
The College Board Exposed: Nonprofit Or $1.6 Billion Testing Monopoly In Disguise?
Founded 1900 to democratize college access, the College Board now straddles an uncomfortable line between its nonprofit mission and corporate-scale revenues. While technically structured as a member organization—with 6,000 high schools and colleges paying annual dues—its financial reality tells a different story.
The math reveals a stark imbalance. Since its inception, cumulative membership dues may total $1.5 billion when adjusted for inflation, but that pales next to the $10+ billion reaped from SATs and AP exams since 1990. This reliance on testing revenue has reshaped the organization's priorities, transforming it from a collaborative membership alliance into a de facto corporate entity with a testing monopoly.
Three strategies underpin the College Board's financial dominance. First, its testing empire operates like a well-oiled machine. The SAT suite—taken by 2 million students annually—generates $200–300 million from base fees and ancillary charges like $15 score reports. Meanwhile, the Advanced Placement (AP) program, which administered 5 million exams at $99 each in 2025, rakes in nearly $500 million, supplemented by millions from course materials and teacher training . Even middle schoolers are monetized through the PSAT 8/9, a controversial exam for 13-year-olds that locks schools into multi-year testing contracts.
Second, the organization has funneled $1.32 billion to Caribbean subsidiaries since 2011; a maneuver critics allege minimizes taxes on its approximately almost $2 billion in assets. Third, perhaps most ethically fraught, is its reliance on underpaid educators. Teachers grade AP exams for about $30/hour—less than half the rate of private tutors—similar to the honorarium paid to SAT proctors. Schools generally pay the cost of proctoring the PSAT. This labor model saves the College Board millions of dollars annually, often subsidizing profits through public school budgets.
Recent controversies highlight how financial incentives increasingly override educational goals. The 2025 digital SAT rollout was plagued by technical failures, the launch stranded students mid-test, with critics accusing the College Board of rushing to outpace its rival, the ACT . Technical issues with AP Classroom and this year's AP Psychology exam further erodes confidence. Its handling of the AP African American Studies curriculum sparked outrage when the organization diluted course content amid political pushback.
Even the pandemic failed to curb revenue-first thinking. Despite 1,900 colleges adopting test-optional policies post-COVID, the College Board lobbied aggressively to preserve SAT mandates. Such decisions align with CEO David Coleman's over $2.5 million compensation package—triple the average for nonprofit leaders—raising questions about whom the organization truly serves.
The Advanced Placement program embodies the College Board's contradictions. While studies show AP courses improve college readiness for underserved students, barriers persist. Exams cost $99 each—a burden for low-income districts—and recent recalibrating of test scores have sparked concerns about score inflation.
Moreover, schools often narrow curricula to align with AP frameworks, sidelining electives and critical thinking. AP's benefits are real but uneven. The program's success hinges on equitable access, yet the College Board profits from the very inequities it claims to address. The College Board does offer discounts for documented low income students, but the over $50 fee is still steep for low-income students.
The College Board's legacy is a study in contrasts. On one hand, AP courses correlate with higher college graduation rates, and standardized metrics help colleges evaluate applicants across diverse educational backgrounds. On the other, its products perpetuate systemic inequities. SAT scores, for instance, continue to be highly correlated with family income. At the same time, the PSAT 8/9 exemplifies profit-driven priorities, subjecting 13-year-olds to high-stakes testing with scant evidence of academic benefit.
Compounding these issues is the organization's labor exploitation. By outsourcing proctoring and grading to underpaid educators, the College Board extracts value from public schools while privatizing profits—a dynamic that mirrors gig economy practices more than educational stewardship.
The College Board must undergo a radical transformation to reclaim its nonprofit mission. Executive pay should align with nonprofit norms (under $500,000), not corporate benchmarks. Testing for students under 16 ought to be eliminated entirely, freeing schools from costly, developmentally inappropriate mandates. Proctoring and grading labor must be fairly compensated, and offshore financial dealings must be disclosed to the public.
Until these reforms materialize, the organization's 125-year legacy will remain shadowed by a question at the heart of its identity: Who benefits most—students or shareholders?
The College Board's nonprofit status hinges on a delicate balance—one increasingly tilted toward Wall Street, not classrooms. As education evolves, stakeholders must demand accountability from an organization that shapes millions of futures… and profits immensely from uncertainty.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
a minute ago
- Bloomberg
C3.ai CEO Tom Siebel to Seek Successor Due to Health Concerns
Software company Inc. is looking for a new chief executive officer after Tom Siebel said he intends to step aside due to health concerns. 'After being diagnosed with an autoimmune disease in early 2025, I have experienced significant visual impairment,' Siebel said in a statement Thursday. He will remain executive chairman once the company's board appoints a successor, he added.


Washington Post
a minute ago
- Washington Post
A replica Oval Office near the White House just got a Trump makeover
WASHINGTON — A replica Oval Office on display near the White House now looks exactly like President Donald Trump's. But it is not the blingy version he is currently using. Visitors starting Thursday will experience the mock Oval Office as it was in the Republican president's first term, until it is redecorated again next year to incorporate the golden touches and other flourishes Trump brought to the workspace after he returned to power in January.


Bloomberg
a minute ago
- Bloomberg
Prosecutor Who Tried Jan. 6 Cases Speaks Out About His Dismissal
Michael Gordon's name never made headlines, but the cases he handled did. As a federal prosecutor in Tampa, Florida, he went after fentanyl dealers, armed robbers, and drug crews. When the Justice Department asked for volunteers to help prosecute people who attacked the US Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, he raised his hand. For two years, Gordon tried cases against some of the most prominent defendants, and earned a promotion to senior trial counsel. He returned to Tampa with a reputation as a closer. When a politically sensitive $100 million fraud case stalled, the US attorney asked him to take it on. The indictment was returned in four weeks.