As Jake Tapper's Biden Book Promotion Faces Criticism, CNN's Ratings Drop For His Show and Others
But the book's release, along with Tapper and Thompson's extensive media tour to promote it in the last month, has not helped the CNN star's ratings — or the shows that follow his.
In fact, viewership for 'The Lead with Jake Tapper' suffered a noticeable year-over-year drop-off in May, posting its worst month since August 2015, according to Nielsen. And the three shows that follow his — 'Erin Burnett Upfront,' 'Anderson Cooper 360' and 'The Source With Kaitlan Collins' — all took significant hits as well, with each seeing its viewership drop 18% or more compared to a year ago.
The ratings drop-off coincided with Tapper and Thompson's tour to promote 'Original Sin.' The book debuted in the top spot on The New York Times bestseller list, selling about 54,000 copies in its first week, and it currently ranks as the sixth-best seller on Amazon. Tapper's hosts on other CNN shows also heavily promoted the book.
It was a tough month for CNN overall. After seeing its ratings rebound following a viewer exodus after the 2024 election, the channel lost that momentum in May, posting its second-lowest weekday primetime and total-day viewership ever; only December 2024 was worse.
Here is a look at the ratings:
'The Lead With Jake Tapper,' per Nielsen data, dropped 25% from 701,000 viewers in May 2024 to 525,000 viewers last month. Cooper and Burnett's shows each lost more than 100,000 viewers compared to a year ago, dropping 18% year-over-year; and Collins' show took a 24% hit compared to a year ago, going from 611,000 viewers to 462,000.
Tapper referred TheWrap to CNN's PR team when reached for comment. 'The award-winning program 'The Lead with Jake Tapper' reaches broad global audiences across CNN, CNN International and Max's streaming platform,' a CNN spokesperson told TheWrap. 'No single metric can capture the true reach and impact of a program driving the national conversation.'
CNN shows like Tapper's are available on Max for streaming, which is not counted by Nielsen, although the channel did not share how much that may have boosted May ratings.
MSNBC did not benefit from any disenchanted CNN viewers moving over to their channel, with its ratings dropping 24% month-over-month between April and May.
Tapper and Thompson have made headlines while promoting the book — perhaps most notably when Tapper told Piers Morgan last week that the cover-up of Biden's cognitive decline was 'maybe even worse than Watergate.'
During an interview on his own channel, Tapper said there was was 'not enough' coverage of Biden's health issues, including from himself. And while appearing on Megyn Kelly's show last month, Tapper said he called Lara Trump to apologize to her, after he ripped her in 2020 for claiming Biden was showing signs of cognitive decline. 'She saw something that I did not see at the time,' Tapper said. '100 percent. And I own that.'
The media blitz hasn't appeared to help CNN's viewership, though, and has opened up the network, and Tapper, to criticism from both sides of the political aisle.
Tapper and Thompson's mea culpas about the press' failings, and their own, haven't mollified conservatives, who have used the reporting in the book as evidence that the media downplayed Biden's health in an effort to prop up his candidacy, which Tapper has denied. 'Original Sin' has also faced attacks from the left, accusing Tapper of focusing on Biden when there are more pressing issues regarding the current administration.
Weighing in on 'The Left Hook' podcast, writer Wajahat Ali described the book by saying, 'While the Trump Administration is galloping towards fascism and arguing to end birthright citizenship, corporate media remain complicit cowards by focusing on Joe Biden's age.'The post As Jake Tapper's Biden Book Promotion Faces Criticism, CNN's Ratings Drop For His Show and Others appeared first on TheWrap.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
9 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Universal Processing Celebrates Grand Opening of New Headquarters, Reinforcing Commitment to Empowering Underserved Businesses
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 2, 2025) - Universal Processing (uP), a leading financial technology company dedicated to empowering underserved businesses across America, is looking towards the future after a star-studded grand opening of its Times Square headquarters. The theme of the night was 'Brick by Brick', a celebration of the people and partnerships that have shaped the company's journey. uP was proud to host many of the people who have been integral to the company's success, and were honored that some of New York's most well-known and influential politicians stopped by the event to make speeches. [ This image cannot be displayed. Please visit the source: ] Image 1 To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: Former Governor George Pataki had this to say about uP's contributions during the COVID-19 pandemic: 'I want to thank Universal Processing, because without what you did during that terrible time, many of the businesses that New York counts on wouldn't be here today.' It was an honor for uP to be recognized by the former governor, as during the pandemic - when Asian-owned businesses across the city were hit hardest - uP stepped in as a lifeline. The company offered multilingual support, financial relief, PPE, and digital tools to help stabilize their communities. [ This image cannot be displayed. Please visit the source: ] Image 2 To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: Former Governor David Patterson also stopped by to applaud uP founder and CEO, Saint Hung: 'For the leadership and all that you have done, for the efforts you waged, and your expansion of concepts that I think is bringing more business to the area and to areas around here…you've done a marvelous job and we look forward to bigger and better things.' [ This image cannot be displayed. Please visit the source: ] Image 3 To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: New York State Senator Stephen Chan crafted a powerful metaphor for Hung's leadership of the company: 'Everybody here is a cog in this timepiece and everybody must be in their place and work in order for our community, our society, our city to tick,' said Mr. Chan. 'Saint is the driving force in that timepiece. He is the conductor of this symphony, and if everybody plays their part correctly, that's what is going to make it sound good. That's what is going to make it beautiful.' 'Saint Hung is committed to growing small and medium-sized businesses in New York,' said Chairman of the New York State Republican Party, Ed Cox. 'These new headquarters in New York City are about the growth of Universal Processing and about Mr. Hung's and Universal Processing's commitment to New York City. Thank you Mr. Hung.' In a surprise move, New York State Assemblymember Lester Chang awarded Universal Processing with a New York State Assembly Citation. 'I applaud you because you had the foresight, vision, and optimism to create this business,' said Assemblymember Chang. 'Writing a citation for me is easy, but earning a citation is the real work.' [ This image cannot be displayed. Please visit the source: ] Image 4 To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: 'We know in New York State that it's the small businesses that are the economic engine that drive this great state,' said New York State Assemblymember Al Taylor, 'so thank you for investing, thank you for being a risk taker.' As uP continues to be recognized for its achievements in the fintech space and expand its service offerings, the company remains focused on its mission to democratize access to fintech solutions, helping more businesses move 'uP'. The new headquarters in Times Square marks a significant milestone in this journey, providing a platform for continued growth and impact. It is also particularly meaningful to founder and CEO Saint Hung, whose father - an architect - worked on Philip Johnson's Times Square Redevelopment Project in 1989. 'For me to come back here and stake my claim to Times Square, it's been an effort 36 years in the making,' said Hung. For media inquiries, event details, or partnership opportunities, please contact: Yin Yu uP PR Team [email protected] About Universal Processing Universal Processing is an award-winning fintech and payment solutions provider, specializing in serving underserved businesses and partner channels with full-service payment processing. As a certified Minority-Owned Business, uP is committed to providing transparent, secure, and scalable payment solutions with 24/7 multilingual support. Learn more at To view the source version of this press release, please visit
Engadget
10 minutes ago
- Engadget
Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' is a middle finger to US solar energy
The so-called 'Big, Beautiful Bill' will, if passed, make sweeping changes to the US' clean energy market. While some of the worst provisions affecting the industry were stripped out during Senate proceedings earlier this week, it's still pretty bad. In fact, the current language of the bill might as well be a middle figure to the domestic solar manufacturing industry. As it stands, the bill guts many of the clean energy programs of Joe Biden's signature 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. That includes killing off incentives for domestic and utility-scale solar power as well as the Clean Electricity Production Credit . Even worse, the bill axes the Domestic Content bonus that incentivized the use of US-made gear. There were a number of provisions that did not survive its journey through the Senate, like the excise tax on renewable energy. As CBS News reported, the levy would have imposed an additional charge on projects that used materials from foreign countries. As CNN explained, this would have cut renewable energy projects in favor of extending the life of coal and gas turbine plants. Rob Gardner is Vice President of Congressional and Regulatory Affairs for SEMA, the Solar Energy Manufacturers for America coalition. He walked me through the bill, explaining the effects of the changes for the US solar industry. 'A positive is that it maintains production tax credits for manufacturers of clean energy components,' he said. One tweak from an earlier version of the bill was the speed at which the existing tax credits would be withdrawn. As it stands, projects that are already approved will qualify for the present regime, as will any project beginning construction before June 2026. 'Basically, a year after enactment [companies have] to begin construction on utility-scale solar projects to receive the full amount of the credit,' said Gardner. And, according to § 70512 (4)(a) those plants will need to be 'placed in service' no later than December 31, 2027. The bigger issue, however, is that the bill creates 'uncertainty for long-term demand for US products,' according to Gardner. Put simply, American-made solar panels are more expensive than their Chinese counterparts due to higher manufacturing costs. By removing the incentives, including the Domestic Content bonus, the US is opening the door for Chinese-made alternatives. Gardner added 'after the tax credits that incentivize domestic production and consumption expire, you will see a flood of Chinese product [in the market.]' The US's Environmental Information Administration projects that the US' total domestic energy consumption will grow by almost two percent in the next year. A slowdown in new energy additions is the last thing the US needs, especially as renewables made up almost 90 percent of all new power generation capacity in 2024. But it's likely that even with all of the changes in the bill, solar will remain the biggest technology used to implement new power generation capacity. Abigail Ross Hopper, CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association pulls no punches in her statement . She said the bill 'undermines the very foundation of America's manufacturing comeback.' Hopper added that 'families will face higher electric bills, factories will shut down, Americans will lose their jobs and our electric grid will grow weaker.' Jason Grumet, CEO of the American Clean Power Association described the bill as a 'step backward' for American energy policy and an 'intentional effort' to undermine 'one of the fastest-growing sources of electric power.' Environmental groups also believe the bill's passing marks a dark day in the world's fight against climate change. Greenpeace USA Deputy Climate Program Director John Noël, said in a statement that 'this is a vote that will live in infamy' for its role in 'doling out fossil fuel industry handouts.' Environmental Defense Fund's Vice President for Political and Government Affairs Joanna Slaney agreed. She said that the bill is 'effectively cutting off supply of cheap energy right when the US needs it most.' In contrast, the bill offers a '10-year reprieve from paying a fee on wasteful methane pollution,' a gas significantly more harmful than carbon dioxide to the environment. Research by clean energy company Cleanview suggests the bill may jeopardize up to 600GW of new renewable energy capacity. This is because of the tight deadlines the bill imposes to qualify for the existing credits, which again, need to begin construction before June 2026. That 600GW figure includes solar farms and battery storage projects in California and Texas that would need to be rushed to get working.
Time Magazine
38 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Sean Combs Acquitted of Sex Trafficking and Racketeering
Sean 'Diddy' Combs, the music mogul whose trial garnered global attention, has been acquitted of sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy. The jury found Combs guilty on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution (a federal felony), one in connection with his ex-girlfriend, musician Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura, and another in connection with his ex-girlfriend who testified under the pseudonym "Jane." Upon hearing the verdict, Combs—who had pleaded not guilty to all charges—could be seen putting his hands together in a prayer stance and mouthing 'thank you, thank you' to the jurors, according to court lead lawyer, Marc Agnifilo, has requested that his client be released ahead of sentencing, in light of him being found "not guilty" of sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy. The court is adjourning for a few hours while the judge considers this. The prosecution has said that Combs faces up to 20 years in prison (the two transportation convictions carry a maximum sentence of 10 years each) but it will be down to the judge to decide how long he serves. On Tuesday, the jury revealed they had reached a verdict on all but one count—the racketeering conspiracy charge. They said there were members with "unpersuadable opinions on both sides." As a result, the jury retired for the day, before resuming deliberations on Wednesday morning. "We have reached a verdict on all counts," the jury wrote in a note at 9:52 a.m. ET on Wednesday. Combs could be seen smiling at his family as he entered the courtroom. The stunning verdict comes after around seven weeks of emotional, graphic testimony from multiple what to know about the case against Combs. What were the accusations against Diddy? Combs was arrested in September, after many people came forward with physical and sexual abuse allegations against him. The federal investigation into Combs that led to his arrest was spurred in part by a civil lawsuit filed in 2023 by his ex-partner, Cassie, born Casandra Ventura, who alleged that he had physically abused and raped her. Ventura and Combs reached a settlement a day after she filed her suit, but Combs denied the allegations. Then, in May 2024, CNN aired CCTV footage in which Combs can be seen punching and kicking Ventura in a Los Angeles hotel hallway in 2016. After the footage was released, Combs admitted to assaulting Ventura in a video posted on Instagram. The federal indictment against Combs alleges that he manipulated and forced women to participate in what he called 'freak-offs,' in which he would allegedly force victims to engage in sexual activities with male sex workers, often giving the women drugs to keep them 'obedient and compliant.' Combs also frequently recorded the 'freak-offs,' according to the indictment. The indictment additionally accuses the music mogul of 'creating a criminal enterprise' that committed many crimes, including sex trafficking, forced labor, and kidnapping. The indictment details various incidents of alleged abuse dating back to 2008. Other allegations separate from the federal indictment go back years earlier, with multiple accusers saying in civil lawsuits against Combs that he assaulted or abused them in the 1990s. More than 50 civil lawsuits alleging abuse perpetrated by Combs have been filed against the music mogul. The accusers include other former romantic partners, as well as young artists, aspiring entertainers, and many men and women who say they encountered Combs at parties or clubs. A number of them were under the age of 18 at the time of the alleged incidents. Combs has denied the allegations, saying in a December 2023 statement after a fourth lawsuit was filed against him: 'Let me be absolutely clear: I did not do any of the awful things being alleged. I will fight for my name, my family and for the truth.' What charges did he face? Combs was indicted on federal charges of sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, and transportation to engage in prostitution. Months after an initial three-count indictment, he was later charged with an additional count of sex trafficking and an additional count of transportation to engage in prostitution. Combs now faces 10 years in prison for each count of transportation to engage in prostitution. (He was found guilty on two counts). Before closing arguments began, prosecutors said in a letter to the judge overseeing the case that they would withdraw some of the criminal allegations against Combs in an effort to 'streamline' instructions given to the jurors prior to deliberations, USA Today reported, citing court documents it reviewed. The allegations in question were related to the racketeering charge, and involved claims that Combs attempted kidnapping and arson and aided and abetted sex trafficking, according to the news outlet. In their closing arguments, however, prosecutors appeared to reference the arson and kidnapping allegations, according to the Associated Press. The prosecution did not drop any of the charges Combs faced. What happened during the trial? Prosecutors called many witnesses—including a male escort who said he was hired to participate in the 'freak-offs,' Ventura's friends and mother, and federal investigators—to the stand. Their case focused on the testimony of three women, including Ventura. The defense didn't call any witnesses to the stand, and Combs himself didn't testify. His lawyers claimed that all the sex being discussed during the trial was consensual. Ventura, who was almost nine months pregnant at the time she took the stand, cried as she recounted the 'freak-offs' that she said Combs pressured her to participate in, The New York Times reported. She said during her testimony that the 'freak-offs' lasted anywhere from 36 hours to four days, and she described being subjected to unwanted sexual activity. Once, she testified, an escort urinated into her mouth until she began to choke and raised her hands, according to the Times. She also described the 2016 incident at the Los Angeles hotel, as well as other times she alleges she was physically and sexually abused by Combs. While cross examining her, Combs's lawyers pointed to messages between Ventura and Combs, arguing that she had voluntarily participated in the 'freak-offs,' according to the Times. But Ventura insisted that she participated only because she had been going along with Combs's requests and that she had been afraid of violent retaliation. She also testified that she and Combs had an opiate dependency during their relationship, the Times reported. Ventura said during her testimony that she received $20 million from Combs to settle her civil suit, but she said, 'I'd give that money back if I never had to have freak-offs,' according to the Times. Multiple other witnesses reportedly testified that they saw or heard Combs beating Ventura. Another woman, who testified under the pseudonym Mia, also took the stand, the Times reported. Mia began working for Combs in 2009, and held various roles in the eight years she worked for him. During her testimony, she described a moment when she had been sleeping in a room in Combs's home; she said he penetrated her without her consent, according to the Times. She described another incident in which she alleges she was forced to perform oral sex on him. She testified that she was afraid of retaliation, and that she felt like it was impossible to say no to him, the Times reported. 'I couldn't tell him no about a sandwich—I couldn't tell him no about anything,' she said, according to the Times. During her testimony, Mia also described an incident in which she said she witnessed Combs attacking Ventura. A third woman, who went by the pseudonym Jane, took the stand and recounted her relationship with Combs, according to the Times. She dated the music mogul from 2021 until he was arrested in September, and said that what had been an intense relationship became a series of incidents involving unwanted sex with male escorts. She described one incident in June 2024 in which the two got into an argument that she said turned into a physical altercation that left her with a black eye and welts on her forehead, the Times reported. She testified that Combs told her to 'put some ice on it and put an outfit on' before offering her an Ecstasy pill and instructing her to have sex with a male escort he had invited to come over, according to the Times. Federal investigators also took the stand, describing the items seized during a raid on Combs's home in Los Angeles, including guns, drugs, about 200 bottles of baby oil, and roughly 900 bottles of Astroglide, the Times reported. At one point during the trial, the prosecution showed the jury clips from videos of the 'freak-offs,' which were taken from electronic devices that Ventura had shared with federal investigators, according to the Times. The videos are sealed, so the public and reporters couldn't view them; instead, jurors viewed the videos on screens and listened with headphones. In its cross-examination, the defense selected other clips of those videos to show the jury, claiming that those clips are 'powerful evidence that the sexual conduct in this case was consensual and not based on coercion,' the Times reported. Ventura's and Jane's testimonies were central to both the prosecution and defense's closing arguments on Friday. Speaking for nearly five hours, prosecutor Christy Slavik argued that Combs had coerced the women to participate in 'freak-offs' through threats, violence, and blackmail, and portrayed them as victims of forced labor, The Washington Post reported. 'You do not need to find that all of the freak-offs or even the majority of freak-offs that he had with [Ventura] or Jane were the product of force or coercion,' Slavik said, according to the Post, telling the jury that 'if there was one time, one single freak-off, when the defendant knew or recklessly disregarded that [Ventura] or Jane was participating because of his lies, his threats or his violence then that's it. He's guilty.' The defense, meanwhile, argued that the women were consenting participants in the freak-offs. 'The evidence, I think, is overwhelming that Cassie wanted to do this,' Combs's attorney Marc Agnifilo said during his nearly four-hour closing, the Post reported. At one point, Agnifilo called the abusive relationship between Combs and Ventura 'a great modern love story,' according to the Post. Jane, he said, may be 'regretting' joining the freak-offs, but Agnifilo argued that 'regret is not the same as intent at the time,' according to the Post. In a rebuttal that lasted a little over an hour, prosecutor Maurene Comey dismissed the defense's arguments as 'excuse after excuse for inexcusable criminal behavior,' the Post into the high-profile trial, a juror was dismissed after Judge Arun Subramanian said there were 'inconsistencies' in how the juror described where he lived, according to AP. 'Taking these all together, the record raised serious concerns as to the juror's candor and whether he shaded answers to get on and stay on the jury,' Subramanian said. Combs's lawyers had argued against the removal, voicing concerns about replacing the juror, a Black man, with an alternate juror who is white.
