Kinahan Cartel chief Sean McGovern extradited from UAE on Irish military jet
Sean McGovern and David Byrne who died in the Regency attack
Kinahan cartel gangster Sean McGovern is on his way back to Ireland on a military plane from Dubai after dramatic developments occurred in the Gulf State in the last number of days.
'There has been major developments in this case in the Middle East, - Mr McGovern is on his way home ' a source has revealed.
The Irish Air Corps flight needs to take at least two stops on the way to Dublin.
Gardaí believe that Drimnagh man McGovern is Daniel Kinahan's right-hand man, and the US Treasury Department has claimed he "sells multi-kilogramme quantities of cocaine" on behalf of the cartel.
He has been held in a prison in Dubai since his arrest last October and he had previously launched a series of legal challenges to the extradition process.
He is also wanted on organised crime charges in this jurisdiction.
His original detention came after protracted consultation between An Garda Síochána, Interpol and police and justice authorities in Dubai and Ireland.
A European Arrest Warrant (EAW) was issued in April 2022 by the High Court for McGovern to face criminal charges here.
UAE authorities did not act on the warrant, but a formal request from the Department of Justice to the UAE equivalent were later issued.
McGovern's original arrest was seen by gardaí as a test case for the planned arrest and eventual extradition of cartel leader Kinahan on criminal charges.
Sources say McGovern's arrest has been a "major breakthrough" in garda efforts to take down the senior leadership of the cartel.
Since 2022, garda efforts have been concentrated on McGovern's extradition because, unlike the Kinahan leadership, he is facing criminal charges.
Sean McGovern, pictured with his partner Anita Freeman
Gardai want to charge him with the murder of Noel 'Duck Egg' Kirwan (62) was shot six times as he sat in his car on December 22, 2016 at St Ronan's Drive, Clondalkin, Dublin 22.
He is believed to have been targeted because of perceived links to members of the Hutch family who were at war with the Kinahan cartel at the time.
McGovern, a convicted drug dealer suffered minor injuries after he was shot during the Regency Hotel bloodbath in February, 2016, when his gang was attacked by the Hutch gang.
He has been named in the Special Criminal Court by Detective Superintendent David Gallagher while giving evidence in the trial of Michael Crotty, who is accused of facilitating the murder of Noel Kirwan in 2016 by buying a mobile phone top-up for Sean McGovern.
He has also been identified by the US sanctions against the Kinahan Organised Crime Group.n the US Treasury sanctions document McGovern connections with the Kinahan Organised Crime Group are laid out.
Sean McGovern and David Byrne who died in the Regency attack
They claimed that he was involved with a cover company being used by the gang to launder money.
McGovern 'was designated for materially assisting, sponsoring, or providing financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, Daniel Kinahan'.
The document alleged that McGovern: 'is Daniel Kinahan's advisor and closest confidant, and evidence indicates that all dealings with Daniel Kinahan go through Sean McGovern. Sean McGovern also has managed communications on behalf of Daniel Kinahan, and he sells multi-kilogram quantities of cocaine'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Wife of man being sued by John Magnier over Barne estate row says couple ‘steamrolled' into litigation they could not afford
The wife of a man being sued by John Magnier over the purported sale of a coveted Co Tipperary estate to him has told the High Court the bloodstock billionaire allegedly threatened any sale of Barne estate to anyone other than him, as he claims was agreed, would put the defendants in 'litigation for years' and cost 'millions'. Anna Thomson-Moore, the wife of defendant Richard Thomson-Moore, has told the High Court that the family had to take out a commercial loan in order to fight the case taken by Mr Magnier over the collapse of the alleged deal for the land. Mr Magnier wants the court to enforce a €15 million deal he claims he agreed with Mr Thomson-Moore in a handshake deal for 751 acres of the land in Co Tipperary on August 22nd, 2023, at Mr Magnier's Coolmore home. In her evidence on Friday, Ms Thomson-Moore told defence barrister Martin Hayden SC that on September 7th, 2023 – two weeks after the claimed handshake deal – Mr Magnier called to Barne with his son, JP, and met the Thomson-Moores, who told Mr Magnier they had to work through tax issues and involve the trustees of the estate to complete any deal. READ MORE Ms Thomson-Moore said at the end of that conversation their estate agent, John Stokes, who had walked out with the Magniers, returned to the house with two brown envelopes given to him by JP containing a total of €50,000 in cash about which she felt 'uncomfortable' and told Mr Stokes this. Ms Thomson-Moore told Mr Hayden the money was put in their safe at Barne and that the following morning they decided to return the money as Ms Thomson-Moore was now 'very uncomfortable' with the situation. The Magnier side has told the court the money was a token of 'appreciation' to the Thomson-Moores for letting the Magnier side on to the land before any sale was finalised. John Magnier arriving at the High Court in Dublin in May. Photograph: Collins Courts The Magnier side was ultimately gazumped by Irish-born, US-based construction magnate Maurice Regan, who offered €22.25 million and was made the preferred bidder. Mr Regan is not a party to the case. The Magnier side has sued the Barne estate, Mr Thomson-Moore and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey) Ltd group, seeking to enforce the purported deal, which they say had been 'unequivocally' agreed. The Barne defendants say there was never any such agreement, as they needed the consent of the trustees to finalise any agreement, and subsequently they preferred to sell the estate to Mr Regan. The Barne estate has been held for the benefit of Richard Thomson-Moore and others by a Jersey trust. Mr Magnier claims the deal had been agreed at the kitchen meeting and there had been no mention of it being subject to trustee approval, which he has said to the court on numerous occasions. Ms Thomson-Moore told the High Court on Friday Mr Magnier was told a number of times before the alleged deal that any agreement was subject to the consent of the trustees. Both sides entered into an exclusivity agreement from August 31st to September 30th, 2023, stipulating the estate would not permit itself or its representatives to solicit or encourage any expression of interest, inquiry or offer on the property from anyone other than Mr Magnier. During September 2023, said Ms Thomson-Moore, Mr Regan had offered around €20 million for the estate but the trustees recommended honouring the exclusivity agreement with Mr Magnier. Ms Thomson-Moore said she was 'frustrated' that the trustees were not looking at the higher offer at all. After the expiry of the exclusivity deal, she said there was a 'flurry' of calls in early October 2023, during which time Mr Stokes told the Thomson-Moores Mr Magnier had told the estate agent he would take the matter to court and 'tie this up for years and millions in litigation'. Ms Thomson-Moore said a commercial loan was taken out by the defendants under Barne Estate Ltd to provide liquidity to defend the Magnier action. 'We did not have the means to defend these proceedings without a loan. I think it is important to have access to justice and we were being steamrolled into proceedings because of a lack of cash and it would not be fair. It felt like an onslaught of proceedings that kicked off very quickly,' she told the court. Ms Thomson-Moore, a solicitor, said the stress and impact of the proceedings initiated against them had been 'enormous' and that this had become 'oppressive'. She said it also had delayed the family's plans to move to her native Australia to attend to the health needs of their son, who needs around-the-clock care. The case continues before Mr Justice Max Barrett.
Irish Independent
16 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Security firm boss apologises after High Court was misled about surveillance of software executive
The boss of an international security firm has apologised and expressed regret to the High Court for a 'mistake' which led to the court being incorrectly told HR software giant Deel Inc had 'no knowledge' of the surveillance of an Irish man at the centre of a corporate espionage case.
Extra.ie
20 hours ago
- Extra.ie
McGregor now faces autumn legal action by former close friend
A multi-million-euro legal action taken against MMA fighter Conor McGregor by his former sparring partner and friend is likely to be heard in the autumn, the High Court has heard. Artem Lobov, 38, a retired MMA fighter known as 'The Russian Hammer', claims to have been the initial creator and co-founder of Mr McGregor's whiskey, which became known as Proper No. Twelve. The Russian native has stated in legal documents before the court that he worked for free for two years to help set up the whiskey brand. Conor McGregor showing off his whiskey. Pic: Conor McGregor/Instagram The former professional fighter, who has a Master's degree from DCU in finance and capital markets, claimed he came up with the idea after studying the liquor market at university. Judge Nessa Cahill was told yesterday that final exchanges of documents have to be made, relating to the date on which Mr Lobov alleges that Mr McGregor offered to pay him 5% of the proceeds from the whiskey sales. A file image of Conor McGregor. Pic: Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images He has said the promise was made while the pair were in a Dublin gym together. Mr Lobov has claimed Mr McGregor then reneged on that promise. At a pre-trial hearing, Mr Lobov's barrister Liam Bell told the court his client had been 'muscled out by the parties and wasn't paid what he was due'. Mr McGregor, who denies that any promise was made to Mr Lobov, is reputed to have been paid $130 million when he and two other shareholders sold their stakes in the whiskey in 2021 to Proximo Spirits, owners of Jose Cuervo tequila. He later offered Mr Lobov €1million in a post on X, which was refused. If Mr Lobov wins the High Court case, Mr McGregor could be ordered to pay him close to €6million. The eight-day trial had been due to be heard earlier this year, but was delayed after Mr Lobov said he had found an old phone, enabling him to be more accurate about when the promise was made by Mr McGregor. Pic: Instagram/Conor McGregor Having initially stated the offer was made in September 2017, he said he now believed it to have been made by Mr McGregor in October of that year. Mr Lobov's barrister, Andrew Walker, said yesterday that disclosure in the case was being extended to include October 2017. 'It is self-evident that he has to cover all the documents evidencing the agreement of October 2017, and he will,' he said. 'If the defence requires anything further, they can let us know,' he added. Mr Lobov will explain in a sworn statement why the existence of the old phone was only revealed late in the day, he said. Mr Walker said Mr Lobov was anxious to get the case listed for a full hearing as soon as possible. A file image of Conor McGregor. Pic: Dave Benett/WireImage Judge Cahill said she would list the case for mention over the coming weeks, with a view to it being heard during the next legal term, which begins in October. In the meantime, Mr McGregor is awaiting a decision from the Court of Appeal to his challenge to the jury's verdict concerning Nikita Hand's claim that she was raped by him in a Dublin hotel. The hair colourist and mother of one was awarded just under €250,000 in damages by a High Court jury last November. Nikita Hand arriving at the Court of Appeal in Dublin. Pic: Collins Courts Mr McGregor will also learn if Ms Hand is found liable by the Court of Appeal for her legal costs in suing Mr McGregor's friend, James Lawrence, for rape. She lost that claim, but the High Court ruled that Mr Lawrence must nevertheless pay his costs – which have been bankrolled by Mr McGregor. The Court of Appeal heard his costs would be significantly higher than the damages she won.
