'Dark Patterns' in Online Advertising: What They Are and How To Avoid Them
RENO, NV, UNITED STATES, July 30, 2025 / EINPresswire.com / -- Online marketing for a business can be stressful and complex, and business owners can be tempted to cut corners. However, there are widespread marketing tactics that may seem normal because they are common, but are unethical and fraudulent. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is labeling these marketing tactics as 'dark patterns.'
Dark patterns are misleading and manipulative design practices in marketing that are used to trick a consumer into agreeing to or purchasing a company's product or service. Deceptive and 'dark' online patterns that businesses should avoid include, but are not limited to, the following:
- Drip Pricing: Only revealing part of the price of a product or service, with additional hidden fees tacked on throughout the transaction.
- Disguising Ads: Making an ad appear like it is independent content or search results.
- Confirmation Shaming: This is when there is an automated guilt or shaming comment in response to a user declining a service or product, such as 'Enjoy your higher prices,' or 'No, I don't want to save money!'
- Roach Motel: 'Roach Motel' is a term for when a company makes it very easy to sign up for a product or service, but extremely difficult to cancel it.
- Forced Continuity: Automatically renewing subscriptions without a re-subscription or prior authorization from the customer in some fashion.
Business owners who are interested in avoiding dark patterns and want to promote their business ethically and honestly are urged to acquire legal counsel to assess the business and make appropriate and compliant recommendations. LegalMatch.com, the nation's most trusted attorney-client matching platform, can pair entrepreneurs for free with a qualified business attorney who can provide expert guidance.
The platform also has a large Online Law Library with articles on many different legal topics, including sales & marketing violations, false advertisement, and more. Business owners and future entrepreneurs can confide in LegalMatch as a trusted source of legal direction and support.
About LegalMatch.com
LegalMatch is the nation's oldest and largest online legal lead-generation service. Headquartered in Reno, Nevada, LegalMatch helps people find the right lawyer and helps attorneys find new clients. LegalMatch's service is free to individuals and small businesses looking for legal help. For more information about LegalMatch, please visit our website or contact us directly.
Ken LaMance
LegalMatch
+1 415-946-0856
email us here
Visit us on social media:
YouTube
X
Legal Disclaimer:
EIN Presswire provides this news content 'as is' without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
38 minutes ago
- Forbes
International Enrollment Could Drop By 150,000 Students, Report Warns
U.S. colleges and universities could see their international student enrollment decline by as many as 150,000 students this fall. That projection — by NAFSA: Association of International Educators in conjunction with JB International — is based on recent Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) and State Department data that suggest that visa bans and disruptions by the Trump administration could dramatically reduce new international enrollment unless issuances rebound sharply in July and August. In the 2023-24 academic year, 1,126,690 international college students were enrolled in U.S colleges and universities, according to the Institute of International Education's Open Doors report. That number was an all-time high, representing about 6% of all college students in the nation. It includes individuals in a category called 'optional practical training,' which covers international students who legally extend their time in the country by working for up to a year before or after they complete their degree requirements. In the years since the pandemic, when the number of international students declined by a record 15%, enrollments have increased by a total of 200,000 students. But now, continued increases appear highly unlikely. According to the NAFSA analysis, a potential 30-40% decline in new foreign students would yield a 15% drop in overall international enrollment in the U.S. That decrease would equate to nearly $7 billion in lost revenue and more than 60,000 fewer jobs. The new estimate includes a breakdown on the possible impact the enrollment losses would have on each state. California would stand to lose more than $1 billion from the anticipated drop, and New York's total cost would approach that total. Several other states — including Illinois, Massachusetts, Ohio, Texas, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Florida— would face financial losses exceeding $200 million each, according to the report. NAFSA pointed to four factors it said were driving the projected decline. International students are an important source of tuition revenue at American colleges. Most of them pay the full tuition price at private colleges and the out-of-state rate at public schools, allowing many schools to discount the tuition charged to a large percentage of their domestic students. The new projection confirms the worst fears of higher education leaders, who have become increasingly concerned that the Trump administration's anti-immigration rhetoric and actions would have a chilling effect on international enrollment and their financial bottom line. Here are some leading examples of those tactics, which began almost immediately after Trump assumed the presidency. In addition to slowing down visa processing, the president has issued executive orders to tighten controls over immigration and implement travel bans against several countries. In one of its highest profile confrontations with higher education, the administration has tried to prevent Harvard University from being able to enroll international students, part of its pressure on the institution to bend to its demands on several issues. Even though those actions have been blocked — at least temporarily– by the courts, they have caused both current and prospective international students to grow increasingly alarmed about their prospects in the United States. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has called for the deportation of foreign university students who 'abuse our hospitality" or engage in a variety of other activities that Rubio has condemned. The Department of Homeland Security has threatened the legal status of international students at scores of universities before lawsuits around the country have largely stopped the attempted deportations, forcing the administration to back down at least for now. In May, Joseph Edlow, Trump's choice to head up the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, testified before a congressional committee that he favored ending the optional practical training program, an avenue that most business leaders and educators believe is key to helping recruit and retain international talent. NAFSA called on the State Department to make two changes to mitigate the predicted damage: In a news release, Fanta Aw, executive director and CEO of NAFSA, said the organization's analysis was 'the first to calculate the potential economic impact of fewer international students on cities and towns across the country,' and that it "should serve as a clarion call to the State Department that it must act to ensure international students and scholars are able to arrive on U.S. campuses this fall.' Describing the immediate consequences as 'just the tip of the iceberg," Aw went on to say that "international students drive innovation, advance America's global competitiveness, and create research and academic opportunities in our local colleges that will benefit our country for generations. For the United States to succeed in the global economy, we must keep our doors open to students from around the world.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Shein's and Temu's prices will get hit even harder by the new de minimis rule
President Donald Trump last week suspended a global trade loophole allowing smaller parcels into America duty-free. This closes a backdoor into the United States for Chinese mega-shippers like Shein and Temu, who could potentially pass the cost of those duties down to consumers. Trump eliminated the so-called 'de minimis exemption,' which had admitted duty-free shipments of goods worth $800 or less into the United States. Giant e-commerce sites used the loophole when shipping hundreds of millions of packages to US consumers. The administration did away with the exemption for goods coming out of China and Hong Kong in May amid the US-China trade war. This latest move extends that to every country around the world. Trump said in an executive order issued on Wednesday that 'many shippers go to great lengths to evade law enforcement and hide illicit substances in imports that go through international commerce' and the risk of 'evasion, deception, and illicit-drug importation are particularly high for low-value articles that have been eligible for duty-free de minimis treatment.' This is more bad news for Chinese retailers and their customers because it shuts down the option of re-routing small shipments duty-free through countries like Vietnam, which is facing a tariff rate of 20%. The executive order also demands that the origin of the package must be declared to US Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Temu and Shein had already started stockpiling goods and bulk-shipping to US warehouses to lower shipping times. Hours after the de minimis exemption expired for China in early May, Temu announced it was overhauling its shipping model. It said it would send out all American orders via US-based distributors, adding that its 'pricing for US consumers remains unchanged.' But some of Temu's American buyers subsequently complained of higher prices and items were quickly out of stock. Companies also will eventually need to restock their warehouses, and 'by imposing (the suspension of de minimis) for the whole world, there is no other workaround,' Chris Tang, a professor of global supply chain management at the University of California, Los Angeles, told CNN. Companies will now have to pay a hefty import tax even if they ship in bulk, which means customers may eventually have to pay more. The suspension of de minimis will also affect the millions of sellers on Amazon Haul, a discount competitor to Temu and TikTok Shop. Amazon and Temu have not responded to CNN's request for comment. Overhauling how Americans shop Last week's repeal will affect a massive amount of packages that Americans are accustomed to receiving duty-free, the sheer amount of which has grown exponentially over the past decade. CBP previously told CNN it processes 'nearly 4 million duty-free de minimis shipments a day.' Research indicates that a majority of those shipments come from China and Hong Kong. In total, over the last fiscal year, CBP said 1.36 billion packages came to the United States under the de minimis exemption. When Trump's executive order goes into effect on August 29, most goods shipped internationally will be subject to the tariffs of the country of origin. Those duties will be about $80 per item for a country with a tariff rate less than 16%, $160 per item for a country of a tariff rate between 16% and 25%, $200 per item for a country with a tariff rate above 25%. Some of that cost could be passed down to consumers. Lower-income households will suffer the most from higher prices on Chinese e-commerce sites. About 48% of de minimis packages were shipped to America's poorest zip codes, while 22% were delivered to the richest ones, according to research in February from UCLA and Yale economists. The Trump administration had first slashed the de minimis exemption on China in May, but then cut the tariff on those cheap packages from 120% to 54%. There is also a $100 flat-fee option for those goods. A federal trade court this week declined to block Trump's elimination of the de minimis exemption on goods from China because the issue is already covered in a broader case challenging Trump's tariff policies. As part of Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' the de minimis rule was slated for repeal on all countries in July 2027. It even established a civil penalty up to $10,000 for more than one violation of the rule. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Gizmodo
2 hours ago
- Gizmodo
The SEC Shifts Gears on Crypto
The Securities and Exchange Commission made its biggest pro-crypto move yet this week. On Thursday, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins launched 'Project Crypto,' an overarching roadmap of the Commission's approach to regulating cryptocurrency. The aim of the project, according to Atkins, is to make the United States 'the crypto capital of the world' by onshoring crypto asset distributions. Atkins hopes to do so by updating the Commission's rules and regulations regarding on-chain software systems, encouraging experimentation with new technology like 'tokenization,' and opening the door to the reclassification of most crypto assets as an investment contract rather than a security. The plan also aims to encourage decentralized finance initiatives that operate without intermediaries and 'super apps' that integrate payment ability with other functions like social media (one example being Elon Musk's vision to transform X into an 'everything app'). It's a huge departure from the SEC's previous approach to crypto under former chairman Gary Gensler, who became crypto industry's public enemy number one due to his strict regulatory approach. Atkins made sure to hammer that point in. 'It's a new day at the SEC and we are picking up the gauntlet and the challenge that President Trump has laid down,' he told CNBC on Friday. Gary Gensler's approach to crypto as SEC chairman was less 'laissez-faire' and more focused on compliance. In an effort to protect investors, Gensler's administration insisted that crypto tokens are overwhelmingly considered securities and are therefore covered under existing legal framework and require full disclosure and SEC registration. That made it especially rough for decentralized finance initiatives. Under Gensler, the SEC launched a wave of lawsuits against crypto exchanges like Coinbase and Binance, claiming that they operated outside the law. The crypto industry deemed this to be regulatory overreach and claimed that it was pushing American crypto innovation overseas. In comes Trump, who ran on a pro-crypto campaign in the 2024 presidential election even though he was once a skeptic himself, claiming that crypto was 'a disaster waiting to happen' back in 2021. One of Trump's first courses of action following the inauguration was to establish a federal crypto working group, chaired by the President's AI and crypto czar David Sacks. That group just released a 160-page report on Wednesday detailing policy recommendations. Trump also recently signed into law the Genius Act, a bill that establishes the first federal regulatory framework for stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency that is designed to have less volatility than traditional forms by pegging it to the U.S. dollar. The Genius Act was a huge win for the crypto industry, allowing banks, credit unions, and other institutions to issue stablecoins. Although Atkins' SEC and the Trump administration at large are ushering in an era of cryptocurrency regulation with some consumer protections, still the roadmap for it seems to involve minimal red tape. The focus instead is overwhelmingly on legitimizing on-chain technology in the financial system. And that seems to be working: A huge array of big companies are rushing to explore blockchain projects. On Thursday, J.P. Morgan announced that it will be partnering with Coinbase to allow crypto purchases via clients' Chase credit cards, and Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan said earlier this month that the bank is planning on launching a stablecoin. Crypto enthusiasts hype its ability to streamline financial processes by cutting out intermediaries and say that it helps give anyone across the globe access to financial accounts. They also praise the privacy and anonymity it provides. But that obviously comes with downsides. Critics view cryptocurrency as a threat to the financial system: the same mechanisms crypto uses to streamline and increase accessibility to financial services can also be used for money laundering, sanctions evasions, and scams. According to the FBI, Americans have lost over $3.9 billion to about 150,000 crypto fraud schemes in 2024 alone. Crypto is also notorious for its volatility, prone to crashes, and has been mired in controversy, notably since the Sam Bankman-Fried scandal. And crypto skeptics in Congress are also pointing out that the Trump administration's regulatory push towards legitimization overlooks one glaring problem: Trump's own conflict of interest. The Trump family runs several crypto projects, from crypto banking platform World Liberty Financial that offers a stablecoin called USD1 to an empire of memecoins and a bitcoin mining business co-founded by Eric Trump. Not only the Trump family but his entire cabinet's burgeoning crypto empire is viewed by many critics as a blurring of lines between personal business interests and official policy. The regulatory actions taken so far could be seen as self-dealing. 'Trump is using the presidency to enrich himself through crypto, and he's doing it in plain sight,' one of Trump's biggest critics on the matter, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, told Vanity Fair last week.
