Kaynes Technology Acquires Canada-Based August Electronics
This acquisition marks an exciting new chapter for August Electronics, one of Canada's leading providers of high-reliability electronics manufacturing services. Now part of the Kaynes Technology group, August is positioned as a globally connected electronics company headquartered in Canada — with expanded capabilities and reach to support customers at every stage. The entire August management team will remain in place post-acquisition, ensuring business continuity and a strong foundation for future growth.
"There is a tremendous alignment between August and Kaynes in terms of culture, capabilities, and customer focus," said Tanya Korenda, CEO of August Electronics. "We are extremely excited about this opportunity to join forces and leverage the global scale, engineering strength, and complementary capabilities that Kaynes brings."
"We are thrilled to welcome August Electronics to the Kaynes family," said Ramesh Kannan, Managing Director, Kaynes Technology."This aligns with our vision to be a globally diversified ESDM leader. The deal strengthens our manufacturing presence in North America, adds key segments like oil & gas, energy, telecom, and factory instrumentation. August Electronics has strong relationships with large customers with significant electronics demand. Following the acquisition, the combined capabilities of August Electronics in Canada and Kaynes Technology in India present a strong opportunity to serve these customers more comprehensively, positioning the Canada-India alliance as a strategic alternative to China-based sourcing."
The partnership is expected to unlock significant synergies across supply chain, engineering, and advanced manufacturing, and will serve as a key driver for Kaynes' strategic expansion in the North American market.
As part of the transition, Co-Founders Jack Francis (President) and Peter Wilson will step away from their roles. Tanya Korenda will remain in her leadership position, ensuring continuity and stability as the company enters this exciting new chapter. August Electronics will continue to operate with its existing team, structure, and the same strong commitment to quality, partnership, and customer service.
"Kaynes shares our core values and long-term vision. Under Tanya's continued leadership, the team is well-positioned to build on our legacy of innovation and customer focus," said Jack Francis, Co-Founder and President. "We're proud of what we've created, and excited to see August thrive as part of the Kaynes Technology group."
Peter Wilson, outgoing Co-Founder, added, "After an incredible journey building August Electronics into the trusted partner it is today, I'm confident this transition marks the beginning of a powerful new phase."
Kaynes Technology India Limited is a global Electronics System Design and Manufacturing (ESDM) company with a strong presence in automotive, industrial, aerospace, medical, and defense sectors. The acquisition of August Electronics further supports Kaynes' mission to deliver high-mix, high-complexity manufacturing solutions at scale around the world.
About August Electronics
August Electronics is a Calgary-based provider of end-to-end electronics manufacturing services, delivering high-reliability solutions for demanding industries such as energy, medical, industrial, and telecommunications. The company partners with clients across the full product development lifecycle, offering flexible, high-quality manufacturing that supports innovation and scalable growth.
Kaynes Technology India Limited is a pioneer in end-to-end electronics manufacturing, offering IoT-enabled solutions across the ESDM spectrum. With 30+ years of experience, it serves marquee clients in automotive, EVs, aerospace, defence, railways, healthcare, and more—delivering integrated design, manufacturing, and supply chain solutions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada News.Net
6 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Expect pause in next policy meeting, RBI already frontloaded rate cuts: CareEdge
New Delhi [India], August 3 (ANI): The RBI has already frontloaded the rate cuts, anticipating the moderation in inflation, and it is unlikely the central bank would go for further rate cuts unless economic growth concerns aggravate, CareEdge said in a pre-monetary policy review meeting. While the US reciprocal tariff rate (25 per cent for India) and proposed penalty are concerning, the RBI may opt to wait till 'we get further clarity on this front', the rating agency said. The next bi-monthly RBI monetary policy review meeting is scheduled for August 4-6, 2025. 'With a forward-looking outlook, the RBI would be focusing on inflation in the quarters ahead,' the report read. With CPI-based retail inflation expected to breach 4 per cent in Q4 2025-26 and average 4.5 per cent in 2026-27, the real policy rate would settle in the range of 1-1.5 per cent at the current repo rate, it asserted. 'Therefore, a rate cut in the upcoming policy meeting appears unlikely. Given the incomplete transmission of the previous rate cuts, the RBI is expected to hold off on further easing, allowing time for the full impact of earlier measures to materialise,' the report read. 'With the RBI having already frontloaded rate cuts and ensured ample liquidity, the MPC may prefer to pause for now and assess how the macroeconomic landscape evolves. Additionally, transmission of the previous rate cuts is still underway and could take some more time to show its effect on the economy.' The upcoming monetary policy meeting in August takes place against the backdrop of a notable moderation in headline inflation in recent months, largely driven by easing food prices. Inflation is projected to average below the 4 per cent target over the next two quarters, supported by a favourable base and muted food inflation. The global trade policy uncertainty will continue to cast a shadow on India's growth outlook; however, the overall impact is likely to be limited given India's limited merchandise trade exposure to the US economy, CareEdge noted. After a total of 100 basis point repo rate reduction since February 2025, the scope for more rate cuts was limited, RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra had hinted after the latest monetary policy meeting. The recent frontloaded repo rate cut by the RBI was understandably aimed at boosting economy, which has relatively moderated. (ANI)
Canada News.Net
6 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
India's economic strength will withstand US tariff shock, sectoral experts speak in one voice
New Delhi [India], August 1 (ANI): Experts from across Indian industries have expressed confidence in the resilience of the Indian economy amid the US President Donald Trump's decision to impose a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, describing the move as impactful in the short term but unlikely to dent India's long-term economic growth story. Reacting to the tariff hike announced by President Trump, Sushil Mohta, Chairman of the Kolkata-based real estate player Merlin Group, said India's robust economy would absorb the shock with minimal long-term disruption. 'I don't think it will make a huge difference. Our economy is very strong today, India is the fourth-largest economy in the world,' Mohta told ANI. 'The common people in India work very hard. Our growth is driven by that effort, not dependent on the policies of any one country.' He pointed to the relatively muted response in domestic stock markets as proof of the economy's strength. 'If there were a major global disruption, we would have seen an immediate reflection in the markets. That hasn't happened,' he noted. On the issue of trade exposure, Mohta said that India's economy is not overly reliant on the US or any single country. From the agriculture sector, Dev Garg, Vice President of the Indian Rice Exporters Federation (IREF), noted that the US tariff move was 'concerning' for rice exporters. 'Last year, India exported around Rs 3,100 crore worth of Basmati and non-Basmati rice to the US. This year, we've only managed Rs 833 crore so far,' he said. However, Garg also viewed the latest tariff development with cautious optimism. 'This could be a blessing in disguise. Thailand and Pakistan, our two key competitors in the US rice market, face 19 per cent tariffs, while India now faces 25 per cent -- just a 6 per cent gap,' he explained. Expecting the depreciation of the Indian Rupee and anticipated deflationary trends in domestic prices, Indian rice could still remain competitive. 'We have record surplus stocks and a weaker rupee at Rs 88 per dollar. These factors may help us offset the tariff burden and possibly even surpass last year's export figures,' he added. Meanwhile, Niranjan Hiranandani, Chairman of the National Real Estate Development Council (NAREDCO), dismissed President Trump's remarks on India's economy being 'dead,' a comment echoed by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi. 'India is currently the fastest-growing major economy with a GDP growth rate of 6.2 per cent to 6.7 per cent. There's no question of it (Indian economy) being weak,' Hiranandani said. 'We are strengthening self-reliance across defence, agriculture, and manufacturing. The ambition is clear (that) India must become truly self-sufficient,' he added. Over the past few months, India and the US have been negotiating for an interim trade deal, but there were some reservations from the Indian side on the US demand for opening up the agricultural and dairy sectors for the US. Agriculture and dairy are critical for India as these two sectors provide livelihood opportunities to a large section of its people. On Wednesday, President Trump announced the imposition of 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods plus an unspecified 'penalty', even as there were hopes of an interim India-US trade deal that would have otherwise helped avoid elevated tariffs. India and the US initiated talks for a just, balanced, and mutually beneficial Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) in March this year, aiming to complete the first stage of the Agreement by October-November 2025. On April 2, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order for reciprocal tariffs on various trade partners, imposing varied tariffs in the range of 10-50 per cent. He subsequently kept the tariffs in abeyance for 90 days, while imposing a 10 per cent baseline tariff. The deadline was to end on July 9, and the US administration later pushed it ahead to August 1. US President Donald Trump had imposed reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries with which the US has a trade deficit. Since assuming office for his second term, President Trump has reiterated his stance on tariff reciprocity, emphasising that the United States will match tariffs imposed by other countries, including India, to 'ensure fair trade'. On Thursday evening, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal made a statement in both houses of the Parliament, stating that the government is examining the impact of tariffs and will take all necessary steps to safeguard the national interest. (ANI)
Canada News.Net
6 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Heres why the EU keeps losing to China
The summit Brussels-Beijing economic summit spotlighted the blocs mounting strategic confusion and accelerating drift toward isolation The China-EU summit held in Beijing late last month could have been a celebration of 50 years of diplomatic relations between two of the world's largest economic powers. Instead, it served as a sobering reminder of the EU's growing strategic confusion, and its inability to capitalize on the immense opportunities offered by cooperation with China. The summit came at a sensitive moment in global politics. What was once hailed as a mutually beneficial partnership has now become entangled in geopolitics, internal divisions within the EU, and the enduring shadow of Washington's influence. The global turbulence of recent years - the pandemic, and the war in Ukraine - has not only strained relations but also reinforced the EU's dependence on the United States. Rather than renewing a partnership that once stood as a pillar of global economic integration, the EU leaders arrived in Beijing with a familiar agenda: accusations over trade practices, warnings about "security threats," and renewed calls for China to "rein in" Russia. Predictably, no breakthrough was achieved. The deterioration of China-EU relations cannot be understood without revisiting the European Commission's strategic shift in 2019. Under Ursula von der Leyen, Brussels officially categorized China as not just a partner but also a "systemic rival" - a move that introduced suspicion into virtually every area of engagement. Since then, an ideological lens has increasingly shaped EU policy, replacing the pragmatism that once underpinned economic cooperation. The consequences have been stark. Brussels has launched measures to restrict Chinese investment, imposed high tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, and - most recently - barred Chinese firms from public tenders worth over €5 million. Further escalation came when the EU included two Chinese banks in its latest sanctions package against Russia, signaling that Europe is willing to weaponize economic tools for political purposes. These steps are justified by the EU as "de-risking." By pushing for reduced interdependence in strategic sectors - raw materials, high-tech supply chains, and digital infrastructure - Brussels has aligned itself with Washington's containment playbook, even as European leaders publicly insist on independence. In Beijing, von der Leyen struck a conciliatory tone, declaring the EU's openness to Chinese investment and cooperation. But such statements ring hollow when juxtaposed with her recent warnings at the G7 summit about a looming "China shock" and accusations of Beijing "weaponizing trade." Similarly, the head of EU diplomacy, Kaja Kallas - also present in Beijing - has accused China of fueling the war in Ukraine and waging hybrid operations against Europe. These mixed signals undermine credibility and reinforce perceptions in Beijing that the EU lacks a coherent, autonomous China strategy. More fundamentally, Brussels' approach is internally contradictory. The EU dreams of "strategic autonomy," yet ties its foreign policy to transatlantic priorities. It seeks economic resilience, yet undermines its own competitiveness by disrupting supply chains and limiting market access. It aspires to global leadership, yet isolates itself from the rest of the world by clinging to zero-sum geopolitics. By contrast, China's position at the summit was clear: focus on complementarity, promote free trade, and pursue win-win cooperation in areas that matter for global stability - digital transformation, green development, and infrastructure connectivity. Beijing emphasized its willingness to deepen exchanges in artificial intelligence, clean energy, and scientific research, seeing these sectors as essential to both sides' modernization. For China, the EU remains a strategic partner, not an adversary. Beijing has long supported European integration and consistently encourages the EU to play an independent role in global affairs. From China's perspective, a strong, autonomous Europe is a counterweight to unilateralism and an anchor of multipolarity. This vision aligns with Europe's own interests - but diverges sharply from Washington's preference for a subordinate EU within the transatlantic alliance. From Beijing's perspective, the EU's current challenges - economic slowdown, energy insecurity, and geopolitical vulnerability - are not caused by China. Rather, they stem from internal divisions and policy choices that tether Europe to US strategies. China fears that Europe's drift into a hardline camp could destabilize the international order, a scenario contrary to Beijing's vision of stability and connectivity across Eurasia. The single most contentious issue remains the war in Ukraine. Brussels insists that China's ties with Moscow "destabilize" Europe, while Beijing argues that it is maintaining an independent and neutral position aimed at facilitating a peaceful settlement. EU leaders, however, continue to press China to "use its influence" to end Russia's military operations - effectively asking Beijing to abandon a key strategic partnership. This is neither realistic nor conducive to diplomacy. For now, this geopolitical deadlock overshadows other areas of potential cooperation. So long as the EU views the Ukraine conflict through an existential lens - and equates neutrality with complicity - China-EU relations will remain constrained, regardless of shared economic interests. Despite political frictions, economic ties remain robust. The EU is China's largest trading partner, and China ranks second for the EU. Together, they account for over one-third of global GDP and nearly 30% of global trade in goods and services. Chinese investment in Europe has surpassed $100 billion, and annual flows are roughly balanced with EU investment in China. These numbers underscore a basic truth: the China-EU relationship is too significant to be defined by ideological posturing. Global supply chains, green technology cooperation, and digital innovation cannot advance without mutual engagement. The question is whether Brussels will recognize this before further damage is done. The EU portrays its current trajectory as "rebalancing" and "de-risking." In reality, these policies risk strategic isolation. By securitizing economic ties and subordinating its diplomacy to US priorities in relation to China, the EU undermines its own competitiveness and alienates partners across the globe. The result is an inward-looking bloc that struggles to influence global norms as it dreams of geopolitical power. For China, the lesson is clear: The EU is not ready for a genuine reset. Beijing will continue to engage constructively but will not expect rapid progress. In the long run, the revival of a balanced partnership may depend on a political shift within Europe - a leadership willing to replace ideological rigidity with pragmatic cooperation. The Beijing summit, rather than rekindling optimism, has confirmed the structural divergence between China and the EU. However, it also highlighted what remains at stake: two economic giants whose cooperation - or confrontation - will shape global stability for decades to come. China stands ready to pursue a future based on multilateralism, open trade, and shared development. Whether the EU can free itself from delusions and anxieties and rediscover the value of partnership with Beijing remains an open question. Until then, the EU's fixation on "de-risking" may turn into what it fears most: self-inflicted decline.
