Milano Unica trade show records 10% rise in international visitors
The share of international visitors at the show, which presented the Fall/Winter 2026-27 collections of premium fabrics and accessories for men, women and children, was 45% of the total. The number of exhibitors too was up from last edition, to 735, driven by an 8.7% increase in European exhibitors.
'Almost all the main markets for Italian exports of fabrics and accessories, both in the EU and outside the EU, have responded positively. While the results, which I hope will be positive, will be seen in 2026, the satisfactory attendance figures of foreign buyers, a fact confirmed by the extensive positive feedback I gathered among fellow exhibitors, makes us look to the future with moderate optimism,' said Simone Canclini, president of Milano Unica.
'The exceptional results we have achieved in this edition of the show are the fruit of our team work, (..) and they confirm the strategic role Milano Unica plays in supporting [Italy's] textile and fashion industries, evident also in the partnership with the MarediModa show,' said Massimo Mosiello, managing director of Milano Unica.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
EU trade ministers discuss €72 billion retaliatory tariffs on US goods
EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič presented EU trade ministers gathered in Brussels for an extraordinary meeting on Monday a list of €72 billion worth of US products to be included in a retaliatory tariff drive, as Washington's pressure ramped up over the weekend with the threat of 30% tariffs on EU imports starting on 1 August. 'We must be prepared for all outcomes, including if necessary, well-considered proportionate measures to restore balance in our transatlantic relationship,' Šefčovič said, adding: 'Today the Commission is sharing with the member states the proposal for the second list of goods, accounting of some €72 billion worth of US Imports. They will now have a chance to discuss it.' The list proposed by the Commission, which has been reduced to €72 billion from €95 billion following consultations with EU industries and member states, still needs to be formally adopted by the member states. It targets a wide range of products, including US-made aeroplanes and bourbon. Last Saturday, after weeks of negotiations, US President Donald Trump published on Truth Social a letter sent to the European Commission threatening to impose 30% tariffs on EU imports if no deal is reached by 1 August. Last week, negotiations appeared to have entered the final stretch, with the EU having reluctantly agreed to a baseline tariff of 10% on its imports. Sector-specific exemptions were still being negotiated, with the EU having secured 0% on aircraft and spirits, and some US tariffs just above 10% on agricultural products. 'We were very very close to an agreement in principle,' Danish foreign affairs minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen regretted. The US currently imposes tariffs of 50% on EU steel and aluminium, 25% on cars, and 10% on all EU imports. According to an EU diplomat, EU retaliation could also include export controls on aluminium scrap, which the US needs. But while the EU is flexing its muscles, it continues to prioritise negotiation. 'We remain convinced that our transatlantic relationship deserves a negotiated solution, one that leads to renewed stability and cooperation,' Maroš Šefčovič said before announcing he had a call planned with his US counterparts on Monday late afternoon. On Saturday, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced a delay in the implementation of an initial retaliatory measure targeting €21 billion worth of US products, which had been suspended until Tuesday. According to the same EU diplomat, a meeting of EU ambassadors had originally decided to postpone it until the end of the year, but Trump's new announcements have made these countermeasures more urgent. They have therefore been postponed until 1 August. Anti-coercion instrument Behind the show of unity displayed on Monday by member states, diplomats are however well aware that complications will arise once a deal with the US is on the table. 'Let's be realistic, we will all have different interpretations,' an official from a member state told Euronews, admitting that once a deal is reached some countries will push for strong retaliation while others will want to avoid escalation, depending on which of their strategic sectors is most hit by the US. France continues to advocate a hard line toward the US, eager to put all the tools at the EU's disposal on the table, including the use of the anti-coercion instrument — the 'nuclear option' of EU trade defence, adopted in 2023. 'This pressure, deliberately applied by the US president in recent days and weeks, is straining our negotiating capacity and must lead us to show that Europe is a power,' French Trade Minister Laurent Saint-Martin said on arrival at the Council. 'Europe is a power when it knows how to demonstrate its ability to respond," Saint-Martin added. 'The US has escalation dominance,' a second EU diplomat told Euronews. On Sunday, von der Leyen ruled out use of the anti-coercion instrument for the time being. 'The anti-coercion is created for extraordinary situations,' she said, adding: 'We are not there yet.' The tool would allow the EU to withdraw licences and intellectual property rights from foreign companies, including US tech giants.
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Elon Musk's X hit with complaint over use of personal data for ads
Elon Musk's social media platform X has been hit with a formal complaint because of alleged breaches of the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA): the platform appears to have used sensitive personal data for targeted advertising. The complaint is filed by nine civil society organisations including European Digital Rights (EDRi), AI Forensics and Centre for Democracy and Technology Europe (CDT). It comes after evidence compiled by AI Forensics on the basis of X's Ad Repository, found that 'major brands as well as public and financial institutions engaged in targeted online advertising', based on special categories of personal data, such as political opinions, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and health conditions. Under the DSA, which entered into force for the largest online platforms – which includes X – in late 2023, platforms are prohibited from offering targeted advertising based on profiling using these special categories of data. AI Forensics uncovered evidence, for example, that 'X allowed Total Energies, the multinational energy and petroleum company, to run ads on its platform excluding users who had engaged with keywords related to ecologist political figures,' the complaint said. In addition, fast-food chain McDonalds could run ads 'excluding X users who had engaged with keywords related to McDonalds' own trade union as well as antidepressants and suicide'. The organisations call on the national Digital Services Coordinators and the European Commission to investigate the potential breach. The Commission began an investigation into X under the DSA in December 2023. In preliminary findings published last summer, the EU executive concluded that blue checkmarks used by the platforms are deceptive and that it falls short on transparency and accountability requirements. X has had the opportunity to reply in writing. The investigation is still pending.
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
What's at stake in the new EU long-term budget?
Think of any EU policy you care about or benefit from, as a citizen, politician, or stakeholder. Whether it's funding Ukraine's reconstruction, boosting the continent's competitiveness, or maintaining farm subsidies, all of it ties back to one foundational element: the EU's long-term budget. That process begins in earnest this Wednesday, when the European Commission presents its first proposal for what is known in Brussels jargon as the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), covering the period from 2028 to 2034. Behind almost every major fight in Brussels, there's a battle over money. And this is the mother of them all. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has promised a comprehensive overhaul of the EU budget to make it simpler, more effective, and better aligned with strategic priorities. Translating that ambition into actual numbers—especially when it comes to funding areas like defence, which the treaties currently prohibit—will be the start of many difficult negotiations with EU leaders and MEPs. Meanwhile, traditional programmes that may no longer be viewed as top priorities could face deep cuts, sparking fierce resistance. A masterclass in secrecy The lead-up to this MFF proposal has been marked by an extraordinary level of secrecy. Few details have leaked, most of them deliberately and only at a very final stage in the process. This cloak of confidentiality is one of the most successful examples of von der Leyen's consolidation of power and a testament to the control wielded by her powerful chief of staff, Bjoern Seibert. Commission insiders describe a system of 'compartmentalisation' akin to methods used in intelligence operations, where individuals only have access to the information strictly necessary for their tasks. Within the Commission, this has meant that discussions about the budget have taken place in isolated groups, particularly in high-level 'chef' meetings involving Commissioners' cabinets and directorate-generals. A senior EU source told Euronews that most of these discussions occurred in silos, with each group unaware of what others were working on, and especially in the dark about the figures for each fund. 'The truth is: numbers will go directly to the College of Commissioners [tomorrow]. Only like three people know about them,' the source revealed. While Commission staff have been working on structure and governance issues of the funds, which couldn't prevent these from being leaked, details on actual funding levels remain tightly guarded. Two key elements The current MFF for 2021–2027 stands at €1.2 trillion, equivalent to about 1% of the EU's GDP (not including post-pandemic recovery funds). Few expect this figure to change dramatically. Instead, the focus will be on spending smarter and prioritising better. Initially, the Commission considered structuring the next MFF around three major pillars: one for national envelopes covering agriculture and cohesion funds; another for competitiveness, innovation, and strategic investment; and a third consolidating all external instruments. While insiders suggest that some adjustments have been made since then, the drive for radical simplification remains intact. 'Still, expect surprises,' one Commission source said. The current 7-year budget has already reduced the number of funding programmes from 58 to 37 in the name of streamlining. Yet the Commission still sees room for further consolidation, and one major question is how drastic this simplification will be. The other is how far the Commission can go in increasing its flexibility to reallocate funds. Today, the vast majority of the EU budget is pre-allocated to specific programmes, leaving little room for rapid response or discretionary spending. The EU does have mechanisms to address emergencies and unforeseen events, but their size is limited: around €21 billion, just a small fraction of the total MFF. The Commission cannot unilaterally shift large sums from one policy area to another without formal revisions, which require the approval of both the European Parliament and the Council. That rigidity is something the new budget proposal will try to address, as enhancing the EU's ability to course-correct in real time has become a top priority (as shown by the mid-term review of the current MFF). Funds to watch Among the most hotly debated issues will be how to fund Ukraine, how to address defence spending despite legal constraints, and whether to introduce new common debt instruments (considering the EU still has to repay its pandemic borrowing). Nordic countries, for example, have pointed out that if von der Leyen avoids debt-based solutions, some member states may push to introduce it anyway. But what will really draw attention this week are the proposed funds themselves. Leaks suggest that a new European Competitiveness Fund will consolidate into a single instrument up to 12 existing programmes, including: Horizon Europe, the EU's flagship research fund; the recently created EU4Health programme; and the LIFE programme for environmental and climate action. Another innovation appears to be something called 'National and Regional Partnerships,' a working title that has surfaced in multiple drafts, and that will be supported by a single "European Economic, Territorial, Social, Rural and Maritime Sustainable Prosperity and Security Fund." This would group together the funds under shared management, namely the agricultural subsidies and the policy to tackle the socio-economic gap between the EU's poorest and richest regions, known as cohesion. With these two funds accounting for the bulk of the EU budget, the expected merging of their structures could have profound implications—not only for governance and oversight, but also for how money is distributed across member states. A tangle of joint programmes will be replaced with 27 national plans specific to agriculture and cohesion, each reflecting EU-wide priorities while tailoring implementation locally. But this raises thorny questions about who controls the funds and how priorities are set. One thing that's likely to remain intact is the European Social Fund, which supports anti-poverty efforts and vulnerable groups. Socialists in the European Parliament claimed this as a key win in exchange for backing von der Leyen's bid for a second term—though in truth, the fund is enshrined in EU treaties and was never really in danger of being scrapped. This week's proposal is only the beginning of what promises to be a long, complex, and politically fraught negotiation process. Member states, the European Parliament (which appears sidelined in the delivery of the EU budget from some leaked drafts), and the Commission will all bring different priorities and red lines to the table. The Danish presidency of the EU Council aims to present the 'nego-box', the first compromise on the Commission's proposal, before the EU summit in December.
