‘Council wants to charge us to park outside our own homes'
Dartford council has claimed a 'majority of residents' are concerned about commuters using their streets as 'free car parks'.
But hundreds of people living in the Newtown ward of Dartford have signed a petition against the plans, accusing the council of a 'money-grabbing' ploy.
Three proposals put forward in a consultation include time restrictions, yellow lines, parking bays and permits. Or they can choose none of the above.
Kelum Alahakoon said commuters forced him to park up to three streets away on weekdays.
'In the mornings, you cannot get parked at all. If you go out, there will be no spaces when you come back,' he said.
'It is just a money-grabber'
But Theresa Attwood, 53, who lives in St Vincent Road, said the problem was residents owning more cars, rather than commuters taking advantage of the lack of restrictions.
She told Kent Online restrictions would 'just move the problem on'.
She added: 'There are other ways to ease the issues. It is just a money-grabber.'
She suggested bays could be installed along her road instead of yellow lines and the current white boxes, to free up space.
Paul and Mary Stearn need car spaces for the two carers who visit each day. Mrs Stearn called the plan 'another tax' and a 'money-making scheme'.
Mr Stearn added: 'The roads by the station do get a lot of commuters parking there as it is nearer to the station, but we do not have that here.'
Ward councillor Laura Edie described the parking situation as 'challenging', adding that streets in the area were built during the Victorian era, when homeowners did not need space for cars.
'Although I think the most challenging time to park in this area is during the evenings, weekends and school holidays, the point of this study was to ease issues caused by commuter parking.'
A design is expected to be completed in October, and, if agreed, will see parking controls brought in early next year.
'Parking is uncontrolled'
The Conservative-run local authority said: 'Parking on many residential streets close to the town centre is uncontrolled, and effectively provides free parking for long-stay users.
'Residents living close to the town centre have asked us to find a solution.'
But residents have taken to social media to oppose the plans.
Kevin Jarl Dell said: 'Vote against it when asked. Permits are not the answer. What happens to visitors to your house?'
Pam Cave wrote: 'There is no solution to the parking in the Newtown area simply because there are more cars than parking spaces. If this goes ahead, we will be paying for the privilege of maybe getting a parking space, probably not outside your own house, and not even necessarily in your own road.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed: The VERY strange ailments that are netting sufferers a free, brand-new car funded by the taxpayer
Taxpayers are funding cars for people with conditions including 'constipation', 'tennis elbow' and 'anxiety'. New figures reveal the government-backed Motability scheme is also being used to provide vehicles for drivers who have abused alcohol or drugs. Motability was set up to help those with serious physical disabilities get around. But the bloated scheme is now being used by people with a wide variety of ailments. A table shows they include over 32,000 new motors for people suffering anxiety or other depressive disorders, while 40 cars went to people with 'tennis elbow', a condition which the NHS advises 'usually goes away with rest'. A further 20 people suffering from constipation made use of Motability, along with 190 who had 'social phobia', the official figures show. Ten people struggling with a 'failure to thrive' got a taxpayer-funded car, and so did another 20 with a 'food intolerance'. A full breakdown of the figures was released in response to a Parliamentary Question and published by the Guido Fawkes website which said some £600million was funnelled from the Department for Work and Pensions into the scheme in 2024, and, as of April, some 589,000 benefits claimants in England and Wales have the publicly-subsidised cars. Online 'influencers' dish out tips for getting Motability cars, including this TikTok user hiding his full face with a red balaclava offering advice on claiming a £31,000 car for 'essentially free' In other videos, he advises his followers how to find out if they are eligible for the Motability scheme (left) and reveals how he acquired his Seat Arona 'for free' (right) Constipation and 'tennis elbow'...some of the more startling conditions for getting a taxpayer-funded car ADHD/ADD: 9,090 Alcohol misuse: 770 Anxiety and depressive disorders: 32,160 Anxiety disorders - other/type not known: 2,600 Back pain: 6,760 Constipation: 20 Depressive disorder: 7,460 Elbow disorders - other/type not known: 50 Obesity: 800 OCD: 650 Phobia - social: 190 Tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis): 40 Allergy risk of anaphylaxis unknown or not fully assessed: 10 Failure to thrive: 10 Food intolerance: 20 The way the scheme works, eligible benefit claimants – meaning those who receive an enhanced rate for qualifying mobility difficulties - can choose to swap a portion of their payments for a new car, scooter or powered wheelchair. The figures show that 800 cars have gone to people with obesity and 230 to those with Tourette's syndrome. Some 770 people with 'alcohol misuse' conditions and another 220 with drug misuse issues lease cars from Motability. The campaign group Crush Crime claims it is 'easier for a drunk-driver to get a free car than a lifetime driving ban', adding: 'Yes, they can get a car BECAUSE they have an alcohol problem.' Motability stressed that 'anyone with an unspent drink-driving conviction cannot drive our vehicles'. Motability came under fire recently as it emerged people online boasted of gaming the system to get new cars 'basically free'. Incredibly, the publicly-funded private company is now so big it buys one in five new cars sold in Britain – and friends or relatives of Motability customers can drive them too. The boss earns £750,000 and – as the Mail revealed earlier this year – Motability is sitting on a £4billion stockpile. Meanwhile TikTok 'influencers' are fuelling the Motability scandal by encouraging Britons to cash in on brand new cars. A non-refundable advance payment based on the value of the vehicle due at the outset is required, but at a significantly lower cost. The scheme has been coming under fire for months amid fears the system is being abused. The boom in claimants, who must be in receipt of benefits in the form of the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) or the Disability Living Allowance (DLA), has proved lucrative for Motability, whose turnover soared to £7billion last year. Meanwhile Motability Operations, the company behind the Motability charity, is sitting on a surplus of £4billion - all of which is stemming from taxpayers' money. One TikTok 'influencer', masking his full face with a red balaclava, handed out tips to claim a £31,000 car for 'essentially free'. He tells his 25,000 followers the best way to obtain PIP and Motability, even advising people to take the Government to court if they are turned down. In one video, he reveals the best way to cash in on an Abarth 695 Sport, worth around £31,000, saying: 'To get this car, all you have to do is pay £599... but there's a catch. You have to be in the Motability scheme, meaning you have to be getting PIP, more specifically the Motability aspect of it. 'You need to get 12 points of that, however if you have a family member on PIP or if you are on PIP yourself you can exchange your allowance to get this car.' In other videos, first reported by The Sun, he advises his followers how to find out if they are eligible for the Motability scheme and reveals how he acquired his Seat Arona, worth up to £29,850, 'for free'. Filming a video while driving around in the car, he says: 'A question I get asked a lot is how did I get my car completely free? I've got this car completely free, so the way I got this car was through the Motability scheme. 'The way I got this car was going into a dealership, giving them the letter, them confirming the benefit and just getting the car ordered... it came within four days.' Another user shared a video boasting how her four-year-old autistic daughter can be 'driven around in style' after the family replaced their Vauxhall Zafira with a flash new Skoda Kodiaq. The vehicle is usually worth around £36,000 but can be leased for £3,299 on the Motability scheme. Motability claimants are supposed to prove they struggle to leave their home or cannot plan and follow a journey route without help to get the required '12 points'. John O'Connell, at the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'The Government must look at the criteria before this situation gets worse.' Motability Operations, which runs the Motability scheme, said: 'To use the Motability Scheme, you must receive a higher rate mobility allowance. Eligibility for the allowance is determined and awarded by the Government.' The Department for Work and Pensions, which makes the decisions on who is eligible for disability benefit claims, said: 'People in receipt of an eligible benefit can choose to join the Motability Scheme. Any misuse of the scheme is a matter for Motability and, where appropriate, the police.' One of the most notorious incidents involving a Motability recipient hit the headlines in May last year when a couple called Bernard and Ann McDonagh were convicted of a string of 'dine and dash' offences. When the McDonaghs and their children went to the Bella Ciao restaurant in Swansea one day last April, they were clearly in the mood to splash out. Their main courses included the two most expensive items on the menu – T-bone and fillet steaks – and when it came to pudding they ordered 'double desserts'. 'They wanted two brownies on a plate,' the owner of the restaurant said later. But when the time came to settle the £329 bill for her party of five, Mrs McDonagh tried to pay with a savings account card. After this had been declined twice, she told the proprietor: 'I'm going to go to the car to get another card, I'll leave my son here as proof that you can trust me.' Unfortunately, for Bella Ciao's bottom line, McDonagh Jr made a run for it shortly afterwards and the family made their escape in a blue Ford Transit van. It later emerged that the McDonaghs had been given the brand-new vehicle by Motability on a three-year lease but, far from putting them on the road to productive employment, it became their getaway vehicle. Their choice of a Ford Transit is illustrative of the range of models that are available to Motability's clients, who are presented with an eye-catching catalogue of gleaming new vehicles. By handing over £60 of their weekly PIP mobility benefit, a claimant can find themselves driving away with an all-electric Dacia Spring – retail price £15,000 – for no upfront cost. In exchange for the full £75.75 weekly allowance, a claimant can 'purchase' a petrol Nissan Juke SUV – retail price £23,000. For people in dire need of assistance with transportation owing to a disability, these vehicles can be essential to their physical and mental wellbeing. But it becomes less clear as to the immediate benefits to the taxpayer when you look further down the list of vehicles purchased by Motability – which enjoys zero VAT on the hire and resale of its vehicles. For an upfront payment of £7,999, customers can walk away with a brand-new BMW i4 M Sport, which retails at £50,000 and accelerates from 0-60mph in five seconds, or, for the same upfront price, a Mercedes-Benz CLA Coupe. Once the lease on a vehicle is up, Motability sells it on the open market, with the profits going back into the company. Labour peer John Mann, who has previously raised concerns about the company, says: 'Motability is making too much money. It needs tighter criteria. There needs to be a return of some of this money they have accrued to the exchequer. 'I also question why it is necessary for its customers to change to a new vehicle so regularly. Cars last a long time and the whole point of Motability must be to help people live a normal life. Three years per car is too short a time-frame.'
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
‘Council wants to charge us to park outside our own homes'
Residents have criticised their council's plans to bring in parking restrictions. Dartford council has claimed a 'majority of residents' are concerned about commuters using their streets as 'free car parks'. But hundreds of people living in the Newtown ward of Dartford have signed a petition against the plans, accusing the council of a 'money-grabbing' ploy. Three proposals put forward in a consultation include time restrictions, yellow lines, parking bays and permits. Or they can choose none of the above. Kelum Alahakoon said commuters forced him to park up to three streets away on weekdays. 'In the mornings, you cannot get parked at all. If you go out, there will be no spaces when you come back,' he said. 'It is just a money-grabber' But Theresa Attwood, 53, who lives in St Vincent Road, said the problem was residents owning more cars, rather than commuters taking advantage of the lack of restrictions. She told Kent Online restrictions would 'just move the problem on'. She added: 'There are other ways to ease the issues. It is just a money-grabber.' She suggested bays could be installed along her road instead of yellow lines and the current white boxes, to free up space. Paul and Mary Stearn need car spaces for the two carers who visit each day. Mrs Stearn called the plan 'another tax' and a 'money-making scheme'. Mr Stearn added: 'The roads by the station do get a lot of commuters parking there as it is nearer to the station, but we do not have that here.' Ward councillor Laura Edie described the parking situation as 'challenging', adding that streets in the area were built during the Victorian era, when homeowners did not need space for cars. 'Although I think the most challenging time to park in this area is during the evenings, weekends and school holidays, the point of this study was to ease issues caused by commuter parking.' A design is expected to be completed in October, and, if agreed, will see parking controls brought in early next year. 'Parking is uncontrolled' The Conservative-run local authority said: 'Parking on many residential streets close to the town centre is uncontrolled, and effectively provides free parking for long-stay users. 'Residents living close to the town centre have asked us to find a solution.' But residents have taken to social media to oppose the plans. Kevin Jarl Dell said: 'Vote against it when asked. Permits are not the answer. What happens to visitors to your house?' Pam Cave wrote: 'There is no solution to the parking in the Newtown area simply because there are more cars than parking spaces. If this goes ahead, we will be paying for the privilege of maybe getting a parking space, probably not outside your own house, and not even necessarily in your own road.'
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
More than 23m Britons think they may be due compensation for mis-sold car loans, UK poll finds
More than 23 million people believe they could be due compensation for a mis-sold car loan, according to a poll before this month's supreme court decision. Borrowers, banks and the government are anxiously awaiting the ruling, which could trigger one of the biggest redress schemes since the £50bn payment protection insurance (PPI). The PPI saga forced UK banks to compensate people who had bought often worthless insurance cover. The survey, conducted for the consumer law firm Slater and Gordon, found that 45% of people think they might be entitled to a payout over a car finance plan taken out between 2007 and 2021. The car loans scandal has been rumbling on for more than a year, but ballooned in October when a court of appeal judgment vastly expanded a Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) investigation into potentially harmful commission arrangements. It determined that paying a secret commission to car dealers, which had arranged the loans without disclosing the sum and terms of the commission to borrowers, was unlawful. Lenders including Santander UK, Close Brothers, Barclays and Lloyds are potentially on the hook for up to £44bn, according to some analysts. The FCA is working on a potential compensation scheme under which lenders that mis-sold loans would check their records and decide who gets compensation. The public's expectations of compensation are high, according to the survey. Of the 4,000 people surveyed, 45% believed they were likely to be eligible for money back, which equates to more than 23 million adults across the UK. Forty per cent said they would consider a legal challenge if dissatisfied with the outcome of their claim. Consumers also showed little trust in the ability of banks and lenders to check records and distribute compensation. There are also concerns that some consumers could miss out because most banks purge customer data after six years. The FCA ordered lenders to cease doing so in January 2024, when it launched the investigation, but files relating to customers with contracts that ended more than six years earlier may have already been lost. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion The chief operating officer of Slater and Gordon, Elizabeth Comley, said the public rightly expected to be compensated for their losses. 'The FCA is trying put things right, but there's a risk that a redress scheme leaves many people disappointed and keen to challenge the process,' she said. 'That sort of backlash would be bad for everyone – the scandal would drag on for years, the courts would be inundated with challenges and the public would be denied the clear resolution they want.'
