Our Long-Term 2024 Acura Integra Type S Warms Our Cold Hearts
The days are getting longer, the birds are beginning to sing, and we're anxiously awaiting temperatures consistently warm enough to warrant swapping our long-term Acura Integra Type S back to its sticky Michelin summer tires. Our anticipation should surprise no one, given our affection for this 10Best winner and its awesome driving dynamics. But the mere existence of winter doesn't mean that our ITS has been hibernating for the last few months. Quite the opposite.
Our Acura spent a good chunk of its first 10,000 miles trudging through a grim Michigan winter, its 320 turbocharged horses reaching the ground via two front contact patches. Though, in fairness, our car had some grip assistance in the form of narrower-than-stock 255/35R-18 Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 winter tires ($984 per set at TireRack), which we mounted on 18-inch BBS wheels left over from our 2019 Honda Civic Type R long-termer. Effusive praise in the Acura's logbook only reinforces what we already knew going into this 40,000-mile test: the Integra Type S is a stellar driver's car that blends a bit more refinement—and yes, cost—into the Type R's proven formula.
"The ITS has incredible bandwidth," noted managing news editor Eric Stafford. "It seamlessly switches from a practical four-seat hatchback to an impressive track car." In its regular duty as a commuter vehicle, our editors have heaped praise upon the sublime action of the Acura's six-speed shifter and its easy-to modulate clutch pedal, as well as its relatively conservative design. "It wasn't until I had to broom five inches of snow off the ITS that I appreciated it lacking the Type R's enormous rear wing," wrote technical editor Austin Irwin.
The accolades keep going from there. "I would happily drive this car to work for the rest of my life," read one recent logbook comment. "I just adore this car—the perfect sports sedan for the money," said another. Deputy video editor Carlos Lago went a little deeper when he called the ITS "a helluva deal: it's a budget BMW M3 that happens to be front-wheel drive and has a better manual shifter."
Since our introductory story on the ITS, its long-distance travel has been limited to a couple of treks into Michigan's great white north, including a nighttime SCCA ice race on Ross Lake in the middle of the Lower Peninsula. Despite the traction limitations of its front-drive layout, the Type S acquitted itself well, impressing associate news editor Jack Fitzgerald with its front-end grip and overall stability. Though the knobby Bridgestones did their part, credit also goes to the effectiveness of the car's dual-axis strut-type front suspension and its wonderfully crisp steering. Fitzgerald remarked that the Integra's willingness to produce lift-off oversteer helped preserve precious momentum around icy corners.
A tradeoff for the Blizzaks' traction in wintery conditions is the significant road noise they emit on the highway, exacerbated by Acura's rather modest sound insulation (we recorded a 73-decibel din inside at 70 mph on the stock summer tires). Most of us are content to drown out the racket by cranking up the 16-speaker ELS audio system. However, some drivers have noticed that the car's 9.0-inch touchscreen becomes almost too dim to see when driving at night, regardless of how the display's brightness is adjusted. Our initial thinking leans to a faulty ambient-light sensor or software glitch, but we'll have the dealer investigate it when the car goes in for its first service visit.
As is, our main expenditure continues to be fuel—our 24-mpg observed economy is spot on with its EPA combined estimate but down a smidge from its initial 25-mpg average. Ice racing and winter tires certainly didn't aid matters. The joy we get from working through the Acura's gears isn't helping, either. And that certainly won't change once we reinstall its summer wheels and tires.
Months in Fleet: 7 months Current Mileage: 10,172 milesAverage Fuel Economy: 24 mpg Fuel Tank Size: 12.4 gal Observed Fuel Range: 290 miles Service: $0 Normal Wear: $0 Repair: $0 The 2024 Acura Integra Type S, affectionately known as the ITS around C/D headquarters, is somewhat conflicted. On one hand, it's a hot hatchback with serious performance and a spacious cargo hold, just like its red-Honda-badged sibling, the Civic Type R (CTR). Yet, its sleeker design and more mature demeanor imply sports sedan—a premium one at that, depending on how you weigh the worth of its Acura emblems. What does this all mean? We're about to find out, because we just welcomed an ITS into our fleet for an extended 40,000-mile test.
Like the Civic Type R, the sportiest Integra is one of our favorite cars to drive. Both share the same gutsy turbocharged 2.0-liter inline-four, mandatory six-speed manual transmission, limited-slip front differential, and dual-axis front struts that help them blast out of corners like no other front-wheel-drive cars we've sampled. Like the Honda, this Acura has a 10Best trophy on its mantel, though it did just lose out to its little brother in a comparison test. Sibling rivalries are tough.
The most obvious difference between the two is their styling, the Type R being the boy racer to the Type S's athlete in a sport coat. Many of us are quick to praise the Integra's understated handsomeness, but the disparities run deeper. The ITS rides a tad softer, lending it slightly better compliance over crappy Midwestern roads. It's a bit more powerful than the Honda (320 horsepower to 315), and it also sounds more convincing as a performance car: Its 83-decibel growl at full whack pleases our ears more than the Type R's 88-decibel impression of a vacuum cleaner. Inside, Acura has made a few subtle design alterations and added some nicer materials here and there, plus swapped out the Civic's crimson cloth seats for its own leather- and microfiber-covered chairs.
These revisions are arguably necessary to justify the ITS's starting price of $52,995—some $7105 dearer than the CTR's. The Type S comes loaded with equipment, including heated front seats with power adjustment for the driver, a 10.2-inch digital instrument display, a 9.0-inch touchscreen, and a 530-watt ELS Studio 3D audio system with 16 speakers. Automated emergency braking, lane-keeping assist, adaptive cruise control, and other driver aids also are on board. Limited availability precluded us from spec'ing our car in Acura's sizzling Tiger Eye Pearl hue, but our ITS wears Platinum White Pearl ($600) awfully well, and its standard black upholstery is tastefully subdued (Red and Orchid hues are no-cost options for the more adventurous). Our final tally: $53,595.
Once we eased our 3217-pound test car (a mere 34 pounds more than a CTR we previously tested) through its 600-mile break-in period, it posted a 5.1-second 60-mph time at the test track, with the quarter-mile falling in 13.6 seconds at 107 mph—in line with our previous test and only a respective 0.2 and 0.1 second behind (yet 1 mph faster than) its Honda kin. Worth noting is that both cars are similarly difficult to launch: Their engines won't rev beyond 3500 rpm when the car is still, which necessitates careful modulation of the clutch and accelerator pedals to produce the quickest times.
Shod with standard 19-inch Michelin Pilot Sport 4S summer tires, sized 265/30ZR-19, our Integra orbited the skidpad with 1.02 g's of grip and stopped from 70 and 100 mph in an impressively tidy 145 and 291 feet, respectively. That's some serious stick, which, combined with the car's excellent handling and slick manual shifter, will make for plenty of entertainment in the months ahead. A 73-decibel interior sound reading at 70 mph—the same as the CTR—is a tad noisy for a premium-branded car but not so much that we'll avoid it for longer voyages. In fact, though our car has mostly commuter miles on its clock, a trek to Virginia International Raceway in support of our Lightning Lap event helped bump its average fuel economy to 25 mpg, which is 1 mpg better than its EPA combined estimate.
With no issues or maintenance visits to report yet, our mission now is to accumulate miles and soak in the Integra Type S's experience. Additional comparisons with the Civic Type R are inevitable. But even if we end up preferring one over the other—or can't decide whether the ITS best channels a hot hatch or a sports sedan—we still have 37,276 miles to go with an exceptional driver's car.
Months in Fleet: 2 months Current Mileage: 2724 milesAverage Fuel Economy: 25 mpg Fuel Tank Size: 12.4 gal Observed Fuel Range: 310 miles Service: $0 Normal Wear: $0 Repair: $0 Damage and Destruction: $0
You Might Also Like
Car and Driver's 10 Best Cars through the Decades
How to Buy or Lease a New Car
Lightning Lap Legends: Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
NASCAR Finally Went Nuclear and Unleashed Its Most Powerful Penalty
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." Last off-season, NASCAR updated its playoff waiver rules to introduce a punishing new stipulation that would effectively destroy a suspended driver's regular season progress. Until last week, the series has avoided issuing any suspension that would trigger this rule. That changed as of Tuesday night, when Austin Hill was handed a one-race suspension for his actions during last Saturday's Xfinity Series race at Indianapolis. Hill's suspension comes after a five-lap in-race penalty for his actions in a wreck involving Aric Almirola. The crash started when Almirola got up to Hill's rear bumper, causing him to slide out but not lose control. Hill then cut back down the track after seemingly saving his car from spinning, slamming into Alimrola's quarter panel and sending his opponent spinning. Almirola would later accuse Hill of intentionally wrecking him, and the five-lap penalty Hill was handed by NASCAR in-race suggests that the series agreed. Because of the new rule, Hill's suspension includes a loss of all the playoff points he could accrue during the year's regular season. That includes 21 playoff points already earned, plus any others he could have claimed with race and stage wins over the next handful of races. That is a major hit in NASCAR's strange and over-complicated elimination playoff format, which carries playoff points (but not regular points) over through every round. Hill can still advance on in those elimination rounds — he will just have to do so without the help of the advantageous extra points he would have earned before the playoffs began. The ruling against Hill is part of a years-long push by NASCAR to clean up intentional wrecks, which have become a major problem in modern stock car racing. Kyle Larson and Bubba Wallace have both received suspensions in the Cup Series for apparent intentional wrecks in recent years; Austin Dillon was not suspended for two different, seemingly intentional wrecks on the last lap of the regular season finale at Richmond last year, but he was effectively knocked out of the playoffs by a ruling determining that his win in the race did not count for postseason eligibility. The series previously opted not to hand out suspensions to Cup Series driver Austin Cindric and Xfinity Series driver Sammy Smith, both of whom were docked 50 regular season points instead. The suspension of Hill suggests that NASCAR viewed the hit as more egregious, more dangerous, or both. Since Hill caused the crash on a straightaway at a very fast oval rather than on a short oval or road course, series officials would have an argument for either option. NASCAR's second-tier Xfinity Series resumes with a race at Iowa Speedway on Saturday. Austin Hill, on the other hand, will be off until the race at Watkins Glen on August 9th. You Might Also Like You Need a Torque Wrench in Your Toolbox Tested: Best Car Interior Cleaners The Man Who Signs Every Car
San Francisco Chronicle
a day ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Edmunds small luxury SUV test: 2025 Acura ADX vs 2025 BMW X1
The 2025 Acura ADX is all-new this year, and it takes its place as Acura's smallest and least expensive crossover SUV. If you think Acura's RDX or MDX are too big or too expensive, the entry-level ADX could very well satisfy. Among many rivals the ADX faces, one of the most well-established models is the 2025 BMW X1. The X1 arrived in BMW dealerships more than a decade ago, and BMW released this latest third-generation X1 for the 2023 model year. Similar to how Acura positions the ADX, the X1 is the entry point to BMW's extensive lineup of SUVs. The ADX and X1 each have seating for five and city-friendly dimensions. But there are differences in price, features and how each drives. Edmunds' team of experts tested them to find out which pint-size SUV is the better buy. Engines and fuel economy The ADX has a 190-horsepower turbocharged four-cylinder engine paired to a continuously variable automatic transmission. Front-wheel drive is standard, and all-wheel drive is optional. Unfortunately, Edmunds found the ADX lacks the refined dynamics found in other Acura vehicles, particularly regarding acceleration. The ADX needed 9.4 seconds to go from zero to 60 mph during Edmunds' testing. This is much slower than nearly all direct rivals, including the spry X1. In comparison, the BMW X1 delivers more of the premium driving feel expected in a luxury vehicle. A turbocharged four-cylinder produces 241 horsepower in the entry-level xDrive28i model or 341 horsepower in the zesty M35i. Each is fitted to a seven-speed automatic transmission and, unlike the ADX, all-wheel drive is standard. Edmunds found its xDrive28i test vehicle needed only 5.9 seconds for the same sprint to 60 mph. That's a difference you'll feel whenever you need to get up to speed on the highway or desire a burst of power to pass a slow-moving car. Fuel economy is a bragging point of both SUVs. The ADX and X1 xDrive28i each offer an EPA-estimated 28 mpg combined city/highway — this dips to 27 mpg when the ADX is fitted with all-wheel drive. Features and value On price alone, the ADX appears the clear winner. It starts at $36,350 including destination charges. That's thousands less than the X1's entry-level price of $42,525. Standard features in the ADX include synthetic leather upholstery, a 9-inch touchscreen, wireless smartphone connectivity, wireless device charging, and ambient LED interior lighting. It also comes packed with an impressive roster of driver aids, such as blind-spot warning, adaptive cruise control and lane keeping assistance. While the X1 is more expensive, it does get all-wheel drive as standard and not an extra-cost option like it is on the ADX. The racy M35i delivers plenty of punch, though it comes with a price — specifically one starting north of $50,000. Similar to its Acura rival, the X1 is nicely equipped with tech features like a digital instrument display, a 10.2-inch touchscreen and wireless smartphone connectivity. The X1 doesn't come with as many standard driver aids, though it does offer a few extra ones that can't get on an ADX at all. Comfort and utility Edmunds experts found the front seats in the ADX A-Spec Advance test vehicle comfortable, highly adjustable, and wrapped in quality leather upholstery. In comparison, the optional M Sport front seats of Edmunds' X1 test vehicle proved great at holding you in place during quick cornering but possibly too firm for ensuring comfort on long drives. The same held true for the X1's sport-tuned suspension; Edmunds suggests choosing standard seat and suspension settings to boost the X1's comfort levels. Both come standard with heated front seats, but only the ADX has available ventilated seats to help you stay cool on hot days. In the X1's favor is its quiet cabin. The ADX, in contrast, lets in a lot of wind and road noise when you're driving on the highway. Both of these SUVs are respectably roomy. The X1 has more overall headroom front and rear, though the ADX fights back with a small edge in rear legroom. Cargo space is another near tie — the ADX provides up to 24.4 cubic feet of storage compared to 25.7 cubic feet with the X1. This is a close category, but the X1 has enough of an advantage to give it the edge. Winner: BMW X1 Edmunds says The Acura ADX will appeal to you if you're looking for a small crossover SUV that's attractively priced. But it also doesn't do much to differentiate itself from a field full of more accomplished rivals. Overall, Edmunds recommends the X1. It's enjoyable to drive and pleasingly luxurious while still being practical.
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Edmunds small luxury SUV test: 2025 Acura ADX vs 2025 BMW X1
The 2025 Acura ADX is all-new this year, and it takes its place as Acura's smallest and least expensive crossover SUV. If you think Acura's RDX or MDX are too big or too expensive, the entry-level ADX could very well satisfy. Among many rivals the ADX faces, one of the most well-established models is the 2025 BMW X1. The X1 arrived in BMW dealerships more than a decade ago, and BMW released this latest third-generation X1 for the 2023 model year. Similar to how Acura positions the ADX, the X1 is the entry point to BMW's extensive lineup of SUVs. The ADX and X1 each have seating for five and city-friendly dimensions. But there are differences in price, features and how each drives. Edmunds' team of experts tested them to find out which pint-size SUV is the better buy. Engines and fuel economy The ADX has a 190-horsepower turbocharged four-cylinder engine paired to a continuously variable automatic transmission. Front-wheel drive is standard, and all-wheel drive is optional. Unfortunately, Edmunds found the ADX lacks the refined dynamics found in other Acura vehicles, particularly regarding acceleration. The ADX needed 9.4 seconds to go from zero to 60 mph during Edmunds' testing. This is much slower than nearly all direct rivals, including the spry X1. In comparison, the BMW X1 delivers more of the premium driving feel expected in a luxury vehicle. A turbocharged four-cylinder produces 241 horsepower in the entry-level xDrive28i model or 341 horsepower in the zesty M35i. Each is fitted to a seven-speed automatic transmission and, unlike the ADX, all-wheel drive is standard. Edmunds found its xDrive28i test vehicle needed only 5.9 seconds for the same sprint to 60 mph. That's a difference you'll feel whenever you need to get up to speed on the highway or desire a burst of power to pass a slow-moving car. Fuel economy is a bragging point of both SUVs. The ADX and X1 xDrive28i each offer an EPA-estimated 28 mpg combined city/highway — this dips to 27 mpg when the ADX is fitted with all-wheel drive. Winner: BMW X1 Features and value On price alone, the ADX appears the clear winner. It starts at $36,350 including destination charges. That's thousands less than the X1's entry-level price of $42,525. Standard features in the ADX include synthetic leather upholstery, a 9-inch touchscreen, wireless smartphone connectivity, wireless device charging, and ambient LED interior lighting. It also comes packed with an impressive roster of driver aids, such as blind-spot warning, adaptive cruise control and lane keeping assistance. While the X1 is more expensive, it does get all-wheel drive as standard and not an extra-cost option like it is on the ADX. The racy M35i delivers plenty of punch, though it comes with a price — specifically one starting north of $50,000. Similar to its Acura rival, the X1 is nicely equipped with tech features like a digital instrument display, a 10.2-inch touchscreen and wireless smartphone connectivity. The X1 doesn't come with as many standard driver aids, though it does offer a few extra ones that can't get on an ADX at all. Winner: tie Comfort and utility Edmunds experts found the front seats in the ADX A-Spec Advance test vehicle comfortable, highly adjustable, and wrapped in quality leather upholstery. In comparison, the optional M Sport front seats of Edmunds' X1 test vehicle proved great at holding you in place during quick cornering but possibly too firm for ensuring comfort on long drives. The same held true for the X1's sport-tuned suspension; Edmunds suggests choosing standard seat and suspension settings to boost the X1's comfort levels. Both come standard with heated front seats, but only the ADX has available ventilated seats to help you stay cool on hot days. In the X1's favor is its quiet cabin. The ADX, in contrast, lets in a lot of wind and road noise when you're driving on the highway. Both of these SUVs are respectably roomy. The X1 has more overall headroom front and rear, though the ADX fights back with a small edge in rear legroom. Cargo space is another near tie — the ADX provides up to 24.4 cubic feet of storage compared to 25.7 cubic feet with the X1. This is a close category, but the X1 has enough of an advantage to give it the edge. Winner: BMW X1 Edmunds says The Acura ADX will appeal to you if you're looking for a small crossover SUV that's attractively priced. But it also doesn't do much to differentiate itself from a field full of more accomplished rivals. Overall, Edmunds recommends the X1. It's enjoyable to drive and pleasingly luxurious while still being practical.
