Far-right lawmakers to lead EU negotiations on new climate target
BRUSSELS (Reuters) -The far-right Patriots for Europe group will lead the European Parliament's work on the bloc's new climate target, European Union lawmakers said on Tuesday, a role that could complicate a deal on the goal to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 90% by 2040.
The Patriots group, which has rejected EU policies to curb climate change, is the third-biggest in the parliament, and includes the political parties of France's far-right leader Marine Le Pen and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban.
Patriots group chair Jordan Bardella said the group "resolutely opposed" the 90% emissions target and had bid to lead the work to assert its vision on the goal.
"We are opposed to it because we feel that there are far too many constraints already bearing on industry at European level, and this would simply precipitate us into de-growth," Bardella told a news conference.
Climate change has made Europe the world's fastest-warming continent, and a severe heatwave last week caused disruption across the continent. But governments from Italy to Poland have pushed back this year on ambitious emissions-cutting goals, citing concerns over the costs for industries.
The new role puts the Patriots in an influential position for when EU countries and the European Parliament negotiate the EU's 2040 climate target in the coming months - talks in which the Patriots will represent the European legislature.
The Patriots will be tasked with drafting an initial proposal for the parliament's position in these negotiations. Liberal, socialist and green groups said they were preparing a proposal, which the Parliament would on Wednesday vote on, to fast-track the negotiations - cutting out this first stage of the process where the Patriots would exert influence.
"We can take back the control of the file," French liberal EU lawmaker Pascal Canfin told reporters.
The Patriots group holds eurosceptic positions including the accusation that the EU is seeking to replace national governments with a European "superstate".
The Patriots secured the negotiating role in a closed-door meeting on Tuesday morning by outbidding the parliament's biggest group, the centre-right European People's Party, EU officials told Reuters.
Brussels has struggled to generate political support for the 2040 climate target, which the European Commission last week proposed after months of delay.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Europe's Clash With Musk's xAI Escalates on Grok's Rants
(Bloomberg) — The clash between Elon Musk's xAI ( empire and European officials is intensifying with leaders in Poland and Germany calling for more aggressive action against the company. Singer Akon's Failed Futuristic City in Senegal Ends Up a $1 Billion Resort Are Tourists Ruining Europe? How Locals Are Pushing Back Can Americans Just Stop Building New Highways? Denver City Hall Takes a Page From NASA Philadelphia Trash Piles Up as Garbage Workers' Strike Drags On German lawmaker Ralf Stegner, responding to antisemitic comments that xAI's chatbot Grok made Tuesday on X, said the posts 'must not be tolerated under any circumstances' and called for sanctions in an interview with the German newspaper Handelsblatt. Poland's government separately urged the European Union to investigate and possibly fine xAI following lewd comments made by Grok about the country's politicians. The EU is already investigating Musk's social media platform under a relatively new content-moderation policy known as the Digital Services Act and had been weighing a fine ahead of its summer recess in August. Bloomberg has reported that the regulator is considering calculating the fine by including revenue from Elon Musk's other businesses, including Space Exploration Technologies Corp. and Neuralink Corp., an approach that would significantly increase the potential penalties. A review specifically targeting Grok would expand the EU's actions against X and threaten to ratchet up tension between Europe and US President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly blasted the region for going after US tech companies. xAI didn't respond to requests for comment. The company said Tuesday that it was working to remove inappropriate posts on X after the antisemitic Grok comments drew widespread condemnation. 'Since being made aware of the content, xAI has taken action to ban hate speech before Grok posts on X,' the chatbot's account posted. Thomas Regnier, the EU spokesperson for digital affairs, said X is obliged to 'assess and mitigate any potential risks' stemming from Grok, which is integrated into its online platform. 'We follow developments closely, like with any other platform, and cannot speculate on potential next steps,' he said Wednesday in an interview with Bloomberg News. Musk announced in March that his xAI startup had taken over his social-media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. On Wednesday, X Chief Executive Officer Linda Yaccarino announced she was stepping down after two years on the job. Yaccarino was responsible for reversing an advertiser exodus from the platform, triggered in part by Musk's own erratic content moderation decisions and posts. She repeatedly had to defend her boss and the platform from critics who've pointed to a rise in violent content, antisemitism and misinformation on X. Johannes Schätzl, a lawmaker from Germany's junior coalition partner, called on the EU to finish its review of X's alleged violations under the Digital Services Act as quickly as possible, and in an interview with Handelsblatt accused Musk of using Grok 'to spread politically extreme content.' Poland's deputy prime minister Krzysztof Gawkowski said that, if X fails to stop the chatbot-fueled 'hate speech,' the bloc should have the option of disabling it for residents. 'We are entering a higher level of hate speech which is controlled by algorithms,' Gawkowski told the Polish radio station RMF FM. 'Turning a blind eye to this matter today, or not noticing it, or laughing about it — and I saw politicians laughing at it — is a mistake that may cost mankind,' he said. Grok drew specific criticism in Poland this week after it responded to user questions about the country's politicians with profanity-laced remarks about their personal life and appearances. Screenshots of the comments quickly spread on social media, fanning a public debate about the dangers of such content. Grok also stoked controversy in Turkey after targeting the nation's president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, in posts. Turkey's transport and infrastructure minister, Abdulkadir Uraloglu, told Bloomberg Wednesday that the comments by Grok were unacceptable. Turkey will ban X 'if necessary,' he said, unless steps are taken to prevent such content. Turkey wouldn't be the first. Brazil briefly took down X last year over hate speech and fake news. Bloomberg reported in February that European governments, reeling from Musk's political attacks, were comparing notes with Brazil President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. —With assistance from Konrad Krasuski, Patrick Donahue, Maxim Edwards and Gian Volpicelli. (Updates with comments from European Commission spokesperson in the sixth paragraph.) Will Trade War Make South India the Next Manufacturing Hub? 'Our Goal Is to Get Their Money': Inside a Firm Charged With Scamming Writers for Millions Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate 'Telecom Is the New Tequila': Behind the Celebrity Wireless Boom SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump promised 200 deals by now. He's gotten 3, and 1 more is getting very close
At the conclusion of his first 100 days in office in late April, President Donald Trump made a stunning statement about his progress on tariff negotiations: He had completed trade deals with 200 countries. More than two months later, Trump has announced just three of those agreements – with China, the United Kingdom and Vietnam. So what happened? Wednesday marks the day that Trump had set three months ago as a deadline for all countries to reach a deal or face higher 'reciprocal' tariffs. Trump has since publicly acknowledged that pausing those 'Liberation Day' tariffs until July 9 left insufficient time to negotiate with practically every country around the world. Trump had initially expected to complete more trade deals by Wednesday's deadline, but in recent weeks he's been convinced that landing those deals can't happen more swiftly, sources familiar with the matter tell CNN. That's why his public rhetoric has shifted in recent weeks to saying he would send out letters that set higher tariffs on America's trading partners, effectively getting results on the board while talks continue. So Trump agreed to push the deadline back to August 1 to give countries that are close to a deal a little more time for talks – particularly the European Union, which is on the verge of announcing a trade deal with the United States. EU and US trade negotiators are nearing a framework agreement that would set in place 10% tariffs and lay out the parameters for extensive trade discussions going forward, according to three officials familiar with the matter. The progress in negotiations with the EU, in particular, was a key consideration in extending the deadline beyond July 9. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent pointed to the EU talks, as well as the view that several other key negotiations were in their final stages, as he advocated for more time, according to two people familiar with the matter. Trump still needs to sign off on any final agreement and talks between the two sides are ongoing, but the officials said the agreement would be announced before the end of the week. Olof Gill, trade spokesperson for the European Commission, confirmed in a press briefing Wednesday that EU trade negotiators are in active discussions with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and that a deal is expected to be announced in the coming days. The progress marks a dramatic turn in Trump's long-standing, long-public disdain for the EU, a view that served as the backdrop to months of frustrating and intractable trade discussions this year. But Trump's tone – and behind the scenes, the tenor and tempo of the negotiations – shifted dramatically in the weeks since he threatened 50% tariffs on the EU in a morning social media post in late May. That unexpected and dramatic threat sparked an immediate response from the EU and set the stage for an urgent effort to reach some form of an agreement before Trump's 'reciprocal' tariffs snapped into place. EU officials have been in the midst of briefing member countries about the framework and proposed negotiating process, one of the EU officials said, adding that despite the often-divergent equities of the bloc's nations, the deal has been presented as the best and likely only way to avoid a dramatic escalation in tariffs on August 1. Trump's negotiators have maintained a hardline on the EU's push for exemptions to sectoral tariffs already in place or forthcoming, the officials said. For instance, a push to reduce Trump's 25% tariff on autos is a central late-stage focus of the discussions, as has an effort to cut the 50% levies on steel. US negotiators have indicated some willingness to consider key EU industries and products for possible rate reductions, including airplanes, alcoholic beverages and some agricultural products. But it would require Trump's final sign-off, the officials said. EU officials have also pledged to significantly increase purchases of US energy and defense sector goods. If a deal can't be reached, the EU has vowed to introduce countermeasures targeting billions of dollars' worth of US exports to the bloc. Those retaliatory steps have been due to come into force on July 14. It is not yet clear if the EU will push back that date to account for Trump's extension of his 'reciprocal' tariffs deadline to August 1. 'If no agreement is reached by the stated deadline, the EU is prepared to activate targeted and proportionate countermeasures in defense of its legitimate interest,' Marie Bjerre, Denmark's minister of European affairs, reminded the European Parliament Wednesday, noting that there are limits to the bloc's patience. Trump has been frustrated by a lack of progress on trade. During a cabinet meeting Tuesday, he said his tariff threats have successfully brought trading partners to the table – but the deals other countries have offered the United States are unacceptable. 'They say … 'We will give you total access, and you don't have to pay any tariffs, but please don't charge us tariffs,' and we don't like that deal,' Trump said. 'We're not hard-line, but it's about time the United States of America started collecting money from countries that were ripping us off – ripping us off – and laughing behind our back at how stupid we were.' Trump this week has sent out several letters setting new tariffs, including 25% tariffs on Japan and South Korea. Other letters are expected to be publicized Wednesday. Other deals have been harder to come by. India has long been viewed as the most likely major partner to sign onto a framework with the US. But Indian trade negotiators have hardened their positions in recent days, according to US officials. India is also a member of the BRICS group, so it's unclear what Trump's 10% tariff threat on BRICS countries Sunday means for trade negotiations. South Korea had also been viewed for weeks as likely to reach an agreement, though Trump's auto tariffs remain a key sticking point in those talks, and Trump's letter on Monday may have thrown a wrench in those gears. Japan steadily moved further away from an outcome in recent weeks, and Trump cast significant doubt on talks that once seemed on a path to a certain agreement. Japanese trade negotiators, who just weeks ago were scrambling to lay the groundwork for an announcement by last month's Group of Seven summit, have delivered far more pessimistic messages in their public statements in recent days. Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said Tuesday that despite 'earnest and sincere discussions,' Japan has been unable to reach a deal, according to remarks translated by CNN. 'We deeply regret that the US government has imposed additional tariffs and announced plans to raise tariff rates,' Ishiba said. Indonesia, Cambodia and Thailand have all delivered substantial offers to their US counterparts in the last two weeks in an effort to move to the front of the line for an agreement and are likely candidates for any near-term deal in the next few days, US officials said. Brazil has ramped up its efforts to secure an agreement, including bilateral talks at the end of last week designed to expand on an earlier offer to sharply reduce tariffs on certain US products, American administration officials said. The most prevalent point of contention among foreign trade teams has been a lack of clarity on what their US counterparts envision for any final agreement. But the biggest roadblock in the more expansive negotiations has been the existence – or promised imposition – of Trump's sectoral tariffs on autos, steel and pharmaceuticals, US officials said. CNN's Alayna Treene, James Frater and Anna Cooban contributed to this report. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
American Military News
an hour ago
- American Military News
Caught off-guard by US strikes on Iran, Europe still looking for role
This article was originally published by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and is reprinted with permission. Europe is still looking for a role in the Israel-Iran conflict after it was caught by surprise following the United States' strikes on Iran over the weekend. But it is fair to say they say there is a sense of humiliation as the American attack on various nuclear facilities in Iran came some 24 hours after the foreign ministers of the E3 (France, Germany, the United Kingdom) and the EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas met with their Iranian counterpart Abbas Araqhchi in Geneva on June 20. Now, those talks didn't lead to much, not even an agreement for a new rendezvous. But Kallas was adamant when pressed on the issue going into the EU foreign affairs council on June 23 that Tehran has been opening up on nuclear and broader security issues. Not that US President Donald Trump agreed. He claimed that European efforts had gone nowhere and that the Iranians weren't even that keen to speak to them. So what now? European foreign ministers will be discussing the issue in Brussels and there are a few contours of a common position — even if it may not have much impact on the ongoing conflict. In fact, it boils down to the Europeans believing that diplomacy is the only way out and that Europe still is ready and experienced enough in dealing with Iran. This may not come in handy right now — but at some point, it might. The main goal for Brussels and other European capitals is to facilitate space for the Iranians and Americans to talk directly to each other. They failed miserably with this in Geneva, but there will be more opportunities. German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul noted before going into the Brussels meeting that Washington is still encouraging the Europeans to stay in contact with Iran. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot insisted that Israeli and American strikes won't on their own keep Iran from getting a nuclear bomb. That, he said, can only be regulated through diplomacy. Would this be some updated Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) — the European-inspired deal struck with European help back in 2015? This agreement limited Tehran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. The EU still clings to the JCPOA as a symbol of European diplomatic achievement. In truth, the deal suffered a major blow during Trump's first term, as it was seen as a legacy of his predecessor, Barack Obama. Under President Joe Biden, it was barely limping along, with both Washington and Tehran adopting increasingly hard-line positions. Now it appears dead with little chance of being resurrected. But there are still aspects of it that can have an impact. Kallas noted that the Europeans still had the option of a sanctions 'snapback' on Iran under the JCPOA. This would add a layer of pressure, but, in reality, this is not on the table for now, according to European diplomats familiar with the matter whom RFE/RL has spoken to. Much like with Ukraine and potential peace talks, it appears that Europe might be a future payer but not a player. And it is weary of criticizing Israel and the United States too much. There is talk of a European weapons embargo on Israel as well as a suspension of an EU-Israel trade deal given the alleged human rights abuses going on in Gaza. Neither is likely to fly as the divisions in the EU are too deep. As for the United States, the worries over the latest strikes are even more muted — for numerous reasons. The EU is in the middle of avoiding a transatlantic trade war with hopes of some sort of a deal being struck over the summer. It's also on the eve of a crucial NATO summit in which it hopes that the United States stays committed to defending Europe and that Trump won't slam European defense spending laggards too much. And eastern EU countries are still hoping that it can persuade Washington to maintain troop levels in their countries amid talks of sweeping reductions. With the latest conflict in the Middle East, there has even been opportunistic chatter that the US presence in Europe might be beefed up given the potential spill-over effect on the continent. So, expect Europe to express worry and call for diplomatic solutions., but not much else.
