Man walks out mid-interview after Fortune 500 VP dodges question: 'Can't keep playing'
A frustrated job seeker decided to walk out of a final-round interview with a Fortune 500 company after the recruiter refused to answer a question he had been asking for several rounds. In a post on Reddit, the man revealed that he walked out of the final-round interview after the hiring team dodged his questions about salary for the fourth time. The candidate revealed that he had been interviewed for a mid-level data analytics role with a Fortune 500 company.(Representational)
The man revealed that he had been interviewed for a mid-level data analytics role with a Fortune 500 company. He had already made it through three rounds of interviews and completed a take-home project for the role.
But the hiring team dodged his questions about the compensation being offered for the role at every stage. Salary question dodged
"Nobody would give me even a range on compensation. Round 1 (recruiter screen): 'We're still benchmarking the position.' Round 2 (hiring manager): 'Let's make sure you're a fit first—then we'll talk numbers.' Round 3 (panel): 'Oh, HR owns that conversation. They'll cover it next time,' Round 4 (director + VP): same song, fourth verse," he wrote.
In the final interview, the candidate repeated the question to the company's Vice President.
'I'm excited about the role, but after four interviews and a take-home project, I need to know the compensation range to confirm we're in the same ballpark,' he said, but even the VP dodged the question. "That's confidential until the offer stage,' he was told.
Frustrated, the candidate paused the interview, thanked the VP for his time and ended the call. "No drama, no mic-drop—just a polite exit," said.
However, the candidate admitted feeling conflicted. While feeling empowered, he also felt unsure that walking away would cost him a viable opportunity. "Part of me wonders if candidates should start doing this en masse so companies can't keep playing 'guess the number' at the finish line," he wrote. Social media reacts
The post received overwhelmingly supportive reactions, sparking a wider debate around salary transparency in hiring.
'If they're not sharing, it's going to be lower than you hope,' one user wrote.
'You shouldn't go to any interview without at least a ballpark,' said another.
Many noted that companies often delay salary talks until candidates are emotionally and time-invested, making them more likely to accept lowball offers.
'It's human nature that the farther people get in the process, the more likely they are to say yes to a bad offer. Companies know this," said one of them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Indian employee in US asked to 'stop speaking in meetings' because of accent: ‘I felt insulted'
An Indian man working in the United States has claimed he was asked to stop speaking in meetings as his accent is hard to understand. In a post shared on Reddit, the man voiced his disappointment with the workplace discrimination he experienced. An Indian man claims he was asked to stop speaking in meetings because of his accent (Representational image) In his Reddit post, the man identified himself as a 32-year-old who is living and working in the US. Originally from India, he is currently part of a team where everyone else is American. 'Today, during a meeting, I asked a team member (about 55 years old) for a project update as part of my regular responsibilities. He told me to stop speaking in meetings because he couldn't understand my accent,' the Indian employee revealed on Reddit. He added that his request to the team member was a simple and straightforward one. 'My original request was simply for a progress update and accompanying pictures. Perhaps my question caught him off guard, given my position as a contractor and my relative age,' the employee wrote. Feeling insulted The man said that this experience left him feeling dismissed and insulted. 'I felt dismissed and insulted,' he said. 'I've always made an effort to communicate clearly and professionally. No one else has said anything like this before I have being with the same client for over a year now,' he wrote on Reddit, asking if other people in similar positions have experienced something like this. (Also read: US company demands Indian employee keep camera on during work hours. His response) In the comments section, he also said that his manager told him not to interact directly with that particular team member going forward. Instead, all communication should be routed through the manager. Accent to blame? His post has sparked a lively discussion on Reddit about different accents and workplace etiquette. Some people advised the employee to give his team member the benefit of doubt, as sometimes it can be truly hard to understand a particular accent. 'I had a meeting once where an Indian lady gave an update regarding the integration of what she was working on, with my team's product. There were a large number of upper management on the call, and I swear I couldn't understand a word she said,' recalled one Reddit user. 'When the update ended, I was unable to continue because I had no idea how to respond. I actually liked working with her, but we almost always communicated through Slack, so the meeting caught me off guard and there was fallout.' 'I have been in meetings with Russians, Vietnamese etc. where I could not understand a single word they said and had to ask for clarification again and again,' another said. 'So when an American says he cannot understand what I said, I would assume he is having the same problem with me that I had with the Russian and other Indian speakers.'
Mint
18 hours ago
- Mint
Did I make right choice? Indian employee says US firm asked to keep camera on during working hours, rejects offer
A student from a tier-3 college in India recently turned down an internship offer from a US-based company due to a condition he found too intrusive — keeping his camera on during all work hours. The student shared his experience in a detailed Reddit post, explaining why he chose to walk away from what seemed like a promising opportunity. According to the post, the student had received an offer for a full stack developer intern role, with the possibility of a full-time position after the internship. Initially, the stipend was set at ₹ 25,000 per month but was later revised to ₹ 35,000– ₹ 40,000. The company also promised a full-time salary of over ₹ 12 lakh per annum after the internship. He was comfortable with the requirement to work during US office hours. However, he was taken aback when the company added another condition: 'The next thing they said was you have to stay in the meeting during working hours and your camera should be on.' Despite trying to convince them otherwise, the company did not agree, and the student decided to reject the offer. Later, he began to question his decision, especially after seniors and friends told him he might not get another such opportunity. 'Did I make the right choice? Or I am gonna regret this?' he asked Reddit. Screengrab from the viral post. His dilemma sparked debate on the platform. One user said, 'I think you've done the right thing. This camera on part is really weird.' Another added, 'Camera on at all times means you will work as a slave.' Some users advised him to take the offer if he had no better options, make money, and leave the company later. Others supported his stand, calling the demand a sign of poor work culture.
Hindustan Times
21 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Man walks out mid-interview after Fortune 500 VP dodges question: 'Can't keep playing'
A frustrated job seeker decided to walk out of a final-round interview with a Fortune 500 company after the recruiter refused to answer a question he had been asking for several rounds. In a post on Reddit, the man revealed that he walked out of the final-round interview after the hiring team dodged his questions about salary for the fourth time. The candidate revealed that he had been interviewed for a mid-level data analytics role with a Fortune 500 company.(Representational) The man revealed that he had been interviewed for a mid-level data analytics role with a Fortune 500 company. He had already made it through three rounds of interviews and completed a take-home project for the role. But the hiring team dodged his questions about the compensation being offered for the role at every stage. Salary question dodged "Nobody would give me even a range on compensation. Round 1 (recruiter screen): 'We're still benchmarking the position.' Round 2 (hiring manager): 'Let's make sure you're a fit first—then we'll talk numbers.' Round 3 (panel): 'Oh, HR owns that conversation. They'll cover it next time,' Round 4 (director + VP): same song, fourth verse," he wrote. In the final interview, the candidate repeated the question to the company's Vice President. 'I'm excited about the role, but after four interviews and a take-home project, I need to know the compensation range to confirm we're in the same ballpark,' he said, but even the VP dodged the question. "That's confidential until the offer stage,' he was told. Frustrated, the candidate paused the interview, thanked the VP for his time and ended the call. "No drama, no mic-drop—just a polite exit," said. However, the candidate admitted feeling conflicted. While feeling empowered, he also felt unsure that walking away would cost him a viable opportunity. "Part of me wonders if candidates should start doing this en masse so companies can't keep playing 'guess the number' at the finish line," he wrote. Social media reacts The post received overwhelmingly supportive reactions, sparking a wider debate around salary transparency in hiring. 'If they're not sharing, it's going to be lower than you hope,' one user wrote. 'You shouldn't go to any interview without at least a ballpark,' said another. Many noted that companies often delay salary talks until candidates are emotionally and time-invested, making them more likely to accept lowball offers. 'It's human nature that the farther people get in the process, the more likely they are to say yes to a bad offer. Companies know this," said one of them.
