The changing perception of India
Post Operation Sindoor, there is a perceptible change in how the world sees India. There is a newfound confidence that the world has been forced to take note of. To its credit, India is not shouting from tree tops about what it did or can do. Yet, a lot in the world, including thinkers, military experts, historians and media stalwarts, are all jostling for space in media to talk about India and not surprisingly, it is mostly laudatory. What has changed in the country that was always in the news for the wrong reasons for decades?
In a matter of days, the narrative on India has shifted from being critical about almost everything Indian to finding many reasons to praise it. India's military capabilities, overall approach to national security, international standing, a full U-turn to paint India as a strong and decisive nation, and broader geopolitical and regional security implications are all part of this new discourse on India. Indian military's precision, professionalism, and the doctrine of SEAD (Suppression of Enemy's Air Defences) have come in for a special mention with awe and admiration from various quarters. The role of locally manufactured military hardware and its effectiveness has made most nations to sit up and take note.
In the aftermath of Operation Sindoor, India's aggressive diplomatic manoeuvring internationally against terror has been unprecedented. India has been very successful in balancing relations with global powers like USA, Russia, China and other nations, including Islamic nations, on its own terms. Discussions abound on India's growing importance as a global economic driver and innovator, with increasing international engagement and investment. The role of India as a potential counterweight not only to China but also to the USA in the evolving global order and trade interests many.
The country seems to have found a unique national interest-based 'Indian Way' to achieve all this. The days of a meek and indecisive India that was always on the lookout for affirmation from others, particularly the western world, are over. The days of taking the less confrontational path are passe. Today, India is decisive without being loud or hypocritical in any manner. Its international relations are guided by participation and mutuality, in the rich traditions of its heritage, without being overbearing or patriarchal. Yet, the message is very clear that it will not tolerate any evil designs on its soil or its people by terrorists or those who support terror and violence.
Some of the key happenings and events in the recent past that support India's transformation are:
Operation Sindoor May 2025: Operation Sindoor is not only a new chapter in India's doctrine to fight terror but also in the conduct of military operations. The doctrine has made it clear that any act of terror on Indian soil will be viewed as an act of war. The response will be decisive, calibrated and aimed at annihilation of selected targets with a disproportionate response. The operation showed hitherto unseen capabilities of Indian military in terms of use and adoption of technology, the capabilities of indigenously produced military hardware that match or exceed the best in the world, apart from professional skills in coordination and execution of complex military operations. Importantly, India has successfully called out Pakistan's oft-repeated nuclear threat bogey.
SCO Meeting 2025: India refused to sign the joint document after the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) meeting in Shanghai. The joint document, drafted by China, failed to address concerns about terrorism. It mentioned the Balochistan train hijacking incident but did not include the Pahalgam terrorist attack at the behest of Pakistan. In the end, there was no joint statement.
QUAD Meeting 2025: India was very emphatic on its stand on terror and the fight against terror. This was obvious in the joint statement which read as follows: 'The Quad unequivocally condemns all acts of terrorism and violent extremism in all its forms and manifestations, including cross-border terrorism, and renews our commitment to counterterrorism cooperation. We condemn in the strongest terms the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir on April 22, 2025, which claimed the lives of 25 Indian nationals and one Nepali citizen, while injuring several others.'
BRICS Meeting 2025: The impact of India on the outcomes of this meeting in Rio de Janeiro, in tandem with Brazil, was more than evident in the final declaration released. The stress on the need for developing nations to take a lead in strengthening Global South Cooperation for a more inclusive and sustainable governance in the future was a key takeaway. This was aimed at countering the pressures and influence that the developed world tends to bring to the table on important subjects like climate change, inclusive development, international trade and financing, socio-economic development, international peace and security, among other issues.
Tarriff war with USA: India and the US have a complex trade relationship that is often marked by disputes and hard negotiations. India has taken a firm stance in defending its trade interests, including approaching the WTO for resolution and exercising its right to impose retaliatory tariffs. India is also encouraging rupee-based trade to reduce the added pressures and costs imposed by a dollar-denominated international trade. It has already seen some success in this regard. The US sees this as a threat to the supremacy of the dollar but India is committed to pursuing its goals.
Export of Military Hardware: Operation Sindoor has showcased some very advanced and effective military hardware produced indigenously. The world, particularly nations like USA and China that arm Pakistan, were in for a rude shock to see the ease with which India neutralised their military hardware and surveillance systems and then operated with impunity in Pakistani airspace. Nations across the world are looking at India with renewed interest in such military hardware. India's growth as an exporter of military hardware with reasonable prices will certainly worry the US and other European nations, who currently have a monopoly in this sector. Today, India is not averse to exporting and is aggressively enhancing its capabilities and capacities in this sector.
In the recent past, India has been more forthright and not shied away from taking a hard line on issues of national importance. India's decision to buy oil from Russia and Iran, support to Israel in the Palestinian conflict, and abstaining from voting on the UN general assembly resolution on 'Measures to Combat Islamophobia' moved by Pakistan, are some of the other instances where India's changed approach in international diplomacy was very evident. India is pursuing its candidature for a permanent seat in the UNSC vigorously, as also for instituting reforms in the UNO. The US and other western nations, who are used to seeing a staid and dithering India over the decades, have still to come to terms with the New India that is decisive and is not ready to compromise on its national interests.
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
On Russia-India trade, the West's predictable hypocrisy
As murmurs grow in Washington and Brussels about targeting India with secondary sanctions for its purchase of discounted Russian oil, one thing becomes clear: The West is at risk of missing the forest for the trees. Yes, India buys Russian crude. But here's the inconvenient truth: Much of that oil is not for Indian consumption — it's being refined in India and then sold to Europe and the United States as diesel, jet fuel, and other products. In effect, the West is punishing India for solving a problem the West created — its own energy dependence on cheap Russian hydrocarbons, even after 2022. The Netherlands is the largest buyer, using the Rotterdam port as a major hub to redistribute Indian-refined diesel across Germany, France, and Belgium. Italy follows, importing significant quantities of diesel and jet fuel, often directly from Reliance and Nayara refineries. Greece and Spain also rank high, sourcing diesel and other middle distillates. Turkey, while technically straddling Europe and Asia, imports both for domestic use and re-export. Notably, the United States purchases Indian-refined jet fuel, diesel, and fuel oil, particularly for the Gulf Coast and East Coast markets. Other buyers include South Africa, Brazil, and Singapore. This hypocrisy does not go unnoticed. Worse, it threatens to drive away one of the most critical swing powers in the new global order, at a time when countering authoritarian aggression requires alignment, not alienation. Let's be clear: India did not invade Ukraine. Russia did. But trying to shift the costs of that war onto New Delhi is not only morally lazy — it's strategically self-defeating. India's increased imports of Russian crude are a result of cold economics, not ideological alignment. It buys deeply discounted oil, refines it efficiently, and resells it into global markets. This arbitrage has not only stabilised global energy prices but helped prevent runaway inflation in Europe and beyond. Moreover, oil revenues to Russia are already capped by the G7's own price mechanisms. To now sanction Indian banks, insurers, or energy traders for legally operating in this framework would signal a Western double standard: When it suits us, trade with Russia is tolerable; when others do it, it's punishable. This isn't diplomacy — it's coercion dressed up as morality. Want to help Ukraine? Go after Russia's real lifelines Cripple the Russian defense-industrial complex: Sanction third-party suppliers in China, the Gulf, and Central Asia who help Russia procure semiconductors, drones, and dual-use goods. Disrupt the military supply chain — not just the fuel tank. Cut off Russian payment systems: Crack down on Mir card networks, shadow banking through the UAE, and crypto-based circumvention routes. Russia's economy floats not just on oil, but on loopholes. Support energy transition, not energy tantrums: Instead of blaming India for refining Russian oil, invest in India's clean energy infrastructure. That's how you reduce global dependence on petro-states like Russia in the long run. India is a democracy. It's not perfect. No country is. But it is a pluralistic, rules-based society that is managing poverty, population, and polarisation at a scale unprecedented in human history. Pushing it toward an economic or diplomatic corner will not bring it closer to the West — it will push it toward strategic neutrality, or worse, estrangement. Ukraine's survival depends on strategic clarity, not performative pressure. Sanctioning India may score headlines, but will do little to hurt Putin. A smarter coalition would align on real choke points: Arms, tech, finance. Additionally, the West should give Ukraine the edge it needs through capabilities that cripple Russia's logistics and infrastructure. It should isolate Russia diplomatically by engaging swing states like Brazil, India, Indonesia, and South Africa with economic and climate partnerships that make alignment with Moscow costlier. This is how you defang Russia — not by punishing energy middlemen. Let's stop the reflexive finger-pointing and start asking the harder question: What will actually change Putin's calculus? Not more Western outrage — but a tighter, targeted strategy that unites rather than divides. India should be a partner in that effort — not its scapegoat. The writer serves as the Global Goodwill Ambassador for President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's office
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
25 minutes ago
- Business Standard
New Zealand: Indian students can work 25 hours/week under new visa rules
Indians studying in New Zealand or planning to head there soon have reason to be optimistic. On July 14, 2025, the New Zealand government unveiled its new International Education Going for Growth Plan, which will tweak immigration rules to attract more international students, while keeping academic quality and immigration compliance intact. As part of this plan, Immigration New Zealand (INZ) will implement several visa-related changes from November 3, 2025. Students can work up to 25 hours a week Currently, international students can work up to 20 hours a week during term time. That cap will now increase to 25 hours for eligible tertiary and secondary school students. The new 25-hour limit will apply automatically to all new student visas granted from November 3, even if the application was submitted before the rule came into effect. But those holding existing student visas will need to either apply for a variation of conditions or a new visa to take advantage of the extra five hours. School students in Years 12 and 13 will still need written permission from both a parent and their school to work these hours. Notably, many student visas already allow full-time work during official breaks and holidays. If this applies, students can wait until after the summer break to apply for the extra in-study work hours—so long as their current visa remains valid. There are currently 40,987 student visa holders in New Zealand with in-study work rights: < 29,790 visas expire on or before March 31, 2026 < 11,197 visas expire after that Not everyone is expected to apply for the additional five hours. Some students may be close to completing their studies, while others may prefer to wait until their next visa renewal to add the change and avoid extra fees. Broader work rights for exchange and Study Abroad students From November, all tertiary-level students on approved exchange or Study Abroad programmes will also be eligible for in-study work rights. This includes even short-term enrolments such as one-semester courses. Until now, these rights were more limited and depended on specific course types or lengths. Change in institution or course level? Apply again INZ also clarified that students will now need to apply for a new visa, not just a variation of conditions, if they decide to change their education provider or lower the level of their study. This move brings greater regulatory certainty and ensures that visa conditions reflect a student's most current enrolment. Surge in Indian enrolments New Zealand has been gaining traction among Indian students over the past year. According to New Zealand Education, international student enrolments from India rose 34% in the January–August 2024 period, reaching 10,640. That's up from 7,930 in the entire 2023 calendar year. 'New Zealand is steadily gaining significance as a preferred alternate study destination over the 'Big Four' countries,' Piyush Kumar, regional director for South Asia, Canada and Latin America at IDP Education told Business Standard. He added, 'Our IDP data also reflects this, with the number of female student enrolments doubling over the same timeframe. This growth can be attributed to its student-first policies and supportive, holistic education system.' Kumar pointed out that the government's decision to exempt Indian degree holders from qualification assessment and simplify the skilled migration route had added to the country's appeal. Strong university rankings bolster appeal All eight of New Zealand's universities are featured in the QS World University Rankings 2026: University of Auckland (#65) University of Otago (#197) Massey University (#230) Victoria University of Wellington (#240) University of Canterbury (#261) University of Waikato (#281) Lincoln University (#407) Auckland University of Technology (AUT) (#410) 'With its welcoming and supportive policies, as well as clear pathways for studying and working, New Zealand is quickly becoming an attractive option. Moreover, all eight New Zealand universities rank amongst the top 500 in the QS World University Rankings 2026,' said Kumar.
India.com
25 minutes ago
- India.com
‘Only PM Modi Works 100 Hours Week,' Narayana Murthy Heaps Praise On Prime Minister
New Delhi: During an in-flight conversation with BJP MP Tejasvi Surya, Infosys co-founder Narayana Murthy praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his work ethic, saying he's possibly the only person who works 100 hours a week. During a nearly two-hour Mumbai to Bengaluru flight, Bengaluru South MP Tejasvi Surya had an inspiring conversation with one of the IT industry's leading icons. Calling it a 'masterclass,' Mr. Surya shared that they discussed a wide range of topics — from technology and manufacturing to urban governance, youth upskilling, ethics, and leadership. Posting on X, Bengaluru South MP Tejasvi Surya shared his experience of meeting Infosys founder Narayana Murthy during a flight from Mumbai to Bengaluru. 'Had an inspiring conversation with the legendary NRN today on the way back to Bengaluru from Mumbai. NRN pioneered the Indian IT services sector, turning it into a global powerhouse. He created wealth for literally lakhs of middle-class families through Infosys,' Surya wrote. Had an inspiring conversation with the legendary NRN today on the way back to Bengaluru from Mumbai. NRN pioneered the Indian IT services sector, turning it into a global powerhouse. He created wealth for literally lakhs of middle class families through Infosys. From AI to… — Tejasvi Surya (@Tejasvi_Surya) July 15, 2025 He further added that their conversation touched on a wide range of topics — 'From AI to manufacturing, state of our cities to upskilling our youth to ethics and leadership – it was a 2 hour masterclass learning from him.' Mr. Surya said he ended the chat with a light remark: "I humorously quipped at the end of our conversation that I'll strive to meet his 70-hour-a-week target," referencing Mr. Murthy's earlier call for young Indians to embrace a stronger work ethic. "To which he laughed and said, 'The only person I know who probably works 100 hours a week is Prime Minister Modi!'" Murthy's comment was a callback to his much-talked-about statement last year, where he urged young Indians to work at least 70 hours a week to boost the nation's productivity. The remark had sparked a nationwide debate while some praised his dedication and work ethic, others raised concerns about burnout, stress, and setting unrealistic expectations.
