, as Justin struggled with unemployment and finding his path,' Schorn's office said of Michael. 'This tireless support underscored Michael's deep, unconditional love.'
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
YouTube minting billions off pirated videos placed next to ads for Trump, GM and more, bombshell report reveals: ‘They're letting it happen'
YouTube places flagrantly pirated videos next to ads for politicians including President Trump, as well as corporate giants like JPMorgan, General Motors and Pizza Hut, according to a bombshell report – and insiders claim Google is turning a blind eye to the shenanigans as it rakes in billions in ad dollars. Last September, YouTube ran a Trump National Committee ad before what looked like a pirated version of the Tom Cruise blockbuster 'Top Gun: Maverick.' Last month, an ad for Procter & Gamble's Olay body wash ran alongside an apparently pirated Russian-language version of Netflix's 'Squid Game,' according to the report. Elsewhere, ads for Pizza Hut and General Motors ran alongside a pirated Spanish-language version of the 2025 movie 'Sinners,' according to screenshots included in a 300-page report compiled by Adalytics, a research firm that partners with Fortune 500 companies. 6 Adalytics compiled a 300-page report on YouTube's issues with pirated content. Adalytics The latter were later removed to a copyright request by Warner Bros, and the other two were eventually taken down over copyright claims. Nevertheless, YouTube scarcely ever gives refunds to brands after it removes videos that violate its own policies, media buyers and advertising executives told The Post. 'They're letting it happen,' said Erich Garcia, a longtime marketing executive. 'It's because they are financially benefiting from this. They are pocketing the money and continuing on.' Garcia said he raised the issue directly with YouTube in early 2023 after noticing bizarre trends while serving as head of paid media at 'I would see these really random YouTube channels, typically foreign language with very small viewership, all of a sudden — in the course of like 20 minutes — rack up thousands of dollars of spend,' Garcia said. These weren't isolated, one-off incidents. Garcia said as much as 50% of Quote's ad spending during a given period would show up in YouTube's reports marked 'Total: other' — indicating that the channels where the ads had run had been removed while failing to identify them. Eventually, Garcia gave a presentation to YouTube staffers, a copy of which was viewed by The Post, which showed that nearly $300,000 — or more than 40% — of Quote's spending, was unaccounted for in YouTube's reports. 6 Trump campaign ads ran along videos of college football games and Hollywood movies. Adalytics He said Google representatives later provided him with a $50,000 account credit, though they didn't admit it was because of the issues he'd flagged. Meanwhile, Adalytics captured video in which Trump campaign ads ran alongside multiple pirated broadcasts of college football games, including a matchup between the Colorado Buffaloes and the Colorado State Rams last fall. That video was later removed after the account was 'terminated,' according to YouTube. A YouTube spokesperson said the Trump campaign ads flagged in the Adalytics report ran on videos that were correctly identified by YouTube's 'Content ID,' a safety tool that scans for copyright-related infractions, and removed from the platform. The channels responsible for the violations were banned. 'When we become aware of channels that repeatedly upload content they don't own, we terminate the channel, and if ads were running on this content, we credit the advertiser,' a YouTube spokesperson said in a statement. Content ID flagged more than 2.2 billion videos in 2024 alone, the company said. In more than 90% of cases, rightsholders opted to keep their content on YouTube in exchange for receiving ad revenue. 6 One of the examples spotted by Adalytics featured an ad for Olay body wash. Adalytics When possible, YouTube provides credits to advertisers whose ads ran on channels that violated its policies, the company said. The White House declined to comment. The Republican National Committee did not return a request for comment. Kamala Harris's campaign encountered similar issues, as did major corporate brands like NBCUniversal, US Bank, T-Mobile and many others, according to Adalytics. Advertisers have been up in arms about ads running against illicit YouTube videos for at least a decade. In 2015, ads for big corporate brands like Toyota and Anheuser-Busch ran alongside videos of ISIS beheadings. In 2017, Lyft pulled advertisers off YouTube after its commercials ran on a white supremacist group's channel. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! That hasn't stopped YouTube from becoming a cash cow for parent company Google. The platform raked in a whopping $36.1 billion in revenue from digital ads in 2024 – including its first-ever $10 billion quarter in the last three months of the year. While YouTube sends placement reports about their ad campaigns, sources say the reports are vague and difficult to parse. Some campaigns can have thousands or even millions of entries logged in a spreadsheet, making performance analysis nearly impossible for smaller businesses. 'They have controls in place, but it appears that they don't work as well as they say they do,' said one ad executive who asked not to be named. 'It is a very complicated ecosystem that they've set up. And it can make it seem as though an advertiser, large or small, is buying in an open exchange where you can end up on channels or videos with unsafe, inflammatory, or foreign-owned content.' 6 Pizza Hut was another brand that fell victim to the issue. Adalytics The industry veterans said YouTube videos that get taken down show up in Google reports in a category titled 'total: other.' The reports give no details on when or why the videos were removed, leaving advertisers at a loss to explain how their money was spent. One media buyer said it was 'utterly impossible' to get a full understanding of how and where brand ads were running on YouTube. 'You can't know for certain what was what,' the buyer said. 'You can't get much transparency into things that were removed.' To vet YouTube's refund policy, a second media buyer performed a test in which ads were specifically marked to run in channels that the buyer knew had been running pirated videos. YouTube removed the videos, but didn't give a refund, according to a copy of a YouTube report viewed by The Post. 6 YouTube generated its first-ever $10 billion quarter for ad sales last fiscal year. NurPhoto via Getty Images 'Why are they not giving a refund for that? If it was not good enough for their policies, but it's good enough for you to take the advertiser's money?' the second media buyer said. 'it seems like they're really focused on the monetization aspect and not so much on the success of campaigns for advertisers.' YouTube pushed back on assertions that its placement reports are too vague and said it encourages advertisers to contact their account managers if they have questions about receiving 'make good' credits. Earlier this year, a US federal judge ruled that Google operates two illegal monopolies related to digital advertising. The Justice Department is pushing for a breakup of the company to restore competition. 6 President Trump's campaign was one of many entities that had their ads run against videos that were taken down for violating YouTube's policies. AP Critics have argued that a lack of competition has allowed Google to skate by without meaningful product and safety improvements. For now, Garcia said advertisers have little choice but to eat their losses and continue working with YouTube due to its massive audience. 'It's like 'kiss the ring,'' Garcia said. 'Where are you gonna go? There is no competition to YouTube.'
