End of your aerial? New Freeview rival could soon offer a better way to watch TV
It's hard to argue that Freeview still rules the roost when it comes to watching TV without paying a monthly fee. This totally free platform features over 100 channels, which are all available via a standard aerial on your roof. Millions of homes across the UK now rely on Freeview for their nightly fix of entertainment but its days could well be numbered.
More of us are now moving away from traditional methods of watching content and switching over to streaming instead. Sky recently confirmed that its Stream box and Glass TV - which receive live shows, sports and movies via an internet connection - are now its biggest sellers and now there's another way to tune into the telly.
Freely, which is actually owned by the same team as Freeview, first launched last year and is slowly improving with more manufacturers including it in their screens and new features being added on a regular basis. It even recently received a boost which now offers a backwards TV guide which lets you find things to watch that have been previously aired.
It's a smart system that's clearly getting a lot of investment, and now there could be an even bigger reason to consider ditching Freeview and that aerial that wobbles around on your chimney.
It's recently been revealed that a Freely may soon start making a dedicated set-top box.
For those not in the know, the only way to currently access this streaming service is to buy a brand new television with it pre-installed.
Another issue is that some manufactures - such as LG and Samsung - haven't yet joined the Freely revolution and don't offer any screens with it installed.
If a standalone set-top box arrived, it would fix these problems and make it seem far more enticing.
Explaining more about the future, BBC 's Tim Davie recently said: "At the BBC we have been working hard to build digital platforms and content to meet changing audience needs, enriching our offer and welcoming the possibilities of a post broadcast world.
"We think now is the time to confirm an IP switchover in the 2030s, setting out the conditions and providing certainty to ensure success.
"The BBC can play a key role in innovating to ensure that the new world is inclusive and accessible.
"To help, we want to double down on Freely as a universal free service to deliver live TV over broadband. And we are considering a streaming media device with Freely capabilities built in, with a radically simplified user interface specifically designed to help those yet to benefit from IP services."
TiVo also recently hinted that they could also bring a Freely-powered set-top box to the UK in the future.
This update would be a direct rival for Sky Stream, which also turns old TVS into fully smart content hubs.
We don't have full details just yet, but watch this space.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
5 hours ago
- Times
Lord Coe worried by unpaid fees of Michael Johnson's Grand Slam Track
Lord Coe has said World Athletics is closely monitoring the situation amid concerns that Michael Johnson's Grand Slam Track league still owes athletes millions of dollars in prize money and appearance fees. Johnson, the former Olympic sprint champion and now BBC pundit, had to cancel the fourth leg of the new league in Los Angeles at the end of June because of financial issues, sparked, not least, by poor attendances in the first three events. As The Times revealed earlier this month, track stars are still waiting on payments due after the opening event in Jamaica at the beginning of April. Indeed, an email from a Grand Slam Track official to agents chasing the money on behalf of their clients promised payment for the Jamaica meet by the end of this month and the following two events, in Miami and Philadelphia, by the end of September. Even so, there is talk of them owing as much as $13million with key stakeholders also as yet unpaid.
The National
8 hours ago
- The National
Rachel Reeves set to reject introducing wealth tax
The Chancellor has come under renewed pressure to levy a new tax on the savings, investments and property of the wealthy and in recent weeks senior Labour figures have refused to rule out the prospect. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander refused to be drawn on the issue earlier this month by the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg, while Keir Starmer also declined to rule out the measure at PMQs after Tory leader Kemi Badenoch accused him of "flirting" with the idea. But Cabinet ministers have reportedly told The Times that a wealth tax is a 'non-starter', alleging wealthy people would simply leave the UK because of it. 'Wealth taxes don't work,' one cabinet minister said. 'Just look at what's happened in other countries that have introduced them. They just don't raise money, certainly not the kind of money that we're looking for.' READ MORE: Labour launch review into raising retirement age Another cabinet minister said a wealth tax was 'off the table'. They said: 'Wealthy people are mobile, they can move their assets to other more favourable jurisdictions.' Another government source did say though that Reeves is reluctant to rule out a wealth tax publicly. They said that other options, such as increasing capital gains tax, remain under consideration. Reeves is preparing to raise taxes in the Autumn Budget after the Government was forced by Labour MPs to abandon welfare cuts and partially reinstate the Winter Fuel Payment. The U-turn on both policies is expected to cost more than £6 billion. The Office for Budget Responsibility, the official forecaster, is also expected to downgrade Britain's growth prospects. Earlier this month ex-Labour leader Neil Kinnock suggested Reeves should bring in a wealth tax, alongside ex-Welsh Labour leader Mark Drakeford. Kinnock claimed it could bring in as much as £11bn for the Treasury. READ MORE: Zarah Sultana calls out 'racist' cartoon in Observer Eight nations have introduced wealth taxes but have subsequently scrapped them including Austria, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Iceland, Luxembourg, Sweden and France. However, four countries have retained wealth taxes in Norway, Spain, Switzerland and Colombia. The Chancellor has little wriggle room in the Autumn Budget because of Labour's manifesto pledge not to increase taxes on 'working people', encompassing income tax, VAT and National Insurance. Reeves was accused of breaching the pledge last year when she increased employers' National Insurance contributions to raise £24 billion.
Rhyl Journal
a day ago
- Rhyl Journal
Water bills to see ‘small, steady' rise despite reform plans, says Reed
Steve Reed is expected to set out plans for 'root and branch reform' of the water sector on Monday, following the publication of a landmark review of the industry. Those plans are thought to include action to tackle sewage spills, invest in water infrastructure and the abolition of the industry's beleaguered regulator Ofwat as ministers seek to avoid a repeat of this year's 26% increase in bills. But while Mr Reed has promised that families will never again see 'huge shock hikes' to their bills, he was unable on Sunday to rule out further above-inflation increases. Although he told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips that bills should be 'as low as possible', he added that there needed to be 'appropriate bill rises' to secure 'appropriate levels of investment'. He said: 'A small, steady increase in bills is what people expect.' Government sources have argued that the recent large rise in bills was necessary to pay for investment in long-neglected infrastructure, but expect Mr Reed's promised reforms to make further rises unnecessary. Asked about the possibility of expanding social tariffs to help households struggling with bills – a move that could see wealthier families pay more – Mr Reed said he had 'not been convinced yet' that this was necessary. Earlier on Sunday, Mr Reed had pledged to halve sewage pollution in England by 2030, after the Environment Agency said serious pollution incidents had risen by 60% in 2024. Mr Reed said the measures the Government was taking would enable it to significantly reduce pollution, with the aim of completely eliminating it by 2035 should it be re-elected. He also suggested to the BBC that he would resign if the 2030 target was not achieved, provided he was still in the same job by then. His comments come before a major report by former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, which is expected to recommend sweeping reform to water regulation on Monday. Sir Jon has been widely reported to be preparing to recommend the abolition of Ofwat, which has faced criticism over its handling of sewage spills and allowing water companies to pay large dividends while taking on significant debt and missing targets for investing in infrastructure. On Sunday, Mr Reed would not say whether he would scrap Ofwat, but also declined to say he had confidence in the regulator. He told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg: 'The regulator is clearly failing.' Sir Jon's interim report criticised regulation of the water sector, which is split between economic regulator Ofwat, the Environment Agency and the Drinking Water Inspectorate. But on Sunday, Conservative shadow communities secretary Kevin Hollinrake said he would be concerned any changes 'might just be shuffling the deckchairs on the Titanic'. He told the BBC: 'It's really important the regulator's effective, and we put in a lot of measures to give Ofwat more powers to regulate the water industry and a lot of those things were very effective.' Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said he backed scrapping Ofwat, calling for a new Clean Water Authority to 'hold these water companies to account'. Sir Ed has also called for the Government to go further and aim to eliminate sewage pollution entirely by 2030, saying voters were 'fed up with empty promises from ministers while Britain's waterways continue to be ruined by sewage'. He added: 'For years water companies have paid out millions in dividends and bonuses. It would be deeply unfair if customers are now made to pick up the tab for this scandal through higher bills.' Although sweeping regulatory reform is likely to be on the table, full nationalisation of the industry will not be after the Government excluded it from Sir Jon's terms of reference. Smaller parties such as the Greens have called for nationalisation, while on Sunday Reform UK's Nigel Farage said he would look to strike a deal with the private sector to bring 50% of the water industry under public ownership. But Mr Farage was unable to say how much this would cost, leading Labour to accuse him of having 'nothing to offer apart from bluster', and shadow Treasury minister Gareth Davies to say he was 'flogging billion-pound promises with no plans to deliver them'. Mr Reed argued nationalisation would cost 'upwards of £100 billion', diverting resources from the NHS and taking years during which pollution would get worse.
