YouTubers Finny Da Legend and Bubbly fatally shot during livestream in Las Vegas, here's why
A long-running
online rivalry
between YouTube streamers tragically escalated into a real-world
double homicide
near the iconic Bellagio Fountains in Las Vegas in June 8. YouTuber Rodney Finley, known as "Finny Da Legend," and his wife, Tanisha Finley, known as "Bubbly," were fatally shot during a livestream by a fellow YouTuber Manuel Ruiz, who goes by "SinCity-MannyWise. During the livestream,
SinCity-MannyWise
approached the couple, leading to a brief exchange before gunfire erupted. Authorities say
Finny Da Legend
was shot multiple times, while Bubbly was fatally struck in the head. YouTube has since terminated SinCity-MannyWise's channel, "Sin City Family," citing violations of community guidelines.
A digital rivalry turns deadly: YouTuber SinCity-MannyWise shoots YouTuber Finny Da Legend
The confrontation between Finny Da Legend and SinCity-MannyWise stemmed from years of online disputes, including trolling, copyright strikes, and heated livestream exchanges. Witnesses say the feud escalated in 2023 when SinCity-MannyWise allegedly pepper-sprayed Bubbly during an in-person encounter.
The horrifying incident unfolded around 10:40 p.m. on South Las Vegas Boulevard, captured live on Finny Da Legend's YouTube stream before it was later removed by the platform. Officers on routine patrol nearby heard gunfire and rushed to the scene, finding both victims with gunshot wounds. Despite immediate medical aid, both were pronounced deceased at the scene.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Una inversión en Amazon podría darte un salario extra.
preg.marketingvici.com
Undo
YouTuber SinCity-MannyWise claims self defence
After turning himself in, SinCity-MannyWise told the court that he acted in self-defense, claiming that Finny Da Legend made a threatening motion and reached toward his waistband. He also admitted to shooting Bubbly, believing she had a weapon—later identified as a phone gimbal.
The judge denied bail, and SinCity-MannyWise remains in custody at the Clark County Detention Center as the case unfolds.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
RERA slaps 4.5L fine on infra firm for fraud in plot sale
Cleared: dk Hyderabad: Telangana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TGRERA) has imposed a penalty of 4.5 lakh on Roy All Diamond Infra Developers for misrepresentation and unauthorised marketing of a residential plot. The authority found that the firm collected 9 lakh from complainant Madikonda Mallesh without any legal ownership or authorisation over the property in question. Mallesh, a 40-year-old govt employee from Mallapur, filed the complaint after discovering that the plot he agreed to purchase in the venture 'Kaasvi E-City' did not belong to the respondent. According to the complaint, Nayak introduced himself as a partner in Roy All Diamond Infra Developers and claimed to be the absolute owner of Plot No. 43, measuring 150 square yards in Ferozguda village, Ibrahimpatnam mandal. He demanded a sale consideration of 36 lakh and received 9 lakh as advance through multiple payments in March 2024. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad Nayak executed a sale agreement on June 7, 2024, with a clause requiring the balance payment of 27 lakh within 40 days. However, the respondent became untraceable after signing the agreement. Upon verifying the property's Encumbrance Certificate, the complainant discovered that the land actually belonged to another real estate developer. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Hidden Cause Found: Dementia And Memory Loss Linked To This Habit Memory and Health Click Here Undo by Taboola by Taboola Furthermore, RERA registration number cited in the respondent's brochure was found to be false. TGRERA Orders Refund with Interest and Seeks Probe into Project Promoters TGRERA, in its findings, observed that the respondent had no legal title or authority over the land and that his conduct constituted a violation of Sections 11(4)(a) and 12 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. In addition to the penalty under Section 61, the authority directed the respondent to refund the 9 lakh received from the complainant with 11% annual interest, calculated from the date of each payment until the amount is realised. The refund has to be completed within 30 days from the date of the order. Noting "unauthorised and deceptive conduct," the authority also instructed Telangana RERA secretary to initiate an inquiry and issue a show cause notice to the registered promoters of Kaasvi E-City. The notice seeks a written explanation on whether Nayak was ever authorised to market or collect payments for the project, and requires submission of all related agreements and correspondence. The order was issued under Sections 37 and 38 of the RERA Act, empowering the authority to take such enforcement actions. The authority has made it clear that any further non-compliance with the refund or penalty payment timelines would invite additional consequences under the Act.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Rights panel slams Haryana cops for stripping disabled CA, orders ₹50k relief
Chandigarh: The Haryana Human Rights Commission (HHRC) has indicted a police assistant sub-inspector (ASI) and a constable of forcibly making an arrested chartered accountant (CA), who has a physical disability, to strip to his underwear, allow a relative of his estranged wife to make a video of him in the embarrassing position, and then distribute it. The commission on Wednesday asked the Haryana home department to pay a compensation of Rs 50,000 to the victim, a resident of Faridabad who was arrested in a molestation case registered on a complaint by his wife at Saran police station. The order came from a full quorum bench comprising commission chairman Justice Lalit Batra, judicial member Kuldeep Jain, and member Deep Bhatia, while announcing partial relief in a case pending for three years. The incident dates to May 2021, when the ASI and constable had gone to arrest the victim. The victim alleged that after his arrest, the cops instructed him to remove his clothes in public view. Though he resisted, they coerced him into disrobing himself to his underwear, he alleged. Thereafter, he claimed, the cops facilitated a relative of his estranged wife to click his photo and shoot a video while in a semi-nude condition, and the same was circulated. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Enhance Online Presence and Get Customers [Try Now] Undo "This was not just a grave violation of human rights of the person by cops but resulted in traumatic stigma on the complainant as the video and pictures shot by private persons were circulated in private circles. Now, we have directed the home department to compensate the victim, and the department is at liberty to recover the fine from the errant cops identified as ASI Jagmati and constable Rakesh," said the commissioner in the order. The complainant also claimed that his request to the office of the Faridabad commissioner of police (CP) did not bear fruit. Even before HHRC, the police force was not cooperative and favoured the errant cops by not sharing the video footage of the lock-up. On reinvestigation, a DCP-level officer admitted to the victim being semi-nude but claimed that the victim volunteered to remove his clothes due to the summer heat. The commission did not buy this theory and assigned the investigation to its own investigating team headed by an SP-level officer. During investigation, the allegations were found to be true, and the complainant also brought on record a clip and photographs circulated by the relative of his estranged wife. "Since the availability of the video clip was an admitted fact supported by circumstantial evidence, this was enough to indict the errant cops to announce this order," said Bhatia, HHRC member.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Shots fired as Punjab village drug chase ends in violence; 2 cops, 3 villagers injured
Jalandhar: A police operation to catch an alleged drug peddler spiralled into violence in a village in Punjab's Hoshiarpur district on Tuesday night, leaving two cops injured and three villagers with bullet 'splinter' wounds. A police team, responding to a drug complaint received on their helpline, was allegedly attacked in Ghaaia village, Dasuya, 200km from Chandigarh, leading to the registration of a case against the village sarpanch, her husband, a former sarpanch, and 25 others on attempted-murder and other charges. According to the FIR, ASI Sarabjit Singh and head constable Sukhdev Singh arrived in the village after an alert received at 8.30pm that one Sukhwinder Singh was selling heroin in the area. The ASI said he contacted former sarpanch Bhupinder Singh, whose wife Kuldeep Kaur currently holds the sarpanch position. "When I asked about the person selling drugs in the village, Bhupinder replied that it was none of my business," the ASI says in the FIR, alleging that when he began to film an inebriated Bhupinder, he was assaulted, and his mobile phone thrown away. When he resumed filming, Bhupinder and his wife allegedly tried to snatch his phone and incited other villagers, claiming police were asking about Sukhwinder. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dolly Parton, 79, Takes off Her Makeup and Leaves Us Without Words The Noodle Box Undo ASI alleged that he was assaulted, his turban pulled down, and his uniform torn. Two residents, Niranjan Singh and Harwinder Singh, tried to snatch his service pistol, says the FIR. "During the scuffle, four bullets got fired from my pistol. They hit the ground and then struck the feet and legs of the accused," he stated. Head constable Sukhdev Singh was also allegedly beaten and injured. Police filed a case against Kuldeep Kaur, Bhupinder, five other named individuals, and 20 unidentified people. Charges include attempt to murder, voluntarily causing hurt to deter a public servant from performing official duty, and obstructing a public servant in the discharge of public function. Dasuya DSP Balwinder Jaura confirmed that the two injured officers are being treated at Dasuya Civil Hospital, while three villagers sustained injuries from bullet splinters.
