
Four killed, 53 injured in Russian drone, missile attack on Ukraine
June 6 (UPI) -- At least four people were killed and 53 injured in Ukraine after Russia launched almost 500 drones and ballistic missiles as the country came under sustained airborne assault for the second night in a row.
Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko said four people were killed and 20 injured after civilian and industrial infrastructure was targeted in six districts of the capital, but that search and rescue operations at multiple sites were continuing Friday morning, he wrote in a social media update.
Interior Minister Ihor Klymenko said in a Telegram post that three of the fatalities were emergency service staff killed as they worked under fire while the attack on Kyiv was ongoing, and that nine other State Emergency Service workers had been injured, some of them seriously.
Kyiv City Military Administration said the combined missile and drone attack caused widespread damage, both from direct hits and debris from downed drones, with subway tracks and trains sustaining damage and a residential tower block and an educational institution set ablaze.
The authority said firefighters were continuing to battle a major blaze at a metal warehouse in Solomianskyi district in the west of the city.
In Ternopil province, 260 miles southwest of Kyiv, 10 people were injured, including five emergency workers hurt while battling a large fire, according to the regional governor.
President Volodymyr Zelensky said almost all of Ukraine had come under attack, including the Khmelnytskyi, Lviv, Volyn, Chernihiv, Cherkasy, Poltava and Sumy regions.
"Some of the missiles and drones were shot down. I thank our warriors for their defense. But unfortunately, not all were intercepted," he wrote on X.
The State Emergency Service in the northwestern province of Volyn said 15 people were injured when a 9-story apartment building in Lutsk, the capital, was struck. In a social media update, the SES said damage to residential and administrative buildings and manufacturing facilities had been extensive.
Kherson Gov. Oleksandr Prokudin reported 10 people injured after Russian forces, which occupy part of the province, opened fire with artillery on residential districts and civil infrastructure in the Ukrainian zone.
Four people were also hurt in Chernihiv, three in Poltava, three in Kharkiv and two in Sumy.
Ivan Federov, governor of Zaporizhzhia province, which is under partial Russian occupation, said on social media that the Ukrainian part of the province had come under heavy attack from airstrikes, artillery and drones, damaging infrastructure and homes, but there had been no deaths or injuries.
However, Ukraine also launched its own attacks into Russia, claiming to have successfully carried out "a preemptive strike, hitting enemy airfields and other important military facilities."
The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine said on social media that drones had carried out a second successful attack overnight on Russian aircraft at Engels airfield in the Saratov region, following a strike at the weekend.
It also claimed Diaghilev airfield in the Ryazan region, where air tankers and escort fighters used to carry out missile strikes against Ukraine were based, was also hit.
Russia's state-run TASS news agency said civilian and industrial targets in Moscow and 11 other regions, including Saratov and Ryazan, were targeted by drones and missiles, injuring at least six people.
The defense ministry said air defenses shot down or disabled 174 drones and three guided missiles, but no mention was made of damage to military bases.
TASS confirmed a blaze in Engels in the Saratov region from a drone strike, but said it was at an industrial facility.
The agency said the injuries occurred in the city of Michurinsk, 250 miles southeast of Moscow, where three people were hurt, two of them hospitalized, and in the Tula region, 120 miles south of Moscow, where three people were being treated in the hospital.
Passengers in cars that were struck by debris from drones downed in Kaluga Region sustained minor injuries, the regional governor said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
4 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump posts fake video showing Obama arrest
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The fake video purports to show FBI agents bursting into the meeting, pushing Obama into a kneeling position and putting him in handcuffs as Trump looks on smiling, while the song 'Y.M.C.A.' by the Village People plays. Later, the fake video shows Obama in an orange jumpsuit pacing in a cell. The start of the video shows a compilation of actual footage of Democratic leaders, including Obama and former President Joe Biden, saying, 'no one is above the law.' Advertisement Obama's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the video. Trump regularly reposts AI-generated or mocked-up videos and photographs on his Truth Social account. Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, said last week that the latest report released by her offices showed a 'treasonous conspiracy in 2016' by top Obama administration officials to harm Trump. She said she would make a criminal referral to the FBI based on recently released documents. Advertisement A link to real video footage from an interview that Gabbard gave to Fox News on Sunday on the subject was also posted to Trump's social media. Democrats have denounced the administration's effort to discredit Obama as politically motivated and riddled with errors, and contradicting previous reviews of the assessment. The latest document, issued last week, did not show Russian manipulation of the election, and instead reinforced the view of intelligence officials who found no evidence that Russia hacked voting systems to change votes. Democrats have cited reports by intelligence agencies and Senate investigators who found that, while Russian hackers probed election systems to see if they could change vote outcomes and extracted voter registration data in at least two states, there was no evidence that they attempted to change votes. The Obama administration's assessment also did not say that Russian hackers manipulated votes. Trump has been trying to change the conversation among his supporters, after the Justice Department walked back its promise to release the full collection of files about Epstein, a multimillionaire financier and convicted sex offender who died in prison in 2019. That decision angered some of the president's most ardent supporters. Some have questioned Trump's judgment on the matter, causing strife within the MAGA movement that powered Trump to two presidential election victories. This article originally appeared in .


New York Post
4 minutes ago
- New York Post
FBI failed to probe key thumb drives in Clinton email probe: DOJ watchdog files
WASHINGTON — The FBI barely glanced at potentially crucial evidence in its investigation of Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server while secretary of state, a newly declassified watchdog report revealed Monday. A confidential source gave thumb drives to the FBI with data acquired via cyber intrusions at the State Department — which included emails from former President Barack Obama and others, according to a declassified version of a Justice Department Inspector General report. But the feds declined to 'comprehensively' analyze those drives due to privilege concerns about victim data — despite an internal draft memo concluding it was necessary to 'assess the national security risks' pertaining to Clinton's private server use. Advertisement 'This document shows an extreme lack of effort and due diligence in the FBI's investigation of former Secretary Clinton's email usage and mishandling of highly classified information,' Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said of the watchdog report. Grassley released the declassified appendix to the June 2018 watchdog report by former DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who currently holds the same position at the Federal Reserve Board and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 5 The FBI neglected to comb through additional thumb drives it received around the time of its investigation of Hillary Clinton's use of a private server, despite those devices containing relevant information. Advertisement It is unclear whether the FBI has since carried out a more thorough probe of the hard drives since the 2018 watchdog report was released. 5 Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) on Monday released the declassified appendix to the June 2018 watchdog report from former DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz. Bonnie Cash/UPI/Shutterstock During the 2016 campaign cycle, the FBI Cyber Division had sought to obtain access to those hard drives to conduct targeted searches for information relevant to the Clinton probe, but was rebuffed, witnesses told the watchdog. Then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe penned a memo to then-US Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates asking to use those thumb drives for the bureau's probe of Russian interference in the 2016 election. Advertisement That request was also shot down due to concerns that the FBI's planned search parameters were too broad and didn't properly safeguard privileged information. The thumb drives in question were 'queried' at least three times, but the purposes behind that were redacted. At least one of those queries came from former Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team. One witness searched for Clinton and found a redacted number of results, including ' Grassley faulted former FBI Director James Comey for the bureau's failure to 'perform fundamental investigative work and left key pieces of evidence on the cutting room floor.' 'The Comey FBI's negligent approach and perhaps intentional lack of effort in the Clinton investigation is a stark contrast to its full-throated investigation of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax, which was based on the uncorroborated and now discredited Steele dossier,' claimed Grassley, 91. Advertisement 5 Grassley faulted former FBI Director James Comey for the bureau's failure to 'perform fundamental investigative work and left key pieces of evidence on the cutting room floor.' AP 'Comey's decision-making process smacks of political infection.' Dismissed intelligence Another notable detail in the watchdog report appendix is that the FBI stumbled upon Russian-language intelligence alleging that former US Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Comey were interfering in the investigation 'to help the Democratic and Republican presidential candidates, respectively.' Investigators translated the intelligence documents into English. The intel also included claims that then-Democratic National Convention Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz had communicated with two individuals who worked at the Soros Open Society Foundations and told them she was confident that the FBI didn't have evidence against Clinton, because 'data was removed from the mail servers just in time.' 5 'Comey's decision-making process smacks of political infection,' Grassley said. AP Officials speculated that the intelligence could have come from a cyber attack at the Atlantic Council. The documents also claimed that Comey, who registered as a Republican prior to 2016, was set on 'dragging this investigation until the presidential elections, in order to effectively undermine the chances' for Clinton to win. Advertisement But Peter Strzok, then the FBI deputy assistant counterintelligence director who was the lead agent on the investigation, pushed his team to comb through the Russian documents via keyword searches and concluded there were no underlying hacked communications included. Comey concluded that the documents weren't credible, and witnesses told the watchdog that they contained information that was 'verifiably false.' The former FBI honcho also defended his decision not to inform Lynch before going public with his July 6, 2016, statement declaring that the Feds wouldn't pursue criminal charges against Clinton over the email debacle, arguing that he was afraid of leaks. His statement exonerating Clinton came prior to interviews with multiple key witnesses related to the probe. Advertisement 5 Comey's July 2016 statement exonerating Clinton came prior to interviews with multiple key witnesses related to the probe. REUTERS The FBI later opened its Crossfire Hurricane investigation into President Trump, looking into whether his campaign colluded with the Kremlin to secure the White House. 'After nearly a decade in the shadows' Grassley said of the watchdog appendix being made public, 'this information is now coming to light thanks to Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel's dedicated efforts to fulfill my congressional request.'

Miami Herald
34 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
President Lee must dispatch Han Duck-soo as special envoy to Washington
SEOUL, July 21 (UPI) -- With U.S. President Donald Trump having officially declared that a 25% reciprocal tariff on all South Korean exports will take effect Aug. 1, the need for swift diplomatic engagement has become urgent. Sending a special envoy to Washington is no longer a matter of protocol, but a strategic imperative. The envoy's role would be to engage directly with senior U.S. officials -- possibly even with President Trump himself -- to address a range of high-stakes issues, including tariff negotiations, defense cost-sharing and bilateral cooperation on trade, energy and investment. Yet despite the urgency, reports indicate that the Lee Jae Myung administration is struggling to finalize its choice, as political debate and hesitation continue to delay the process. According to media reports, some within the ruling camp are calling for a full reconsideration of the nomination. Kim Chong-in, the former interim leader of the conservative People Power Party and the reported nominee, has publicly expressed displeasure at this development stating, "Did I ever ask to be sent [as a special envoy]?" The presidential office has offered only a vague response, likening the speculation to "being asked about a divorce before a wedding." These remarks suggest that Kim may have been tentatively considered, but mounting political resistance has likely caused the administration to retreat from that choice. Meanwhile, with the Aug. 1 deadline fast approaching, the task of appointing a credible and effective envoy remains unresolved. There is little time left. With Trump's tariff decision already formalized, South Korea must now act with urgency. The appointment of a special envoy is no longer optional -- it is a strategic necessity. Whoever is chosen must be capable of navigating the complex political and economic landscape in Washington and engaging directly with senior U.S. officials on the full range of critical bilateral issues -- from tariffs and defense cost-sharing to investment and energy cooperation. In this context, the government must prioritize credibility, clarity and results. That is why former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo emerges as a compelling choice. While Kim Chong-in is widely respected as a seasoned economic policymaker and negotiator, he may not be the right person for this delicate moment. In 2021, he publicly criticized Trump on social media -- a fact that likely has not gone unnoticed in Washington. Trump, famously reactive to criticism and guided by a highly transactional worldview, recently doubled tariffs on Brazil after President Lula voiced opposition. Sending an envoy with a history of confrontation could risk derailing already fragile talks. Han, on the other hand, has no prior personal relationship with Trump, but is said to have developed a warm rapport with him during a phone call. Trump reportedly praised Han's fluent English, perhaps sensing a sense of familiarity -- Han is a Harvard-trained economist, while Trump graduated from the Wharton School. That small personal connection may make a big difference in setting the tone of the conversation. In a high-stakes negotiation, personal chemistry matters. Compared to Kim, Han is more likely to establish a constructive dialogue with Trump -- something South Korea urgently needs. Beyond personal rapport, Han brings unmatched policy credentials. He is one of Korea's foremost experts in trade and economic diplomacy, having served across the Ministry of Commerce and the Ministry of Trade and Industry, and as the country's first chief trade Nngotiator. He also was ambassador to the United States, and uniquely, he has served as prime minister under progressive and conservative administrations --Roh Moo-hyun and Yoon Suk-yeol -- earning bipartisan respect. From trade and security to American politics and protocol, Han is arguably the most qualified figure to handle a volatile and transactional counterpart like Trump. His greatest asset may be his ability to engage the U.S. president without a translator -- an advantage that cannot be overstated at the negotiating table. The stakes are especially high. The envoy will not only be tasked with addressing tariffs, but also with resolving disputes over non-tariff barriers, securing investment opportunities like the Alaska LNG project and navigating difficult defense-related negotiations -- including cost-sharing for U.S. troops stationed in Korea. Any misstep could have long-term consequences for Korea's economic and strategic position. And Trump is no ordinary interlocutor. To understand who Trump is, one need only look back to a 2016 interview in a Korean newspaper. "I sleep 28 hours a week and read 28 hours a week," he said. He is not merely a real estate developer, but a lifelong student of negotiation strategy. One of his favorite books is The Art of War by Sun Tzu, whose first principle is to win without fighting. In fact, Trump authored The Art of the Deal in 1987 -- a book that transformed him from an unknown businessman into a household name. Facing a leader like Trump requires more than policy expertise; it requires strategic insight and mental discipline. Yet, sending Han as special envoy may seem politically unthinkable at this moment. From the perspective of many in Lee's coalition, Han is a deeply controversial figure. He served as prime minister under former President Yoon Suk-yeol, who is currently in jail awaiting trial on treason charges following his administration's failed martial law declaration. Han was seen by many progressives as being aligned with the previous government and even at odds with Lee himself. For some, nominating Han as envoy may appear to betray the spirit of political reform. But this is precisely where Lee has a chance to lead. If he truly seeks national unity and international credibility, now is the time to rise above partisanship and prioritize the national interest. Over the past few weeks, he has surprised many by making gestures of political inclusion -- retaining a minister from the previous administration, meeting with opposition leaders and even encouraging dialogue with the business community. These steps have stabilized markets, lifted investor confidence and helped push his approval rating above his election-day result. Appointing Han as special envoy would be a natural extension of that leadership style. Whether or not Han succeeds in negotiations, the act of appointing him would signal the seriousness and maturity of the Lee administration to both domestic and international audiences. In moments like this, personal risk is often the price of statesmanship. What's needed now is not just diplomacy -- but a decision. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.