
The biggest problem with Macron's new smoking ban: the French
In France it is now illegal to smoke on beaches, in parks, at bus stops, near schools and at the entrances to libraries and sports centres. President Macron's stated goal is to produce a tobacco-free generation by 2032 and he is doing everything he can to stamp out public smoking in any place where children might be present.
There is, however, one factor that his government appears to have overlooked: the French.
This is a country with a historic disregard for authority where a third of working-age adults still smoke, just under a quarter of them every day. Casual smoking is creeping up and more French women smoke now than 50 years ago. In western Europe, cigarettes have become an increasingly rare sight, but between the Channel and the Mediterranean smoking remains a fact of life.
At least five French mayors went on record within days of the ban to say it was unenforceable.
An afternoon at a packed beach in the south of France last week showed why. Smokers dotted the Plage des Catalans in Marseille, while greater numbers simply avoided the ban by smoking on its the fringes: from rocks, café terraces opposite the beach and a stretch of concrete beside the loos.
Everyone was aware of the new rule, the first of its kind in Europe. No one, including the police, seemed to know exactly what it meant.
A loudspeaker boomed out a clear instruction, in French and then English: 'For those of you who want to smoke, you have to go on the concrete side of the beach.'
Confusion reigned. When retired brasserie owner Léa Abzar, 67, sat smoking on the concrete with her pet chihuahua, police arrived to tell her she had to go somewhere else.
'They told me that even up there you're not allowed,' she said, pointing to the promenade and street above the beach. 'Which means these days we're allowed to smoke at home, and that's it.' (The gendarmes seemed to be misinformed about this: there is nothing in the new law that bans smoking on pavements or highways.)
'It won't decrease anything at all,' she added, of the new restrictions on smoking. 'I can guarantee you. Even diseases don't make it decrease. I find it a shame that these people who lead us waste time making these kinds of laws when there are much more important things to deal with.'
Naïm Bessah, a lifeguard, told me that in 20 minutes on patrol he had stopped 'three or four' people smoking on the actual beach. Smoking had already been banned on Marseille's beaches anyway, he said, though people 'didn't respect it'.
He added: 'Since the new ban, if we see it, we stop people. But it's not our job.' His heart really didn't seem to be in it. Two minutes later I spotted him near the men's loos with his yellow lifeguard's T-shirt off, cigarette in hand.
Under the new law fines for infractions rise from €135 (£117) to €750 for repeat offenders, but I saw no fines at all being imposed by police on the beach. The closest shave was when a policeman dashed off towards a woman on the sand fiddling with a suspicious-looking object: a suspected cannabis joint. The woman claimed it was a cigarette and that she wasn't going to smoke it there. The police moved on.
Aurore Faust, 46, a carer from Marseille, stood with a cigarette just off the sand near steps to the road. She has been smoking for 20 years, is now on four or five a day and has no plans to quit. 'We will not stop, never,' she said — although she could see the merits of the beach ban because it will protect children.
Campaigners say the restrictions need to go further. François Torpart, from the National Committee Against Smoking, said it had pushed for café terraces to be included, a move that surveys show a majority of French people would actually support.
Torpart said in time the current 'first step' would make a difference. He cited the ban on smoking in restaurants and public transport in 2007, a year when Britain did the same. 'There were some of the same reservations, the same hesitations, such as how to enforce the regulations, [people saying] we cannot have the police intervene everywhere, etc,' he said. 'But the fact is that it worked well.'
In France it proved less effective than in other countries, though. Britain is currently bringing in some of the strictest anti-smoking rules in the world, in the form of Sir Keir Starmer's Tobacco and Vapes Bill now going through the Lords. It will ban children born since January 1, 2009, from ever buying cigarettes. It also includes a ban on smoking outside schools, hospitals and playgrounds, similar to the French law, although beaches are not included.
As it stands, however, France has all the same restrictions as Britain, but almost three times the number of smokers.
France is now joining the ranks of the few countries to have nationwide bans on smoking in certain outdoor public spaces. Mexico is one (beaches and parks), Singapore another (parks, bus stops, playgrounds and other locations). Finland bans smoking in areas primarily used by minors, such as daycare facilities and schools. Many Australian states and Canadian provinces have bans at beaches (Bondi Beach is smoke-free). In Spain and Italy, western Europe's next most smoker-full countries, lots of local councils have banned smoking on beaches. Some French ones already had, too.
Since the new ban came into force, it has been criticised by several local elected mayors, who in France have powers over policing. Dominique Cap, mayor of Plougastel-Daoulas, a peninsula community in Brittany, called the ban an 'absurd and very Parisian' decision.
In Marseille too, it looked that way, at least for now.
'If people want to smoke, they smoke,' said Remi Cozzolino from behind the counter of his tobacconist-newsagent facing the sea in front of Plage des Catalans.
Had the ban affected business? 'Not at all.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Post Office could hand ownership to staff amid review after Horizon scandal
Ministers are to consider handing over ownership of the Post Office to its operators after the Horizon IT scandal. The Department for Business and Trade (DBT) has published a green paper, starting the first big review of the scandal-plagued organisation in 15 years. The review, which will run until 6 October, follows the publication last week of the first part of the two-year public inquiry into the Horizon IT scandal. Ministers said that part of the review will include looking at the ownership model of the Post Office, which is ultimately controlled by the government, including the possibility of mutualisation. Ministers have previously met representatives of post office operators to discuss the possibility of handing ownership to the network branch managers who run its 11,500 outlets. 'This green paper marks the start of an honest conversation about what people want and need from their Post Office in the years ahead,' said Gareth Thomas, the post office minister. 'Post Offices continue to be a central part of our high streets and communities across the country. However, after 15 years without a proper review, and in the aftermath of the Horizon scandal, it's clear we need a fresh vision for the future.' About 1,000 post office operators were prosecuted by the Post Office between 1999 and 2015 because of faulty Horizon accounting software that made it look as though they had been committing fraud. The scandal, widely considered to be the most widespread miscarriage of justice in UK history, was the subject of the critically acclaimed ITV drama Mr Bates vs the Post Office, which aired last year and thrust the problem into the national spotlight. Bates has previously criticised the idea of mutualisation. 'Currently, the government subsidises it and will continue to have to support it. They can't just give it to the subpostmasters and say: 'Here you go, mate',' he said last year. In November, the Post Office announced it was to close up to 115 branches putting 2,000 jobs at risk. Nigel Railton, the Post Office chair, is cutting hundreds of staff jobs in order to add £250m annually to operators' remuneration. On Monday, the government also announced that it is to provide a further £118m subsidy to help the Post Office push through its restructure and transformation plans. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion The Communications Workers Union (CWU) criticised the award of the subsidy and said the Post Office and Royal Mail, which were split more than a decade ago, needed to be reunified. 'Successive governments have failed the Post Office, its workers and customers,' said a spokesperson for the CWU. 'And choosing to use government subsidies for planned redundancies, closures and so-called transformation plans that are nothing more than managed decline. The only way to build a successful future is to bring Royal Mail and the Post Office back together through a new joint venture ownership model.' The owner of the Royal Mail was bought by Czech tycoon Daniel Křetínský's EP Group in a £3.6bn deal that took the stock market listed business private earlier this year. The government said its green paper will provide the opportunity to work 'hand in hand' with post office operators and the public to ensure the company is 'put on a path to a strong and sustainable future'. 'We now have a once-in-a-decade opportunity to have a national conversation about the future of our post offices and their role in supporting communities across the UK,' said Neil Brocklehurst, the chief executive of the Post Office. According to the latest official figures, just over £1bn has been paid out in compensation to more than 7,300 claimants across the four redress schemes up to 2 June.


Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ukrainian 'draft dodgers' reveal how they avoided going to war
Three years and hundreds of thousands of casualties into Russia 's full-scale invasion, Ukraine's war-weary population still sees no end in sight. With Kyiv desperate for manpower and violent press-gangers roaming the streets, many fighting-age men are willing to do almost anything to dodge the draft. They fake diseases they don't have, bribe doctors for medical exemptions and even marry disabled women to secure a coveted carer's permit, all in hopes of stopping conscription officers from darkening their doors. Some go further still, slipping across rivers in dinghies and sneaking through forests to cross borders, only to wind up in Western Europe living off benefits meant for genuine refugees. MailOnline spoke to several Ukrainian men who openly confessed how, and why, they've managed to avoid being called up to serve - m en who, by their own admission, might well have fought and died on the front lines by now had they not done so. We also spoke to a lawyer building a new career as an 'anti-draft adviser', schooling clients on the myriad ways they can beat the military recruiters without stepping outside the confines of the law. Levko, 41, is the proud owner of an ID card which shows he is disabled - only it's not his. He claims to have found it in 2023 at a second-hand market and bought it for a few hundred hryvnia, less than five pounds. The original owner, whose portrait is on the card, bears little resemblance to Levko. But with a bit of effort that includes regularly dyeing his hair, he says that the permit is enough to fool conscription officers, and grants him a medical exemption from military service. Levko (pictured) lives each day in fear that one day, the conscription office will dig through their records and realise his fraud. If that happens, he will not only be shipped off to war, but will be slapped with a hefty fine - another fate he is keen to avoid. The 41-year-old, who works as a matchmaker, owns a marriage agency and enjoyed tidy profits before the war, arranging dates and marriages between Western men and Ukrainian women. But Russia's invasion has greatly hampered his business, not least because many women fled the country. 'I hate the Ukrainian government,' he said flatly. 'My ex-girl is now in Britain. I hate all the girls who went abroad. 'I'll join (the military) when they make women join… since they are more patriotic than men,' he quipped sarcastically. Besides his distaste for Zelensky's government, Levko wanted to avoid military service after hearing stories from friends who had been sent to fight. 'I know some people who have died in the military training,' he claims. 'One had epilepsy, but nobody knew how to care for him, so he was left to die.' He added that many prospective conscripts fear the treatment from their own military almost as much as the enemy. Watching a relative endure disease, illness, or old age can be a trying ordeal. But for Ukrainian fighting-age men, it is also a blessing. Artem (pictured), 48, is unemployed, but looks after his elderly mother at home in Kyiv. As a registered carer for his 85-year-old parent, he is exempt from service. Every few months, officials drop by to verify that he still lives with her, and a yearly trip to the hospital confirms that the old woman needs care. But when Russian helicopters soared over Ukrainian skies and tanks rolled across the border some 40 months ago, Artem was not sitting at his infirm mother's bedside - his brother was responsible for caring for the matriarch, meaning Artem himself was in line to be drafted. So, the family hatched a cunning plan to safeguard the fate of both sons. Fighting-age males were restricted from leaving the country, but as a registered carer, Artem's brother was briefly permitted to accompany his mother abroad. 'My brother's family were in Poland, and he travelled there with my mother,' Artem explained. 'The next day, my mother left him in Poland and travelled back to Ukraine alone.' As soon as she stepped foot back on Ukrainian soil, Artem collected her, drove to Kyiv and immediately registered himself as her responsible carer, thus exempting him from being called up. Artem said that fears for his personal safety and his poor physical condition were paramount to his decision to avoid the draft. 'I have some problems with my back and so on, but I could serve. Now I'm safe.' Although his method for avoiding the draft is technically legal, he made it clear that many go to great lengths to obtain a golden 'carer' permit - and said he is all too happy to help them. 'You can do anything to get a deferment… find a disabled woman, psychologically problematic, get married and you're her carer,' he laughed. 'I am also trying to help those who don't know the legal processes or how to deal with the police. When they approach me, I ask them to give me their name and ID card number, which they are obliged to do under Article 32 (of the Ukrainian Law on National Police). 'If not, police can misinform you, lie to you about your rights.' Weeks after speaking with MailOnline, Artem was arrested by conscription officers and sent to military training despite his status as a carer. His associates plan to lodge a legal challenge, but we no longer know where Artem is. Andriy (pictured), 38, was previously a journalist but at the outbreak of war quickly switched careers and now works as a mathematics teacher. Teachers at schools and universities are included in the list of occupations that are partially exempt from the draft. Other key industries whose employees are 'booked', meaning non-liable to serve, include the railways, energy sector, civil service and firefighters. For schoolteachers, a one-year deferral from mobilisation is easy to attain, but they are not guaranteed permanent exemption from service. Becoming a teacher, however, remains one of the most popular methods for men looking to legally avoid conscription. Andriy said that a violent run-in with a conscription officer encouraged him not to take any risks. 'They smashed my phone when I tried to record and called me rude names,' he said. This reflects a common mood amongst those avoiding military service - often they are supportive of the cause yet dislike the conscription officers and police. 'Often I make videos of the police when they do document checks - often the police aren't checking the documents properly, they can just seize you.' But the guilt of not serving has driven Andriy to support Ukraine's efforts elsewhere. 'It is morally difficult […] from the first days of the war, I helped the armed forces of Ukraine. I travelled to the newly liberated territories, bringing humanitarian aid to people.' Ihor (pictured), 35, was not content with any of the aforementioned approaches to avoid the military call-up. Instead, he resorted to the most secure option, but one that comes with the greatest risk - fleeing the country altogether. He explained how he left his home to track west, crossing the Dniester river in a rubber dinghy before slipping across the border into Moldova. Ihor refused to give specifics of his journey, only to say that he eventually managed to reach Ireland. He now claims to be living off benefit payments in state-supported accommodation, though it is unclear how long he will manage to continue doing so as the Irish government declared it was shuttering some housing facilities over the summer. When asked to explain his reasons for leaving, he became jittery and refused to give details answers. 'War makes you weird psychologically, I would like to be normal,' he said, adding that he did not want 'to fight for oligarchs and US money'. When we pressed further, he refused to speak, declaring that journalists should 'focus on Zelensky and reasons for the war' and rolled back his earlier claims. 'I am here legally because I came here on a deferment from the military,' he said. Under the EU-wide Temporary Protection Status, all Ukrainians who have left the country have a right to housing support, work, healthcare and social benefits. But individual countries' support for Ukrainian refugees varies, with Poland no longer providing welfare to men of fighting age. 'There should be no financial incentives for avoiding the draft in Ukraine,' Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski urged last year. In April 2024, Ukraine also stopped offering consular support to fighting age men.


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Post Office transformation effort gets £118m funding boost
Why you can trust Sky News Efforts to turn around the crisis-hit Post Office have been given a £118m funding boost as the government continues to consider a new ownership structure. Sky News revealed in October last year, as the Horizon IT scandal inquiry neared its conclusion, that a government-commissioned review was to explore the idea of a mutual model. It would effectively see ownership transferred from the government to sub-postmasters, creating a John Lewis Partnership-style structure, if such an option was to be followed through. It's being considered as a way to return public and postmaster trust to the Post Office. The options are to be the subject of a 12 week consultation on the organisation's future. The new £118m subsidy package was being made available, the Department for Business and Trade said, to fund the transformation plan and further investment. "This funding will protect key services, including access to cash deposits and withdrawals as well as key government services, such as passport applications and the DVLA, alongside helping the Post Office deliver cost-saving measures in its Transformation Plan, part of the New Deal for Postmasters", the statement said. Post Office minister Gareth Thomas added: "Post Offices continue to be a central part of our high streets and communities across the country. "However, after 15 years without a proper review, and in the aftermath of the Horizon scandal, it's clear we need a fresh vision for its future. "This Green Paper marks the start of an honest conversation about what people want and need from their Post Office in the years ahead." 2:55 But the general secretary of the Communication Workers Union, Dave Ward, accused the department of lacking sincerity. He responded: "Successive governments have failed the Post Office, its workers and customers - and choosing to use government subsidies for planned redundancies, closures and so-called transformation plans that are nothing more than managed decline. "This Labour Government are unashamedly doing exactly the same as the Tories did - managing the politics of the Post Office, prioritising further cost-cutting and offering no vision for its future." The update was provided as sub-postmasters await further conclusions from the Horizon IT inquiry. The first volume, published last week, highlighted the impact of false theft and false accounting accusations made against at least 1,000 postmasters. It concluded that 13 people may have taken their own lives after being falsely accused of wrongdoing, based on evidence from the IT system that the Post Office and developers Fujitsu knew could be faulty. At the same time, inquiry chair Sir Wyn Williams recommended further action to improve compensation outcomes amid years of frustration over delays and wrangling over the sums due.