logo
France calls for new EU ammo plan, speeding up satellite constellation

France calls for new EU ammo plan, speeding up satellite constellation

Yahoo02-04-2025
PARIS — France is calling for a new European plan to ramp up ammunition production, including of complex ordnance such as missiles, and wants to move forward at a meeting of European Union defense ministers in Warsaw this week, French Armed Forces Minister Sébastien Lecornu said.
Lecornu will also ask the European Commission to speed up deployment and increase the budget for the IRIS² sovereign satellite constellation, the French minister said in a press briefing with his Danish counterpart, Troels Lund Poulsen, in Paris on Tuesday afternoon.
The defense ministers are meeting on April 2 and 3 to discuss a white paper on the future of European defense, developing and financing defense capabilities within the 27-nation bloc, and military support for Ukraine. Lecornu said policymakers need to move on to concrete measures to build up Europe's defense industry.
'We have to stop with the big speeches, we have to stop with the packages of billions where we don't always know exactly how it works,' Lecornu said. 'We need things that are sometimes perhaps more modest, but very effective.'
The EU's Act in Support of Ammunition Production 'worked, we are therefore calling for a new edition of an ASAP-type facility,' according to Lecornu. The European Commission allocated €500 million ($540 million) through the program to boost ammo output, and now forecasts the bloc will produce 2 million artillery shells this year, from an estimated annual capacity of 230,000 rounds in early 2023.
A new ammo program should cover both simple and complicated munitions, including missiles, the French minister said. EU aid could help in a hypothetical scenario where missile maker MBDA sets up licensed production in European countries by adding to corporate financing and purchases by the host country, according to Lecornu.
France has support from other EU members to ask the Commission to speed up the IRIS² plan for a sovereign European satellite constellation, Lecornu said, declining to name the countries. The project is key to European strategic autonomy and is progressing, but has 'an enormous challenge in terms of execution time,' the minister said.
The consortium picked to deploy the satellite constellation, led by SES, Eutelsat and Hispasat, is targeting full operational status for the early 2030s, pushing back IRIS² by several years compared to an EU timetable in March 2023 that envisaged full service in 2027.
'It's an issue on which the commission is obviously eagerly awaited and on which we'd like to help,' Lecornu said. 'It's about money because it's about speeding up, and money means speeding up. It may also be about simplifying the organization, the very governance of IRIS².'
'It makes sense, because we don't have a solution, we don't have a plan B, it's either that or Starlink,' Lecornu said, referring to the satellite constellation operated by Elon Musk's SpaceX.
'The problem is, we have industrial time that is sometimes decorrelated from diplomatic time,' Lecornu said. 'I'm trying to reduce diplomatic time, because there are still people making noise and doing complicated things, when in fact there are industrial opportunities.'
Denmark formalized the purchase of French Mistral short-range air defense missiles in Paris, and 'we can do even more together,' Lund Poulsen said. 'I hope also that it will be possible to make further announcements in the coming month about new procurements in France. I think the French defense companies have a lot to offer.'
The Danish government in February agreed to allocate an additional 50 billion kroner ($7.2 billion) to defense over the coming two years, boosting defense spending to more than 3% of GDP in 2025 and 2026.
The Nordic nation is looking to rebuild an air-defense bubble after decommissioning its Hawk missile systems in 2005. Denmark last month shortlisted the French-Italian SAMP/T and the U.S. Patriot air-defense batteries to cover the high end of the threat spectrum in its planned purchase, while MBDA France's VL MICA system, Kongsberg's NASAMS, the IRIS-T SLM from Germany's Diehl Defence and the U.S. IFPC. are in competition for the lower end.
'We are in Denmark very concerned about the situation with the land-based air-defense system, because we don't have any,' Lund Poulsen said. He expects the government will be able to make a decision 'before summer.'
'I'm very happy that France also today have told me directly that they will be willing to collaborate with Denmark in that context,' the Danish minister said. 'We have to see the offers that will come in, but let me just underline that it is of our interest also to have a decision before summer.'
Buying SAMP/T would make Denmark the first export customer in the EU for the long-range air-defense system, with France and Italy currently the only users in the 27-nation bloc. Ukraine uses a donated SAMP/T system to defend the Kyiv area, while Singapore is the only other export user following a purchase in 2013.
Meanwhile, Lund Poelsen commented on the American military presence in Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark, where the U.S. operates Pituffik Space Base. U.S. President Donald Trump has threatened to annex Greenland, citing security needs.
'Denmark has a long-lasting good relationship with the U.S., also about the security in Greenland,' the minister said. He said Denmark has an agreement from 1951 about the U.S. presence in the territory. 'So if the U.S. would like to have more bases in Greenland, it is possible for them to raise that question to the Danish government. And will they be doing that? We'll be willing to discuss that.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Donald Trump's Plan to Arm Ukraine Differs From Joe Biden's
How Donald Trump's Plan to Arm Ukraine Differs From Joe Biden's

Newsweek

time8 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

How Donald Trump's Plan to Arm Ukraine Differs From Joe Biden's

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's push for European NATO members to purchase U.S.-made weapons for Ukraine marks a shift from the more direct military support for Kyiv of his predecessor, Joe Biden. But unlike Biden, Trump has been more direct in engaging with Moscow, and both have taken their own approaches to economic measures to pressure Russian President Vladimir Putin. Why It Matters The United States is the world's biggest provider of military support for Ukraine, but when Trump took office, there were fears that the Republican president would cut or curb this lifeline. Trump's move in the first half of 2025 to reset economic ties with Moscow also raised concerns about whether Biden-era sanctions aimed at choking revenues for Putin's war machine would be eased. The president's tone has shifted both towards Putin and regarding the continuation of U.S. military support for Ukraine, raising hope in Kyiv that the U.S. commitment to Ukraine may be as significant, albeit delivered differently, as Biden's. Then-President Joe Biden (L) and Donald Trump arrive at Trump's presidential inauguration ceremony on January 20, 2025. Then-President Joe Biden (L) and Donald Trump arrive at Trump's presidential inauguration ceremony on January 20, To Know Putin invaded Ukraine just over 13 months into Biden's White House term. Between February 24, 2022, and January 20, 2025, the U.S. became the world's biggest supplier of weapons and aid for Ukraine's fight, pledging over $175 billion in support. The Democratic president also signed the Ukraine Democracy Defense Lend-Lease Act of 2022 and led the Ukraine Defense Contact Group, a coalition of about 50 countries coordinating military assistance. "President Biden was able to organize a broad coalition of Western countries that helped transform the Ukrainian military into a formidable force, capable of resisting a much larger and better-funded Russian army supported by Iran and North Korea," Yuriy Boyechko, the CEO of Hope for Ukraine, told Newsweek. But his approach to arming Ukraine was criticized as piecemeal, as the Biden administration took pains to avoid escalation, opposing Kyiv's use of American equipment against military targets within Russia. Volodymyr Zelensky and Joe Biden on the sidelines of the 79th Session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York on September 25, 2024. Volodymyr Zelensky and Joe Biden on the sidelines of the 79th Session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York on September 25, 2024. ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images By July 2022, the U.S. had supplied HIMARS (High Mobility Artillery Rocket System), and on July 6, 2023, Biden approved cluster munitions to Ukraine. However, deliveries of long-range ATACMS (Army Tactical Missile System) missiles were delayed and eventually allowed, provided they would never be used to hit targets within Russia. Ukraine had been requesting U.S.-made F-16 fighters since 2022, but only started receiving them in July 2024 through third countries. Other weapons systems that were blocked or held up included Patriot surface-to-air missiles, M1 Abrams tanks, and Gray Eagle drones—delays which Kyiv said have added to battlefield losses among its forces. Sanctions Not Talks Rather than focusing on direct talks with Moscow, Biden's actions towards Putin centered on sanctions. As a parting shot, his administration imposed another round of measures, bringing the total to over 3,500, according to Statista, which are still in place today. "The Biden administration's approach did not really include direct negotiations with the Russians," George Beebe, former director of the CIA's Russia analysis and director of grand strategy at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told Newsweek. "They approached this by saying 'we're going to put enough economic and military pressure on Russia and isolate Russia internationally and diplomatically turn Russia into a persona non grata,'" Beebe said. The aim was to force the Russians to recalculate the costs and benefits of the invasion and capitulate, he said, "and that didn't work." Trump's Approach NATO chief Mark Rutte and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz have welcomed Trump's proposal for the U.S. to provide new weapons to Ukraine. The NATO-coordinated arms plan for Kyiv was unveiled as a novel approach to the direct aid from Biden, which is touted as ensuring the continued flow of American arms to Ukraine, paid for by Europe. Trump has repeatedly stated that the U.S. had spent $350 billion on helping Ukraine, although the actual amount was significantly less. But a deal in which NATO and European Union states purchase U.S.-made weapons systems, deliver some to Ukraine, and replace them through agreements with Washington could satisfy Trump's MAGA base, who do not want to see American taxpayers footing the bill. "Clearly a situation where the Europeans are paying for this is a better deal for the United States than providing aid directly to Ukraine that probably will never be paid back," said Beebe, "that certainly was one of the considerations that President Trump bore in mind." Rutte said the deal included missiles, ammunition, and air defense, while Trump announced that Patriot missiles—critical to defend against Russia's drone and missile bombardment on civilian structures—were "already being shipped," to Ukraine. U.S. President Donald Trump (L) and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House on February 28, 2025. U.S. President Donald Trump (L) and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House on February 28, Tariffs The prospect of weapons shipments follows Trump's issuing an ultimatum to Moscow of "severe" tariffs unless Russia agrees to a peace deal within 50 days to end its war in Ukraine. He has since teased a shorter time frame. These would be, according to Trump, 100 percent secondary tariffs, in which any country doing business with Russia would face a significant levy on selling their products to the U.S. Demanding Russian action within a deadline is a tactic that differs from Biden's approach, although there are questions about its effectiveness. Beebe said the Biden administration likely considered such a move but concluded it would rebound against the U.S. in terms of inflation and the prospect of higher global oil prices. However, Russia realizes that imposing these tariffs on Europe, as well as its major trading partners, Turkey and China, "would go very poorly for the United States," he added, with potential impacts on inflation and global oil prices. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump on July 14 at the White House: "We're gonna be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days." U.S.-based Nova Ukraine said in a statement to Newsweek regarding the 50-day deadline and delivery of U.S weapons: "We have long advocated for decisive U.S. leadership to help Ukraine defend itself and deter further Russian aggression." Brian Taylor, a political science professor at Syracuse University's Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, told Newsweek: "The good news for Ukraine is has finally figured out that Putin is the main obstacle to peace." George Beebe, the director of grand strategy at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told Newsweek: "We have to focus on a geopolitical compromise that the West concedes that Ukraine won't be in NATO and NATO forces won't be in Ukraine, and Russia, in turn, concedes that it will not block Ukrainian accession to the European Union. So far, neither Biden nor Trump has focused on pursuing that compromise." What Happens Next Boycheko, whose group provides support to Ukrainian communities on the frontline, said Trump's approach to aiding Ukraine is so far mostly just promises and statements. If Trump follows through on promises like secondary sanctions and the deployment of the most advanced military capabilities to Ukraine, "then we will be able to compare what was done by the current administration vs the previous administration," he said. Meanwhile, Taylor said that by deferring these proposed sanctions for 50 days, "Trump left himself plenty of time to change his mind again, while Putin keeps bombing Ukrainian cities nightly and his army remains on the offensive."

EU court denies Le Pen heirs' appeal to evade repaying misused funds
EU court denies Le Pen heirs' appeal to evade repaying misused funds

UPI

time8 minutes ago

  • UPI

EU court denies Le Pen heirs' appeal to evade repaying misused funds

July 16 (UPI) -- The General Court of the European Union ruled Wednesday that Jean-Marie Le Pen's daughters remain on the hook for more than $348,000 of his misused expenses. The Court's judgement stated that an appeal by former European Parliament member Jean-Marie Le Pen's daughters was denied because "no evidence of use of the appropriations in accordance with the applicable regulations has been provided." The "appropriations" refers to money allegedly used illegally by Jean-Marie Le Pen during the 2009-2014 European parliamentary term. Le Pen had used the funds under the Parliament's budget line 400, which covers "the administrative and operational expenditure" of parliamentary expenses. However, Le Pen instead purportedly put the funding toward personal expenses and was fined around $371,000 by the European Parliament in 2016, who then started in May of that year to withhold over $8000 monthly from him. Le Pen died in January, and his daughters sought to annul the EU's decision to recover their father's expenses from them, and instead have their debt canceled and paid for by the Parliament. Nonetheless, the court decided that since Le Pen never "demonstrated that the costs for which he had requested to be covered from the appropriations allocated under Parliament's budget line 400 were in accordance with the regulations relating to this budget line," that the money must be recovered. In a press release, the Court said Wednesday that it "holds that the procedure which led the Parliament to adopt the recovery decision and to issue the debit note is not contrary to the principles of legal certainty and the protection of legitimate expectations."

Boss of world's biggest Scotch whisky producer steps down amid sales slump
Boss of world's biggest Scotch whisky producer steps down amid sales slump

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Boss of world's biggest Scotch whisky producer steps down amid sales slump

THE boss of the world's biggest Scotch whisky producer has stepped down from her role. Debra Crew, chief executive of Diageo, is to leave the company following a two-year tenure. It comes as the spirits giant has grappled with weaker sales and a sinking share price. File image of whisky (Image: Archive) Crew has stepped down as CEO with "immediate effect" and by "mutual agreement" with the board, the company said. READ MORE: John Swinney addresses Scottish absence at Israel 'collective action' conference Chief financial officer Nik Jhangiani will step into the top job until a permanent boss is found. Crew became chief executive two years ago, taking over from former boss Sir Ivan Menezes, who died in June 2023. She was the group's first female chief executive, having previously held senior positions at tobacco company Reynolds American and PepsiCo, prior to which she served as an officer in the US army. During her tenure, Crew has overseen a more challenging period for the company which owns brands including Guinness, Gordon's and Baileys. Its sales dropped for the first time in around four years during the 2023-24 financial year, dragged lower by a weaker performance in Latin America. READ MORE: Dress worn by Outlander character goes on display in Scottish filming location More recently, Diageo warned that it was expecting new US trade tariffs – particularly a 10% levy on UK and European exports – to cost it around 150 million dollars (£112 million) each year. The company, which is based in London and employs around 30,000 people, launched a 500 million dollar (£373 million) cost-saving programme over a three-year period in May. Diageo's share price has also slumped over the last two years – nearly halving in value. Its share price was up around 4% on Wednesday following the announcement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store