logo
ABC managing director says Antoinette Lattouf case not a good use of taxpayer money

ABC managing director says Antoinette Lattouf case not a good use of taxpayer money

The ABC's managing director says the more than $1 million spent in litigation with journalist Antoinette Lattouf was not "a good use of taxpayers' money" following her win in the Federal Court.
A Federal Court judge on Wednesday found Ms Lattouf was unlawfully terminated by the ABC after she was taken off air three days into a five-day contract as an ABC Radio Sydney presenter in December 2023.
Justice Darryl Rangiah ruled the ABC contravened the Fair Work Act by terminating her employment for reasons "including that she held a political opinion opposing the Israeli military campaign in Gaza".
Managing director Hugh Marks told ABC News Channel the matter was "regrettable".
"Let's face it, as it's been reported, many millions of dollars have been spent that shouldn't have been spent," he said.
In February, the ABC told Senate estimates the broadcaster had spent at least $1.1 million in its defence.
Attempts by Ms Lattouf had been made to resolve the matter at the Fair Work Commission last year, her lawyer said.
Justice Rangiah said the ABC must pay Ms Lattouf $70,000 compensation for "non-economic loss" and further court hearings will be held to determine pecuniary penalty for breaching the Fair Work Act.
In his judgment, Justice Rangiah said the decision to terminate Ms Lattouf's employment was in part "made to appease pro-Israel lobbyists".
"It became clear that the complaints were an orchestrated campaign by pro-Israel lobbyists to have Ms Lattouf taken off air," Justice Rangiah wrote in his judgment.
"The complaints caused great consternation amongst the senior management of the ABC."
In response, Mr Marks said the broadcaster's processes as they stood were "clear" but were not followed in this instance.
"I don't think there's any change that's needed. I think the process is clear, there is defined separation between management — between the conduct of the organisation and external forces," he said.
"The proof will be in the pudding about how we act on that basis going forward. Our obligations are to ensure fairness, impartiality in our reporting and coverage."
Mr Marks said a "big part" of his role would be to address the influence of external forces going forward.
In an earlier written statement, Mr Marks said the ABC acknowledged the Federal Court's decision, adding the broadcaster "let down our staff and audiences".
"This failure has caused understandable concern among the public and inside the organisation," he said.
"The values of the ABC must be reflected in how we work. In this case the judge found the correct processes weren't followed and, consequently, errors were made."
In the statement, Mr Marks said the ABC specifically regretted "how the decision to remove Ms Lattouf from air was handled", noting the distress it in turn caused her.
"We extend our sincere apologies to Ms Lattouf and wish her well in her future endeavours," he said.
Mr Marks, a former Nine Entertainment chief executive, was appointed as former ABC managing director David Anderson's successor in December 2024.
Former chair Ita Buttrose and former ABC chief content officer Chris Oliver-Taylor — both of whom were cross-examined in the Federal Court proceedings — have since left the ABC.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wyndham City Council referred to IBAC as MP claims tens of millions 'flushed down the toilet' on failed IT project
Wyndham City Council referred to IBAC as MP claims tens of millions 'flushed down the toilet' on failed IT project

ABC News

time25 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Wyndham City Council referred to IBAC as MP claims tens of millions 'flushed down the toilet' on failed IT project

A council in Melbourne's booming outer south-west has been referred to the state's anti-corruption watchdog over a failed IT project worth tens of millions of dollars. The issue emerged when representatives from Wyndham City Council faced a fiery parliamentary committee hearing into fraud and corruption controls in local government. Labor's MP for Point Cook, Mat Hilakari, questioned whether the council did enough to inform ratepayers about the cost blowout, which he put at $69 million. But the council defended its transparency, saying information about the project was publicly available. In 2018, the council appointed tech company Oracle Australia to provide software that could combine council functions on one platform. It was supposed to be a $20 million project, taking two years. But four years later, the project was running nearly $20 million over budget. So the council terminated the contract and engaged a new company, TechnologyOne, to do the work. Mr Hilakari told the inquiry he estimated the cost blowout for the entire project at nearly $70 million. "I would put it at probably around $69 million in overruns, and this hasn't been publicly disclosed until this point in time, is that right?" he asked. The council's chief executive, Stephen Wall, said he would take the issue of the cost on notice. "But that sounds excessive," he said. Mr Hilakari asked why the failure of the original project, and the cost overrun, had not been communicated to ratepayers. "Whose decision is it not to disclose these things to the public?" he asked. Wyndham Deputy Mayor Josh Gilligan said financial decisions were all available, but said no-one had asked about them. "I just take particular umbrage with the question that suggests that we were not or were somehow not wanting to disclose cost variation to a major project," he said. "I just completely dispute that." Mr Wall agreed. "All of council's financial transactions are transparent," he said. The ABC understands the council's handling of the issue has been referred to Victoria's Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission, IBAC. The ABC understands another Wyndham councillor, Robert Szatkowski, has made a referral to Victoria's Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission, IBAC, for matters that relate to the IT project. The ABC has contacted IBAC for comment. A referral to IBAC does not mean it will launch an investigation and the ABC is not suggesting that a referral implies any findings of wrongdoing. Councillor Gilligan pointed out to Mr Hilakari that the state government was also facing cost blowouts on various projects. "You would agree that cost overruns on a state level of hundreds of millions of dollars occur, on the regular?" he asked. "And we're very transparent about that," Mr Hilakari said. "As we are," Cr Gilligan insisted. "Well then you'd better tell me where the project fail of Oracle and the tens and tens of millions of dollars of ratepayer funds that were flushed down the toilet to be frank, where was that publicly disclosed?" Mr Wall said he would take that on notice, but said there was a clear business case and a tender process, and that the current IT project was a success. Wyndham council is facing backlash for diverting funds from developers in Point Cook to be used elsewhere in the municipality. Cr Gilligan told the hearing the council had a prerogative to spend money raised from Point Cook developments in another location. "That money can be spent in a location that is different to the one that you want it spent in," he said. "That is our prerogative, just as state and federal governments have their own prerogative within the realm of law to make decisions, this council has made a decision to look at spending it on an intergenerational project somewhere else." The committee is due to table its full report in November.

‘Innocent life matters': The photographs of children that captured the world's conscience
‘Innocent life matters': The photographs of children that captured the world's conscience

Sydney Morning Herald

timean hour ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

‘Innocent life matters': The photographs of children that captured the world's conscience

Warning: Graphic content The photograph of an emaciated child broke Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's heart. 'For anyone with any sense of humanity, you have to be moved by that, and you have to acknowledge that every innocent life matters, whether it be Israeli or Palestinian,' Albanese said. 'A one-year-old boy is not a Hamas fighter, and the civilian casualties and death in Gaza is completely unacceptable,' he told ABC's Insiders on Sunday. 'That boy isn't challenging Israel's right to existence, and nor are the many who continue to suffer from the unavailability of food and water.' The image of Muhammad Zakariya Ayyoub al-Matouq being cradled by his mother Hedaya al-Muta'wi, captured on July 21 and distributed by the photographic network Getty, evoked previous pictures that shocked the world. There is the photograph of Phan Thi Kim Phuc running from a napalm attack in 1972 during the Vietnam War, Steve McCurry's portrait of Afghan refugee Sharbat Gula in 1984, and a haunting image of a vulture stalking a Sudanese child amid widespread famine in 1993. In each case, the ethics behind the photograph have become disputed. Was the image exploitative? Should the photographer have intervened? What toll did it take on the individual who became a symbol for wider suffering? The Israeli embassy in Australia went further on Monday. Deputy head of mission, Amir Meron, told journalists that there was no starvation in Gaza and that 'false pictures' of the situation in the territory were spreading. 'This is a false campaign that is being [led] by Hamas, taking advantage of sick children in order to show a false claim and false presentation of hunger and starvation in the Gaza strip,' Meron said, without specifically referring to the image of al-Matouq.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store